世界城市地铁发展历程与规律

doi:10.11821/xb200812003

地理学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (12): 1257-1267.doi: 10.11821/xb200812003

世界城市地铁发展历程与规律

曹小曙, 林强

中山大学地理科学与规划学院, 广州510275

收稿日期:2008-05-04 修回日期:2008-10-29 出版日期:2008-12-25 发布日期:2008-12-25
作者简介:曹小曙(1970-), 男, 甘肃人, 博士, 博士生导师, 中国地理学会会员, 主要从事交通地理与土地利用研究。 E-mail: caoxiaoshu964@sohu.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40571052)

The Evolution of Worldwide Metro Systems: A Study on Their Scales and Network Indexes

CAO Xiaoshu, LIN Qiang

School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2008-05-04 Revised:2008-10-29 Online:2008-12-25 Published:2008-12-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40571052

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于地铁系统数据统计分析，对地铁建设的空间时序以及网络发育差异进行归纳，结合相关数据推导出地铁规模的匡算模型，并依据地铁系统的属性指标组和网络指标组对世界 121 个城市地铁系统样本进行聚类分析，将其划分为3 个类别，并讨论城市人口规模和城市用地规模对地铁规模的影响，最后对中国53 个城市进行地铁规模匡算和等级划分。结果显示，世界城市地铁建设在时空上存在波动性，地区间地铁系统的网络发育不均衡，欧洲和北美洲的地铁网络发育较为成熟，而亚洲和南美洲的地铁网络则有较大的扩展潜力。第一类别地铁系统规模大，网络发育成熟，但仍有较大的扩展潜力，地铁规模与城市用地规模的相关性更强；第二类别地铁系统网络的发育程度较好，但是扩展潜力一般，地铁规模与城市人口规模和城市用地规模的相关性较弱；第三类别地铁系统的规模普遍较小，地铁网络发育处于较低等级水平，地铁网络仍然有很大的成环潜力和结合潜力，地铁规模与城市人口规模的相关性更强。中国城市地铁的匡算规模介于37.4~129.9 km，根据模型的匡算结果中国地铁系统可以划分为4 个等级，未来中国的地铁建设仍然有很大潜力。

关键词: 城市地铁, 网络结构, 属性指标, 聚类分析, 世界, 中国

Abstract:

Abstract: Based on the statistics of 121 metro systems in the world, this paper analyses the worldwide metro construction from 1863 to 2003. Linear regression is introduced to show the relationship between the metro scale and urban population, as well as surface area. And by applying the hierarchical cluster analysis, three types of metro systems are identified in terms of their scales and network indexes: the first metro system with 10 samples, which is huge and with complex network, such as London and New York; the second metro system with four samples, which is relatively big but with limited network patulous potential, such as Athens and Vienna; and the third metro system with 107 samples, which is relatively small but has great patulous potential in network, such as Beijing and Montreal. Our findings suggest that metro scale, as well as network indexes, show great differences among five major continents. Metro systems in Europe and North America embrace a more mature network; however, metro systems in Asia and South America have greater network patulous potential. Also we find that in most cases urban population has more impacts on metro scale, especially to the samples in the third metro system. However, when it comes to the first metro system, surface area has significant impacts on metro scale. Finally three linear regression models are implemented to calculate the theoretical scales of 53 Chinese major cities, and it shows that theoretic metro scales in these cities range from 37.2 km to 129.9 km. These metro systems can be divided into four classes based on their model calculations. According to the result, Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing should develop the biggest metro systems in China. With the progress of urbanization in China, metro systems will grow rapidly in the coming years, especially in the developed regions.

Key words: metro systems, network, attribute indexes, hierarchical cluster analysis, world, China

曹小曙, 林强. 世界城市地铁发展历程与规律[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(12): 1257-1267.

CAO Xiaoshu, LIN Qiang. The Evolution of Worldwide Metro Systems: A Study on Their Scales and Network Indexes[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(12): 1257-1267.

参考文献

[1] Cervero R, Landis J. Assessing the impacts of urban rail transit on local real estate markets using quasi-experimental comparisons. Transportation Research Part A, 1993, 27(1): 13-22.

[2] Lin J J, Gau C C. A TOD planning model to review the regulation of allowable development densities around subway stations. Land Use Policy, 2006, 23(3): 353-360.

[3] Du Hongbo, Mulley C. The short-term land value impacts of urban rail transit: Quantitative evidence from Sunderland, UK. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(1): 223-233.

[4] Knowles R D. Transport impacts of greater Manchester's metrolink light rail system. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(1): 1-14.

[5] Golias J C. Analysis of traffic corridor impacts from the introduction of the new Athens metro system. Journal of Transport Geography, 2002, 10(2): 91-97.

[6] Crampton G R. Urban economic structure and the optimal rail system. Urban Studies, 2000, 37(3): 623-632.

[7] Kim T J. Effects of subways on urban form and structure. Transportation Research, 1978, 12(4): 231-239.

[8] Zhu X, Liu S X. Analysis of the impact of the MRT system on accessibility in Singapore using an integrated GIS tool. Journal of Transport Geography, 2004, 12(2): 89-101.

[9] Hill R. The Toulouse metro and the South Yorkshire Supertram: A cross cultural comparison of light rapid transit developments in France and England. Transport Policy, 1995, 2(3): 203-216.

[10] Vuk G. Transport impacts of the Copenhagen metro. Journal of Transport Geography, 2005, 13(3): 223-233.

[11] Friedman M, Cordovil C. The Rio de Janeiro subway system: A case study in applying theory to practice. Transportation Research Part A, 1979, 13(2): 125-130.

[12] Costa F J, Noble A G. The growth of metro systems in Madrid, Rome and Athens. Cities, 1990, 7(3): 224-229.

[13] Knowles R D. Light rail transit development in Britain. Geography, 1992, 77(1): 17-21.

[14] Godard X. Some lessons from the LRT in Tunis and the transferability of experience. Transportation Research Part A, 2007, 41(10): 891-898.

[15] Zheng Jiefen, Liu Hongyu. Comprehensive development of rail transport and land resources in Hong Kong. China Railway Science, 2002, 23(5): 1-5.
[郑捷奋, 刘洪玉. 香港轨道交通与土地资源的综合开发. 中国铁道科学, 2002, 23(5): 1-5.]

[16] Tian Li, Zhuang Haibo. Finding the system of united development between constructing urban express rail traffic and development real estate: Case study in Guangzhou. Urban Planning Forum, 1998, (2): 30-34.
[田莉, 庄海波. 城市快速轨道交通建设和房地产联合开发的机制研究: 以广州市为例的思考. 城市规划汇刊, 1998, (2): 30-34.]

[17] Fang Xiangyang, Chen Zhongnuan. The distribution pattern and its cause of retailing business along the subway in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2004, 19(6): 11-16.
[方向阳, 陈忠暖. 广州地铁沿线零售商业形态与空间分布探讨. 人文地理, 2004, 19(6): 11-16.]

[18] Jin Jian, Zhang Dianye, Guo Zizheng. Demand mechanism model analysis of rational scale of urban rail transit network. Journal of the China Railway Society, 28(5): 16-20.
[金键, 张殿业, 郭孜政. 城市轨道交通合理规模激励及模型分析, 铁道学报, 2006, 28(5): 16-20.]

[19] Hu Huaying. Metro's passengers prediction model research in China: A case study in Guangzhou. Urban Affair, 1991, (5): 2-6.
[胡华颖. 中国城市地铁客流预测建模研究: 以广州为例. 城市问题, 1991, (5): 2-6.]

[20] Qing Wenjun, Liang Chengwen. Research in rational scale of Shenyang rapid rail transit. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(9): 48-50.
[秦文军, 梁成文. 沈阳市快速轨道交通合理规模研究. 城市规划, 1999, 23(9): 48-50.]

[21] Wang Xuan, Bai Tinghui. The integral construction of subway. Urban Planning Forum, 1999, (6): 36-39.
[王璇, 白延辉. 地铁的整合建设. 城市规划汇刊, 1999, (6): 36-39.]

[22] Pan Haixiao, Hui Ying. Construction of rail traffic and metropolitan development. Urban Planning Forum, 1999, (2): 12-17.
[潘海啸, 惠英. 轨道交通建设与都市发展. 城市规划汇刊, 1999, (2): 12-17.]

[23] Lu Ximing. The review of the Chinese rail system planning. City Planning Review, 24(7): 62-64.
[陆锡明. 我国城市轨道系统规划的反思. 城市规划, 2000, 24(7): 62-64.]

[24] Ovenden M. Metro maps of the world. Middlesex: Capital Transport Publishing, 2003.

[25] Cities, surface area (square kilometers) (discontinued)
[76 countries, 1983-1999]. Available from , Retrieved 4 December 2007.

世界城市地铁发展历程与规律

The Evolution of Worldwide Metro Systems: A Study on Their Scales and Network Indexes

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	古恒宇, 沈体雁. 中国高学历人才的空间演化特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 326-340.
[2]	朱晟君, 金文纨. 地方出口产品结构及制度环境与企业出口相关多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 398-414.
[3]	李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 周俊俊, 徐婷婷, 王皎贝. 中国失踪人口的时空格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 310-325.
[4]	葛全胜, 朱会义. 两千年来中国自然与人文地理环境变迁及启示[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 3-14.
[5]	张兴航, 张百平, 王晶, 余付勤, 赵超, 姚永慧. 中国南北过渡带东段样带植被序列与气候分界问题[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(1): 30-43.
[6]	李哲, 丁永建, 陈艾姣, 张智华, 张世强. 1960—2019年西北地区气候变化中的Hiatus现象及特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1845-1859.
[7]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 周亮, 王旭峰, 李振亚, 庞素菲, 颉斌斌. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1948-1965.
[8]	敖荣军, 常亮. 基于结构方程模型的中国县域人口老龄化影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1572-1584.
[9]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. 中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1603-1616.
[10]	马春玥, 买买提·沙吾提, 姚杰, 古丽努尔·依沙克. 1950—2015年中国棉花生产时空动态变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1699-1710.
[11]	郑景云, 张学珍, 刘洋, 郝志新. 过去千年中国不同区域干湿的多尺度变化特征评估[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1432-1450.
[12]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1451-1464.
[13]	瞿诗进, 胡守庚, 李全峰. 中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1539-1553.
[14]	魏素豪, 李晶, 李泽怡, 宗刚. 中国农业竞争力时空格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1287-1300.
[15]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.