长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型
收稿日期: 2004-09-02
修回日期: 2005-01-04
网络出版日期: 2005-03-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目 (40201001); 国土资源部“百人计划”项目; 中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KZCX2-310)
Rural Housing Land Transition in Transect of the Yangtse River
Received date: 2004-09-02
Revised date: 2005-01-04
Online published: 2005-03-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40201001; Programme of Excellent Young Scientists of the Ministry of Land and Resources; Knowledge Innovation Project of CAS, No.KZCX2-310
利用样带这一综合与集成研究的工具,选取无论是在社会经济发展程度还是自然环境要素变化等方面都存在明显梯度的长江沿线样带为研究区,采用横向比较的研究方法,基于一定的理论假设,研究了区内的农村宅基地转型。研究表明：1987~2001年研究区根据土地利用变化的聚集度指数划分的各区段农村宅基地在建设用地增加中所占比例总体上看,从上游至下游,从甘孜—玉树区到泸州—迪庆区、恩施—重庆区、铜陵—宜昌区直至上海—巢湖区,这一比例逐渐降低;长江沿线样带各区段所处的农村宅基地转型阶段与样带内各区段所处的经济发展水平相吻合,基本上验证了此前的理论假设。据此,目前由各省 (区、市) 自行制定农村宅基地标准不利于实现土地的集约利用,国家应根据区域经济发展水平和自然条件的差异分区、分类制定农村宅基地标准。针对研究区目前农村宅基地的发展现状,根据区域农村宅基地转型阶段提出了相应的管理对策。
龙花楼, 李秀彬 . 长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型[J]. 地理学报, 2005 , 60(2) : 179 -188 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200502001
Each IGBP Transect has been designed around the variation of a major environmental factor as it influences terrestrial ecosystem structure and functioning. Most are organised around a gradient of either temperature or precipitation that varies continuously in geographical space. Transects are usually taken as tools for synthesis and integration. Synthesis and integration activities are essential for the practical application of transects research to management issues. Transect of the Yangtse River with obvious gradients both in the condition of physical environment and in the level of socioeconomic development is taken as a study area. There are 312 counties involving 11 provinces in the study area. Its total area amounts to 1.12 million km2. Land use transition refers to the changes in land use morphology, the overall pattern of actual land cover in a region at a given time, over time. It usually corresponds to the transition of regional socioeconomic development phase. The theoretical hypotheses of rural housing land transition are put forward as the following. That is the development of rural housing of every region should undergo some stages: the ratio of rural housing to increased settlements decreases gradually with the development of local economy, and the end of the transition corresponds to a new equilibrium between rural housing and other construction activities. Taking horizontal comparative research method, rural housing land transition in the study area is analyzed. Conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) In the period of 15 years from 1987 to 2001, the ratio of rural housing to increased settlements in five regions, divided according to the aggregation index of land use change, is generally decreased gradually from the upper reaches to the lower reaches. 2) Each region is in different rural housing land transition phases respectively, and it corresponds to its respective socioeconomic development level. The results successfully testified above theoretical hypotheses. Accordingly, the authors suggest that the state should set down uniform standard of rural housing according to the differentiation of socioeconomic development level and physical conditions instead of different provinces with its individual standard at present. Furthermore, aiming at the status quo of rural housing in the study area, corresponding regional policies should be set down according to their different rural housing land transition phases.
[1] Steffen W L, Walker B H, Ingram J S I et al. Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems: The Operational Plan. IGBP Report No.21. Stochkholm: IGBP, 1992.
[2] Koch G W, Scholes R J, Steffen W L et al. The IGBP Terrestrial Transects: Science Plan. IGBP Report No. 36. Stochkholm: IGBP, 1995.
[3] Zhang Xinshi, Yang Dian'an. Allocation and study on global change transects in China. Quaternary Sciences, 1995, 15(1): 43-52.
[张新时, 杨奠安. 中国全球变化样带的设置与研究. 第四纪研究, 1995, 15(1): 43-52.]
[4] Wang Quan. Advance research on terrestrial transects. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1997, 12(1): 43-50.
[王权. 全球变化陆地样带研究及其进展. 地球科学进展, 1997, 12(1): 43-50.]
[5] Gao Qiong, Li Xiaobing, Yang Xiusheng. Responses of vegetation and primary production in North-South Transect of Eastern China to global change under land use constraint. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2003, 45(11): 1274-1284.
[高琼, 李晓兵, 杨秀生. 土地利用约束下中国东部南北样带生产力和植被分布对全球变化的响应. 植物学报, 2003, 45(11): 1274-1284.]
[6] Steffen W L, Scholes R J, Valentin C et al. The IGBP terrestrial transects. In: Walker B H, Steffen W L, Canadell J, et al. The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change: Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, London, 1999. 66-87.
[7] Desanker P V, Frost P G H, Justice C O et al. The Miombo Network: Framework for a Terrestrial Transect Study of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in the Miombo Ecosystems of Central Africa. IGBP Report No.41. Stochkholm: IGBP, 1997.
[8] Scholes R J, Parsons D A B. The Kalahari Transect: Research on Global Change and Sustainable Development in Southern Africa. IGBP Report No.42. Stochkholm: IGBP, 1997.
[9] Zhang Xinshi, Zhou Guangsheng, Gao Qiong et al. Northeast China Transect (NECT) for global change studies. Earth Science Frontiers, 1997, 4(1-2): 145-151.
[张新时, 周广胜, 高琼 等. 全球变化研究中的中国东北森林—草原陆地样带(NECT). 地学前缘, 1997, 4(1-2): 145-151.]
[10] Zhou Guangsheng, Wang Yuhui, Jiang Yanling. Global change and IGBP-NECT, northeast China. Earth Science Frontiers, 2002, 9(1): 198-216.
[周广胜, 王玉辉, 蒋延玲. 全球变化与中国东北样带. 地学前缘, 2002, 9(1): 198-216.]
[11] Kang Muyi, Jiang Yuan, Shi Ruixiang. A preliminary analysis on land use change in NECT during 1984-1996. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2000, 20(2): 115-120.
[康慕谊, 江源, 石瑞香. NECT样带1984~1996土地利用变化分析. 地理科学, 2000, 20(2): 115-120.]
[12] Grainger A. National land use morphology: patterns and possibilities. Geography, 1995, 80(3): 235-245.
[13] Long Hualou, Li Xiubin. Analysis on regional land use transition: a case study in transect of the Yangtse River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(2): 144-149.
[龙花楼, 李秀彬. 区域土地利用转型分析--以长江沿线样带为例. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2): 144-149.]
[14] Long Hualou. Land use transition: a new integrated approach of land use/cover change study. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2003, 19(1): 87-90.
[龙花楼. 土地利用转型--土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(1): 87-90.]
[15] Long Hualou, Li Xiubin. Land use pattern in transect of the Yangtse River and its influential factors. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(4): 417-425.
[龙花楼, 李秀彬. 长江沿线样带土地利用格局及其影响因子分析. 地理学报, 2001, 56(4): 417-425.]
[16] Long Hualou, Li Xiubin. Spatio-temporal modelling of land use changes in transect of the Yangtse River and corresponding countermeasures. Geographical Research, 2001, 20(6): 660-668.
[龙花楼, 李秀彬. 长江沿线样带土地利用变化时空模拟及其对策. 地理研究, 2001, 20(6): 660-668.]
[17] David Harvey. Explanation in Geography. London: Edward Arnold Ltd., 1971.
[大卫·哈维 著. 高泳源, 刘立华, 蔡运龙 译. 地理学中的解释. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1996.]
[18] Nunes C, Augé J I. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No.48 and IHDP Report No.10. Stochkholm: IGBP, 1999.
[19] Sun Chengquan, Lin Hai, Qu Jiansheng. Global Change and Social Science Research Issues in the Human Dimensions. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2003.
[孙成权, 林海, 曲建升. 全球变化与人文社会科学问题. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003.]
[20] Serneels S, Lambin E F. Proximate causes of land use change in Narok district Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 65-81.
[21] Turner II B L, Villar S C, Foster D et al. Deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: an integrative approach. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 154: 353-370.
[22] Walker R, Moran E F, Anselin L. Deforestation and cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: external capital and household processes. World Development, 2000, 28(4): 683-699.
[23] Lambin E F, Rounsevell M D A, Geist H J. Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 82: 321-331.
[24] Ning Deng, Jiang Liang. The study on the urbanization in China during the transitional period. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(12): 17-19.
[宁登, 蒋亮. 转型时期的中国城镇化发展研究. 城市规划, 1999, 23(12): 17-19.]
[25] Cai Yunlong. The mechanisms of cropland conservation in Chinese rural transformation. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2001, 21(1): 1-6.
[蔡运龙. 中国农村转型与耕地保护机制. 地理科学, 2001, 21(1): 1-6.]
[26] Liu Aiyu. Analysis on China's regional economic disparities in the process of society transition. Journal of Zhejiang, 2000, (2): 10-15.
[刘艾玉. 社会转型过程中的地区经济差距探析. 浙江学刊, 2000, (2): 10-15.]
[27] Lin Yifu, Cai Fang, Li Zhou. Analysis on China's regional disparities in the period of economy transition. Economic Research, 1998, (6): 3-10.
[林毅夫, 蔡昉, 李周. 中国经济转型时期的地区差距分析. 经济研究, 1998, (6): 3-10.]
[28] Li Xiubin. Visulizing spatial equality of development. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1999, 19(3): 254-257.
[李秀彬. 地区发展均衡性的可视化测度. 地理科学, 1999, 19(3): 254-257.]
[29] Heilig Gerhard K. Sustainable regional and rural development in China: where do we stand? IIASA Interim Report IR-03-026, Laxenburg.
[30] Cai Yunlong. Geographical study on sustainable agriculture and rural development. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1999, 14(6): 602-606.
[蔡运龙. 农业与农村可持续发展的地理学研究. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(6): 602-606.]
[31] Li Shantong, Hou Yongzhi. The distinctiveness of China's various economic growth stages and the main targets of industrial development during the 15th Five-Year-Plan. Management World, 2001, (2): 95-101.
[李善同, 侯永志. 我国经济发展阶段特征与"十五"时期产业发展的主要任务. 管理世界, 2001, (2): 95-101.]
[32] Chen Guojie, Wang Qing. Theoretical model and trend analysis on mountainous economic development stages in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(2): 303-310.
[陈国阶, 王青. 中国山区经济发展阶段的理论模型与预测. 地理学报, 2004, 59(2): 303-310.]
[33] Li Juanwen, Wang Qifang. The development phases theory about regional economy analysis of development phases about contemporary China's regional economy. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(4): 6-9.
[李娟文, 王启仿. 区域经济发展阶段理论与我国区域经济发展阶段现状分析. 经济地理, 2000, 20(4): 6-9.]
[34] Bicik I, Jelecek L, Stěpánek V. Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18: 65-73.
[35] Krausmann F, Haberl H, Schulz N B et al. Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria (Part I): driving forces of land-use change: 1950-1995. Land Use Policy, 2003, 20: 1-20.
[36] Li Xiubin. Explanation of land use changes. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(3): 195-203.
[李秀彬. 土地利用变化的解释. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(3): 195-203.]
[37] Haberl H, Batterbury S, Moran E. Using and shaping the land: a long-term perspective. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18: 1-8.
[38] Liu Yansui, Chen Baiming. The study framework of land use/cover change based on sustainable development in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(3): 324-330.
[刘彦随, 陈百明. 中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆被变化研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 324-330.]
[39] Zhu Huiyi, Lu Changhe, Li Xiubin. Land use studies in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2004, 14(suppl.): 69-73.
[40] Liu Shenghe, Li Xiubin, Zhang Ming. Scenario analysis on urbanization and rural-urban migration in China. IIASA Interim Report IR-03-036, Laxenburg.
[41] Liu Jiyuan, Liu Mingliang, Zhuang Dafang et al. Analysis on the spatial pattern of recent land use changes in China. Science in China (Series D), 2002, 32(12): 1031-1040.
[刘纪远, 刘明亮, 庄大方 等. 中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析. 中国科学(D辑), 2002, 32(12): 1031-1040.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |