产业发展

20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业变革及其地方效应

展开
  • 1. 浙江省城乡规划设计研究院, 杭州310007;
    2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101
杨晓光(1972-), 男, 安徽淮南人, 主要从事区域规划与城市规划、区域发展等方面的理论和实践研究。 E-mail: yangxg@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2008-01-21

  修回日期: 2008-08-04

  网络出版日期: 2008-12-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(4040101)

Transformations and Local Effects of China's Township and Village Enterprises in the 1990s

Expand
  • 1. Zhejiang Urban & Rural Planning Design Institute, Hangzhou 310007, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2008-01-21

  Revised date: 2008-08-04

  Online published: 2008-12-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.4040101

摘要

以1993 年和2000 年对中国七个不同乡镇的近百家乡镇企业和近4000 名企业职工两次 实地调研的数据为基础, 运用实证研究的方法, 探讨了20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业改制过 程中乡镇财政收入、乡镇企业职工工资和福利以及农村劳动力转移的变化。结果表明: 乡镇 企业改制对我国农村地区的社会经济造成了较为深刻的影响, 由于乡镇工业发展缓慢和集体工业的改制, 私营经济成为农村经济的主体, 其与乡镇政府的直接经济联系有所减弱, 乡镇企业税收对财政的支撑作用有所减弱; 乡镇企业职工工资有不同程度的增长, 但增长幅度不大, 乡镇企业职工的福利没有得到显著改善, 土地的社会保障功能仍然十分突出; 私营企业 通过提高劳动效率、加大劳动强度和增加劳动时间来增加企业效益, 这也导致90 年代后期乡镇企业对劳动力吸引能力的减弱。乡镇企业劳动力市场基本还局限在镇区范围, 只有当镇区劳动力资源短缺时, 跨区域的劳动力市场才会发育。

本文引用格式

杨晓光, 樊杰 . 20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业变革及其地方效应[J]. 地理学报, 2008 , 63(12) : 1268 -1276 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200812004

Abstract

This paper, using the method of substantial evidence research, studies transformations and effects of China's township and village enterprises in the late 20th century based on the field investigated data for seven towns. The transformations of township and village enterprises in China have influenced the town government revenue, employees' wages and welfare and village labor force migration. Results show that, in this connection, the transformation of collective enterprises has played an important role in the private sector's development since the 1990s. One indication is the dramatic decline of the employees in collective enterprises and the increases of employees in private enterprises. On the other hand, the privatization of industrial enterprises created problems for the town government such as the unemployment in collective enterprises and the private enterprises' reduction of profits to the local government. The process of privatizing collective enterprises together with tax reforms caused the main drop in income for townships; the wages of township and village enterprises' employees containing the growth of different degrees, but the increasing range is not very big. The welfare of township and village enterprises' employees obviously did not change, and most workers are engaged in agricultural activity with their families. Sticking to agricultural activities granted them the security to return to farming in case that they lost their nonagricultural jobs. Because the township and village enterprises have come to slow growth, and the private enterprises increased the production by increasing labor time and intensity, the rural enterprises are absorbing less surplus labor force than before. The township and village enterprises prefer applicants from their own township. Only when the local labor market is exhausted can the employees from outside the township be employed.

参考文献


[1] Li Hongbin, Scott Rozelle. Saving or stripping rural industry: An analysis of privatization and efficiency in China. Agricultural Economics, 2000, 23: 5-21.

[2] Wolfgang Taubmann, Fan Jie. Economic structures and changes in rural enterprises in China at the end of the twentieth century. The Chinese Economy, 2003, 36: 1-99.

[3] Li Chengui. Review on theories of China's rural industrialization. China Rural Survey, 2002, (6): 34-45.
[李成贵. 中国 农村工业化理论研究评述. 中国农村观察, 2002, (6): 34-45.]

[4] Yang Xiaoguang, Fan Jie. Analysis of regional rural industrial competitive power in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2005, 25(1): 1-6.
[杨晓光, 樊杰. 中国农村工业地区竞争力差异分析. 地理科学, 2005, 25(1): 1-6.]

[5] Yuan Jieping. Township village enterprises in Jiangsu are intensive to turn the condition evaluation of the scale management. Chinese Rural Economy, 1998, 10: 26-29.
[袁界平等. 江苏乡镇企业集约化规模经营状况评价.中国农 村经济, 1998, (10): 26-29.

[6] Zhang Jun, Feng Qu. An analytical framework of restructure of collective township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (8): 12-20.
[张军, 冯曲. 集体所有制乡镇企业改制的一个分析框架. 经济研究, 2000, (8): 12-20.]

[7] Zhi Zhaohua. Another explanation of the restructuring of township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2001, (3): 12-18.
[支兆华. 乡镇企业改制的另一种解释. 经济研究, 2001, (3): 12-18.]

[8] Qin Hui. Town and village enterprises hesitating at the crossroad. Reform, 1997, (6): 105-111.
[秦晖. 十字路口看乡企: 清华大学乡镇企业转制问题调查研究报告. 改革, 1997, (6): 105-111.]

[9] Jiang Changyun. The logic of property right reform of township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (10): 23-29.
[姜长云. 乡镇企业产权改革的逻辑. 经济研究, 2000, (10): 23-29.]

[10] Zhang Xiaoshan, Yuan Peng. Studies on the property rights system of cooperative shares enterprises in rural areas. Social Sciences in China, 1998, (2): 15-31.
[张晓山, 苑鹏等. 农村股份合作制企业产权制度研究. 中国社会科学, 1998, (2): 15-31.]

[11] Chen Jianbo. Institutional change and rural informal institution: The formation and control of properties of China's township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (1): 48-55.
[陈剑波. 制度变迁与乡村非正规制度: 中国乡镇 企业财产形成和控制. 经济研究, 2000, (1): 48-55.]

[12] Taubmann W, Fan Jie. Die Roller der Indunstrie im Transformationsprozes des laendlichen China. Geographische Zeitschrift, 1995, 83: 3-4. (德文)

[13] Fan Jie, Wolfgang Taubmann. An analysis of the economic features and regional difference of China's rural industrialization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(5): 398-407.
[樊杰, W.陶普曼.中国农村工业化的经济分析及省 际发展水平差异. 地理学报, 1996, 51(5): 398-407.]

[14] Li Jing. Empirical analysis of township financial income and expenditure: Based on audit report of a central China county. China Rural Survey, 2006, (1): 57-61.
[李靖. 乡镇财政收支行为的实证研究: 基于中部地区W 县审计报告 资料. 中国农村观察, 2006, (1): 57-61.]

[15] Miao Changhong, Fan Jie, Zhang Wenzhong. The development of rural industry in China: An integrative framework of locational analysis. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(1): 125-133.
[苗长虹, 樊杰, 张文忠. 中国农村工业发展: 一个综 合区位分析框架. 地理研究, 2002, 21(1): 125-133.]

[16] Dong Xiaoyuan, Paul Bowles, Samuel P S. Share ownership and employee attitudes: Some evidence from China's post privatization rural industry. Journal of Comparative Economics 2002, 30: 812-835.

[17] Ding Jinhong, Liu Zhenyu, Cheng Danming. Areal differentiation of inter-provincial migration in China and characteristics of the flow field. Acta Geograpjyoca Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 106-114.
[丁金宏, 刘振宇, 程丹明等. 中国 人口迁移的区域差异与流场特征. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 106-114.]

[18] Yao Yang. Labor market integration in developed villages. China Rural Survey, 2001, (2): 2-10.
[姚洋. 发达地区村庄 劳动力市场的整合. 中国农村观察, 2001, (2): 2-10.]

[19] Jiang Changyun. Fund resources of township enterprises and the dynamic change in their financing structure: Analysis and consideration. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (2): 34-39.
[姜长云. 乡镇企业资金来源和融资结构的动态变 化: 分析与思考. 经济研究, 2001, (2): 34-39.]

[20] Liu Shiding. Possession, Recognition, and Personal Network. Beijing: Huaxia Press, 2003. 11-27.
[刘世定. 占有、认知 与人际关系. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2003. 11-27.]

[21] Guo Jianjun. Present stage our country farmer income growth characteristic, face of antinomy and counterplan. The Economic Research and Reference, 2001, (43): 2-12.
[郭建军. 现阶段我国农民收入增长特征、面临的矛盾和对策. 经济研究参考, 2001, (43): 2-12.]

[22] Jiang Changyun. Rural land and farmers' social security. Comparative Economic and Social Systems, 2002, (1): 49-55.
[姜长云. 农村土地与农民的社会保障. 经济社会体制比较, 2002, (1): 49-55.]

[23] Sheng Laiyun. Analysis of the determinants of rural labor migration in China. China Rural Survey, 2007, (3): 2-15.
[盛 来运. 中国农村劳动力外出的影响因素分析. 中国农村观察, 2007, (3): 2-15.]

[24] Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. ActaGeographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
[刘彦随.中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]

[25] Wang Guoxia, Lu Qi. Migration of rural population in recent years in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(5): 630-635.
[王国霞, 鲁奇. 中国近期农村人口迁移态势研究. 地理科学, 2007, 27(5): 630-635.]

文章导航

/