皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价
收稿日期: 2005-10-28
修回日期: 2006-01-23
网络出版日期: 2006-06-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(30370625); 教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”项目(NCET-04-0149)
Land Use Change and Eco-security Assessment of Huangfuchuan Watershed
Received date: 2005-10-28
Revised date: 2006-01-23
Online published: 2006-06-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.30370625; Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University No.NCET-04-0149
基于"3S"技术揭示了皇甫川流域近十多年来的土地利用变化状况,并进一步在像元水平上对流域生态安全进行了综合评价,最后重点分析了流域土地利用变化与生态安全的关系。结果表明：① 近十几年来,皇甫川流域土地利用变化剧烈,土地利用格局持续承受着来自当地快速城市化进程及社会经济发展和生态环境保护及建设两方面相互矛盾的巨大压力;② 1987年到2000年,流域生态安全状况有所好转,但整体好转的状况难掩局部地区生态环境在大规模治理和恢复的背景下发生的恶化;③ 流域内林地、耕地、灌丛、水体、城镇用地和草地从面积上看,基本上均处于生态安全的预警状态,而裸砒砂岩和沙地的绝对大部分属于中警状态或重警 (巨警) 状态;④ 6种不同土地利用类型的安全指数大小顺序基本保持为灌丛 > 林地 > 草地 > 耕地 > 沙地 > 裸砒砂岩,表明林、灌措施是流域生态恢复和重建的首选和重要组成部分,而沙地尤其是分布面积较广的裸砒砂岩则是流域生态环境综合治理的难题和关键。最后,提出了通过优化流域土地利用格局来确保生态安全的初步设想。
喻锋, 李晓兵, 王宏, 余弘婧 . 皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价[J]. 地理学报, 2006 , 61(6) : 645 -653 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200606008
Supported by "3S" technology, this paper analyses land use change in Huangfuchuan Watershed from 1987 to 2000, conducts a synthetic eco-security assessment on the watershed by multiplication algorithm model on the pixel scale, and discusses the relationship between different land use patterns and eco-security of watershed. The results showed: (1) In recent 10 years, the general tendency of land use change in the study area was that the proportion of urban land, woodland, cropland and shrub increased constantly and that of water area, grassland, sandy land and bare rock decreased gradually. During this period, the watershed land use pattern was under the tremendous pressure from the conflict between the rapid urbanization, economic development and the conservation and rehabilitation of eco-environment. The distinct decline of water area is the bottleneck of this contradiction. (2) From 1987 to 2000, the average synthetical eco-security index rose from 6.033 to 6.506. It is sure that the eco-environment of the whole watershed has been improved. However, eco-environment in some areas even went worse despite of large-scale comprehensive harnessment. (3) In Huangfuchuan Watershed, most of the sandy and soft rocky lands are in a moderate-warning or serious-warning state of eco-security, and the rest of the land use types basically in a light-warning state of eco-security. (4) Land use types are closely correlated with eco-security. The order of eco-security index is: shrub > woodland > grassland > cropland > sand > soft rock, which indicates that measures taken based on woodland and shrub are the priority and important means for ecological restoration of the watershed. Furthermore, the sandy land and bare rocky land are the key problems of comprehensive harnessment of the watershed, which could not be overlooked. Generally, this paper emphasized the impacts of different land use types and patterns on eco-security of watershed and put forward suggestions concerning the adjustment or optimization of land use pattern and improvement of the technical system for eco-security assessment based on simulation and prediction of land use change, which would have wide application prospectives in the future.
Key words： Huangfuchuan Watershed; land use change; eco-security assessment
[1] Shi Peijun, Gong Peng, Li Xiaobing et al. Methodology and Application of Study on Land Use/Cover Change. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
[史培军, 宫鹏, 李晓兵 等. 土地利用/覆盖变化研究的方法与实践. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.]
[2] Pascher K, Gollmann G. Ecological risk assessment of transgenic plant releases: an Austrian perspective. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1999, 8: 1139-1158.
[3] Vlyssides A G. Electrochemical treatment of vinasse from beet molasses. Water Science and Technology Proceedings of the 1996 and IAWQ International Conference on Pretreatment of Industrial Wastewaters, 1996.
[4] Folmer E C R, Geurts P M H, Francisco J R. Assessment of soil fertility depletion in Mozambique. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1998, 71: 159-167.
[5] Ciro Gardi, Marcello Tomaselli, Vittorio Parisi et al. Soil quality indicators and biodiversity in northern Italian permanent grasslands. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2002, 38: 103-110.
[6] Zeng Dehui, Jiang Fengqi, Fan Zhiping et al. Ecosystem health and sustainable development for human. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(6): 751-756.
[曾德慧, 姜凤岐, 范志平 等. 生态系统健康与人类可持续发展. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(6): 751-756.]
[7] Luo Yuechu, Zhou Zhongxuan, Sun Yi et al. Assessment methods of watershed ecosystem health. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(8): 1606-1614.
[罗跃初, 周忠轩, 孙轶 等. 流域生态系统健康评价方法. 生态学报, 2003, 23(8): 1606-1614.]
[8] Kong Hongmei, Zhao Jingzhu, Ji Lanzhu et al. Assessment method of ecosystem health. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(4): 486-490.
[孔红梅, 赵景柱, 姬兰柱 等. 生态系统健康评价方法初探. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(4): 486-490.]
[9] Huang Heping, Yang Jie, Song Bingyu et al. Ecosystem health assessment of the hilly and gully area of Loess Plateau in Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(5): 1048-1056.
[黄和平, 杨劼, 宋炳煜 等. 内蒙古黄土丘陵沟壑区生态系统健康评价. 生态学报, 2005, 25(5): 1048-1056.]
[10] Rapport D J. Ecosystem services and management options as blanket indicators of ecosystem health. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 1995, 4(2): 97-105.
[11] Zuo Wei, Wang Qiao, Wang Wenjie et al. Study on regional ecological security assessment index and standard. Geography and Territorial Research, 2002, 18(1): 67-71.
[左伟, 王桥, 王文杰 等. 区域生态安全评价指标与标准研究. 地理学与国土研究, 2002, 18(1): 67-71.]
[12] Zuo Wei, Zhou Huizhen, Wang Qiao et al. Comprehensive assessment and mapping of the regional ecological safety: a case study of Zhongxian County, Chongqing City. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2004, 41(2): 203-209.
[左伟, 周慧珍, 王桥 等. 区域生态安全综合评价与制图: 以重庆市忠县为例. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(2): 203-209.]
[13] Chen Dongjing, Xu Zhongmin. Study on assessment of the ecological security in the continental watersheds in Northwest China: a case study at the middle reaches of Heihe River Watershed, Zhangye Prefecture. Arid Land Geography, 2002, 25(3): 219-224.
[陈东景, 徐中民. 西北内陆河流域生态安全评价研究: 以黑河流域中游张掖地区为例. 干旱区地理, 2002, 25(3): 219-224.]
[14] Guo Zhongwei. To build the early warning and maintaining system of national ecological security. Science and Technology Review, 2001, (1): 54-56.
[郭中伟. 建设国家生态安全预警系统与维护体系: 面对严重生态危机的对策. 科技导报, 2001, (1): 54-56.]
[15] Su Weici, Li Jiulin. A preliminary study on the warning appraisal of eco-environment in the Wujiang Valley. Guizhou Science, 1997, 15(3): 207-214.
[苏维词, 李久林. 乌江流域生态环境预警评价初探. 贵州科学, 1997, 15(3): 207-214.]
[16] Chen Guojie, He Jinfeng. An approach on the theory and methodology of ecological and environment warning. Chongqing Environmental Sciences, 1999, 21(4): 8-11.
[陈国阶, 何锦峰. 生态环境预警的理论和方法探讨. 重庆环境科学, 1999, 21(4): 8-11.]
[17] Liu Yong, Liu Youzhao, Xu Ping. Evaluation on ecological security of regional land resources: a case study of Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province. Resources Science, 2004, 26(3): 69-75.
[刘勇, 刘友兆, 徐萍. 区域土地资源生态安全评价: 以浙江嘉兴市为例. 资源科学, 2004, 26(3): 69-75.]
[18] Zhang Jianxin, Xing Xudong, Liu Xiao'e. Evaluation on ecological security of sustainable utilizaton of land resource. Hunan Geology, 2002, 21(2): 119-121.
[张建新, 邢旭东, 刘小娥. 湖南省土地资源可持续利用的生态安全评价. 湖南地质, 2002, 21(2): 119-121.]
[19] Lu Jinfa, You Lianyuan, Chen Hao et al. Assessment of ecological security and adjustment of land use in Xilinhaote City of Inner Mongolia. Resources Science, 2004, 26(2): 108-114.
[卢金发, 尤联元, 陈浩 等. 内蒙古锡林浩特市生态安全评价与土地利用调整. 资源科学, 2004, 26(2): 108-114.]
[20] Fan Yida, Shi Peijun, Gu Zhihui et al. A method of data gridding from administration cell to gridding cell. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(1): 105-108.
[范一大, 史培军, 辜智慧 等. 行政单元数据向网格单元转化的技术方法. 地理科学, 2004, 24(1): 105-108.]
[21] Zhang Yinhui, Zhao Gengxing. Classification methods of land use/cover based on remote sensing technologies. Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2002, 23(3): 21-25.
[张银辉, 赵庚星. 土地利用/土地覆盖遥感分类方法的研究综述. 中国农业资源与区划, 2002, 23(3): 21-25.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |