旅游与文化地理

自我叙事式解读回族宗教活动空间的意义

展开
  • 1. 陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院, 西安 710062;
    2. 北京大学光华管理学院, 北京 100871
白凯(1974-),男,博士,副教授,中国地理学会会员(S110006543M),主要研究方向为文化地理学、旅游心理与行为。E-mail:baikaifrance@yahoo.com.cn;baikai@snnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2012-03-10

  修回日期: 2012-10-09

  网络出版日期: 2012-12-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目 (41271157;40961006)

The Self-narrative Style Interpretation of Hui's Religious Activity Space

Expand
  • 1. School of Tourism and Environment, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China;
    2. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received date: 2012-03-10

  Revised date: 2012-10-09

  Online published: 2012-12-20

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271157;No.40961006

摘要

基于主位研究视角,以作者自我叙事的方式,对回族宗教活动空间的存在主义意涵进行了主体意向性解读,完整自叙和沉浸思考后作者认为,回族宗教活动空间存在以下特征:① 回族宗教活动空间的核心构成为家、清真寺和坟园;② 家、清真寺和坟园对回族宗教信仰者而言,不是单一的物理空间,而是具有特殊意义的宗教“地方”;③ 说明了回族宗教活动空间具有地方到无地方的转化特征,无地方转换的地方指向是清真寺;④ “接都哇”这一宗教仪式和宗教行为构建了回族宗教活动空间从空间到地方,从地方到无地方转换的桥梁。该分析过程与结论说明了回族宗教活动空间具有从地方的物质宗教空间结构到无地方的精神宗教空间结构的递进转换特征。

本文引用格式

白凯 . 自我叙事式解读回族宗教活动空间的意义[J]. 地理学报, 2012 , 67(12) : 1698 -1715 . DOI: 10.11821/xb201212011

Abstract

Based on emic perspective, this paper makes a subjective intentionality interpretation of the existential meaning of Hui's religious activity space by the self-narrative style method. After a complete autobiography and immersed thinking, the author holds the idea that there are some characteristics existing in Hui's religious activity space shown as follows: Firstly, homes, mosques and graveyards constitute the core of Hui's religious activity space. Secondly, for Muslim believers, homes, mosques and graveyards are not single physical space, but religious "places" which have unique significances. Thirdly, the author's memories and summaries of the religious functions and meanings of homes, mosques and graveyards illustrate that Hui's religious activity space are characterized by transformation from place to placelessness. The non-place conversion's place point is the mosque. Fourthly, "jie du wa"--a religious ceremony and religious behavior--builds bridges from space to place, from place to placelessness for Hui religious activity space. The analysis and conclusions explicate that Hui's religious activity space has the trait of transition from material religion spatial structure of place to spirit religious space structure of placelessness.

参考文献

[1] Park C. Religion and geography. Chapter 17//Hinnells J. Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion. London: Routledge, 2004: 1-29.

[2] Stump R W. The Geography of Religion: Faith, Place, and Space. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2005: 301-328.

[3] Huang Chih-hong. The Tendency Investigation of Geography of Religion. (Taiwan) Social Studies and Education Research, 2005, (10): 177-204. [黄志弘. 宗教地理学研究趋势之探讨. (台湾) 社会科教育研究, 2005, (10): 177-204.]

[4] Xue Ximing, Zhu Hong. A review on foreign geography of religion and its evolution. Human Geography, 2010, 25(3): 109-113. [薛熙明, 朱竑. 国外宗教地理研究回顾与进展. 人文地理, 2010, 25(3): 109-113.]

[5] Chris C Park. Sacred World: An Introduction to Geography and Religion, London;New York: Routledge, 1994.

[6] David E Sopher. Geography of Religions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

[7] David E Sopher. Geography and Religions. Progress in Human Geography, 1981, 5: 510-524.

[8] David N Livingstone. Space for Religion: A Belfast case study. Political Geography, 1998, 17(2): 145-170.

[9] Lily Kong. Mapping ‘new' geographies of religion: Politics and poetics in modernity. Progress in Human Geography, 2001, 25(2): 211-233.

[10] Ceri Peach. Social Geography: New religions and ethnoburbs-contrasts with culture geography. Progress in Human Geography, 2002, 26(2): 252-260.

[11] Lily Kong. Global shifts, theoretical shifts: Changing geographies of religion. Progress in Human Geography, 2010, 34 (6): 755-776.

[12] Pan Chaoyang. Review of the geography research of Taiwan religious phenomenon. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 1996, 34(2): 1-20. [潘朝阳. 台湾宗教现象地理学研究之回顾. 思与言, 1996, 34(2): 1-20.]

[13] Xue Ximing, Zhu Hong . Impact of transportation on spatial diffusion of Christianity: A case study of the Missionary Residential Centers (MRCs) in Guangdong from 1807 to 1920. Tropical Geography, 2008, 28(3): 288-293. [薛熙明, 朱竑. 交通对基督教空间扩散的影响研究: 以广东基督教宣教地的分布为例(1807-1920年). 热带地理, 2008, 28(3): 288-293.]

[14] Zhu Hong, Guo Chunlan. Response of indigenization and globalization in the changes of villages: Contabescence and renascence of Gospel villages in Shenzhen. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(8): 967-977. [朱竑, 郭春兰. 本土化与 全球化在村落演化中的响应: 深圳老福音村的死与生. 地理学报, 2009, 64(8): 967-977. ]

[15] Xue Ximing, Zhu Hong, Chen Xiaoliang. Spatial diffusion patterns of Protestants in Guangdong since 19th century. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(2): 304-312. [薛熙明, 朱竑, 陈晓亮. 19世纪以来基督教新教在广东的空间扩散模式. 地理研究, 2010, 29(2): 304-312.]

[16] Roger W Stump. The Geography of Religion: Faith, Place and Space. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher Inc., 2005.

[17] Carolyn Ellis, Tony E Adams, Arthur P Bochner. Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2011, 12(1): 1-18, 786.

[18] Ellis Carolyn, Arthur P Bochner. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject//Norman K Denzin, Yvonna S Lincoln. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000: 733-768, 787.

[19] John W Creswell, Dana L Miller. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 2000, 39(3): 124-130.

[20] Wang Xinjian, Zhu Yanli. Narrative style, self-perspective and self-development. Advances in Psychological Science, 2010, 18(12): 1858-1863. [ 汪新建, 朱艳丽. 叙述方式、自我视角与自我发展. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(12): 1858-1863.]

[21] Crossley M L. Introducing Narrative Psychology: Self, Trauma and the Construction of Meaning. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000: 86.

[22] D Jean Clandinin, F Michael Connelly. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. California: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 2000: 137-138.

[23] Patton M Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc., 2002: 109-110.

[24] Tuan Yi-Fu. Pan Guicheng trans. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Taipei: National Institute of Compilation and Translation, 1998: 25. [段义孚. 潘桂成 译. 经验透视中的空间与地方. 台北: 国立编译馆, 1998: 25.]

[25] Tuan Yi-Fu. Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1977: 136-137.

[26] Shi Tianfu. Spatial viewpoint of geography. Taiwan: A Geographic Research Report of Taiwan Normal University, 1990, (16): 115-137. [施添福. 地理学中的空间观点. 台湾: 台湾师范大学地理研究报告, 1990, (16): 115-137.]

[27] Lin Jiaying. The formation and transformation of the sense of place within local old farmers caused by the industrial development in Tanzhi, Taichung County [D]. Taiwan: Geography Department, National Changhua University of Education A, 2011: 29. [林佳莹. 潭子乡产业与当地老农地方感的形塑与转化[D]. 台湾: 国立彰化师范大学地理系, 2011: 29.]

[28] Claval Paul. A History of Geographical Thoughts. 3rd. ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2007: 323-324. [[法]保罗·克拉瓦尔. 地理学思想史. 3版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007: 323-324.]

[29] Tuan Yi-Fu. Religion: From Place to Placelessness. Chicago: The Center for American Places, 2010: 5.

[30] Relph E. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion, 1976.

[31] David Swartz. Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997: 233-234.
文章导航

/