生态环境的区域差异

黄土丘陵小流域土壤物理性质的 空间变异

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心系统生态开放实验室, 北京 100085;
    2. 北京师范大学资源与环境科学系, 北京 100875;
    3. 国土资源部土地整理中心, 北京 100035
邱扬 (1969- ), 男, 博士。主要从事景观生态与土地质量、干扰生态与植物生态、土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail: qiuyang69@sohu.com

收稿日期: 2002-02-09

  修回日期: 2002-06-07

  网络出版日期: 2002-09-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目 (90102018); 国土资源部科技项目 (2001010104)

Variability of the Soil Physical Properties on the Loess Plateau

Expand
  • 1. Department of Systems Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100085, China;
    2. Department of Resources and Environmental Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    3. Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100035, China

Received date: 2002-02-09

  Revised date: 2002-06-07

  Online published: 2002-09-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 90102018; Science & Technology Project of Ministry of Land and Resources, China, No. 2001010104

摘要

黄土丘陵小流域土壤物理性质在景观尺度上的空间变异以质地、容重和饱和含水量最小,稳定入渗率最大,团稳性与粘结力居中。不同土地利用类型之间诸项物理性质都存在显著差异。土壤质地以林地的砂粒含量显著偏低但粉粒含量显著高于其它土地利用类型,休闲地的粉粒含量显著较低;容重以林地显著偏大,耕地较小;饱和含水量以灌木地较大,林地显著偏低;土壤团稳性以林地显著偏高,耕地显著偏低;土壤粘结力以灌木地、林地、荒地和休闲地显著较强,耕地显著较弱;稳定入渗率以灌木地显著较高,间作地显著较低。就坡形来说,垂直与水平凹形坡的砂粒含量都显著较低而粉粒含量比较高,相反直形坡的砂粒比较高而粉粒含量显著较低;饱和含水量与稳定入渗率都是以垂直直形坡较高,垂直凹形坡则较低。就坡向而言,偏东坡的土壤粘结力显著低于偏西坡;偏北坡土壤质地比偏南坡粘性强,但稳定入渗率低。稳定入渗率还随坡度的增大而增高。随着海拔的升高,土壤砂粒含量与稳定入渗率增高,而粘粒含量与团稳性呈降低趋势。

本文引用格式

邱扬,傅伯杰,王军,陈利顶 . 黄土丘陵小流域土壤物理性质的 空间变异[J]. 地理学报, 2002 , 57(5) : 587 -594 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200205011

Abstract

The degree of spatial variability of the soil physical properties and the ability of environmental attributes to predict that variability were studied in Da Nangou catchment (3.5 km2) on the Loess Plateau, China. The soil physical properties including soil texture (sand, silt, clay), bulk density, saturated soil moisture content, aggregate stability, soil cohesion, stable infiltration rate were measured at 111 plots across the catchment. It is found that the spatial variation is small for soil texture, bulk density and saturated soil moisture content, moderate for aggregate stability and cohesion, and great for stable infiltration. The spatial distribution of the soil physical properties is due to the joint-influence of land use and topography, and the dominant factors differ for different soil physical properties. There is significant difference in the soil physical properties between different land use types as determined by the correlation analysis. The sand content shows the lowest value while the silt content exhibits the highest values on the woodland, and the silt content is lower for the fallow land than the other land use types. The bulk density exhibits the greatest values for the woodland while it is the lowest for the cropland. For the saturated soil moisture content, it is the greatest for the shrub land while it is the lowest for the woodland. The woodland also is the strongest in the aggregate stability, while the cropland is the weakest. The soil cohesion shows higher values for the shrub land, woodland, wasteland and the fallow land, but it displays a lower value for the cropland. The shrub land is the greatest in the stable infiltration rate, while the intercropping land is the lowest. Based on the correlation analysis, it is indicated that a significant correlation exists between the soil physical properties and the terrain indices. The sand content is lower and the silt content is higher on the concave slope than the other surface types, however, the straight slope shows an opposite picture.

参考文献


[1] Qiu Yang, Fu Bojie, Wang Yong. Spatiotemporal variation in soil erosion and its relation to the environmental factors. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 16(1): 11-16.
[邱扬, 傅伯杰, 王勇. 土壤侵蚀时空变异及其与环境因子的时空关系. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(1): 101-106.]

[2] Leng Shuying, Li Xiubin. New progresses of international study on land quality indictors (LQIs). Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(1): 177-185.
[冷疏影, 李秀彬. 土地质量指标体系国际研究的新进展. 地理学报, 1999, 54(1): 177-185.]

[3] Hartemink A E. Soil chemical and physical properties as indicators of sustainable land management under sugar cane in Papua New Guinea. Geoderma, 1998, 85: 283-306.

[4] Li Habin. Theory and methodology of spatial heterogeneity quantification. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 9(6): 651-657.
[李哈滨. 空间异质性定量研究理论与方法. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(6): 651-657.]

[5] Qiu Yang, Fu Bojie, Wang Jun et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil moisture content and its relation to influencing factor on the Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(5).
[邱扬, 傅伯杰, 王军 等. 黄土丘陵小流域土壤水分的空间异质性及其影响因子. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(5).]

[6] Western A W, Grayson R B, Bloschl G. Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water Resources Research, 1999, 35(3): 797-810.

[7] Seyfried M. Spatial variability constraints to modeling soil water at different scales. Geoderma, 1998, 85: 231-254.

[8] Wang Jun, Fu Bojie, Qiu Yang et al. Spatiotemporal variability of soil moisture in small catchment in Loess Plateau - semivariograms. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(4): 428-437.
[王军, 傅伯杰, 邱扬 等. 黄土丘陵小流域土壤水分的时空变异特征-半变异函数. 地理学报, 2000, 55(4): 428-437.]

[9] Chien Y L, Lee D Y, Guo H Y et al. Geostatistical analysis of soil properties of mid-west Taiwan soils. Soil Sci., 1997, 162: 291-297.

[10] Bloschl G, Sivapalan M. Scale issues in hydrological modeling: a review. Hydrol. Proc., 9(3-4): 251-290.

[11] Qiu Yang. The kernel of landscape ecology. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2000, 19(2): 42-49.
[邱扬. 景观生态学的核心. 生态学杂志, 2000, 19(2): 42-49.]

[12] Webster R. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. Adv. Soil Sci., 1985, (3): 1-7.

[13] Pennock D J, de John E. Spatial pattern of soil redistribution in Borll landscapes, Southern Saskatchewan, Canada. Soil Sciences, 150(6): 867-873.

[14] Burrough P A. Soil variability: a late 20th century view. Soils and Fertilizers, 1993, 56(5): 529-562.

[15] Martinez-Mena M, Williams A G, Ternan J L et al. Role of antecedent soil water content on aggregates stability in a semi-arid environment. Soil & Tillage Research, 1998, 48: 71-80.

[16] Keck T J, Quimby W F, Nielsen G A. Spatial distribution of soil attributes on reconstructed mine soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1993, 57: 782-786.

[17] Qiu Yang, Fu Bojie, Wang Jun et al. Spatio-temporal distribution of land use in relation to topography in a gully catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(5).
[邱扬, 傅伯杰, 王军 等. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用的时空分布及其与地形因子的关系. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(5).]

[18] Qiu Y, Fu B, Wang J, Chen L. Soil moisture variation in relation to topography and land use in a hillslope catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 240(3,4): 243-263.

[19] Fu Bojie, Chen Liding, Ma Keming. The effect of land use change on the regional environment in the Yanjuan Gou catchment in the Loess Plateau of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(3): 241-246.
[傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响. 地理学报, 1999, 54(3): 241-246.]

[20] Qiu Yang. Quantitative analysis of relationships between spatial and temporal variation of soil moisture content and environmental factors at a gully catchment of the Loess Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(5): 741-747.
[邱扬. 黄土丘陵小流域土壤水分时空分异与环境关系的数量分析. 生态学报, 2000, 20(5): 741-747.]

[21] Wang Jun, Fu Bojie. The impact of land use on spatial and temporal distribution of soil moisture on the Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(1): 84-91.
[王军, 傅伯杰. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用结构对土壤水分时空分布的影响. 地理学报, 2000, 55(1): 84-91.]

[22] Kessler J, Oosterbaan R J. Determining hydraulic conductivity of soils. Surveys and Investigations, 1974, 16(3): 253-296.

[23] Moore I D, Gessler P E, Nielsen G A et al. Soil attribute predictions using terrain analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1993, 57: 443-452.

[24] King D, Bourennane H, Isambert M et al. Relationships of the presence of a non-calcareous clay-loam horizon to DEM attributes in a gently sloping area. Geoderma, 1999, 89: 95-111.

[25] Gilley J E, Doran J W. Tillage effects on soil erosion potential and soil quality of a former Conservation Reserve Program site. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1997, 52: 184-188.

文章导航

/