地理学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (6): 808-822.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201406008
顾高翔1, 王铮2,3
收稿日期:
2013-06-29
修回日期:
2014-05-16
出版日期:
2014-06-20
发布日期:
2014-06-20
作者简介:
顾高翔(1985-),男,浙江宁波人,博士,研究方向为地理计算、经济计算。E-mail:caesarggx@163.com
基金资助:
GU Gaoxiang1, WANG Zheng2,3
Received:
2013-06-29
Revised:
2014-05-16
Published:
2014-06-20
Online:
2014-06-20
Supported by:
摘要: 空间结构是区域的基本组成部分,在空间交互过程和区域经济发展方面起着重要的作用。本文的主要研究目标是在不同的道路交通系统作用下,中国区域空间结构的发展演化过程。这对于解决中国当前经济发展中的不平衡问题,探索使区域平衡发展的方法具有重要意义。与传统的研究方法不同,本文从自上而下建模的角度构建了一个基于Agent 的动态区域经济模型。在模型中,中国的每个地级市都被定义为企业Agent,拥有不同技术水平的劳动者Agent 为企业提供劳动力,并在Wilson 空间吸引力模型的作用下在区域之间迁移。技术作用于劳动力之上,随劳动者的迁移而扩散。资本由企业的投资行为而转移。模型中的道路交通线具有不同的权值,这意味着道路交通网是异质的。通过情景模拟,得到以下结论:在分级道路交通网的作用下,传统的中心—腹地扩散模式已不再适用。技术服从枢纽—网络结构从中心城市向外扩散。资本的流动也具有与技术扩散相似的过程和空间结构。交通条件可以在很大程度上影响区域的发展,同时自然条件仍然起着空间锁定的作用。优惠的税率政策可以在一定程度上打破这种空间锁定,有利于吸引劳动者迁移,提高当地的生产技术水平。
顾高翔, 王铮. 技术扩散和资本流动作用下中国区域空间结构演化——基于Agent的模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(6): 808-822.
GU Gaoxiang, WANG Zheng. Agent-based simulation on the evolution and development of regional spatial structure with technology and capital diffusion in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(6): 808-822.
[1] Lu Yuqi. A review and prospect of the research on chinese regional spatial structure. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21 (4): 468-476. [陆玉麒. 中国区域空间结构研究的回顾与展望. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(4): 468-476.] [2] Nian Meng, Sun Jiuwen. Research of regional economic spatial structure change in China. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2012, (2): 89-96. [年猛, 孙久文. 中国区域经济空间结构变化研究. 经济理论与经济管理, 2012, (2): 89-96.] [3] Parr J B. Regional economic change and regional spatial structure: Some interrelationships. Environment and Planning A, 1979, 11(7): 825-837. [4] Bruinsma F, Rietveld P. Urban agglomerations in European infrastructure networks. Urban Studies, 1993, 30(6): 919- 934. [5] Gutierrez J, Gonzalez R, Gomez G. The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(4): 227-238. [6] Gastner M T, Newman M E J. The spatial structure of networks. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 2006, 49(2): 247-252. [7] Xue Ling, Weng Jin. Dynamic simulation on spatial structure of metropolitan commerce based on monopolistic competition model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(8): 938-948. [薛领, 翁瑾. 基于垄断竞争的大都市商业空间结构 动态模拟. 地理学报, 2010, 65(8): 938-948.] [8] Xue Ling, Yang Kaizhong. Sciences of complexity and studies of evolutional simulation of regional spatial structure. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(1): 79-88. [薛领, 杨开忠. 复杂性科学理论与区域空间演化模拟研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(1): 79-88.] [9] Holland J. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Addsion-Wesley, 1995. [10] Holland J. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Perseus Books, 1998. [11] Wang Zheng, Wu Jing, Yang Nian. A review and prospect of the multi- agent applications in geography. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2005, 2(3): 52-60. [王铮, 吴静, 杨念. 多自主体在地理学中应用的回顾和展望. 复 杂系统与复杂性科学, 2005 ,2(3):52-60.] [12] Jennings N R, Campos J R. Towards a social level characterization of socially responsible agents. IEEE Proceedings, Software Engineering, 1997, 144(1): 11-25. [13] Schilloa M, Funka P, Rovatsosb M. Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies. Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, 2000, 14(8): 825-848. [14] Wooldridge M, Jennings N R. Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 1995, 10(2): 115-152. [15] Wooldridge M, Jennings N R. Agent theories, architectures, and languages: A survey. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1995, (890): 1-39. [16] Bonabeau E. Agent- based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99(3): 7280-7287. [17] Ostrom T. Computer simulation: The third symbol system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1988, 24: 381-392. [18] Gilbert N, Troitzsch K G. Simulation for the Social Scientist. New York: Open University Press, 2005. [19] Berger T. Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool for technology diffusion, resource use changes and policy analysis. Agricultural Economics, 2001, 25(2/3): 245-260. [20] Ligtenberg A, Wachowicz M, Bregt A K et al. A design and application of a multi- agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 72(1/2): 43-56. [21] Dai Xiaoye. Agent-based modeling of sequential innovation diffusion on network [D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2008. [戴霄晔. 序列创新的网络扩散自主体模拟[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2008] [22] Wang Z, Liu T, Dai X. Effect of policy and entrepreneurship on innovation and growth: An agent-based simulation approach. Studies in Regional Science, 2010, 40(1): 19-26. [23] Zhang J F. Growing Silicon Valley on a landscape: An agent-based approach to high-tech industrial clusters. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2003, 13: 193-197. [24] Yao Zixuan. Agent-based modeling of multi-regional innovation diffusion and knowledge spillover [D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2009. [姚梓璇. 多区域创新扩散与知识溢出的自主体模拟[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2009.] [25] Xue Ling, Weng Jin, Yang Kaizhong et al. Dynamic simulation of impact factors on mono- centric urbanization by using agent based modeling. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(4): 947-956. [薛领, 翁谨, 杨开忠等. 基于自主体 (agent) 的单中心城市化动态模拟. 地理研究, 2009, 28(4): 947-956.] [26] Krugman P. First nature, second nature and metropolitan location. Journal of Regional Science, 1993, 33(2): 129-144. [27] Wang Z. Spatial interaction: A statistical mechanism model. Chinese Geography, 2000, 10(3): 279-284, [28] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistics Yearbook-2012. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2012. [国家统 计局. 中国统计年鉴2012. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2012.] [29] Judd K L. The welfare cost of factor taxation in a perfect-foresight model. Journal of Political Economy, 1987, 95(4): 675-709. [30] Trostel P A. The effect of taxation on human capital. Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(2): 327-350. [31] Antras P. Is the U.S. aggregate production function Cobb- Douglas? New estimates of the elasticity of substitution. Contributions to Macroeconomics, 2004, 4(1). [32] Felipe J, Adams F G. "A Theory of Production"—The estimation of the Cobb-Douglas function: A retrospective view. Eastern Economic Journal, 2005, 31(3): 427-445 [33] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistics Yearbook-2012. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2007. [国家统 计局. 中国统计年鉴2007. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2007] [34] Department of National Accounts, National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2002 Input-Output Tables of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2002. [国家统计局国民经济核算司. 2002 年中国投入产出表. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2002.] [35] Roy J R, Thill J C. Spatial interaction modeling. Papers in Regional Science, 2003, 83(1): 339-361. [36] Wilson A G. A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1967, 1: 253-267. [37] Xia Haibin. Roughness and remoteness analysis oriented GIS-design, model and algorithm [D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2006. [夏海斌. 面向艰苦边远性分析的地理信息系统: 设计、模型和算法[D]. 上海: 华东师范大 学, 2006.] [38] Barro R J. Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2004. [39] Romer P. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98: 71-102. [40] Wang Zheng, Xia Haibin, Wu Jing. General Geography. Beijing: Science Press, 2010. [王铮, 夏海斌, 吴静. 普通地理 学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.] [41] Vance J E. Capturing the Horizon: The Historical Geography of Transportation since the Transportation Revolution of the Sixteenth Century. New York: Harper & Row, 1986. [42] Seitz H. A dual economic analysis of the benefits of the public road networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 1993, 27(3): 223-239. [43] Gallup J L, Sachs J D, Mellinger A D. Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review, 1999, 22(2): 179-232. [44] Xia Haibin, Wang Zheng. Evolution of land differentiation in Chinese mainland. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(12): 2123-2138. [夏海斌, 王铮. 中国大陆空间结构分异的进化. 地理研究, 2012, 31(12): 2123-2138.] |
[1] | 魏石梅, 潘竟虎. 中国地级及以上城市网络结构韧性测度[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1394-1407. |
[2] | 杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454. |
[3] | 殷江滨, 李尚谦, 姜磊, 程哲, 黄晓燕, 路改改. 中国连片特困地区非农就业增长的时空特征与驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1471-1488. |
[4] | 胡畔, 陈波, 史培军. 中国暴雨洪涝灾情时空格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162. |
[5] | 朱政, 朱翔, 李霜霜. 长江中游城市群空间结构演变历程与特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 799-817. |
[6] | 黄晓东, 马海涛, 苗长虹. 基于创新企业的中国城市网络联系特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 835-852. |
[7] | 王录仓, 刘海洋, 刘清. 基于腾讯迁徙大数据的中国城市网络研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 853-869. |
[8] | 夏兴生, 潘耀忠, 朱秀芳, 张锦水. 中国综合农业分区下的Ångström-Prescott公式系数逐月校正与优选[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 888-902. |
[9] | 王淑佳, 孙九霞. 中国传统村落可持续发展评价体系构建与实证[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 921-938. |
[10] | 范泽孟. 中国生态过渡带分布的空间识别及情景模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 626-644. |
[11] | 徐羽, 李秀彬, 辛良杰. 中国耕地规模化流转租金的分异特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 753-763. |
[12] | 古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340. |
[13] | 朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414. |
[14] | 李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325. |
[15] | 葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14. |