当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向——全球变化人类行为计划(IHDP)第六届开放会议透视
收稿日期: 2005-11-25
修回日期: 2005-12-05
网络出版日期: 2006-02-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金杰出青年基金项目 (40425008)
The Future of Human-Environment Interaction Research in Geography:Lessons from the 6th Open Meeting of IHDP
Received date: 2005-11-25
Revised date: 2005-12-05
Online published: 2006-02-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Outstanding Youth Fund, No.40425008
在扼要介绍了全球变化人类行为计划 (IHDP) 第六届开放会议主要内容的基础上,综合当前ESSP开展的主要研究项目、IHDP已实施的主要科学研究计划等,阐述了当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的主要领域和发展趋势。作者认为：人地系统除具有区域性和综合性特征外,还具有脆弱性、风险性、恢复性与适应性特征。当代地理学从地理要素与格局的综合研究转向现代地理过程的综合研究;从自然地理与人文地理的集成研究转向现代资源与环境的系统研究;从地理环境重建研究转向现代综合灾害风险管理研究;从地理格局与过程的动力学研究转向资源保障与区域安全系统仿真研究;从区域人地系统相互作用机制研究转向全球人地系统相互作用机制研究。
史培军, 王静爱, 陈婧, 叶涛, 周洪建 . 当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向——全球变化人类行为计划(IHDP)第六届开放会议透视[J]. 地理学报, 2006 , 61(2) : 115 -126 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200602001
Based on a general introduction to the content of the 6th open meeting of IHDP, and an overview of the major projects and science plans of ESSP and IHDP, this paper discussed the future science issues and development priorities for human-environment research in Geography. Besides regional heterogeneity and holistic view, which have already been highly emphasized in Geography, the human-environment system also has vulnerability, risk, resilience and adaptability, which are newly discovered inherent features. These four features can modify, change or transform each other in certain spatial and temporal context. Because of these features, Geography, which takes the mechanism and process of the human-environment system as its congenital task, must redesign its research strategy to contribute to the global human-environment research community. The necessary strategic transformations for geographic research include: from element and pattern oriented to process oriented integrated research; from integrated research which combines physical geography and human geography to systematic research on resources and environment issues; from environment reconstruction to integrated disaster risk management research; from dynamics of pattern and process to systematic simulation of resources guarantee and regional security; from regional human-environment interaction mechanism research to global human-environment interaction mechanism research. This is a big challenge for Geography, and also a precious opportunity we could not bear to lose. We should learn from the strategies in the science plans for global environmental change of IHDP and IGBP, strengthen the understanding of dynamic and non-dynamic behaviors of the human-environment system, then solve the complex globalization, urbanization, resources, environment, ecology, disaster, risk and sustainable development problems we are facing through systematic and integrated research, which is a big advantage of Geography, and gradually approach a resource conserving and environment friendly society. Only in this way, could geographers contribute to the construction of a well off and harmonious society in China, the decision making of global sustainable development, and the bi-health of human and Earth.
[1] Hesse A, Goebel B, Mullin L et al. Conference Book for the Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community. Bonn, Germany, October, 2005, IHDP, P4-45.
[2] Janssen M. Scholarly network on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation with the human dimensions of global environmental change. In: Hesse A et al. (eds.), Conference Book for the Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community, Bonn, Germany, October 2005, IHDP, P75-76.
[3] Shi Peijun, Zhang Shuying, Pan Yaozhong et al. Ecological capital and regional sustainable development. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2005, (2): 131-137.
[史培军, 张淑英, 潘耀忠 等. 生态资产与区域可持续发展. 北京师范大学学报 (社会科学版), 2005, (2): 131-137.]
[4] Shi Peijun, Okada N, Linnerooth-Bayer J (eds.). Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IIASA-DPRI Forum on Integrated Disaster Risk Management. September 14-18, 2005, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
[5] Shi Peijun, Zou Ming, Li Baojun et al. Regional safety construction and risk management system: the actuality and trend of the study of disaster and risk based on the world congress on risk. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2005, 20(2): 173-179.
[史培军, 邹铭, 李保俊 等. 从区域安全建设到风险管理体系的形成: 从第一届世界风险大会看灾害与风险研究的现状与发展趋向. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(2): 173-179.]
[6] Shi Peijun, Guo Weiping, Li Baojun et al. Disaster reduction and sustainable development: the adjustment of disaster reduction strategies of China based on "the 2nd World Conference on Disaster Reduction 2005". Journal of Natural Disasters, 2005, 14(3): 1-7.
[史培军, 郭卫平, 李保俊 等. 减灾与可持续发展模式: 从第二次世界减灾大会看中国减灾战略的调整. 自然灾害学报, 2005, 14(3): 1-7.]
[7] Organization Committee of Asian Conference on Disaster Reduction, Ministry of Civil Affairs of P. R. China, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of P. R. China. Handbook for the Asian Conference on Disaster Reduction. September, 2005, Beijing, China.
[亚洲减灾大会组织委员会, 中华人民共和国民政部, 中华人民共和国外交部, 亚洲减灾大会会议手册, 2005年9月, 北京, 中国.]
[8] Huang Chongfu. Theory and Practice of Natural Disaster Risk Assessment. Beijing: Science Press, 2005.
[黄崇福. 自然灾害风险评价理论与实践. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.]
[9] Shi Peijun. Dynamics of regional disaster system and paradigm for integrated disaster risk reduction. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2005, 14(6).
[in press]
[史培军. 四论灾害研究的理论与实践. 自然灾害学报, 2005, 14(6).]
[10] Gallopin G. Linkages between adaptation, resilience, vulnerability and adaptation, in Hesse A et al edited "Conference Book for the Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community", Bonn, Germany, October 2005, IHDP, 75-76.
[11] Young O. How will globalization after the resilience, vulnerability and adaptability of socio-ecological system? In Hesse A et al (eds), Conference Book for the Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community. Bonn, Germany, October, 2005, IHDP, 75-76.
[12] Lerner-Lam A, Dilley M, Chen R. Global natural disaster risk hotspots: transition to a regional approach. In: Shi Peijun et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IIASA-DPRI Forum on Integrated Disaster Risk Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
[13] Shi Peijun, Li Xiaobing, Zhang Wensheng et al. The "Earth health-human being health model" of biological resources development and ecological construction. Resources Science, 2004, 26(3): 2-8.
[史培军, 李晓兵, 张文生 等. 论生物资源开发与生态建设的"双健康模型". 资源科学, 2004, 26(3): 2-8.]
[14] Shi Peijun, Ye Tao, Chen Jing. Ecological capital assessment and land use adjustment: the path to sustainability. Global Change Newsletter, 2005, (62): 13, 16-17.
[15] Ye Duzheng, Fu Congbin, Ji Jinyun et al. Orderly human activity and subsistent environment. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2001, 16(4): 453-460.
[叶笃正, 符淙斌, 季劲钧 等. 有序人类活动和生存环境. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 453-460.]
[16] Tang Haiping, Zhang Xinshi. Establishment of optimized eco-productive paradigm in the farming-postural zone of northern China. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2003, 45(10): 1166-1173.
[17] Bai Yongfei, Han Xingguo, Wu Jianguo et al. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia. Nature, 2004, 431: 181-184.
[18] White G. Human adjustment to floods. Research Paper 29, Chicago. IL: University of Chicago, Department of Geography, 1942.
[19] Shi Peijun. Dynamics of regional disaster system and paradigm for integrated disaster risk reduction. In: Shi Peijun et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IIASA-DPRI Forum on Integrated Disaster Risk Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |