中国生态脆弱带人地关系行为机制模型及应用
收稿日期: 2004-04-11
修回日期: 2004-10-08
网络出版日期: 2005-01-25
基金资助
国家973计划项目“中国北方沙漠化过程与防治”(GT2000048705); 日本环境省地球环境研究基金重点项目“沙漠化的评价与监测综合研究”
An Application of Bio-economic Household Model to Analysis on Man-Land Relationship Behavior in Ecologically Fragile Land of China
Received date: 2004-04-11
Revised date: 2004-10-08
Online published: 2005-01-25
Supported by
National Key Basic Research Program, No. GT2000048705; Global Environment Research Fund of Ministry of the Environment, Japan
以农牧交错带为研究对象,通过建立人地关系行为机制模型,探讨外部社会经济因素影响土地退化的机制,并重点就当前正在实施的退耕还林还草政策所带来的生态经济效果进行分析。模型拟合结果显示,利用玉米及农作物秸秆作为饲料,扩大舍饲动物饲养,或者扩大种植葵花或油料作物等商品作物以替代自给性作物糜子,将可以在不加剧水土流失的前提下增加农户收入。模型结果还显示,非农就业机会增加时,农户会减少坡地垦殖。这表明推进农村工业化和城镇化发展,增加农民非农就业机会,鼓励农民进城的政策对于黄土高原的水土保持也是有促进作用的。
关键词： 农牧交错带; 人地关系行为机制模型; 退耕还林还草政策; 中国
石敏俊, 王涛 . 中国生态脆弱带人地关系行为机制模型及应用[J]. 地理学报, 2005 , 60(1) : 165 -174 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200501019
Land degradation is one of the severe environmental problems in China. In order to combat land degradation, a soil conservation program has been introduced since 2000 to reduce soil erosion by converting slope farmland into forest and pasture. This paper represents the first systematic attempt to investigate the impact of the soil conservation program on land degradation in the Loess Plateau. The results indicate that the soil conservation program to convert slope land into forest or pasture is an effective way to combat soil erosion. However, a subsidy that is higher than profit from slope land use activity before conversion is needed to encourage farmers to join the conservation program. Relevant policies to encourage and assist farmers to raise livestock in folds with crops produced from fields as well as fodder and forage grass from the converted slope land might contribute to combat soil erosion. Increase in off-farm job opportunities may encourage farmers' households to reduce farming practices on slope land. This implies that policies to encourage ruralurbanization might contribute to combat soil erosion.
[1] Wang Tao (ed.). Desert and Desertification in China. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Science & Technology Publishing House, 2003. 3-34.
[王涛 主编. 中国沙漠与沙漠化. 石家庄: 河北科学技术出版社, 2003. 3-34.]
[2] Jiang Dingsheng (ed.). Soil Erosion and Its Control Mode in Loess Plateau. Beijing: China Water Resources and Electric Power Press, 1997. 1-7.
[蒋定生 著. 黄土高原水土流失与治理模式. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1997. 1-7.]
[3] Yang Wenzhi, Yu Cunzu (ed.). Areal Control and Assessment in Loess Plateau. Beijing: Science Press, 1992.
[杨文治, 余存祖 主编. 黄土高原区域治理与评价. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992.].
[4] Miao Zongyi (ed.). Polit Study on All-round Way of Soil Erosion Control and Agriculture, Forestry and Stockbreeding at Huangfuchuan Watershed. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1991.
[苗宗义 编著. 皇甫川流域水土流失综合治理农林牧全面发展试验研究. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1991.]
[5] Jin Zhengping, Shi Peijun et al. (ed.). Soil Erosion Model and Control Pattern at Huangfuchuan Watershed. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 1992.
[金争平, 史培军 等著. 黄河皇甫川流域土壤侵蚀系统模型和治理模式. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1992.]
[6] Jin Zhengping (ed.). Soil Erosion Control and Agro-pasture Development at Arsenic Sandstone Area. Beijing: Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2003.
[金争平 编著. 砒砂岩区水土保持与农牧业发展研究. 北京: 黄河水利出版社, 2003.]
[7] Heerink N, Kuyvenhoven A, Van Wijk M S. Economic Policy Reforms and Sustainable Land Use in Development Countries: Issues and Approaches. Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. New York: Physica-Verlag, 2001.
[8] Barbier B. Induced innovation and land degradation: results from a bioeconomic model of a village in West Africa. Agricultural Economics, 1998, 19: 15-25.
[9] Shiferaw B, Holden S. Soil erosion and smallholders' conservation decision in the highlands of Ethiopia. World Development, 1999, 27: 739-752.
[10] Singh I, Squire L, Strauss J. Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications, and Policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1986.
[11] Kruseman G, Ruben R, Hengsdijk H et al. Farm household modeling for estimating the effectiveness of price instruments in land use policy. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 1995, 43: 111-123.
[12] Kruseman G, Bade J. Agrarian policies for sustainable land use: bio-economic modeling to assess the effectiveness of policy instruments. Agricultural System, 1998, 58: 465-481.
[13] Mullen J D, Taylor D B, Fofana M et al. Integrating long-run biological and economic considerations into Striga management programs. Agricultural System, 2003, 76: 787-795.
[14] Fleming E, Milne M. Bioeconomic modeling of the production and export of cocoa for price policy analysis in Papua New Guinea. Agricultural System, 2003, 76: 483-505.
[15] Shiferaw B, Holden S, Aune J. Population Pressure and Land Degradation in the Ethiopian Highlands: A Bio-Economic Model with Endogenous Soil Degradation. Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. New York: Physica-Verlag, 2001.
[16] Kruseman G. Assessing the Effects of Policy Measures on Household Welfare and Agro-Ecological Sustainability: An Overview of Farm Household Modelling Approaches. Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. New York: Physica-Verlag, 2001.
[17] Bontkes T S. Agricultural Prices and Land Degradation in Koutiala, Mali: A Regional Simulation Model Based on Farmers' Decision Rules, Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. New York: Physica-Verlag, 2001.
[18] Kruseman G, Van Keulen H. Soil Degradation and Agricultural Production: Economic and Biophysical Approaches. Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. New York: Physica-Verlag, 2001.
[19] Shi M. Development of the storeyed polyculture in China: a case study on the upland areas of North China. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Tsukuba, 1996.
[20] Williams J R, Jones C A, Dyke P T. EPIC, the Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Economics Research Service, and Soil Conservation Service, Temple, TX, 1987.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |