陆地生物圈动态模式:生态系统模拟的发展趋势
收稿日期: 2001-12-21
修回日期: 2002-03-09
网络出版日期: 2002-07-25
基金资助
国家基金委海外杰出青年基金(40128005); 中国科学院海外知名学者计划
Dynamics of the Terrestrial Biosphere in Changing Global Environments: Date, Models, and Validation
Received date: 2001-12-21
Revised date: 2002-03-09
Online published: 2002-07-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40128005
陆地生物圈是一个通过能量、水及各个化学要素与大气及物理气候系统进行交换而相互作用的动态系统。由于生物圈平衡模式有很多局限性,目前迫切需要发展新一代模式—生物圈动态模式,用来在全球变化的背景下评价和预测陆地生物圈初级生产力和生物地球化学循环。陆地生物圈动态模式的目的是模拟自然和人类活动扰动导致的陆地生态系统中的动态变化,以及陆地生物圈与大气之间能量、水和碳循环之间的相互作用。开发生物圈动态模式的关键差距并不在于我们没有构建模式源代码的能力,而在于不能很好地描述经验与构建模式所应用的概念之间的联系,尤其是缺乏构建模式所必需的数据,以及对陆地生态系统复杂机理的认识尚不完整、对如何提高和扩展我们已有的知识以及如何对模式进行验证缺乏了解。数据、模式结构、参数库和预测不确定性之间的相互作用将会推动生物圈动态模式的进步与发展。
田汉勤 . 陆地生物圈动态模式:生态系统模拟的发展趋势[J]. 地理学报, 2002 , 57(4) : 379 -388 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200204001
The terrestrial biosphere is a dynamic system that interacts with the atmosphere and climate principally through the exchanges of energy, water and elements. Because of the limitations of equilibrium terrestrial biosphere models, the new generation models - dynamic biosphere models, are critically needed for assessing and predicting the primary production and biogeochemical cycles of the terrestrial biosphere in changing global environments. The goal of dynamic biosphere modeling is to model dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems induced by natural and anthropogenic disturbances, as well as the interactions of energy, water and carbon cycles within the terrestrial biosphere and between the terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere. The critical gaps in developing such a terrestrial biosphere model are not our inability to construct model code but instead the poorly developed links between empiricism and the concepts we used to construct our models, especially: a lack of data that would help to make our models mechanistic, an incomplete fundamental knowledge about how complex terrestrial ecosystems work, a poor understanding of how to scale up what we do know and of how to validate such a model. We have watched many models put forth as hypotheses, criticized, and fail to predict--but then over time become more and more useful, more mechanistic, and genuinely predictive.
Key words： biosphere; carbon cycle; ecosystem dynamics; ecosystem model
[1] Melillo J M, Houghton R, Kicklighter D W et al. Tropical deforestation and the global carbon budget. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ., 1996, 21: 293-310.
[2] Tian H, Melillo J M, Kicklighter D W et al. Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems. Nature, 1998, 396: 664-667.
[3] Schimel D, Melillo J, Tian H et al. Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science, 2000, 287: 2004-2006.
[4] Prentice I C et al. The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric CO2, Chapter 3. In: The Third Assessment Report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2001. Cambridge University Press.
[5] Melillo J M, McGuire A D, Kicklighter D W et al. Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature, 1993, 363: 234-240.
[6] Smith T M, Shugart H H. The transient response of terrestrial carbon storage to a perturbed climate. Nature, 1993, 361: 523-526.
[7] Rotmans J, den Elzen M G J. Modeling feedback mechanisms in the carbon cycle: balancing the carbon budget. Tellus, 1993, 45B: 301-320.
[8] Running S W, Hunt Jr. E R. Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. In: Ehleringer J R, Field C (eds.), Scaling Processes Between Leaf and Landscape Levels. Orlando: Academic Press, 1993. 141-158.
[9] Potter C S, Randerson J, Field C B et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1993, 7: 811-841.
[10] VEMAP Members. VEMAP: a comparison of biogeography and biogeochemistry models in the context of global climate change. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1995, 9: 407-437.
[11] Post W M, King A, Wullschleger S. Historical variations of terrestrial carbon storage. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1997, 11: 99-109.
[12] Cao M, Woodward F I. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature, 1998, 393: 249-252.
[13] Tian H, Melillo J M, Kicklighter D W et al. The sensitivity of terrestrial carbon storage to historical climate variability and atmospheric CO2 in the United States. Tellus, 1999a, 51B: 414-452.
[14] Odum H T. Systems Ecology: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons., 1983.
[15] Hall C A S. An assessment of several of most important theoretical models in ecology and of the data used in their support. Ecol. Model., 1988, 43: 5-31.
[16] Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K. Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science, 1994, 263: 641-646.
[17] Rastetter E B. Validating models of ecosystem response to global change. BioScience, 1996, 46: 190-198.
[18] Lieth H. Modeling the primary productivity of the world. In: Lieth, Whittaker R H (eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975. 237-263.
[19] Dai A, Fung I Y. Can climate variability contribute to the "missing" CO2 sink? Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1993, 7:599-609.
[20] Heimann M et al. Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models through simulations of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2: first results of a model intercomparison study. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1998, 12: 10-24.
[21] Fung I Y, Tucker C J, Prentice K C. Application of advanced very high resolution radiometer vegetation index to study atmosphere-biosphere exchange of CO2. J. Geophys. Res., 1987, 92: 2999-3015.
[22] Heimann M, Keeling C D. A three dimensional analysis of atmospheric CO2 transport based on observed winds: 2. model description and simulated tracer experiments. In: Peterson J H (ed.), Aspects of Climatic Variability in the Pacific and Western Americas. Geophys. Monog., 1989, 55: 237-275.
[23] Lovelock J E. Geophysiology: a new look at earth science. In: Dickison R E (ed.), The Geophysiology of Amazonia: Vegetation and Climate Interactions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987. 11-24.
[24] Lovelock J E, Kump L R. Failure of climate regulation in a geophysiological model. Nature, 1994, 369: 732-734.
[25] McGuire A D, Melillo J M, Joyce L A et al. Interactions between carbon and nitrogen dynamics in estimating net primary productivity for potential vegetation in North America. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1992, 6:101-124.
[26] Bonan G B. Land-atmosphere interactions for climate system models: coupling biophysical, biogeochemical, and ecosystem dynamical processes. Remote Sens. Environ., 1995, 51: 57-73.
[27] Ji Jingjun. A climate-vegetation interaction model: simulating physical and biological processes at the surface. Journal of Biogeography, 1995, 22: 445-451.
[28] Sellers P J, Bounoua L, Collatz G J et al. Comparison of radiative and physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO2 on climate. Science, 1996, 271:1402-1406.
[29] Sellers P J, Dickinson R E, Randall D A et al. Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science, 1997, 275: 502-509.
[30] Parton W J, Stewart J W, Cole C V. Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochem., 1988, 5: 109-131.
[31] Kindermann J et al. Structure of a global carbon exchange model for the terrestrial biosphere: the Frankfurt Biosphere Model (FBM). Water Air Soil Pollut., 1993, 70: 675-684.
[32] Henderson-Sellers A. Continental vegetation as a dynamic component of global climate models: a preliminary assessment. Clim. Change, 1993, 23: 337-377.
[33] Zeng N, Neelin J D, Lao K M et al. Enhancement of interdecadal climate variability in the Sahel by vegetation interaction. Science, 2000, 286: 1537-1540.
[34] Patten B C. Systems approach to concept of environment. Ohio J. Sci., 1978, 78: 206-222.
[35] Patten B C, Jorgensen S E. Complex Ecology: The Part-Whole Relation in Ecosystems. Prentice Hall Canada, 1994.
[36] Emanual W R. Modeling carbon cycling on disturbed landscape. Ecol. Model, 1996, 891: 1-12.
[37] Schimel D S et al. Spatial variability in ecosystem processes at the continental scale: models, data, and the role of disturbance. Ecol. Monog., 1997, 67: 251-271.
[38] Kindermann J et al. Interannual variations of carbon flux exchange. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1996, 10: 737-755.
[39] Friedlingstein P, Fung I, Holland E et al. On the contribution of the biosphere CO2 fertilization to the missing sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1995, 9: 541-556.
[40] Davis M B. Lags in vegetation response to greenhouse warming. Clim. Change, 1989, 15: 75-82.
[41] Braswell B H, Schimel D S, Linder E et al. The response of global terrestrial ecosystems to interannual temperature variability. Science, 1997, 278: 870-872.
[42] Minnen J G V, Goldewijk K K, Leemans R. The importance of feedback processes and vegetation transition in the terrestrial carbon cycle. J. Biogeog., 1995, 22: 805-814.
[43] Botkin D B, Janak J F, Wallis J R. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol.,1972, 60: 948-972.
[44] Botkin D B. Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[45] Shugart H H. A Theory of Forest Dynamics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.
[46] Solomon A M. Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: simulation modeling experiments in eastern North America. Oecologia, 1986, 68: 567-579.
[47] Running S W, Gower S T. FOREST-BGC, a general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional application. Tree Physiol., 1991, 9: 147-160.
[48] Friend A D, Stevens A K, Knox R G et al. A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v3.0). Ecol. Model., 1997, 95: 249-287.
[49] Plochl M, Gramer W. Coupling global models of vegetation structure and ecosystem processes. Tellus, 1995, 47B: 240-250.
[50] Haxeltine A, Prentice I C, Cresswell I D. A coupled carbon and water flux model to predict vegetation structure. J. Veg. Sci., 1996, 7: 651-666.
[51] Bormann F H, Likens G E. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.
[52] Tian H, Qi Y. An analysis on ecological succession processes. In: Ma Shijun (ed.), Advance in Modern Ecology. Beijing: Science Press, 1990. 90-100.
[53] Wofsy S C, Munger J E, Bakwin P S et al. Net CO2 uptake by northern woodlands. Science, 1993, 260: 1314-1317.
[54] Grace J, Lloyd J, McIntyre J et al. Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain forest in southwest Amazonia, 1992 to 1993. Science, 1995, 270: 778-780.
[55] Goulden M L, Munger J W, Fan S et al. Exchange of carbon diocide by a deciduous forest response to interannual climate variability. Science, 1996, 271: 1576-1578.
[56] Prentice I C, Cramer W, Harrison S P et al. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J. Biogeog., 1992, 19: 117-134.
[57] Neilson R P. Vegetation redistribution: a posssible biosphere source of CO2 during climatic change. Water, Air and Soil Pollut., 1993, 70: 659-673.
[58] Neilson R P, Marks D. A global perspective of regional vegetation and hydrologic sensitivity from climate change. J. Veg. Sci., 1995, 5: 715-730.
[59] King G A, Neilson R P. The transient response of vegetation to climate change: a potential source of CO2 to the atmosphere. Water Air Soil Pollut., 1992, 64: 365-383.
[60] Woodward F I, Smith T M, Emanuel W R. A global primary productivity and phytogeography model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1995, 9: 471-490.
[61] Skole D, Tucker C J. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science, 1993, 260: 1905-1910.
[62] Houghton R A. The worldwide extent of land use change. Bioscience, 1994, 44: 305-313.
[63] Tian H, Xu H, Hall C A S. Pattern and change of a boreal forest landscape in the northeastern China. Water, Air and Soil Pollut., 1995, 82: 465-476.
[64] Turner II B, Clark W, Kates R et al. The Earth as Transformed by Human Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[65] Matson P A, Parton W J, Power A G et al. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 1997, 277: 504-507.
[66] Detwiler R P, Hall C A S. Tropical forests and the global carbon budget. Science, 1988, 239: 42-47.
[67] Dixon R K, Brown S A, Houghton R A et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 1994, 263:185-190.
[68] Houghton R A. Terrestrial sources and sinks of carbon inferred from terrestrial data. Tellus, 1996, 48B: 420-432.
[69] Dickinson R E. Changes in land use. In: Kevin E Trenberth (eds.), Climate System Modeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 149-172.
[70] Turner II B L, Skole D, Sanderson S et al. Land-use and land-cover change science/research plan. In: IGBP Global Change Report No.35 and HDP Report No.7. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme and the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Programme, 1995, Stockholm and Geneva.
[71] Solomon A M, Prentice K C, Leemans R et al. The interaction of climate and land use in future terrestrial carbon storage and release. Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 1993, 70: 595-614.
[72] Turner II B, Moss R, Skole D. Relating land use and global land-cover change: a proposal for an IGBP-HDP core project. IGBP Report No. 24, 1993, Sweden.
[73] Hall C A S, Cleveland C J, Kaufmann R. Energy and Resource Quality: The Ecology of the Economic Process. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
[74] Moore B, Boone R D, Hobbie J E et al. A simple model for analysis of the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the global carbon budget. In: Bolin B (ed.), Modelling the Global Carbon Cycle, SCOPE 16. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981. 365-385.
[75] Houghton R A, Hobbie J E, Melillo J M et al. Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecol. Monog., 1983, 53: 235-262.
[76] Melillo J M, Fruci J R, Houghton R A et al. Land-use change in the Soviet Union between 1850 and 1980: causes of a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Tellus, 1988, 40B: 116-128.
[77] Hall C A S, Uhlig J. Refining estimates of carbon release from tropical land use change. Can. J. For. Res., 1991, 21: 118-131.
[78] Dale V H, O'Neill R V, Pedlowski M A et al. Causes and effects of land-use change in central Rondonia, Brazil. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 1993, 59: 997-1005.
[79] Hall C A S, Tian H, Qi Y et al. Modeling spatial and temporal pattern of tropical land use change. J. Biogeog., 1995, 22: 753-757.
[80] Qi Y, Hall C A S, Tian H et al. A rule-based spatial model of land-use change and carbon dynamics. Geographic Information Science, 1996, 2: 24-36.
[81] Lambin E. Modeling deforestation processes: a review. TREES Series B/11. European Commision DG XIII, Luxembourg, 1994.
[82] Likens G E, Bormann F H, Johnson N M. Interactions between major biogeochemical cycles in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Gene E Likens (ed.), Some Perspective of the Major Biogeochemical Cycles. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981. 93-111.
[83] Schindler D W, Bayley S E. The biosphere as an increasing sink for atmospheric carbon: estimates from increased nitrogen deposition. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1993, 7: 717-734.
[84] Hudson R J M, Gherini S A, Goldstein R A. Modeling the global carbon cycle: Nitrogen fertilization of the terrestrial biosphere and the "missing" CO2 sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1994, 8: 307-333.
[85] Dickinson R E, Henderson-Sellers A, Kennedy P J et al. Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model. Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-275+STR, 1986, Boulder.
[86] Sellers P J, Mintz Y, Sud Y C et al. A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 1986, 43: 505-531.
[87] Dickinson R E. Land processes in climate models. Remote Sens. Environ., 1995, 51: 27-38.
[88] Foley J A, Prentice I C, Ramankutty N et al. An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1996, 10: 603-628.
[89] Cox P M, Betts R A, Jones C D et al. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature, 2000, 408: 184-187.
[90] Rastetter E B, King A W, Cosby B J et al. Aggregating fine-scale ecological knowledge to model coarser-scale attributes of ecosystems. Ecol. Appl., 1992, 2: 55-70.
[91] Keeling C D, Bacastow R B, Carter A F et al. A three dimensional analysis of atmospheric CO2 transport based on observed winds I: analysis of observational data. In: Peterson J H (ed.), Aspects of Climatic Variability in the Pacific and Western Americas. Geophys. Monog., 1989, 55: 165-236.
[92] Keeling C D, Whorf T P, Wahlen M et al. Interannual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980. Nature, 1995, 375: 666-670.
[93] Enting I G, Trudinger C M, Francey R J. A synthesis inversion of the concentration and 13C of atmospheric CO2. Tellus, 1995, 47B: 35-52.
[94] Hall C A S, Ekdahl C A, Wartenberg D E. A 15 year record of the biotic metabolism in the Northern Hemisphere. Nature, 1975, 255: 136-138.
[95] Tian H, Hall C A S, Qi Y. Increased biotic metabolism of the biosphere inferred from observed data and model. Sci. in China (Ser. B), 2000a, 43(1): 58-68.
[96] Prentice K, Fung I Y. The sensitivity of terrestrial carbon storage to climate change. Nature, 1990, 346: 48-50.
[97] Overpeck J T, Bartlein P J, Webb III T. Potential magnitude of future vegetation change in eastern North America: comparisons with the past. Science, 1991, 254: 692-695.
[98] Foley J A, Kutzbach J E, Coe M T et al. Feedbacks between climate and boreal forests during the mid-Holocene, Nature, 1994, 371: 52-54.
[99] Peng C H, Guiot J, Campo E V et al. Temporal and spatial variations of terrestrial biomes and carbon storage since 13000 yr BP in Europe: reconstruction from pollen data and statistical models. Water, Air and Soil Pollut., 1995, 82: 375-390.
[100] TEMPO. Potential role of vegetation feedback in the climate sensitivity of high-latitude regions: a case study at 6000 years BP. Glob. Biogeochem. Cyc., 1996, 10: 727-736.
[101] Overpeck J T. Paleoclimtology and climate system dynamics. Rev. Geophys., (suppl.), 1995: 863-871.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |