新时代中国乡村空间特征及其多尺度治理

doi:10.11821/dlxb202308001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

解构新时代乡村空间特征是构建乡村空间治理体系的前提条件，多尺度乡村空间特征及其治理路径将有效支撑国家治理体系的现代化。基于地理学综合性、区域性和流动性思维范式，解构多尺度乡村空间特征，总结其治理困境，建构基于地理学分析范式的多尺度乡村空间治理框架，探索可行的治理路径，进而构建了“特征识别—困境解析—治理框架—治理路径”的多尺度乡村空间治理系统研究方案。研究发现：① 基于地理学综合性、区域性和流动性分析范式解析多尺度乡村空间运转逻辑，需要破解尺度综合、尺度分异和尺度流动对多尺度乡村空间特征的作用机制，突出乡村空间综合性特征、强化乡村空间异质性特征、融合乡村空间流动性特征；② 城乡空间综合统筹不足和空间流动网络不畅通，叠加乡村空间异质性价值不显化是乡村空间治理亟待破解的困境；③ “空间综合治理—空间分区治理—空间流动治理”多尺度乡村空间治理框架，有效破解城乡空间难综合、区域空间难协调、空间网络不畅通等问题；④ 统筹城乡空间的综合性治理、创新用途管制的区域性治理、均衡发展权配置的流动性治理是多尺度乡村空间治理的可行路径。厘清新时代多尺度乡村空间特征并建构科学的治理体系为推进城乡融合发展和乡村振兴战略提供理论支撑。

关键词: 乡村空间, 空间治理, 乡村振兴, 城乡融合发展, 多尺度治理, 中国

Abstract:

Deconstructing rural spatial characteristics is the precondition for building rural spatial governance system in the new era, and multi-scale rural spatial characteristics and its governance path would effectively support the modernization of the national governance system. Based on the comprehensive, regional and mobile thinking paradigm of geography, this paper deconstructs the multi-scale rural spatial characteristics, identifies its internal operating logics, summarizes its governance dilemmas, constructs a multi-scale rural spatial governance framework that is based on geographical analysis paradigm, explores feasible governance paths, and constructs a multi-scale rural spatial governance system research plan, namely, "characteristics identification-dilemma analysis-governance framework-governance path". The paper finds that: (1) to analyze the operating logics of the multi-scale rural space through the comprehensive, regional and mobile analytical thinking of geography, it is necessary to understand the mechanism of action of scale synthesis, scale differentiation and scale flow to the multi-scale rural spatial characteristics, highlighting the comprehensive characteristics of rural space, strengthening rural spatial heterogeneity, and integrating rural spatial mobility. (2) The lacking urban-rural spatial overall planning, unsmooth spatial mobile network and not-reflected different types of rural spatial value are the key dilemmas in the rural spatial governance, which need to be addressed. (3) The multi-scale rural spatial governance framework of "comprehensive spatial governance-spatial zoning governance-spatial mobile governance" could effectively solve the problems of urban-rural spatial integration, regional spatial coordination and spatial network blockage. (4) Integrating urban-rural comprehensive governance, innovating regulation control to improve regional governance and balancing the configuration of spatial development right to achieve mobile spatial governance are feasible paths for multi-scale rural space governance. In conclusion, clarifying the multi-scale rural spatial characteristics in the new era and constructing a scientific governance system could provide theoretical support to promote integrated urban-rural development and rural vitalization strategy.

Key words: rural space, spatial governance, rural revitalization, urban-rural integration development, multi-scale governance, China

戈大专. 新时代中国乡村空间特征及其多尺度治理[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(8): 1849-1868.

GE Dazhuan. The characteristics and multi-scale governance of rural space in the new era in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 1849-1868.

图/表 5

参考文献 63

[1]	Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[2]	Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013
	[戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013
[3]	Long Hualou, Chen Kunqiu. Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 295-309. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
	[龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
[4]	Xiong Juhua, Gao Yang, Wu Hao, et al. Exploring the integrative development paths of geographic sciences from the perspective of National Natural Science Foundation of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(8): 1839-1850. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202208001
	[熊巨华, 高阳, 吴浩, 等. 国家自然科学基金视角下地理科学融合发展路径探索. 地理学报, 2022, 77(8): 1839-1850.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202208001
[5]	Fu Bojie. Geography: From knowledge, science to decision making support. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11): 1923-1932. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201711001
	[傅伯杰. 地理学: 从知识、科学到决策. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11): 1923-1932.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201711001
[6]	Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
[7]	Halfacree K. Trial by space for a 'radical rural': Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 2007, 23(2): 125-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002
[8]	Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
	[刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[9]	Wang Dan, Liu Zuyun. Progress and implications of international rural space research. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(12): 1991-2002. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.12.014
	[王丹, 刘祖云. 国外乡村空间研究的进展与启示. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1991-2002.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.12.014
[10]	Woods M. The local politics of the global countryside: Boosterism, aspirational ruralism and the contested reconstitution of Queenstown, New Zealand. Geojournal, 2011, 76(4): 365-381. doi: 10.1007/s10708-009-9268-7
[11]	Zhang Xiaolin. On discrimination of rural definitions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(4): 365-371. doi: 10.11821/xb199804009
	[张小林. 乡村概念辨析. 地理学报, 1998, 53(4): 79-85.]
[12]	Long Hualou. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028.
	[龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028.]
[13]	Ge Dazhuan, Lu Yuqi, Sun Pan. The logic of rural spatial governance and revitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(4): 777-794. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202204002
	[戈大专, 陆玉麒, 孙攀. 论乡村空间治理与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 777-794.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202204002
[14]	Long H L. Land Use Transitions and Rural Restructuring in China. Singapore: Springer, 2020.
[15]	Woods M. Rural. New York: Routledge, 2011.
[16]	Lu Dadao. The methodology of human-economic geography and its characteristics. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(3): 387-396. doi: 10.11821/yj2011030001
	[陆大道. 人文—经济地理学的方法论及其特点. 地理研究, 2011, 30(3): 387-396.]
[17]	Lu Dadao. Some key issues concerning development of geographical science in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(1): 3-8. doi: 10.11821/xb200301001
	[陆大道. 中国地理学发展若干值得思考的问题. 地理学报, 2003, 58(1): 3-8.]
[18]	Li Hongbo, Hu Xiaoliang, Zhang Xiaolin, et al. On the analysis of rural space. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 591-600. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.003
	[李红波, 胡晓亮, 张小林, 等. 乡村空间辨析. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 591-600.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.003
[19]	Marsden T. Rural futures: The consumption countryside and its regulation. Sociologia Ruralis, 1999, 39(4): 501-526. doi: 10.1111/soru.1999.39.issue-4
[20]	Zhou Guohua, Liu Chang, Tang Chengli, et al. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of quality of life in rural areas of Hunan province. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(12): 2475-2489. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201812009
	[周国华, 刘畅, 唐承丽, 等. 湖南乡村生活质量的空间格局及其影响因素. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12): 2475-2489.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201812009
[21]	Yang Ren. Spatial differentiation and mechanisms of typical rural areas in the suburbs of a metropolis: A case study of Beicun Village, Baiyun District, Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1622-1636. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908010
	[杨忍. 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1622-1636.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908010
[22]	Woods M. Performing rurality and practising rural geography. Progress in Human Geography, 2010, 34(6): 835-846. doi: 10.1177/0309132509357356
[23]	Li Shuangcheng, Zhang Wenbin, Chen Liying, et al. Digital twin space and its applications: Concurrent discussion on the space reconstruction of geographical research. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(3): 507-517. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202203001
	[李双成, 张文彬, 陈立英, 等. 孪生空间及其应用: 兼论地理研究空间的重构. 地理学报, 2022, 77(3): 507-517.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202203001
[24]	Flachs A. Charisma and agrarian crisis: Authority and legitimacy at multiple scales for rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 2021, 88: 97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.010
[25]	Janin Rivolin U. Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: A European comparison. European Planning Studies, 2017, 25(6): 994-1012. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
[26]	MacKinnon D. Rural governance and local involvement: Assessing state community relations in the Scottish Highlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 2002, 18: 307-324. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00048-1
[27]	Ye C, Liu Z M. Rural-urban co-governance: Multi-scale practice. Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(10): 778-780. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.02.021 pmid: 36659192
[28]	Wen Qi, Shi Linna, Ma Caihong, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of multidimensional poverty at the village level: Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10): 1850-1864. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810003
	[文琦, 施琳娜, 马彩虹, 等. 黄土高原村域多维贫困空间异质性研究: 以宁夏彭阳县为例. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1850-1864.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810003
[29]	Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
	[房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
[30]	Ge Dazhuan, Lu Yuqi. Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106008
	[戈大专, 陆玉麒. 面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106008
[31]	Di Ludovico D, D'Ascanio F. European cross-scale spatial planning and territorial frames in the Italian Median Macroregion. European Planning Studies, 2019, 27(7): 1369-1390. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1581729
[32]	Müller B, Hoffmann F, Heckelei T, et al. Modelling food security: Bridging the gap between the micro and the macro scale. Global Environmental Change, 2020, 63: 102085. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102085. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102085
[33]	Yuan Yuan, Zhao Xiaofeng, Zhao Yuntai, et al. The hierarchical scheme and the vertical transmission of village planning within the national territorial spatial planning system. Urban Planning Forum, 2020(6): 43-48.
	[袁源, 赵小风, 赵雲泰, 等. 国土空间规划体系下村庄规划编制的分级谋划与纵向传导研究. 城市规划学刊, 2020(6): 43-48.]
[34]	Wang Cheng, He Yanzhou. Spatio-temporal differentiation and differentiated regulation of the vulnerability of rural production space system in Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1680-1698. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008009
	[王成, 何焱洲. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统脆弱性时空分异与差异化调控. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1680-1698.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008009
[35]	McGee T G. The emergence of desakota regions in Asia:Expanding a hypothesis//Ginsburg N S, Koppel B, McGee T G, et al. The Extended Metropolis:Settlement Transition Is Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991: 3-26.
[36]	Fu Bojie, Leng Shuying, Song Changqing. The characteristics and tasks of geography in the new era. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(8): 939-945. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.08.939
	[傅伯杰, 冷疏影, 宋长青. 新时期地理学的特征与任务. 地理科学, 2015, 35(8): 939-945.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.08.939
[37]	Song Changqing, Cheng Changxiu, Shi Peijun. Geography complexity: New connotations of geography in the new era. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(7): 1204-1213. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201807002
	[宋长青, 程昌秀, 史培军. 新时代地理复杂性的内涵. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1204-1213.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201807002
[38]	Chen Min, Lv Guonian, Zhou Chenghu, et al. Thinking on the development and construction of geographic modeling and simulation system for the study of geographical characteristics in the new era. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2021, 51(10): 1664-1680. doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2020-0264
	[陈旻, 闾国年, 周成虎, 等. 面向新时代地理学特征研究的地理建模与模拟系统发展及构建思考. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(10): 1664-1680.]
[39]	Liu J G, Dietz T, Carpenter S R, et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 2007, 317(5844): 1513-1516. doi: 10.1126/science.1144004 pmid: 17872436
[40]	Liu J G, Hull V, Batistella M, et al. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 2013, 18(2): 26. DOI: 10.5751/es-05873-180226. doi: 10.5751/es-05873-180226
[41]	Tan Minghong, Li Xiubin. Paradigm transformation in the study of man-land relations: From local thinking to global network thinking modes. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(10): 2333-2342. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202110001
	[谈明洪, 李秀彬. 从本土到全球网络化的人地关系思维范式转型. 地理学报, 2021, 76(10): 2333-2342.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202110001
[42]	Cloke P. Country backwater to virtual village? Rural studies and the 'cultural' turn. Journal of Rural Studies, 1997, 13(4): 367-375. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00053-3
[43]	Rocha J C, Peterson G D, Bodin Ö, et al. Cascading regime shifts within and across scales. Science, 2018, 362: 1379-1383. doi: 10.1126/science.aat7850 pmid: 30573623
[44]	Hao Qing, Peng Jian, Wei Ye, et al. The connotation of territory and the suggestions of drawing up spatial planning in the New Era. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(9): 2219-2247. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210905
	[郝庆, 彭建, 魏冶, 等. “国土空间”内涵辨析与国土空间规划编制建议. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2219-2247.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210905
[45]	Yue Wenze, Wang Tianyu. Rethinking on the basic issues of territorial and spatial use control in China. China Land Science, 2019, 33(8): 8-15.
	[岳文泽, 王田雨. 中国国土空间用途管制的基础性问题思考. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(8): 8-15.]
[46]	Lv Guonian, Zhou Chenghu, Lin Hui, et al. Development overview and some thoughts on geographic synthesis. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(20): 2542-2554.
	[闾国年, 周成虎, 林珲, 等. 地理综合研究方法的发展与思考. 科学通报, 2021, 66(20): 2542-2554.]
[47]	Fang Chuanglin, Liu Haimeng, Luo Kui, et al. Comprehensive regionalization of human geography in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(2): 179-196. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201702001
	[方创琳, 刘海猛, 罗奎, 等. 中国人文地理综合区划. 地理学报, 2017, 72(2): 179-196.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201702001
[48]	Fan Jie, Zhou Kan, Sheng Kerong, et al. Study on China's land comprehensive functional zone and its division scheme. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2023, 53(2): 236-255. doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2022-0022
	[樊杰, 周侃, 盛科荣, 等. 中国陆域综合功能区及其划分方案研究. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2023, 53(2): 236-255.]
[49]	Wu Chuanjun. On the research core of geography-the regional system of man-land relationship. Economic Geography, 1991, 11(3): 1-6. doi: 10.2307/140646
	[吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991, 11(3): 1-6.]
[50]	Fan Jie. "Territorial System of Human-environment Interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 597-607. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804001
	[樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 597-607.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804001
[51]	Tang Chengli, He Yanhua, Zhou Guohua, et al. The research on optimization mode of spatial organization of rural settlements oriented by life quality. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(10): 1459-1472. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
	[唐承丽, 贺艳华, 周国华, 等. 基于生活质量导向的乡村聚落空间优化研究. 地理学报, 2014, 69(10): 1459-1472.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
[52]	Li Y H, Westlund H, Liu Y S. Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 68: 135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003
[53]	He S J, Zhang Y S. Reconceptualising the rural through planetary thinking: A field experiment of sustainable approaches to rural revitalisation in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 96: 42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.008
[54]	Song Changqing, Zhang Guoyou, Cheng Changxiu, et al. Nature and basic issues of geography. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(1): 6-11. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.01.002
	[宋长青, 张国友, 程昌秀, 等. 论地理学的特性与基本问题. 地理科学, 2020, 40(1): 6-11.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.01.002
[55]	Peng Jian, Du Yueyue, Liu Yanxu, et al. From natural regionalization, land change to landscape service: The development of integrated physical geography in China. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10): 1819-1833. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710001
	[彭建, 杜悦悦, 刘焱序, 等. 从自然区划、土地变化到景观服务: 发展中的中国综合自然地理学. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10): 1819-1833.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710001
[56]	Fu Bojie. The integrated studies of geography: Coupling of patterns and processes. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1052-1059. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408002
	[傅伯杰. 地理学综合研究的途径与方法: 格局与过程耦合. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1052-1059.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408002
[57]	Xi Guangliang, Zhen Feng, Qian Xintong. Territory spatial security and planning strategies from the perspective of mobility. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(8): 1935-1945. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220801
	[席广亮, 甄峰, 钱欣彤. 流动性视角下的国土空间安全及规划应对策略. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(8): 1935-1945.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220801
[58]	Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang. Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 563-576. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704001
	[龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 563-576.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704001
[59]	Ye Chao, Yu Jie, Zhang Qingyuan, et al. From governance to rural-urban co-governance: Research frontiers, trends, and the Chinese paths. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 15-27. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002
	[叶超, 于洁, 张清源, 等. 从治理到城乡治理: 国际前沿、发展态势与中国路径. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 15-27.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002
[60]	Qiao Jiajun, Ma Yuling. Research on dynamic model of urban-rural interface. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(12): 2283-2297. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201612008
	[乔家君, 马玉玲. 城乡界面动态模型研究. 地理研究, 2016, 35(12): 2283-2297.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201612008
[61]	Ge Dazhuan, Sun Pan, Tang Lisha, et al. The logic and path of supporting urban-rural integrated development through territorial space planning. China Land Science, 2023, 37(1): 1-9.
	[戈大专, 孙攀, 汤礼莎, 等. 国土空间规划支撑城乡融合发展的逻辑与路径. 中国土地科学, 2023, 37(1): 1-9.]
[62]	Lu Ming, Li Pengfei. Realizing common prosperity in building a unified big market. Social Science Journal, 2022(6): 109-118, 209.
	[陆铭, 李鹏飞. 在构建统一大市场中实现共同富裕. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(6): 109-118, 209.]
[63]	Tiebout C M. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 1956, 64(5): 416-424. doi: 10.1086/257839