山地研究

小五台山亚高山草甸生物多样性的空间格局

展开
  • 北京师范大学资源科学研究所,北京师范大学中国生态资产评估研究中心,北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京 100875
黄晓霞 (1978-), 女, 博士生。通讯作者:江源jiangy@bnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2002-07-11

  修回日期: 2002-10-28

  网络出版日期: 2003-03-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(40071002)

The Spatial Pattern of Biodiversity in Subalpine Meadow on Mt. Xiaowutai

Expand
  • Institute of Resources Science, Beijing Normal University; China Ecological Capital Assessment Research Center, Beijing Normal University; Key Lab of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2002-07-11

  Revised date: 2002-10-28

  Online published: 2003-03-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40071002

摘要

在野外考察获取第一手资料的基础上,主要采用Shannon-Weaver指数和S?rensen指数对小五台山亚高山草甸植被的植物生物多样性及其空间变化格局进行了分析和研究。主要结论如下:1) 海拔高度对植物生物多样性影响非常明显,海拔2300 m和2700 m左右分别既是α多样性也是β多样性出现明显变化的地段。2) 不同坡向条件下群落的α多样性表现为东坡>西坡>南坡>北坡;而S?rensen指数分析表明,当坡向变化时,β多样性较高。3) 山坡中部特别是中下部具有较高的α多样性,而β多样性较低,坡面上β多样性的大小主要取决于坡面所处海拔高度的范围。

本文引用格式

黄晓霞,江源,刘全儒,黄秋如,戴泉玉 . 小五台山亚高山草甸生物多样性的空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2003 , 58(2) : 186 -192 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200302004

Abstract

Based on the data from field survey in subalpine meadow on Mt. Xiaowutai, Hebei Province, α diversity and β diversity of the meadow were analyzed through Shannon-Weaver index and S?rensen index analysis in this paper. The results are as follows: 1) Both diversity indexes change obviously with elevation, and α diversity and β diversity change dramatically at the elevations of around 2300 m and 2700 m. 2) The order of α diversity index, from high to low, is Eastern > Western > Southern > Northern. β diversity reflected by S?rensen index increases when slope exposure changes. 3) Higher α diversity, but lower β diversity is observed on the mid-slope or the mid-bottom slope. The value of β diversity depends mostly on the range of elevation, normally between 2300 m and 2750 m, the β value reaches the highest.

参考文献


[1] Cui Haiting. On the demarcation of subalpine and alpine in North China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1983, 28(8): 494-497.
[崔海亭. 关于华北山地高山带和亚高山带的划分问题. 科学通报, 1983, 28(8): 494-497.]

[2] K?rner C. Alpine Plant Life: Fnctional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999.

[3] Zhang Jintun. A preliminary study on Kobresia meadow on Wutai Mountains in Shanxi province, China. Journal of Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition), 1989, 12(3): 353-360.
[张金屯. 山西五台山嵩草草甸的初步研究. 山西大学学报 (自然科学版), 1989, 12(3): 353-360.]

[4] Cao Yanli, Cui Haiting, Liu Hongyan et al. Remote sensing analysis of alpine landscape of Wutai Mts., Shanxi province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(3): 298-306.
[曹燕丽, 崔海亭, 刘鸿雁 等. 五台山高山带景观的遥感分析. 地理学报, 2001, 56(3): 298-306.]

[5] Gao Xianming, Ma Keping, Huang Jianhui et al. Studies on plant community diversity in Donglinshan mountain, Beijing, China: XI. the βdiversity of mountain meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1998, 18(1): 24-32.
[高贤明, 马克平, 黄建辉 等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究XI 山地草甸β多样性. 生态学报, 1998, 18(1): 24-32.]

[6] Yu Pengtao, Liu Hongyan. Surface pollen and its climatical significance of vertical zone in Beitai, Xiaowutai Mountain. Universitatis Pekinensis (Acta Scientiarum Naturalium), 1997, 33(4): 475-484.
[于澎涛, 刘鸿雁. 小五台山北台北坡植被垂直带的表土花粉及其气候意义研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 33(4): 475-484.]

[7] Ma Keping. Plant community diversity in Dongling Mountain, Beijing, China: II. species richness, evenness and species diversities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1995, 15(3): 268-278. (In Chinese)
[马克平. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究: II. 丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数. 生态学报, 1995, 15(3): 268-278.]

[8] Dierschke, Hartmut. Pflanzensoziologie. Stuttgart, Ulmer., 1994.

[9] Whittaker, Robert H. Communities and Ecosystems. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1970.

[10] Zhang Jintun, Mi Xiangcheng. Pattern analysis of dominant species and communities of subalpine meadow in Wutai Mountains, Shanxi. Henan Science, 1999, 17(Suppl.): 65-67.
[张金屯, 米湘成. 山西五台山亚高山草甸优势种群和群落的格局研究. 河南科学, 1999, 17(专辑): 65-67.]

文章导航

/