20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业变革及其地方效应

doi:10.11821/xb200812004

地理学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (12): 1268-1276.doi: 10.11821/xb200812004

20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业变革及其地方效应

杨晓光¹, 樊杰²

1. 浙江省城乡规划设计研究院, 杭州310007；
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101

收稿日期:2008-01-21 修回日期:2008-08-04 出版日期:2008-12-25 发布日期:2008-12-25
作者简介:杨晓光(1972-), 男, 安徽淮南人, 主要从事区域规划与城市规划、区域发展等方面的理论和实践研究。 E-mail: yangxg@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(4040101)

Transformations and Local Effects of China's Township and Village Enterprises in the 1990s

YANG Xiaoguang1¹, FAN Jie²

1. Zhejiang Urban & Rural Planning Design Institute, Hangzhou 310007, China;
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2008-01-21 Revised:2008-08-04 Online:2008-12-25 Published:2008-12-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.4040101

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以1993 年和2000 年对中国七个不同乡镇的近百家乡镇企业和近4000 名企业职工两次实地调研的数据为基础，运用实证研究的方法，探讨了20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业改制过程中乡镇财政收入、乡镇企业职工工资和福利以及农村劳动力转移的变化。结果表明：乡镇企业改制对我国农村地区的社会经济造成了较为深刻的影响，由于乡镇工业发展缓慢和集体工业的改制，私营经济成为农村经济的主体，其与乡镇政府的直接经济联系有所减弱，乡镇企业税收对财政的支撑作用有所减弱；乡镇企业职工工资有不同程度的增长，但增长幅度不大，乡镇企业职工的福利没有得到显著改善，土地的社会保障功能仍然十分突出；私营企业通过提高劳动效率、加大劳动强度和增加劳动时间来增加企业效益，这也导致90 年代后期乡镇企业对劳动力吸引能力的减弱。乡镇企业劳动力市场基本还局限在镇区范围，只有当镇区劳动力资源短缺时，跨区域的劳动力市场才会发育。

关键词: 中国, 乡镇企业, 改制, 地方效应

Abstract:

This paper, using the method of substantial evidence research, studies transformations and effects of China's township and village enterprises in the late 20th century based on the field investigated data for seven towns. The transformations of township and village enterprises in China have influenced the town government revenue, employees' wages and welfare and village labor force migration. Results show that, in this connection, the transformation of collective enterprises has played an important role in the private sector's development since the 1990s. One indication is the dramatic decline of the employees in collective enterprises and the increases of employees in private enterprises. On the other hand, the privatization of industrial enterprises created problems for the town government such as the unemployment in collective enterprises and the private enterprises' reduction of profits to the local government. The process of privatizing collective enterprises together with tax reforms caused the main drop in income for townships; the wages of township and village enterprises' employees containing the growth of different degrees, but the increasing range is not very big. The welfare of township and village enterprises' employees obviously did not change, and most workers are engaged in agricultural activity with their families. Sticking to agricultural activities granted them the security to return to farming in case that they lost their nonagricultural jobs. Because the township and village enterprises have come to slow growth, and the private enterprises increased the production by increasing labor time and intensity, the rural enterprises are absorbing less surplus labor force than before. The township and village enterprises prefer applicants from their own township. Only when the local labor market is exhausted can the employees from outside the township be employed.

Key words: China, township and village enterprises, transformation, local effects

杨晓光, 樊杰. 20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业变革及其地方效应[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(12): 1268-1276.

YANG Xiaoguang1, FAN Jie. Transformations and Local Effects of China's Township and Village Enterprises in the 1990s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(12): 1268-1276.

参考文献

[1] Li Hongbin, Scott Rozelle. Saving or stripping rural industry: An analysis of privatization and efficiency in China. Agricultural Economics, 2000, 23: 5-21.

[2] Wolfgang Taubmann, Fan Jie. Economic structures and changes in rural enterprises in China at the end of the twentieth century. The Chinese Economy, 2003, 36: 1-99.

[3] Li Chengui. Review on theories of China's rural industrialization. China Rural Survey, 2002, (6): 34-45.
[李成贵. 中国农村工业化理论研究评述. 中国农村观察, 2002, (6): 34-45.]

[4] Yang Xiaoguang, Fan Jie. Analysis of regional rural industrial competitive power in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2005, 25(1): 1-6.
[杨晓光, 樊杰. 中国农村工业地区竞争力差异分析. 地理科学, 2005, 25(1): 1-6.]

[5] Yuan Jieping. Township village enterprises in Jiangsu are intensive to turn the condition evaluation of the scale management. Chinese Rural Economy, 1998, 10: 26-29.
[袁界平等. 江苏乡镇企业集约化规模经营状况评价.中国农村经济, 1998, (10): 26-29.

[6] Zhang Jun, Feng Qu. An analytical framework of restructure of collective township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (8): 12-20.
[张军, 冯曲. 集体所有制乡镇企业改制的一个分析框架. 经济研究, 2000, (8): 12-20.]

[7] Zhi Zhaohua. Another explanation of the restructuring of township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2001, (3): 12-18.
[支兆华. 乡镇企业改制的另一种解释. 经济研究, 2001, (3): 12-18.]

[8] Qin Hui. Town and village enterprises hesitating at the crossroad. Reform, 1997, (6): 105-111.
[秦晖. 十字路口看乡企: 清华大学乡镇企业转制问题调查研究报告. 改革, 1997, (6): 105-111.]

[9] Jiang Changyun. The logic of property right reform of township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (10): 23-29.
[姜长云. 乡镇企业产权改革的逻辑. 经济研究, 2000, (10): 23-29.]

[10] Zhang Xiaoshan, Yuan Peng. Studies on the property rights system of cooperative shares enterprises in rural areas. Social Sciences in China, 1998, (2): 15-31.
[张晓山, 苑鹏等. 农村股份合作制企业产权制度研究. 中国社会科学, 1998, (2): 15-31.]

[11] Chen Jianbo. Institutional change and rural informal institution: The formation and control of properties of China's township enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (1): 48-55.
[陈剑波. 制度变迁与乡村非正规制度: 中国乡镇企业财产形成和控制. 经济研究, 2000, (1): 48-55.]

[12] Taubmann W, Fan Jie. Die Roller der Indunstrie im Transformationsprozes des laendlichen China. Geographische Zeitschrift, 1995, 83: 3-4. (德文)

[13] Fan Jie, Wolfgang Taubmann. An analysis of the economic features and regional difference of China's rural industrialization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(5): 398-407.
[樊杰, W.陶普曼.中国农村工业化的经济分析及省际发展水平差异. 地理学报, 1996, 51(5): 398-407.]

[14] Li Jing. Empirical analysis of township financial income and expenditure: Based on audit report of a central China county. China Rural Survey, 2006, (1): 57-61.
[李靖. 乡镇财政收支行为的实证研究: 基于中部地区W 县审计报告资料. 中国农村观察, 2006, (1): 57-61.]

[15] Miao Changhong, Fan Jie, Zhang Wenzhong. The development of rural industry in China: An integrative framework of locational analysis. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(1): 125-133.
[苗长虹, 樊杰, 张文忠. 中国农村工业发展: 一个综合区位分析框架. 地理研究, 2002, 21(1): 125-133.]

[16] Dong Xiaoyuan, Paul Bowles, Samuel P S. Share ownership and employee attitudes: Some evidence from China's post privatization rural industry. Journal of Comparative Economics 2002, 30: 812-835.

[17] Ding Jinhong, Liu Zhenyu, Cheng Danming. Areal differentiation of inter-provincial migration in China and characteristics of the flow field. Acta Geograpjyoca Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 106-114.
[丁金宏, 刘振宇, 程丹明等. 中国人口迁移的区域差异与流场特征. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 106-114.]

[18] Yao Yang. Labor market integration in developed villages. China Rural Survey, 2001, (2): 2-10.
[姚洋. 发达地区村庄劳动力市场的整合. 中国农村观察, 2001, (2): 2-10.]

[19] Jiang Changyun. Fund resources of township enterprises and the dynamic change in their financing structure: Analysis and consideration. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (2): 34-39.
[姜长云. 乡镇企业资金来源和融资结构的动态变化: 分析与思考. 经济研究, 2001, (2): 34-39.]

[20] Liu Shiding. Possession, Recognition, and Personal Network. Beijing: Huaxia Press, 2003. 11-27.
[刘世定. 占有、认知与人际关系. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2003. 11-27.]

[21] Guo Jianjun. Present stage our country farmer income growth characteristic, face of antinomy and counterplan. The Economic Research and Reference, 2001, (43): 2-12.
[郭建军. 现阶段我国农民收入增长特征、面临的矛盾和对策. 经济研究参考, 2001, (43): 2-12.]

[22] Jiang Changyun. Rural land and farmers' social security. Comparative Economic and Social Systems, 2002, (1): 49-55.
[姜长云. 农村土地与农民的社会保障. 经济社会体制比较, 2002, (1): 49-55.]

[23] Sheng Laiyun. Analysis of the determinants of rural labor migration in China. China Rural Survey, 2007, (3): 2-15.
[盛来运. 中国农村劳动力外出的影响因素分析. 中国农村观察, 2007, (3): 2-15.]

[24] Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. ActaGeographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
[刘彦随.中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]

[25] Wang Guoxia, Lu Qi. Migration of rural population in recent years in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(5): 630-635.
[王国霞, 鲁奇. 中国近期农村人口迁移态势研究. 地理科学, 2007, 27(5): 630-635.]

20 世纪90 年代中国乡镇企业变革及其地方效应

Transformations and Local Effects of China's Township and Village Enterprises in the 1990s

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[2]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[3]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[4]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[5]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[6]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[7]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[8]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[9]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[10]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[11]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[12]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[13]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[14]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[15]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.