城市地理

转型期中国城镇居民住房类型分化及其影响因素——基于CGSS (2005) 的分析

展开
  • 1. 华南师范大学地理科学学院,广州510631;
    2. 中山大学城市与区域研究中心,广州510275
刘望保(1975-), 男, 博士, 副研究员, 中国地理学会会员(S110007720M), 主要研究方向为城市社会地理。 E-mail: wbliu@scnu.edu.cn; liufeng09023@126.com.

收稿日期: 2009-07-13

  修回日期: 2010-05-30

  网络出版日期: 2010-08-20

基金资助

香港浸会大学基金项目(HKBU2080/99H); 教育部人文社科青年项目(09YJC840016)

Housing Type Variation and Its Influencing Factors in Transitional Urban China:Based on Analysis of CGSS 2005

Expand
  • 1. School of Geographical Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China;
    2. Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Sun Yet-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received date: 2009-07-13

  Revised date: 2010-05-30

  Online published: 2010-08-20

Supported by

Fund of Hong Kong Baptist University, No.HKBU2080/99H; Fund of Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education,No.09YJC840016

摘要

转型时期我国城镇居民主要通过市场竞争机制和科层分配体制来获取个人住房,获取稀缺的住房资源的途径和机会的差异在一定程度上反映了住房不平等和社会分化。处于体制转型时期的中国城镇,制度、市场和家庭因素等多重因素相互交织,共同影响中国城镇居民住房选择。以覆盖全国88 个城镇的《中国综合社会调查(CGSS)》(2005 年城镇部分) 调查资料为基础,本文分析了转型背景下中国城镇居民住房类型分化及其影响因素,研究发现:改革 开放30 多年以来,中国城镇的住房自有率大幅度提高,其主要原因从1998 年前的公房房改政策向1998 年后住房市场化政策转变。家庭生命周期、家庭收入、户籍、单位性质、职业等变 量显著影响住房选择,体现市场与制度对住房资源分配的双重影响。经济发达地区由于住房资源紧缺、住房价格高,居民住房承受能力差异较大,工作单位性质、户籍和家庭生命周期变量对住房选择的影响更显著。随着住房市场化进一步发展和住房制度改革的逐步深入,地方政府应逐步放宽社会住房的享受标准,尤其是户籍限制条件;开发商应更关注社会经济快 速转型背景下的家庭结构变化及其对居住偏好的影响。

本文引用格式

刘望保, 闫小培, 曹小曙 . 转型期中国城镇居民住房类型分化及其影响因素——基于CGSS (2005) 的分析[J]. 地理学报, 2010 , 65(8) : 949 -960 . DOI: 10.11821/xb201008006

Abstract

Market competition mechanism and bureaucracy distribution system are the two main channels for China's urban residents to obtain individual housing. To some extent, the differences of channels and opportunities for different types of households to obtain rare housing resources reflect housing inequality and social division in urban China. Institutional factors, market factors and household factors have interacted to shape individual's housing choice in transitional urban China. Using China's General Social Survey (CGSS 2005) (urban part) which covers 88 cities across the country, this paper analyzes housing type variation and its influencing factors in transitional urban China. It is found that house-ownership rate increases more quickly since the reform in 1978 and its main causes have transformed from public housing reform policy to housing commercialisation policy prior to and after 1998. Housing commercialisation has been enhanced gradually, and diversity characterizes housing tenure structure in transitional urban China. The findings demonstrate that household life cycle change, income, hukou, types of work units and occupation have significant impacts on housing choice which manifests the dual significant effect on housing distribution system from institutional and market force. The findings also reveal that types of work units, hukou and life cycle variables have more significant effects on housing choice in more developed areas when housing sources tend to be rare resources and house prices go high and there exists a great gap of housing affordability among residents. With future development of housing commercialisation and housing system reform, local government should gradually relax the constraints for social housing, especially the hukou constraints. Real estate developers should concern more about household structure change and its impacts on the residential preferences in the context of rapid socio-economic transformation.

参考文献


[1] Rex J, Moore R. Race, Community and Conflict. London: Oxford University Press, 1967.

[2] Li Lulu, Li Hanlin, Wang Fenning. China's Danwei system and system reform. Chinese Social Sciences Quarterly (Hongkong), 1994(Spring): 5-16.
[李路路, 李汉林, 王奋宁. 中国的单位现象与体制改革. 中国社会科学季刊(香港), 1994, (春季卷): 5-16.]

[3] Chai Yanwei, Chen Lingji, Zhang Chun. Transformation of Danwei system: An angle of view on city changes in China. World Regional Studies, 2007, 16(4): 60-69.
[柴彦威, 陈零极, 张纯. 单位制度变迁:透视中国城市转型的重要视角.世 界地理研究, 2007, 16(4): 60-69.]

[4] Bian Yanjie, Liu Yongli. Social stratification, home ownership, and quality of living: Evidence from China's Fifth Census. Sociological Research, 2005, (3): 86-98.
[边燕杰, 刘勇利. 社会分层、住房产权和居住质量: 对中国“五普” 数据的分析. 社会学研究, 2005, (3): 86-98.]

[5] Arnott R. Economic theory and housing//SMill E//Handbook of Urban Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1987.

[6] Henderson J V, Ioannides Y M. A model of tenure choice. The American Economic Review, 1983, 73(1): 98-113.

[7] Henderson J V, Ioannides Y M. Tenure choice and the demand for housing. Economics, 1985, 53(210): 231-246.

[8] Henderson J V, Ioannides Y M. Owner occupancy: Investment and consumption demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 1987, 21(2): 228-241.

[9] Henderson J V, Ioannides Y M. Dynamic aspects of consumer decisions in housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 1989, 26: 212-230.

[10] Clark W A V, Dieleman F M. Households and Housing: Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market. New Jersey: New Brunswick, 1996.

[11] Wang Yaping. Housing reform and its impacts on the urban poor in China. Housing Studies, 2000, 15(6): 845-864.

[12] Wang Yaping, Alan Murie. Social and spatial implications of housing reform in China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000, 24(2): 397-416.

[13] Huang Youqin. Renters' housing behavior in transitional urban China. Housing Studies, 2003, 18(1): 103-126.

[14] Huang Youqin. Housing tenure choice in transitional urban China: A multilevel analysis. Housing Studies, 2001, 39(1): 7-32.

[15] Li Siming. Housing tenure and residential mobility in urban China: A study of commodity housing development in Beijing and Guangzhou. Urban Affairs Reviews, 2003, 38(4): 510-534.

[16] Mayer K, Tuman N. Event History Analysis in Life Course Research. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.

[17] Henretta J C. Family transitions, housing market context and first home purchase by young married households. Social Forces, 1987, 66(2): 520-536.

[18] Feijten P, Mulder C H. The timing of household event and housing events in the Netherlands: A longitudinal perspective. Housing Studies, 2002, 17(5): 773-792.

[19] Dieleman F M, Everaers P C J. From renting to owning: Life course and housing market circumstances. Housing Studies, 1994, 9(1): 11-25.

[20] Deurloo M C, Clark W A C, Dieleman F M. The moving to housing ownership in temporal and regional contexts. Environment and Planning A, 1994, 26(11): 1659-1670.

[21] Wang Xingzhong. Studies on China's Urban Social Spatial Structure. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
[王兴中. 中国社会 空间结构研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.]

[22] Wu Qiyan, Ren Dongming, Yang Yinkai et al. The theoretical basis of urban residential differentiation and its research field. Human Geography, 2000, 15(3): 1-5.
[吴启焰, 任东明, 杨荫凯等. 城市居住空间分异的理论基础和研究层次. 人文地理, 2000, 15(3): 1-5.]

[23] Yi Zheng. Residential mobility in transitional urban China: A case study of Guangzhou
[D]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-Sen University, 2003.
[易峥. 社会转型时期中国城市居住流动研究: 以广州为例
[D]. 广州: 中山大学, 2003.]

[24] Liu Wangbao, Yan Xiaopei. Comparison of influencing factors for residential mobility between different household register types in transitional urban China: A case study of Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 2007, 26(5): 1055-1065.
[ 刘望保, 闫小培. 转型期广州市居住迁移影响因素于户籍之间的比较. 地理研究, 2007, 26(5): 1055-1065.]

[25] Feng Jian, Zhou Yixing. Intra-urban migration and correlative spatial behavior in Beijing in the process of suburbanization: Based on 1000 questionnaires. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(2): 227-242.
[冯健, 周一星. 郊区化 过程中北京城市内部迁居及相关空间行为: 基于千份问卷调查分析. 地理研究, 2004, 23(2): 227-242.]

[26] Liu Wangbao, Yan Xiaopei, Cao Xiaoshu. A study on urban resident housing tenure stratification in Guangzhou during the transitional period. Tropical Geography, 2006, 26(4): 349-364.
[刘望保, 闫小培, 曹小曙. 转型期广州市城市居民 住房产权分异研究. 热带地理, 2006, 26(4): 349-364.]

[27] Zhou Suhong, Yan Xiaopei. The impact of commuters' travel pattern on urban structure: A case study in some typical communities in Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sincia, 2006, 61(2): 179-189.
[周素红, 闫小培. 基于居民通勤行为分析 的城市空间解读: 以广州市典型案例为案例. 地理学报. 2006, 61(2): 179-189.]

[28] Liu Wangbao, Yan Xiaopei, Fang Yuanping et al. Related characteristics and mechanisms for excess commuting in Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sincia, 2008, 63(10): 1085-1096.
[刘望保, 闫小培, 方远平等. 广州市过剩通勤相关特 征及其形成机制. 地理学报, 2008, 63(10): 1085-1096.]

[29] Gao Xiaolu. Modeling housing demand structure with an example of Beijing. Acta Geographica Sincia, 2008, 63(10): 1033-1044.
[高晓路. 北京市居民住房需求结构分析. 地理学报, 2008, 63(10): 1033-1044.]

[30] Zhang Wenzhong, Liu Wang, Meng Bin. On location advantage value of residential environment (LAVRE) in the urban and suburban areas of Beijing. Acta Geographica Sincia, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.
[张文忠, 刘旺, 孟斌. 北京市居住环境的区位优势度分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 115-121.]

[31] Meng Bin. The spatial organization of the separation between jobs and residential locations in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sincia, 2009, 64(12): 1457-1466.
[孟斌. 北京城市居民职住分离的空间组织特征. 地理学报, 2009, 64 (12): 1457-1466.]

[32] Bian Yanjie, Logan J R. “Work Units” and the commodification of housing: Observations on the transition to a market economy with Chinese characteristics. Social Sciences in China, 1997, 18(4): 28-35.

文章导航

/