土地利用

铁铝土的发生分类与系统分类参比特征

展开
  • 1. 土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室, 南京 210008;
    2. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所, 南京 210008
于东升 (1966-), 副研究员, 主要从事土壤资源与管理、土壤侵蚀与水土保持以及土壤信息系统等方面研究工作。E-mail: dshyu@issas.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2003-10-20

  修回日期: 2004-01-10

  网络出版日期: 2004-09-25

基金资助

江苏省自然科学基金重点项目 (BK2002504); 中国科学院知识创新工程信息化建设专项 (INF105-S); 中国科学院南京土壤研究所所长基金项目 (005102)

The Characteristics of Ferralosols References between Chinese Soil Taxonomy and Genetic Soil Classification of China

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Nanjing 210008, China;
    2. Institute of Soil Science, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China

Received date: 2003-10-20

  Revised date: 2004-01-10

  Online published: 2004-09-25

Supported by

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, No. BK2002504; Knowledge Innovation Project of CAS, No.INF105-S; General Foundation of Institute of Soil Science, CAS, No.005102

摘要

利用最新建立的1:100万中国土壤数据库,研究了我国铁铝土的发生分类与中国土壤系统分类的参比及其在中国土壤系统分类中的空间和数量特征。结果表明:我国发生分类铁铝土总面积为1122 969.6 km2,地带性分布规律明显;与发生分类铁铝土参比的中国土壤系统分类土纲有富铁土、淋溶土、雏形土、铁铝土、新成土和变性土6个,它们分别占发生分类铁铝土总面积的34.8%、32.2%、26.1%、6.3%、0.6%、0.04%,其中包含了25个土类和53个亚类,参比关系复杂,空间分布规律不明显。分析各类型土壤参比的面积及其标准偏差,结果表明土壤参比的单元级别越低,越易于参比和把握。虽然中国土壤系统分类研究已经完成了中、高级土壤分类单元的划分,但为使中国土壤系统分类更实用、更易于普及,深入开展土壤基层分类研究,进一步发展和完善中国土壤系统分类是必要的,也是十分迫切的。研究结果对于土壤类型的正确参比、中国土壤系统分类的应用与发展,具有很好的参考应用价值。

本文引用格式

于东升,史学正,王洪杰,孙维侠,陈志诚,龚子同 . 铁铝土的发生分类与系统分类参比特征[J]. 地理学报, 2004 , 59(5) : 671 -679 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200405004

Abstract

References between Genetic Soil Classification of China (GSCC) and Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST), characteristics of distribution of GSCC-Ferralosols in CST were studied, based on 1:100M Soil Database of China. GSCC-Ferralosol is a type of zonal soil with a total area of 1,122,969.6 km2 in China. There are 6 CST Orders referenced with GSCC-Ferralosols, including 25 CST Groups and 53 CST Subgroups, such as Ferrosols, Argosols, Cambosols, Ferralosols, Primosols and Vertosols, in percentages of total area of GSCC-Ferralosols respectively 34.8, 32.2, 26.1, 6.3, 0.6 and 0.04. The reference relationship between GSCC and CST was so complicated that there were no obvious distribution rules for the GSCC-Ferralosols in CST. Results obtained from statistics of references area of the soils in CST show that it is easier to grasp references if the references are all at lower level for both GSCC and CST. Although CST has been finished at high level, it is important and urgent to study and develop the CST at basic level, in order that the CST can be widely used. The result is also useful for soil reference and application of CST.

参考文献


[1] Soil Survey Staff in USDA. Keys to Soil Taxonomy (6th edn.), 1994. 1-306.

[2] FAO/ISRIC/ISSS. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Reports, 1998. 1-87.

[3] Research Group and Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Index on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (3rd edn.). Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2001. 1-275.
[中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤系统分类课题组. 中国土壤系统分类课题研究协作组. 中国土壤系统分类检索(第三版). 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社, 2001. 1-275.]

[4] Gong Zitong. The tendency of soil classification, standardization and internationalization. In: Advance in Chinese Soil Taxonomic Classification. Beijing: Science Press, 1993. 1-6.
[龚子同. 土壤分类的定量化、标准化和国际化. 见: 中国土壤系统分类进展. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993. 1-6.]

[5] Research Group and Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Index on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (2nd edn.). Beijing: Agricultural Science and Technology of China Press, 1995. 1-218.
[中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤系统分类课题组, 中国土壤系统分类课题研究协作组. 中国土壤系统分类检索(修订方案). 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1995. 1-218.]

[6] Research Group and Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Index on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (draft version). Beijing: Science Press, 1991. 1-120.
[中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤系统分类课题组, 中国土壤系统分类课题研究协作组. 中国土壤系统分类检索(首次方案). 北京: 科学出版社, 1991. 1-120.]

[7] Chen Zhicheng, Zhao Wenjun. Soil classification of Hainan island based on Index on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (draft version). In: Zhou Huizhen (ed.), Soil & Terrain Database and Mapping of Hainan Island. Beijing: Science Press, 1994. 10-24.
[陈志诚, 赵文君. 海南岛土壤类型——按《 中国土壤系统分类(首次方案) 》. 周慧珍 主编, 海南岛土壤与土地数据库及制图. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994. 10-24.]

[8] Gong Zitong, Chen Zhicheng, Luo Guobao et al. Soil reference with Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Soils, 1999, 31(2): 57-63.
[龚子同, 陈志诚, 骆国保 等. 中国土壤系统分类参比. 土壤, 1999, 31(2): 57-63.]

[9] Ding Ruixin, Liu Youzhao, Sun Yuhua. Soil reference with Chinese Soil Taxonomy in subtropical China. Soils, 1999, 31(2): 97-103.
[丁瑞兴, 刘友兆, 孙玉华. 我国亚热带湿润区土壤系统分类参比. 土壤, 1999, 31(2): 97-103.]

[10] Shi Xuezheng, Gong Zitong. Soil references between soil classifications systems in south-east China. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1996, 27(3): 97-102.
[史学正, 龚子同. 我国东南部不同分类系统中土壤类别归属的对比研究. 土壤通报, 1996, 27(3): 97-102.]

[11] Chen Zhicheng, Zhao Wenjun. Soil classification of ferralosols of China. Soils, 1989, 21(2): 75-79.
[陈志诚, 赵文君. 我国铁铝土的分类. 土壤, 1989, 21(2): 75-79.]

[12] Chen Zhicheng, Zhao Wenjun. Soil references of latosol with Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Soils, 1999, 31(2): 90-96.
[陈志诚, 赵文君. "砖红壤"在土壤系统分类中的归属. 土壤, 1999, 31(2): 90-96.]

[13] Chen Jianfei. Soil types references of Wuyi Mountain. Soils, 1999, 31(3): 149-154.
[陈健飞. 武夷山土壤分类参比. 土壤, 1999, 31(3): 149-154.]

文章导航

/