关中—天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系

doi:10.11821/dlxb201511006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

关中—天水经济区是西部大开发规划中提出的需要重点发展的第三个经济区,经济迅速发展的同时带给生态环境巨大压力,因此研究关中—天水经济区的生态系统服务变化以及生态系统服务之间的关系,对经济区的可持续发展具有重要意义。本文测算了2000年至2010年关中—天水经济区的净初级生产力（NPP）、保水量以及土壤侵蚀量——反映狭义上的保土服务功能（减少土壤侵蚀）,引入玫瑰图以及生产可能性边界方法研究这三种生态系统服务之间的权衡和协同关系,并对2030年关中—天水经济区的土地利用类型进行情景模拟,在不同情景下研究净初级生产力（NPP）保水以及土壤侵蚀三者的空间分布和相互之间权衡和协同关系。结果表明：NPP与保水之间存在协同关系,NPP的增加会促进保水量的提高,反过来,保水量的增加有利于NPP的积累;NPP与土壤侵蚀以及保水与土壤侵蚀之间为权衡关系,NPP、保水的增长有利于减少土壤侵蚀,增加土壤保持量;保护情景下获得的NPP与保水量最多,土壤侵蚀量最少,是最优的土地利用类型方案,最有利于生态环境;不同情景下NPP与土壤侵蚀以及保水与土壤侵蚀之间也存在权衡关系。

关键词: 净初级生产力, 土壤侵蚀, 保水, 权衡, 情景, 关中—天水经济区

Abstract:

Natural ecosystems offer society important goods and services. With the rapid population growth and ongoing natural resource use, humans have enhanced the production of some services at the expense of others. This paper examines changes in ecosystem services, and the relationship between ecosystem services, in Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region. These ecosystem changes are of great significance to the sustainable development of this economic region. The methods of "rose map" and "production possibilities frontiers (PPFs)" are applied to evaluate the trade-offs and co-benefits between NPP, water conservation, and soil erosion. Furthermore, the CASA (Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach) model, ULSE (Universal Soil Loss Equation) model, and the water storage capacity method are used to estimate net primary productivity (NPP), water conservation, and soil erosion. The study takes soil retention (the reduction of soil erosion) as a model ecosystem service, using 2000-2010 data from the study area. Three land use strategy scenarios - planning, exploitation and protection - are applied to evaluate potential changes in ecosystem services and trade-offs between NPP, water conservation, and soil erosion. The study reveals noticeable trade-offs between NPP, water conservation, and soil erosion, with co-benefits from NPP and water conservation. There are also trade-offs between NPP, water conservation, and soil erosion under the three scenarios. The "protection" scenario is the most favorable land use strategy for regulating ecosystem service capacity; that scenario results in the highest NPP, water conservation, and soil retention. The results could impact natural capital and ecosystem services planning, management, and land use decision-making.

Key words: NPP, water conservation, soil erosion, trade-offs, scenarios, Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region

杨晓楠, 李晶, 秦克玉, 李婷, 刘婧雅. 关中—天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773.

Xiaonan YANG, Jing LI, Keyu QIN, Ting LI, Jingya LIU. Trade-offs between ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 28

[1]	Daily G. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, 1997. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0992.1998.00083.x
[2]	Assessment M E.Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005. doi: 10.1023/A:1006890513754
[3]	Rodríguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M, et al.Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 28. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.06.002
[4]	Leh M D K, Matlock M D, Cummings E C, et al. Qua.pngying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 165: 6-18.
[5]	Ii Shuangcheng, Zhang Caiyu, Liu Jinlong, et al.The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390.
	[李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390.]
[6]	Dymond J R, Ausseil A G, Ekanayake J C, et al.Tradeoffs between soil, water, and carbon: A national scale analysis from New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 95(1): 124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.019 pmid: 22115517
[7]	Schrobback P, Adamson D, Quiggin J.Turning water into carbon: Carbon sequestration and water flow in the Murray-Darling Basin. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 49(1): 23-45. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9422-1
[8]	Hall J M, Holt T, Daniels A E, et al.Trade-offs between tree cover, carbon storage and floristic biodiversity in reforesting landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2012, 27(8): 1135-1147. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9755-y
[9]	Palmer C, Silber T.Trade-offs between carbon sequestration and rural incomes in the N'hambita Community Carbon Project, Mozambique. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(1): 83-93.
[10]	Onaindia M, De Manuel B F, Madariaga I, et al. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 289: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.010
[11]	Paterson S, Bryan B A.Food-Carbon Trade-offs between agriculture and reforestation land uses under alternate market-based policies. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17(3). doi: 10.5751/ES-04959-170321
[12]	Fu Bojie, Zhang Liwei.Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
	[傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
[13]	Zander K K, Garnett S T, Straton A.Trade-offs between development, culture and conservation: Willingness to pay for tropical river management among urban Australians. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(12): 2519-2528. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.012 pmid: 20724063
[14]	Abbiati M, Mistri M, Bartoli M, et al.Trade-off between conservation and exploitation of the transitional water ecosystems of the northern Adriatic Sea. Chemistry and Ecology, 2010, 26: 105-119. doi: 10.1080/02757541003693193
[15]	Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al.Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7(1): 4-11. doi: 10.1890/080023
[16]	Bai Yang, Ouyang Zhiyuan, Zheng Hua, et al.Modeling soil conservation, water conservation and their tradeoffs: A case study in Beijing. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2012, 24(3): 419-426. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60790-0 pmid: 22655354
[17]	Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B.Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993, 7(4): 811-841. doi: 10.1029/93GB02725
[18]	Field C B, Randerson J T, Malmström C M.Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1995, 51(1): 74-88. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-V
[19]	Zhang Yili, Qi Wei, Zhou Caiping, et al.Spatial and temporal variability in the net primary production (NPP) of alpine grassland on Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2009. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(9): 1197-1211. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201309004
	[张镱锂, 祁威, 周才平, 等. 青藏高原高寒草地净初级生产力(NPP)时空分异. 地理学报, 2013, 68(9): 1197-1211.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201309004
[20]	LI Jing, Ren Zhiyuan.Spation temporal change of water conservation value of Loess Plateau ecosystem in northern Shaanxi province. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(2): 240-244.
	[李晶, 任志远. 陕北黄土高原生态系统涵养水源价值的时空变化. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(2): 240-244.]
[21]	Wang Wanzhong, Jiao Juying. Qutantitative evaluation on factors influencing soil erosion in China. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996(5): 1-20.
	[王万忠, 焦菊英. 中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究. 水土保持通报, 1996(5): 1-20.]
[22]	Bonnisseau J M, Cornet B.Valuation equilibrium and pareto optimum in non-convex economies. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1988, 17(2/3): 293-308. doi: 10.1016/0304-4068(88)90012-2
[23]	Gren I M, Svensson L, Carlsson M, et al.Policy design for a mu.pngunctional landscape. Regional Environmental Change, 2010, 10(4): 339-348. doi: 10.1007/s10113-009-0105-9
[24]	Lee M Y.Economic tradeoffs in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem: Herring and whale-watching. Marine Policy, 2010, 34(1): 156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.06.001
[25]	He Chunyang, Shi Peijun, LI Jinggang, et al.Scenarios simulation land use change in the northen China by system dynamic model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(4): 599-607.
	[何春阳, 史培军, 李景刚, 等. 中国北方未来土地利用变化情景模拟. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 599-607.]
[26]	Qin Xianhong, Duan Xuejun, Yang Jian.Scenarios simulation of urban land use allocation and scheme evaluation based on GIS: A case study of Taicang City. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(9): 1121-1129.
	[秦贤宏, 段学军, 杨剑. 基于GIS的城市用地布局多情景模拟与方案评价: 以江苏省太仓市为例. 地理学报, 2010, 65(9): 1121-1129.]
[27]	Jia Xiaoqing, Fu Bojie, Feng Xiaoming, et al.The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 43: 103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.028
[28]	Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al.Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 2012, 109(19): 7565-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201040109 pmid: 22529388