微观视角下旅游情境人地关系的理论与经验

doi:10.11821/dlxb202110003

地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (10): 2360-2378.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202110003

微观视角下旅游情境人地关系的理论与经验

黄剑锋(), 陆林(), 宋玉

安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院旅游发展与规划研究中心,芜湖 241002

收稿日期:2020-05-28 修回日期:2021-07-05 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-12-25
通讯作者: 陆林(1962-), 男, 安徽芜湖人, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110000078M), 研究方向为旅游地理、旅游管理。E-mail: llin@263.net
作者简介:黄剑锋(1982-), 男, 安徽宣城人, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师, 研究方向为旅游者行为与旅游地治理、城镇化与乡村发展。E-mail: hjfengy@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41930644);国家自然科学基金项目(41401153);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJCZH060)

Theoretical and empirical exploration of human-environment relationship in tourism context from a microcosmic perspective

HUANG Jianfeng(), LU Lin(), SONG Yu

School of Geography and Tourism, Centre for Tourism Research and Planning, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, Anhui, China

Received:2020-05-28 Revised:2021-07-05 Published:2021-10-25 Online:2021-12-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41930644);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41401153);Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of China(19YJCZH060)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旅游现象与活动中的人地关系是旅游研究中的跨学科议题,但目前微观心理与行为视角下的旅游情境人地关系研究尚有不足。本文检视了旅游情境人地关系研究的特殊性和多元性,探究了微观视角下旅游情境人地关系研究的经验化路径,以旅游者行为意愿为例对人—地二元环境刺激促成人—地交互及行为反应的可能机制进行了理论推导和实证检验,并分析了上述理论与经验探讨对于旅游情境人地关系研究的启示。研究表明：① 旅游情境人地关系研究具有多元对象、层次、范式及方法论,存在4种主要情形和2种典型范式。② 心理—行为范式是拓展人地关系研究的重要方向,提炼具体问题和聚焦具体变量是微观视角下旅游情境人地关系研究经验化及本体论化的关键环节。③ 认知和情感形象、地方依恋、行为意愿等构成的经验模型是对人—地二元到人—地交互理论逻辑的一种刻画,为旅游者行为提供了一个可能的人地关系解释。④ 微观视角下旅游者行为意愿的形成经历了地的功能与人的情感两个向度环境刺激、地方依恋人地联结有机体、行为反应之间的传导过程。⑤ 微观视角下旅游情境人地关系研究需把握人地关系主题与旅游现象特性、完善多元尺度和范式、推进理论的经验化、注重方法的问题导向和理论意义。

关键词: 人地关系, 旅游情境, 微观视角, 研究范式, 旅游者行为, 刺激—有机体—反应

Abstract:

The human-environment relationship in tourism phenomenon and activity is an interdisciplinary subject with theoretical and practical significance. However, human-environment relationship research in tourism context is distinctive due to the particularity and comprehensiveness of tourism phenomenon, with certain psychological and behavioral research gaps on ontological level and from microcosmic perspective. This paper, firstly, investigates the research pluralism as well as the basic situations and typical paradigms of human-environment relationship in tourism context, and probes into the possible empiricalization and ontologization approach to human-environment relationship research in the tourism context from a microcosmic perspective; and then it explores a possible theoretical mechanism of which dualistic human-environment stimulus leads to human-environment relationship and then to behavioral response in case of tourist behavioral intention based on stimulus-organism-response theory, and tests the hypothesized model based on empirical data collected in a typical study site; finally, it analyzes the inspiration for human-environment relationship research in tourism context stemmed from the above theoretical and empirical research. The research indicates the following: (1) There are four basic situations and two typical paradigms in human-environment relationship research in tourism context, which are diverse in research objects, scales, paradigms and methodologies. (2) The psychological-behavioral paradigm is an important direction to expand human-environment relationship research, while proposing concrete questions and focusing on specific variables are the key approach to empiricalization and ontologization of human-environment relationship research in the tourism context from a microcosmic perspective. (3) The empirical model composed of perceived cognitive image and affective image, place attachment as well as behavioral intention reflects the theoretical logic of human-environment duality to human-environment relationship to a certain extent, which provides a possible microcosmic explanation for human-environment relationship in tourist behavior. (4) The formation of tourist behavioral intention from a microcosmic perspective has experienced a transformation from two dimensional stimulus oriented to environmental function and human affection to human-environment organism of place attachment and then to behavioral response. (5) The human-environment relationship research in the tourism context from a microcosmic perspective requires that we grasp the theme of human-environment relationship and characteristics of tourism phenomena, improve diverse perspectives, scales and paradigms, promote the empiricalization of grand theories, and emphasize problem orientation and theoretical significance of certain methods and techniques.

Key words: human-environment relationship, tourism context, microcosmic perspective, research paradigm, tourist behavior, stimulus-organism-response

黄剑锋, 陆林, 宋玉. 微观视角下旅游情境人地关系的理论与经验[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(10): 2360-2378.

HUANG Jianfeng, LU Lin, SONG Yu. Theoretical and empirical exploration of human-environment relationship in tourism context from a microcosmic perspective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(10): 2360-2378.

图/表 7

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

表4

图3

参考文献 90

[1]	Bao Jigang, Zhang Jie, Xu Honggang, et al. Tourism geography in China: Between hometown and alien land. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(5):803-823. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201705001
	[ 保继刚, 张捷, 徐红罡, 等. 中国旅游地理研究: 在他乡与故乡之间. 地理研究, 2017, 36(5):803-823.]
[2]	Zhang Lingyun. A study on consumers' behavior and phenomenon under unusual environment. Tourism Tribune, 2008, 23(10):12-16.
	[ 张凌云. 旅游学研究的新框架: 对非惯常环境下消费者行为和现象的研究. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(10):12-16.]
[3]	Wu Chuanjun. Man-earth areal system: The core of geographical study. Economic Geography, 1991, 11(3):1-6. doi: 10.2307/140646
	[ 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991, 11(3):1-6.]
[4]	Huang Zhenfang, Huang Rui. The theoretical perspective and academic innovation of tourism geography based on human-environment interactions. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(1):15-26. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201501002
	[ 黄震方, 黄睿. 基于人地关系的旅游地理学理论透视与学术创新. 地理研究, 2015, 34(1):15-26.]
[5]	Gössling S. Human-environmental relations with tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002, 29(2):539-556. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00069-X
[6]	Beery T H, Wolf-Watz D. Nature to place: Rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, 40:198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.006
[7]	Telbisz T, Imecs Z, Mari L, et al. Changing human-environment interactions in medium mountains: The Apuseni Mts (Romania) as a case study. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13(9):1675-1687. doi: 10.1007/s11629-015-3653-0
[8]	Buckley L B, Foushee M S. Footprints of climate change in US national park visitation. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2012, 56(6):1173-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00484-011-0508-4 pmid: 22109104
[9]	Gaughan A E, Binford M W, Southworth J. Tourism, forest conversion, and land transformations in the Angkor basin, Cambodia. Applied Geography, 2009, 29(2):212-223. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.09.007
[10]	Hoang H T T, Vanacker V, van Rompaey A, et al. Changing human-landscape interactions after development of tourism in the northern Vietnamese Highlands. Anthropocene, 2014, 5:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2014.08.003
[11]	Feng Weihong. Quantitative analysis of ectourism region system evolution based on man-land relationship. Human Geography, 2006, 21(4):74-78.
	[ 冯卫红. 基于人地关系的生态旅游地域系统演变定量分析. 人文地理, 2006, 21(4):74-78.]
[12]	Student J, Kramer M R, Steinmann P. Simulating emerging coastal tourism vulnerabilities: An agent-based modelling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 2020, 85:103034. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.103034. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.103034
[13]	Yin Peng, Liu Shuguang, Duan Peili. Analysis on the vulnerability and obstacle indicators in island-type tourism destination: Take Zhoushan City for example. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(10):234-240.
	[ 尹鹏, 刘曙光, 段佩利. 海岛型旅游目的地脆弱性及其障碍因子分析: 以舟山市为例. 经济地理, 2017, 37(10):234-240.]
[14]	Chen Jia, Yang Xinjun, Wang Ziqiao, et al. Vulnerability and influence mechanisms of rural tourism socio-ecological systems: A household survey in China's Qinling mountain area. Tourism Tribune, 2015, 30(3):64-75.
	[ 陈佳, 杨新军, 王子侨, 等. 乡村旅游社会—生态系统脆弱性及影响机理: 基于秦岭景区农户调查数据的分析. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(3):64-75.]
[15]	Giddy J K, Webb N L. The influence of the environment on adventure tourism: From motivations to experiences. Current Issues in Tourism, 2018, 21(18):2124-2138.
[16]	Li Yaoqi, Guan Xinhua. From "people-brand" relationship to "people-destination" relationship: The effects of self-destination connection. Tourism Tribune, 2015, 30(9):52-62.
	[ 黎耀奇, 关新华. 从人—品牌关系到人—地关系: 自我目的地联结. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(9):52-62.]
[17]	Zhou Lingqiang, Li Qiucheng, Zhu Lin. Outcome efficacy, people-destination affect, and tourists' enviromentally responsible behavior intention: A revised model based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2014, 44(2):88-98.
	[ 周玲强, 李秋成, 朱琳. 行为效能、人地情感与旅游者环境负责行为意愿: 一个基于计划行为理论的改进模型. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 44(2):88-98.]
[18]	Tan S K, Tan S H, Kok Y S, et al. Sense of place and sustainability of intangible cultural heritage: The case of George Town and Melaka. Tourism Management, 2018, 67:376-387. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.012
[19]	Buzinde C N, Manuel-Navarrete D, Yoo E E, et al. Tourists' perceptions in a climate of change: Eroding destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(2):333-354. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2009.09.006
[20]	Hua H L, Zhou S Y, Ding Z Q, et al. The change mechanism of human-environment interactions from the perspective of contextualization: A case study of the Honghe Hani rice terraces as a world cultural heritage site. Sustainability, 2018, 10(7):2230. DOI: 10.3390/su10072230. doi: 10.3390/su10072230
[21]	Sun Jiuxia, Pang Zhaoling, Wang Xueji. Modernity colonization and local response: Development practice of minority salt tourism community. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(4):214-222.
	[ 孙九霞, 庞兆玲, 王学基. 现代性拓殖与地方响应: 少数民族盐业旅游社区的发展实践. 经济地理, 2020, 40(4):214-222.]
[22]	Guo Wen, Huang Zhenfang. Tourism and multi-dimensional production and identity construction of the "home" in Zhudi village. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(4):907-921. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181359
	[ 郭文, 黄震方. 旅游与竹地摩梭人“家”空间的多维生产及身份认同建构. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4):907-921.]
[23]	Lu Dadao. The value of geographical science and the feelings of geographers. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(10):1539-1551. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201510001
	[ 陆大道. 地理科学的价值与地理学者的情怀. 地理学报, 2015, 70(10):1539-1551.]
[24]	Zhou Xiaohong. Sociology theories' basic paradigms and the possibility of a more integrated sociological paradigm. Sociological Research, 2002, 17(5):33-45.
	[ 周晓虹. 社会学理论的基本范式及整合的可能性. 社会学研究, 2002, 17(5):33-45.]
[25]	Cai Yunlong, Ye Chao, Chen Yanguang, et al. Methodology of Geography. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.
	[ 蔡运龙, 叶超, 陈彦光, 等. 地理学方法论, 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.]
[26]	Bishop R. The Philosophy of the Social Sciences: An Introduction. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.
	[ 罗伯特·毕夏普. 社会科学哲学: 导论. 王亚男, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.]
[27]	Harvey D. Explanation in Geography. Gao Yongyuan, Liu Lihua, Cai Yunlong, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2009.
	[ 大卫·哈维. 地理学中的解释. 高泳源, 刘立华, 蔡运龙, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009.]
[28]	Cai Yunlong. A paradigm of the research on man-earth relationship: Philosophical and ethical speculations. Human Geography, 1996, 11(1):1-6.
	[ 蔡运龙. 人地关系研究范型: 哲学与伦理思辩. 人文地理, 1996, 11(1):1-6.]
[29]	Buttimer A. Diverse perspectives on society and environment: Plenary lecture at the 32th International Geographical Congress. Zhou Shangyi, Wu Liping, Zhang Yichen trans. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(3):323-331.
	[ 安·布蒂默. 多元视角下的人地关系研究: 在第32届国际地理大会上的主题演讲. 周尚意, 吴莉萍, 张镱宸, 译. 地理学科进展, 2013, 32(3):323-331.]
[30]	Meng Bin, Wang Jinfeng. A review on the methodology of scaling with geo-data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2):277-288.
	[ 孟斌, 王劲峰. 地理数据尺度转换方法研究进展. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2):277-288.]
[31]	Wang Xingzhong. On the main models of man-earth relationship in human geography. Human Geography, 1991, 6(2):48-53.
	[ 王兴中. 人—地行为的主要模式(型)论. 人文地理, 1991, 6(2):48-53.]
[32]	Lu Lachang. Discussion on scientific paradigm of man-environment relationship. Human Geography, 1998, 13(2):14-17.
	[ 吕拉昌. 人地关系操作范式探讨. 人文地理, 1998, 13(2):14-17.]
[33]	Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. Jin Wulun, Hu Xinhe. trans. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012.
	[ 托马斯·库恩. 科学革命的结构. 4版. 金吾伦, 胡新和, 译北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.]
[34]	Babbie E R. The Practice of Social Research. 11th ed. Qiu Zeqi, trans. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2018.
	[ 艾尔·巴比. 社会研究方法. 11版. 邱泽奇, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2018.]
[35]	Lu Dadao. Theoretical studies of man-land system as the core of geographical science. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(2):135-145.
	[ 陆大道. 关于地理学的“人—地系统”理论研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(2):135-145.]
[36]	Fan Jie. "Territorial system of human-environment interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4):597-607.
	[ 樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):597-607.]
[37]	Lu Dadao. The framework document of "Future Earth" and the development of Chinese geographical science: The foresight of Academician Huang Bingwei's statement. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408001
	[ 陆大道. “未来地球”框架文件与中国地理科学的发展: 从“未来地球”框架文件看黄秉维先生论断的前瞻性. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1043-1051.]
[38]	Zhang Xiaoming, Weng Jiaming. From "sense of place" to "human-place association": A human-place relationship in the Guangzhou Tianhe Sports Center public leisure space. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(7):1581-1593. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180830
	[ 张骁鸣, 翁佳茗. 从“地方感”到“人地相处”: 以广州天河体育中心公共休闲空间中的人地关系为例. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7):1581-1593.]
[39]	Chai Yanwei, Tan Yiming, Shen Yue, et al. Space-behavior interaction theory: Basic thinking of general construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710012
	[ 柴彦威, 谭一洺, 申悦, 等. 空间—行为互动理论构建的基本思路. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970.]
[40]	Cai Xiaomei, Zhu Hong. Towards a beautiful life in the new era: An introduction to the issue of "everyday life geography and urban-rural leisure". Geographical Research, 2019, 38(7):1557-1565. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190497
	[ 蔡晓梅, 朱竑. 新时代面向美好生活的日常生活地理与城乡休闲: “生活地理与城乡休闲”专栏解读. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7):1557-1565.]
[41]	Yuan Fang, Wang Hansheng. Social Research Methods. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2013.
	[ 袁方, 王汉生. 社会研究方法教程, 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2013.]
[42]	Jorgensen B S, Stedman R C. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21(3):233-248. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0226
[43]	Hidalgo M C, Hernández B. Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21(3):273-281. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
[44]	Scannell L, Gifford R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
[45]	Lewicka M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2011, 31(3):207-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
[46]	Merton R K. Social Theory and Social Structure. Tang Shaojie, Qi Xin, et al. trans. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2015.
	[ 罗伯特·K·默顿. 社会理论和社会结构. 唐少杰, 齐心, 等, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2015.]
[47]	Zhang Chen, Huang Zhenfang. Constructing the theoretical model of "tri-space" interaction in the tourism context. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(2):232-242.
	[ 张郴, 黄震方. 旅游地三元空间交互理论模型建构. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2):232-242.]
[48]	Student J, Lamers M, Amelung B. A dynamic vulnerability approach for tourism destinations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020, 28(3):475-496. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1682593
[49]	Cai Yunlong. A paradigm of the research on man-earth relationship: Global positivist study. Human Geography, 1996, 11(3):3-8.
	[ 蔡运龙. 人地关系研究范型: 全球实证. 人文地理, 1996, 11(3):3-8.]
[50]	Liu Dachun. An Introduction to Dialectics of Nature. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2004.
	[ 刘大椿. 自然辩证法概论. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2004.]
[51]	Nagel E. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Xu Xiangdong, trans. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2002.
	[ 欧内斯特·内格尔. 科学的结构: 科学说明的逻辑问题. 徐向东, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2002.]
[52]	Chen Xiaoping, Shen Wei. Empirical Methods in Organization and Management Research. 3rd ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2018.
	[ 陈晓萍, 沈伟. 组织与管理研究的实证方法. 3版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.]
[53]	Mehrabian A, Russell J A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.
[54]	Slama M E, Tashchian A. Validating the S-O-R paradigm for consumer involvement with a convenience good. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1987, 15(1):36-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02721952
[55]	Donovan R J, Rossiter J R. Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 1982, 58(1):34-57.
[56]	Su Lujun, He Xuehuan, Hu Dongbin, et al. A study on the impact mechanism of service quality on tourists resistance to negative information: Based on the framework of Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R). Tourism Science, 2017, 31(6):30-51.
	[ 粟路军, 何学欢, 胡东滨, 等. 服务质量对旅游者抵制负面信息意愿的影响机制研究: 基于Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R)分析框架. 旅游科学, 2017, 31(6):30-51.]
[57]	Liu Weimei, Lin Derong. Mechanism of word-of-mouth tourism recommendations based on destination trust. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(10):63-74.
	[ 刘卫梅, 林德荣. 基于信任的旅游目的地口碑推荐机制研究. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(10):63-74.]
[58]	Su L J, Swanson S R. The effect of destination social responsibility on tourist environmentally responsible behavior: Compared analysis of first-time and repeat tourists. Tourism Management, 2017, 60:308-321. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.12.011
[59]	Yüksel A. Tourist shopping habitat: Effects on emotions, shopping value and behaviours. Tourism Management, 2007, 28(1):58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.07.017
[60]	Baloglu S, McCleary K W. A model of destination image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999, 26(4):868-897. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4
[61]	San Martín H, Rodríguez del Bosque I A. Exploring the cognitive-affective nature of destination image and the role of psychological factors in its formation. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(2):263-277. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.012
[62]	Tuan Yifu. Topophilia: Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. Zhi Cheng, Liu Su, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2018.
	[ 段义孚. 恋地情结. 志丞, 刘苏, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2018.]
[63]	Manzo L C. Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 23(1):47-61. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
[64]	Moser G. Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person-environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 29(3):351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.002
[65]	Hettner A. Geography: Its History, Nature and Methods. Wang Lansheng, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2009.
	[ 阿尔夫雷德·赫特纳. 地理学: 它的历史、性质和方法. 王兰生, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009.]
[66]	Zhang H M, Fu X X, Cai L A, et al. Destination image and tourist loyalty: A meta-analysis. Tourism Management, 2014, 40:213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.006
[67]	Gallarza M G, Saura I G, Garcı́a H C. Destination image: Towards a conceptual framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002, 29(1):56-78. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00031-7
[68]	Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
[69]	Cai Yunlong. A paradigm of the research on man-earth relationship: Positive study of territorial system. Human Geography, 1998, 13(2):7-13.
	[ 蔡运龙. 人地关系研究范型: 地域系统实证. 人文地理, 1998, 13(2):7-13.]
[70]	Hawkins D I, Mothersbaugh D L. Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. 12th ed. Fu Guoqun, et al. trans Beijing: China Machine Press, 2014.
	[ 德尔·I·霍金斯, 戴维·L·马瑟斯博. 消费者行为学. 12版. 符国群, 等, 译. 北京, 机械工业出版社, 2014.]
[71]	Lin C C, Lockwood M. Forms and sources of place attachment: Evidence from two protected areas. Geoforum, 2014, 53:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.008
[72]	Williams D R, Vaske J J. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 2003, 49(6):830-840.
[73]	Gursoy D, Gavcar E. International leisure tourists' involvement profile. Annals of Tourism Research, 2003, 30(4):906-926. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(03)00059-8
[74]	Lee K H, Scott N, Packer J. Habitus and food lifestyle: In-destination activity participation of Slow Food members. Annals of Tourism Research, 2014, 48:207-220. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.06.009
[75]	Huang L Y, Gursoy D, Xu H G. Impact of personality traits and involvement on prior knowledge. Annals of Tourism Research, 2014, 48:42-57. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.05.010
[76]	Prayag G, Ryan C. Antecedents of tourists′ loyalty to Mauritius: The role and influence of destination image, place attachment, personal involvement, and satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 2012, 51(3):342-356. doi: 10.1177/0047287511410321
[77]	Kyle G, Graefe A, Manning R, et al. An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Journal of Leisure Research, 2003, 35(3):249-273. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2003.11949993
[78]	Yuksel A, Yuksel F, Bilim Y. Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty. Tourism Management, 2010, 31(2):274-284. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.007
[79]	Kim J H. The impact of memorable tourism experiences on loyalty behaviors: The mediating effects of destination image and satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 2018, 57(7):856-870. doi: 10.1177/0047287517721369
[80]	Tu Hongwei, Xiong Linying, Huang Yimin, et al. The effect of destination image on tourist behavior intention: An explanation based on the Emotion Appraisal Theory. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(2):32-41.
	[ 涂红伟, 熊琳英, 黄逸敏, 等. 目的地形象对游客行为意愿的影响: 基于情绪评价理论. 旅游学刊, 2017, 32(2):32-41.]
[81]	Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903. pmid: 14516251
[82]	Wu Minglong. Practice of Questionnaire Statistical Analysis: Operation and Application of SPSS. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010.
	[ 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.]
[83]	Wu Minglong. Structural Equation Model: Operation and Application of AMOS. 2nd ed. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010.
	[ 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS的操作与应用. 2版. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.]
[84]	Wu Minglong. Structural Equation Model: Advanced Practice of Amos. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2013.
	[ 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: Amos实务进阶. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2013.]
[85]	Baron R M, Kenny D A. The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6):1173-1182. pmid: 3806354
[86]	Preacher K J, Hayes A F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 2008, 40(3):879-891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
[87]	Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
[88]	Fu Bojie, Leng Shuying, Song Changqing. The characteristics and tasks of geography in the new era. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(8):939-945. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.08.939
	[ 傅伯杰, 冷疏影, 宋长青. 新时期地理学的特征与任务. 地理科学, 2015, 35(8):939-945.]
[89]	Liu Yungang, Lu Dadao, Bao Jigang, et al. How to revive geography: Our reflection and practice. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6):1049-1069. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201806001
	[ 刘云刚, 陆大道, 保继刚, 等. 如何回归地理学: 我的思考与实践. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6):1049-1069.]
[90]	Zhan Dongsheng, Zhang Wenzhong, Yu Jianhui, et al. Application of questionnaire survey method in human geography studies in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(6):899-913. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201606001
	[ 湛东升, 张文忠, 余建辉, 等. 问卷调查方法在中国人文地理学研究的应用. 地理学报, 2016, 71(6):899-913.]

变量	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1.性别	1
2.年龄	-0.033	1
3.教育程度	-0.050	-0.041	1
4.旅游次数	-0.060	0.135^**	-0.108^**	1
5.认知形象	-0.031	0.014	-0.088^*	-0.036	(0.738)
6.情感形象	-0.043	-0.016	-0.079^*	-0.033	0.565^**	(0.851)
7.地方依恋	-0.012	0.038	-0.060	0.003	0.440^**	0.560^**	(0.719)
8.行为意愿	-0.024	0.060	-0.068	-0.047	0.512^**	0.626^**	0.659^**	(0.795)
9.旅游涉入	-0.052	0.029	-0.030	0.021	0.394^**	0.479^**	0.348^**	0.490^**	(0.805)
均值	1.514	2.973	2.818	1.776	3.859	3.960	3.442	3.723	4.017
标准差	0.504	0.920	0.680	0.862	0.641	0.689	0.675	0.704	0.684

变量	地方依恋		行为意愿
变量	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	M6	M7
性别	0.003	0.014	-0.010	-0.012	0.002	-0.004	-0.020
年龄	0.029	0.045	0.057	0.042	0.075	0.055	0.042
教育程度	-0.019	-0.012	-0.025	-0.015	-0.019	-0.014	-0.034
旅游次数	0.013	0.015	-0.040	-0.047	-0.038	-0.045	-0.059
认知形象	0.438^***		0.507^***	0.271^***
情感形象		0.561^***			0.624^***	0.374^***
地方依恋				0.537^***		0.447^***	0.655^***
R²	0.195	0.316	0.267	0.499	0.398	0.535	0.440
∆R²	0.190	0.311	0.254	0.232	0.385	0.522	0.427
F	30.022^***	57.281^***	45.054^***	102.592^***	82.008^***	118.526^***	97.289^***
∆F	146.137^***	281.729^***	214.549^***	286.536^***	396.972^***	347.141^***	472.410^***

变量	地方依恋						行为意愿
变量	M8	M9	M10	M11	M12	M13	M14	M15	M16
性别	-0.014	0.010	0.010	-0.014	0.017	0.013	-0.030	-0.007	-0.007
年龄	0.036	0.025	0.023	0.036	0.042	0.035	0.065	0.038	0.034
教育程度	-0.061	-0.020	-0.020	-0.061	-0.013	-0.010	-0.073	-0.031	-0.028
旅游次数	-0.009	0.006	0.005	-0.009	0.012	0.012	-0.065	-0.064	-0.063
认知形象		0.357^***	0.367^***
情感形象					0.512^***	0.517^***
地方依恋								0.552^***	0.549^***
旅游涉入		0.206^***	0.216^***		0.102^**	0.113^**		0.297^***	0.306^***
认知形象×旅游涉入			0.076^*
情感形象×旅游涉入						0.068^*
地方依恋×旅游涉入									0.042
R²	0.005	0.231	0.236	0.005	0.324	0.328	0.013	0.517	0.519
∆R²	0.005	0.226	0.005	0.005	0.319	0.004	0.013	0.504	0.002
F	0.805	30.951^***	27.311^***	0.805	49.435^***	43.142^***	1.995	110.370^***	95.073^***
∆F	0.805	90.779^***	4.437^*	0.805	145.942^***	3.967^*	1.995	322.987^***	2.106

作用路径	调节变量	前半段		后半段
作用路径	调节变量	间接效应	95%置信区间	间接效应	95%置信区间
认知形象→地方依恋 →行为意愿	高旅游涉入	0.244^***	[0.178, 0.313]	0.306^***	[0.242, 0.371]
	低旅游涉入	0.190^***	[0.123, 0.256]	0.289^***	[0.220, 0.363]
	组间差异	0.054	[0.002, 0.135]	0.016	[-0.028, 0.077]
情感形象→地方依恋 →行为意愿	高旅游涉入	0.280^***	[0.216, 0.364]	0.329^***	[0.266, 0.404]
	低旅游涉入	0.244^***	[0.188, 0.311]	0.310^***	[0.245, 0.386]
	组间差异	0.037	[0.001, 0.081]	0.019	[-0.012, 0.064]

微观视角下旅游情境人地关系的理论与经验

Theoretical and empirical exploration of human-environment relationship in tourism context from a microcosmic perspective

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 90

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.
[2]	谈明洪, 李秀彬. 从本土到全球网络化的人地关系思维范式转型[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(10): 2333-2342.
[3]	杨庆媛, 罗奎, 劳昕. 基于地理学视角的国际空间规划嬗变与启示[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1223-1236.
[4]	赵成双苹, 莫多闻. 长江中游江汉—洞庭盆地全新世以来水文环境演变与人类活动[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(3): 529-543.
[5]	陆大道, 刘彦随, 方创琳, 陈明星, 王姣娥, 席建超. 人文与经济地理学的发展和展望[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2570-2592.
[6]	童昀, 马勇, 刘海猛. COVID-19疫情对中国城市人口迁徙的短期影响及城市恢复力评价[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2505-2520.
[7]	杨宇,李小云,董雯,洪辉,何则,金凤君,刘毅. 中国人地关系综合评价的理论模型与实证[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(6): 1063-1078.
[8]	胡国建, 陈传明, 金星星, 王强. 中国城市体系网络化研究[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 681-693.
[9]	周亮, 车磊, 周成虎. 中国城市绿色发展效率时空演变特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2027-2044.
[10]	王玉明,王瑞康. 城市化时期郊区土地利用结构信息熵上升的原因[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1647-1657.
[11]	周扬,郭远智,刘彦随. 中国县域贫困综合测度及2020年后减贫瞄准[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1478-1493.
[12]	樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 597-607.
[13]	黄骁力, 丁浒, 那嘉明, 汤国安. 地貌发育演化研究的空代时理论与方法[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 94-104.
[14]	李小云, 杨宇, 刘毅. 中国人地关系演进及其资源环境基础研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(12): 2067-2088.
[15]	李双成, 王珏, 朱文博, 张津, 刘娅, 高阳, 王阳, 李琰. 基于空间与区域视角的生态系统服务地理学框架[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639.