土地利用与区域开发

20世纪90年代中国区域经济增长的要素分析

展开
  • 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101
杨晓光 (1972- ), 男, 博士研究生, 主要从事区域经济与产业方面的研究。E-mail: yangxg@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2002-06-09

  修回日期: 2002-09-11

  网络出版日期: 2002-11-25

基金资助

中科院地理与资源所领域前沿项目(CXIOG-B00-03)

Factors of Production in Regional Economic Growth of China in the 1990s

Expand
  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2002-06-09

  Revised date: 2002-09-11

  Online published: 2002-11-25

Supported by

The Knowledge Innovation Project of the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of CAS, No.CXIOG-B00-03

摘要

利用中国各省1990~1999年的时间序列数据,采取丹尼森要素分析法,对影响中国各省区工业GDP增长的各要素进行了分析研究。结果表明:尽管资本投入是20世纪90年代GDP增长的主要推动力,但中国各省资本投入的增长差异并不能很好的解释地区经济的差异,而由技术进步和资源优化所呈现的全要素生产率越来越成为地区经济增长的主要力量,也是90年代地区经济发展差异形成的主要因素,由此得出:在现有的条件下,未来中国地区经济差异将出现扩大化的趋势。

本文引用格式

杨晓光,樊杰,赵燕霞 . 20世纪90年代中国区域经济增长的要素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2002 , 57(6) : 701 -708 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200206010

Abstract

The paper analyzed the influencing factors in the industrial GDP growth of each province in China. The results showed that the TFP due to both technological progress and resource optimization increasingly becomes the main power of regional economic growth. Conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) In the 1990s, the TFP is becoming the main reason to influence regional disparity, and it is the main force to promote economic growth. (2) The capital is the main force to promote regional economic growth in China, but, the labor force affect is not distinct. (3) In the 1990s, each province witnessed the increase of TFP as a consequence of economic growth in scale and labor productivity, however, the contribution of resource allocation and capital-output ratio for economic growth is very low.

参考文献


[1] Lu Dadao. The regional policy effects and regional development states in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(6): 496-508.
[陆大道, 刘毅. 中国区域政策的实施效果与区域发展的基本态势. 地理学报, 1999, 54(6): 496-508.]

[2] Lu Dadao. Regional Development of China, 1997. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1997. 15-60.
[陆大道. 1997中国区域发展报告. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997. 15-60.]

[3] Lu Dadao. Regional Development of China, 1999. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1999. 27-61.
[陆大道. 1997中国区域发展报告. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1999. 27-61.]

[4] Li Xiaojian, Qiao Jiajun. County level economic disparities of China in the 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(2): 136-145.
[李小建, 乔家君. 20世纪90年代中国县际经济差异的空间分析. 地理学报, 2001, 56(2): 136-145.]

[5] Dennison F. Accounting for the United States Economic Growth 1929-1969. Washington, D.C, Brooking Inst, 1974.

[6] Dennison Edward F, William K Chung. Economic Growth and its Sources. In: Hugh Patrick, Henry Rosovsky (eds.), Asian's New Giant: How the Japanese Economy Works, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1976.

[7] Chen Jianjun. The Economic Development of the High Rapid Growth Region in China. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Press, 2000. 114-193.
[陈建军. 中国高速增长地域的经济发展. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2000. 114-193.]

[8] Zhang Junkuo. Factor Analysis for Economic Growth. Beijing: China Finance and Economics Press, 1988.
[张军扩. 经济增长的要素及其因素分析. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 1988.]

[9] Guo Kesha. The process, problems and solutions of industrialization in China. Social Sciences in China, 2000, (3): 60-71.
[郭克莎. 中国工业化进程、问题和出路. 中国社会科学, 2000, (3): 60-71.]

[10] Wei Houkai. Effects of foreign direct investment on regional economic growth in China. Economic Research Journal, 2002, (4): 19-26.
[魏后凯. 外商直接投资对中国区域经济增长的影响. 经济研究, 2002, (4): 19-26.]

[11] Wu Jian. Regional discrepancy of FDI in China and its effect on economic growth. Economic Research Journal, 2002, (4): 27-35.
[武剑. 外商直接投资的区域分布及其经济增长效应. 经济研究, 2002, (4): 27-35.]

[12] Shen Kunrong. The characteristics of "Club Convergence" of China's economic growth. Economic Research Journal, 2002, (1): 33-37.
[沈坤荣. 中国经济增长的 "俱乐部收敛" 特征及其成因研究. 经济研究, 2002, (1): 33-37.]

文章导航

/