EN中文

地理学报 >

2004 , Vol. 59 >Issue 7s: 85 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/xb20047s012

城市地理

空间结构与城市竞争力

展开
  • 马里兰大学城市规划系,马里兰 20742,美国
丁成日 (1963-), 男, 博士, 副教授; 马里兰大学城市理性增长国家中心, 林肯土地政策研究院中国城市管理与土地政策部主任。主要从事城市经济、城市政策、土地政策、城市规划以及用经济学方法和数量方法进行政策和规划分析。E-mail: cding@umd.edu

收稿日期: 2004-09-13

  修回日期: 2004-09-25

  网络出版日期: 2004-12-25

收起

Spatial Structure and City Competitiveness

Expand
  • Urban Studies and Planning Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Received date: 2004-09-13

  Revised date: 2004-09-25

  Online published: 2004-12-25

Fold

摘要

城市竞争力的最重要决定因素之一是城市效率。城市效率反映在劳动力资源 (市场) 效率、土地资源 (市场) 市场效率、资本资源 (市场) 效率和城市基础实施利用与投资效率。城市可持续发展的必要前提之一是地方政府有能力提供城市发展所需要的城市基础设施建设。作者阐述了城市空间结构对劳动力资源、土地资源、资本资源以及城市基础设施利用的影响。同时,可以通过科学规划,提升城市竞争力,促进城市可持续发展。

关键词： 城市空间结构; 城市效率; 城市竞争力

本文引用格式

丁成日 . 空间结构与城市竞争力[J]. 地理学报, 2004 , 59(7s) : 85 -92 . DOI: 10.11821/xb20047s012

Abstract

City competitiveness largely hinges on urban efficiency that is reflected in labor markets, land markets, capital markets, and provision of urban infrastructure. This paper illustrates the impacts of urban spatial structure on the efficiency of labor, capital, and land markets as well as on urban infrastructure and public financing. It indicates that urban planning can change or determine urban spatial structure in a way that promotes urban competitiveness and sustainable urban development.

Key words： urban spatial structure; urban efficiency; city competitiveness

参考文献


[1] Ding Chengri. Managing urban growth for efficiency in infrastructure provision: dynamic capital expansion and urban growth boundary models. Ph.D. Dissertation, 1996.

[2] Mills E S. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review, 1967, 57: 197-210.

[3] Muth R F. Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.

[4] Alonso W. Location and Land Use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.

[5] Brueckner Jan. The structure of urban equilibria: a unified treatment of the Muth-Mills Model. In: E S Mills (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. II. Elsevier Science Publisher B V, 1987.

[6] Ding Chengri. Land policy and urban housing development. Urban Studies, 2002, 9(2): 61-66.
[丁成日. 土地政策与城市住房发展. 城市发展研究, 2002, 9(2): 61-66.]

[7] Ding Chengri. Is the population density of Chinese cities high? City Planning Review, 2004, 199(8): 43-48.
[丁成日. 中国城市的人口密度高吗？城市规划, 2004, 199(8): 43-48.]

[8] Haruya Hiroka. The development of Tokyo's rail network. Japan Railway & Transport Review, 2000, 23, March.

[9] Papageorgiou Yorgos, David Pines. An Essay on Urban Economic Theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

[10] Bertaud Alain. Metropolitan Structures around the world: What is common? What is difference? What is relevance to Marikina in the context of Metro Manila? Presentation in Marikina, 2003.

[11] Cervero Robert, Kang-Li Wu. Sub-centering and commuting: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area, 1980-1990. Urban Studies, 1998, 35(7): 1059-1076.

[12] McMillen Daniel P. Employment Subcenters in Chicago: Past, Present, and Future Economic Perspectives. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 2003.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉