地理学报

地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (10): 2489-2503.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202110011

• 城市与区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国资源型城市高质量发展综合评估及影响机理

崔丹1(), 卜晓燕2(), 徐祯1, 李国平1, 吴殿廷3   

  1. 1.北京大学政府管理学院,北京 100871
    2.宁夏大学地理科学与规划学院,银川 750021
    3.北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-05 修回日期:2021-04-19 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 卜晓燕(1979-), 女, 宁夏隆德人, 博士, 副教授, 主要从事生态经济和区域发展研究。E-mail: lantian_2007@163.com
  • 作者简介:崔丹(1985-), 女, 河南漯河人, 博士, 助理研究员, 主要从事区域经济和城市经济发展研究。E-mail: cuidan208@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA040);中国博士后基金(2019M660341);国家自然科学基金项目(41771128);国家自然科学基金项目(41901147);宁夏自然科学基金项目(2019AAC03251)

Comprehensive evaluation and impact mechanism of high-quality development of China's resource-based cities

CUI Dan1(), BU Xiaoyan2(), XU Zhen1, LI Guoping1, WU Dianting3   

  1. 1. School of Government, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    2. School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    3. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2020-11-05 Revised:2021-04-19 Published:2021-10-25 Online:2021-12-25
  • Supported by:
    Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China(20ZDA040);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2019M660341);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41771128);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901147);Ningxia Natural Science Foundation(2019AAC03251)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

摘要：

促进资源型城市转型升级与高质量发展,是中国全面实现高质量发展的难点和重点。对资源型城市高质量发展水平进行综合评估并分析其影响机理既能丰富相关理论研究,也具有重要的实践意义。基于马克思主义政治经济学,梳理和分析了新时代高质量发展的理论框架,系统构建了资源型城市高质量发展的指标体系,在此基础上综合测算了中国117个资源型城市的高质量发展水平,并深入分析了其影响机理。结果表明：① 2005—2017年资源型城市高质量发展水平持续增长,整体呈现显著的“东部相对较高、西部相对较低”的分布格局。② 高质量发展水平较高和较低的城市具有明显的区域集聚特征,但高质量发展水平局部不平衡性加剧,空间极化现象持续扩大。③ 不同成长阶段的城市高质量发展水平存在较大差别,其中,再生型城市高质量发展水平最高,而衰退型城市高质量发展水平最低。④ 资源型城市与省会城市或直辖市的距离、区位和海拔、城市的开放时间等均对资源型城市高质量发展水平有重要影响。

关键词: 高质量发展, 资源型城市, 熵值法, 影响机理, 中国

Abstract:

Promoting the transformation, upgrading, and high-quality development of resource-based cities is a key point to achieve high-quality development in China. The comprehensive evaluation of the high-quality development of resource-based cities and the analysis of its influence mechanism can not only enrich the relevant theoretical research, but also have important practical significance. Based on Marxist political economy, this paper reviews and analyzes the theoretical framework of high-quality development in the new era, and systematically constructs the index system of high-quality development of resource-based cities. On this basis, the high-quality development level of 117 resource-based cities is comprehensively estimated, and its influence mechanism is analyzed. The results show the following. (1) From 2005 to 2017, the high-quality development level of resource-based cities continued to grow, showing a significant spatial distribution pattern of "relatively high in the east, but relatively low in the west and northeast". (2) The cities with higher and lower high-quality development levels have obvious regional agglomeration characteristics, but the local imbalance of high-quality development level intensifies, and the phenomenon of spatial polarization continues to expand. (3) The high-quality development level of cities in different growth stages is quite different. Among them, the high-quality development level of regenerative cities is the highest, while that of declining cities is the lowest. (4) The distance between resource-based cities and provincial capital cities or municipalities directly under the central government, natural factors (such as location, and altitude of cities), and the open time of cities have an important impact on the high-quality development level of resource-based cities.

Key words: high-quality development, resource-based cities, entropy method, impact mechanism, China