长江流域稻田生态系统的水分和养分转换过程
收稿日期: 2003-09-27
修回日期: 2003-12-25
网络出版日期: 2004-01-25
基金资助
亚洲太平洋地区环境创新战略-环境监测系统项目; 中国科学院知识创新重要方向项目 (KZCX2-SW-415和KZCX2-407)
Experimental Study on Water and Nutrient Transformation in the Paddy Ecosystem of the Yangtze Valley
Received date: 2003-09-27
Revised date: 2003-12-25
Online published: 2004-01-25
Supported by
The Asia-Pacific Environmental Innovation Strategy (APEIS)-Integrated Environmental Monitoring System Project; Knowledge Innovation Project of CAS, No. KZCX2-SW-415 and KZCX2-407
田间模拟施肥进步和灌溉模式的定位试验在中国科学院桃源农业生态试验站进行。结果表明施肥制度和水分管理模式显著地影响水分和养分的转化过程和生产效益。单施N的产量效应为4.5 kg/kg，而NP或NPK配施养分总的产量效应分别为8.8 kg/kg和8.0 kg/kg；有机物料循环的增产率为56.8%，在有机物料循环的基础上配施NPK化肥最大的增产率可达到80.1%；化肥应用的进步可使水稻产量增长62.5%或通过施肥实现的水稻产量中由于化肥应用所占的贡献份额为38.4%，有机无机肥配合水稻产量增长80.1%，或通过施肥达到的产量中有机无机肥配合所占的份额为44.4%。本区双季稻年灌溉需水量为5838 m3/hm2，年变异C.V = 8.3%。晚稻灌溉占全年的71%，7~9月是灌溉需水高峰期，占全年灌溉量的68%。生产灌溉效率 (灌溉水量与产量之比)：生物量3.67 kg/m3，精谷量1.48 kg/m3。常规管理田间水分分配为：蒸散占1/2，翻耕整地占1/6，植物构成占1/21，田间渗漏占1/14，其它环境耗水 (维持) 占1/5。耕灌雨养管理翻耕整地和田间渗漏比例过高。不同灌溉处理试验表明：双季稻生产的灌溉，以早稻保持水层灌溉，晚稻按需配额灌溉的模式比较适宜。
周卫军,王克林,王凯荣,谢小立,刘鑫,王勤学,渡边正孝 . 长江流域稻田生态系统的水分和养分转换过程[J]. 地理学报, 2004 , 59(1) : 25 -32 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200401003
The located experiment was conducted in Taoyuan Experimental Station of Agroecosystem Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The result indicated both fertilization systems and water management pattern significantly affected the transformation processes and production efficiency of the nutrient and water. The production efficiency was 4.5 kg/kg for N fertilizer application only, but 8.8 kg/kg and 8.0 kg/kg for NP and NPK fertilizer combined, respectively. The yield-increase rate was 56.8% in the organic residue recycle case, however it could be up to 80.1% based on organic residue combined application with NPK fertilizer. The yield-increase rate was 62.8% with fertilizer application development and 80.1% with inorganic-organic fertilizer combined. In other words, in the case of optimum fertilization system, the largest contribution portion of inorganic fertilizer applied was 38.4% while that of inorganic-organic fertilizer combined was 44.4%. There were obvious differences in water transformation in paddy fields with different irrigation patterns. Water distribution in the paddy field with control irrigation (CI) showed that transpiration and evaporation accounted for 1/2, plowing and preparing land for 1/6, plant constitution for 1/21, field leakage for 1/14, and other environment consumption (maintenance) for 1/5. Whereas, the proportion of plowing and preparing land and field leakage was too large under rain-fed (RF) conditions. Water needed for irrigation was about 5838 m3/hm2 and the annual variation efficiency of irrigation water required was 8.3%, of which 71% for growing late rice. Irrigation between July and September consumed 68% of the total water required. Irrigation production rate was 3.67 kg/m3 in rice biomass and 1.48 kg/m3 in grain output. It was concluded that for growing double harvest rice in the Yangtze Valley, the thinner water layer must be kept in early rice and the periodical ration irrigation was very important for late rice.
Key words： transformation process; Yangtze Valley; the paddy ecosystem; water; nutrient
[1] Cao Y Z, Song Z W. Plant Physiology. Lanzhou: Publishing House of Lanzhou University, 1998. 1-44.
[曹仪植, 宋占午. 植物生理学. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 1998. 1-44.]
[2] BAHC NEWS. Biospheric aspects of the hydrological cycle: a core project of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (GJBP), 1998, (6): 2-3.
[3] Wang H X, Liu C M. Advances in crop water use efficiency research. Advances in Water Science, 2000, 11(1): 99-104.
[王会肖, 刘昌明. 作物水分利用率的内涵及研究进展. 水科学进展, 2000, 11(1): 99-104.]
[4] Liu H X, Wang D L, Zhang L et al. Comparative study on the agricultural management systems in black soil region of Songhuajiang River-Nenjiang River Plain of Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1994, 5(2): 148-151.
[刘鸿翔, 王德禄, 张素君 等. 松嫩平原黑土区不同养分循环结构农业经营制度的比较研究. 应用生态学报, 1994, 5(2): 148-151.]
[5] Shen S M, Liu H X, Wang K R et al. Contribution of fertilization development in food production and geographic differentiation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 9(4): 386-390.
[沈善敏, 刘鸿翔, 王凯荣 等. 施肥进步在粮食生产中的贡献及地理分异. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(4): 386-390.]
[6] Shen S M. A review on long-term fertilizer experiments in other countries. Journal of Soil Science, 1984, 15(2): 85-93.
[沈善敏. 国外的长期肥料试验. 土壤通报, 1984, 15(2): 85-93.]
[7] Ponnamperuma F N. Straw as a source of nutrients for wetland rice. In: S Banta, C V Mendoza (eds.), Organic Matter and Rice. Los Banos, The Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1984. 117-136.
[8] Sharma A R, Mittra B N. Effect of combination of organic materials and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of rice. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 1988, 111: 495-501.
[9] Wang Y H. Soil-ameliorating and fertilizing mechanism of organic manure. Journal of Soil Science, 1990, 21(4): 145-151.
[汪寅虎. 有机肥改土作用和供肥机制研究. 土壤通报, 1990, 21(4): 145-151.]
[10] He D Y. Mineralization characteristics of organic manure at gleyed paddy and N use by hybrid rice. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 1984, 15(2): 39-44.
[何电源. 潜育性水稻土中有机物的矿化特性及杂交水稻对氮素利用特点. 农业现代化研究, 1984, 15(2): 39-44.]
[11] Liu X L, Gao Z, Liu C S et al. Effect of combined application of organic manure and fertilizers on crop yield and soil fertility in a located experiment. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1996, 33(2): 138-147.
[刘杏兰, 高宗, 刘存寿 等. 有机-无机肥配施的增产效应及对土壤肥力影响的定位研究. 土壤学报, 1996, 33(2): 138-147.]
[12] Power J F, Koerner P T, Doran J W et al. Residual effects of crop residues on gain production and selected soil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1998, 62: 1393-1397.
[13] Liu J R, Zhang D Y, Zhou W. The effect of mixed application of organic and inorganic fertilizers in paddy (The third report). Acta Agriculture Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 1990, 12(1): 37-42.
[刘经荣, 张德远, 周卫. 水稻土有机、无机肥料配合施用的效应 (之三). 江西农业大学学报, 1990, 12(1): 37-42.]
[14] Verma T S, Bhagat R M. Impact of rice straw management practices on yield, nitrogen uptake and soil properties in a wheat-rice rotation in northern India. Fer. Res., 1992, 33: 97-106.
[15] Cassman K G, De Datta S K, Amaramte S T et al. Long-term comparison of the agronomic efficiency and residual benefits of organic and inorganic nitrogen source for tropical lowland rice. Exp. Agric., 1996, 32: 427-444.
[16] Xie X L, Peng P Q, Liu X P et al. Food safety and countermeasure of water issue at three provinces of middle reaches of Changjiang River. In: Scientific and Technical Countermeasure and Floodwater Disaster in Yangtze Valley. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. 217-222.
[谢小立, 彭佩钦, 刘新平 等. 长江中游三省粮食安全与水问题对策. 见: 长江流域洪涝灾害与科技对策. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999. 217-222.]
[17] Wang J S, Xu Z K, Yao J W. Analysis of food throughput per unit water use. Advances in Water Science, 1999, 10(4): 429-433.
[王建生, 徐子恺, 姚建文. 单位水量粮食生产能力分析. 水科学进展, 1999, 10(4): 429-433.]
[18] Zhu S J, Ding Y F. Moisture movement literature on summarizing SPAC system and agri-forestry. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 7(1): 49-51.
[朱首军, 丁艳芳, 薛泰谦. 土壤-植物-大气 (SPAC) 系统和农林复合系统水分运动研究综述. 水土保持研究, 2000, 7(1): 49-51.]
[19] Kang S Z, Liu X M, Xiong Y Z et al. The Theory and Application of Water Transport in Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum (APAC). Beijing: Publishing House of Water and Electricity. 1994. 184-186.
[康绍忠, 刘晓明, 熊运章 等著. 土壤—植物—大气连续体水分传输理论及其应用. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1994. 184-186.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |