土地利用

不同生计类型农户的土地利用——三峡库区典型村的实证研究

展开
  • 1. 西南大学资源学院, 重庆400716;
    2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101
阎建忠(1972-), 博士, 副教授, 中国地理学会会员(S110005960M), 从事自然地理综合研究。

收稿日期: 2010-04-26

  修回日期: 2010-08-24

  网络出版日期: 2010-11-20

基金资助

国家科技支撑计划(2007BAD87B10)

Land Use Characters of Farmers of Different Livelihood Strategies: Cases in Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Expand
  • 1. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2010-04-26

  Revised date: 2010-08-24

  Online published: 2010-11-20

Supported by

National Science and Technology Support Plan, No.2007BAD87B10

摘要

采用分层随机抽样、参与式农村评估、地块调查等方法,研究了重庆市涪陵区珍溪镇3 个典型村样本农户的土地利用和土地投入的差异。共调查了227 户,2250 个地块。结果发现:① 除了6.17%的非农户土地撂荒、退耕或出租外,纯农户、一兼户、二兼户的土地利用类型均以集约为主。纯农户因年龄结构老龄化,劳动力供应不足,相对粗放的耕地面积为48.95%。一兼户相对集约利用的面积比例为71.08%。二兼户相对集约利用的面积比例为67.20%。② 土地投入有明显差异。纯农户每公顷农业劳动力投入少,劳动力老龄化;由于缺乏资金,农业机械及省工性投入少,多选择农家肥及磷肥、碳铵等价格较低的传统肥料。一兼户劳动力投入的数量与质量都最高,有长期投资农业的意愿与动力,农业机械投资量最大,保持了较高的农家肥施用量,且各种化肥配合施用,用量适中;二兼户每公顷农业劳动力投入大,以老人与妇女为主;由于收入高,农业机械及省工性投入比纯农户多,首选价格高、省劳力的化肥。非农户无土地投入。`

本文引用格式

阎建忠, 卓仁贵, 谢德体, 张镱锂 . 不同生计类型农户的土地利用——三峡库区典型村的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 2010 , 65(11) : 1401 -1410 . DOI: 10.11821/xb201011010

Abstract

This study examines land use types and input level of every plot of sample farmers in three typical villages in Chongqing. Through stratified random sampling survey, participatory rural appraisal and investigation of plots, 227 households and 2250 plots are investigated and sampled. Farmers are divided into four types: pure agriculture households, agriculture-dependent households, off-farm dependent households and off-farm households. The results show: (1) Apart from 6.17% of off-farm households, who leave land uncultivated, abandoned or rent, land use types of pure agriculture households, agriculture-dependent households and off-farm dependent households are mainly intensive. Some 48.95% of arable land of pure agriculture households are relatively extensive due to the aging. The proportions of relatively extensive arable land of agriculture-dependent and off-farm dependent households are 71.08% and 67.20% , respectively. (2) Land inputs are different among the four farmer types. Off-farm household have no land input. Pure agriculture households have low agricultural labor input due to aging, and less agricultural machinery and labor-saving inputs due to lack of funds, so they prefer to choose manure, phosphate fertilizer, ammonium bicarbonate and other cheap fertilizers.

参考文献


[1] Barrow C J, Hicham H. Two complimentary and integrated land uses of the western High Atlas Mountains, Morocco: The potential for sustainable rural livelihoods. Applied Geography, 2000, 20: 369-394.

[2] Ellis F, Mode N. Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Tanzania.World Development, 2003, 31(8): 1367-1384.

[3] Holden S, Shiferaw B, Pender J. Non-farm income,household welfare,and sustainable land management in a less-favoured area in the Ethiopian highlands. Food Policy, 2004, 29: 369-392.

[4] Eija Soini. Land use change patterns and livelihood dynamics on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 85: 306-323.

[6] Gina Koczberski, George N Curry. Making a living: Land pressures and changing livelihood strategies among oil palm settlers in Papua New Guinea. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 85: 324-339.

[6] McCusker B, Carr E R. The co-production of livelihoods and land use change. Geoforum, 2006, 37(5): 790-804.

[7] Bradstock A. Land reform and livelihoods in South Africa's Northern Cape Province. Land Use Policy, 2006, 23(3): 247-259.

[8] Clay D C, Reardon T, Kangasniemi J. Sustainable intensification in the highland tropics: Rwandan farmers' investments in land conservation and soil fertility. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1998, 46(2): 351-378.

[9] Holden S, Shiferaw B, Pender J. No-farm income, household welfare,and sustainable land management in a less-favoured area in the Ethiopian highlands. Food Policy, 2004, 29: 369-392.

[10] Pender J. Development pathways for hillsides and highlands: Some lessons from Central America and East Africa. Food Policy, 2004, 29: 339-367.

[11] Ransom J K, Paudyal K, Adhikari K. Adoption of improved maize varieties in the hills of Nepal. Agricultural Economics, 2003, 29(3): 299-305.

[12] Huang Zongzhi. The Peasant Family and Rural Development in the Yangzi River Delta. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2000.

[黄宗智. 长江三角洲小农家庭与乡村发展. 北京: 中华书局, 2000.]

[13] Huang Zongzhi. Small Farmer Economy in North China and Social Change. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2000.

[黄 宗智. 华北的小农经济与社会变迁. 北京: 中国书局, 2000.]

[14] Li Xiaojian, Qiao Jiajun. Evolution of livelihood diversification and economic development of farmers in less developed regions. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 2003, (5): 58-61.

[李小建, 乔家君. 欠发达地区农户的兼业演变及农户经济 发展研究. 中州学刊, 2003, (5): 58-61.]

[15] Ouyang Jinliang, Song Chunmei, Yu Zhenrong et al. The farm household's choice of land use type and its effectiveness on land quality and environment in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(1): 1-11.

[欧阳进良, 宋春 梅, 宇振荣等. 黄淮海平原农区不同类型农户的土地利用方式选择及其环境影响. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(1): 1-11.]

[16] Yan Jianzhong, Zhang Yili, Bai Wanqi et al. Livelihood succession and land use/cover changein the Upper Reaches of Dadu River watershed. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(3): 83-89.

[阎建忠, 张 镱锂, 摆万奇等. 大渡河上游生计方式的时空格局与土地利用/覆被变化. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(3): 83-89.]

[17] Chen Yuqi, Li Xiubin. Structural change of agricultural land use intensity and its regional disparity in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 469-478.

[陈瑜琦, 李秀彬. 1980 年以来中国耕地利用集约度的结构特征. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 469-478.]

[18] Liu Chengwu, Li Xiubin. The changing characteristics of the agricultural land use intensity in China based on the production cost. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(1): 9-15.

[刘成武, 李秀彬. 基于生产成本的中国农地利用集约 度的变化特征. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(1): 9-15.]

[19] Li Yuechen, Liu Chunxia, Zhao Chunyong et al. Spatiotemporal features of soil and water loss in the Three Gorges Reservoir area of Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(5): 502-513.

[李月臣, 刘春霞, 赵纯勇等. 重庆市三峡 库区水土流失的时空格局特征. 地理学报, 2008, 63(5): 502-513.]

[20] Meng Qinghua, Yang Linzhang. Nutrient losses in different land use types in the Three George Reservoir area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(6): 1028-1033.

[孟庆华, 杨林章. 三峡库区不同土地利用方式的养分流失研究. 生态学报, 2000, 20(6): 1028-1033.]

[21] Huang Yulin, Zhao Hanzhang, Chen Mingshan et al. Study on the slope vegetation-soil environmental change in Shanxia Reservoir area and its land utilization. Forest Research, 1995, 8(5): 520-527.

[黄雨霖, 赵汉章, 陈明珊等. 三峡库区坡地 植被—土壤环境变化及土地利用的研究. 林业科学研究, 1995, 8(5): 520-527.]

[22] Sun Xiaoxia, Zhang Jixian, Liu Zhengjun. Monitoring the land use dynamics and analyzing its change in time series using imagery in Three George Reservoir area. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2008, 17(4): 557-560.

[孙晓霞, 张继贤, 刘正军. 三峡库区土地利用时序变化遥感监测与分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 557-560.]

[23] Shao Huaiyong, Xian Wei, Yang Wunian et al. Land use/cover change during lately 50 years in Three Gorges Reservoir area. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(2): 453-458.

[邵怀勇, 仙巍, 杨武年等. 三峡库区近50 年间土地利 用/覆被变化. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(2): 453-458.]

[24] Cai Chongfa, Ding Shuwen, Shi Zhihua et al. Prediction on soil nutrients losses at typical small watershed of Three Gorges area with GIS. Journal of Soil andWater Conservation, 2001, 15(1): 10-12.

[蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华等. GIS支持 下三峡库区典型小流域土壤养分流失量预测. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(1): 10-12.]

[25] Zhu Wei, Wei Hong, Peng Yue et al. The effects of different land use types on the change characteristics of soil erosion in the area around Three Gorges Reservoir region. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 14(3): 377-383.

[朱韦, 魏 虹, 彭月等. 三峡库周区不同土地利用方式下土壤侵蚀变化特征. 水土保持研究, 2007, 14(3): 377-383.]

[26] Lin Shan, Feng Minglei, Ruan Leilei et al. Soil N2O flux and its affecting factors under different land use patterns in Three Gorges Reservoir area of China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(6): 1269-1276.

[林杉, 冯明磊, 阮雷雷等. 三峡库区不同土地利用方式下土壤氧化亚氮排放及其影响因素. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(6): 1269-1276.]

[27] Liao Xiaoyong, Chen Zhijian, Liu Shaoquan et al. Effects of land use types on soil fertility in small watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Ecology and Environment, 2005, 14(1): 99-101.

[廖晓勇, 陈治誎, 刘邵权等. 三峡库区小流域土地利 用方式对土壤肥力的影响. 生态环境, 2005, 14(1): 99-101.]

[28] Han Shucheng, Xie Yongsheng, Hao Mingde et al. Research on the difference of investment behavior of different farm household type. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 12(5): 83-85.

[韩书成, 谢永生, 郝明德等. 不同类型农 户土地投入行为差异研究. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12(5): 83-85.]

[29] Li Xiubin, Zhu Huiyi, Tan Minghong et al. Measurement of land use intensity. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(6): 83-89.

[李秀彬, 朱会义, 谈明洪等. 土地利用集约度的测度方法. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(6): 83-89.]

[30] Li Xiubin,Wang Xiuhong. Changes in agricultural land use in China: 1981-2000. Asian Geographer, 2003, 22(1/2): 27-42.

[31] Zhang Liping, Zhang Yili, Yan Jianzhong et al. Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountain region of the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(4): 377-385.

[张丽萍, 张镱锂, 阎建忠 等. 青藏高原东部山地农牧区生计与耕地利用模式. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 377-385.]

文章导航

/