旅游生态足迹模型及黄山市实证分析
收稿日期: 2004-02-23
修回日期: 2004-05-28
网络出版日期: 2004-09-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(49571031); 安徽省自然科学基金重点项目(03021011)
Touristic Ecological Footprint Model and Analysis of Huangshan City in 2002
Received date: 2004-02-23
Revised date: 2004-05-28
Online published: 2004-09-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.49571031; Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, No.03021011
基于生态足迹的理论与方法，旅游者的生态消费及结构特征，提出旅游生态足迹的概念，构建了旅游交通、住宿、餐饮、购物、娱乐、游览等6个旅游生态足迹计算子模型。并以黄山市为例，计算并分析了2002年黄山市游客的旅游生态足迹及其效率。结果表明：(1) 黄山市游客的人均旅游生态足迹为0.106 hm2；(2) 黄山市人均生态赤字达0.219 hm2，其中旅游生态足迹的生态赤字“贡献”为48.40%；(3) 黄山市游客的人均旅游生态足迹年度转化值为12.36 hm2，是当地居民年人均生态足迹的9倍；(4) 黄山市单位旅游生态足迹产值为684美元/hm2，是黄山市单位本底生态足迹产值的1.17倍，但仅为全球平均水平的61.84%；(5) 黄山市单位旅游游览、购物、住宿生态足迹产值高，而旅游交通、餐饮的单位生态足迹产值较低；(6) 旅游生态足迹的区际转移导致旅游生态责任的区际转移与生态影响的区际扩散，旅游业发展具有全球性生态影响的特征。最后指出了影响旅游生态足迹大小的关键因子，旅游生态足迹计算中存在的问题以及在旅游可持续发展研究中的应用前景。
章锦河,张捷 . 旅游生态足迹模型及黄山市实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2004 , 59(5) : 763 -771 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200405015
Based on the theory and method of ecological footprint, combined with the ecological consumption and its structural character of tourist, the paper, taking the Huangshan City as an example, calculates and analyses the touristic ecological footprint and its efficiency of Huangshan City in 2002. Six characteristics have been summarized: (1) The touristic ecological footprint of Huangshan City is 0.106 hm2 per capita in 2002. In comparison, the fossil energy land is about 88.23% of this footprint, tourist transportation and food are the main constitutes of the total footprint, about 55.67% and 33.90%. (2) The ecological deficit of Huangshan City is 0.219 hm2 per capita in 2002. About 48.40% of the ecological deficit is a result of touristic ecological footprint. (3) Extrapolating the footprint of a tourist to Huangshan City (3.13 days) to 1 year, results in an area of 12.36 hm2 per capita in 2002, almost 9 times that of the average footprints of citizens of Huangshan City. (4) In Huangshan City, the average tourist output of 1 hm2 ecological footprint is US$684, 1.17 times the average output of the Huangshan City' citizens ecological footprint, 61.84% that of the world. (5) Dimensions of tourist flows, tourist consumption level and model, tourist spatial behavior, the policy and stratagem of the tourist destination are the key factors to affect the size of touristic ecological footprint. (6) The shift of TEF among regions will result in shift and diffusibility of tourist ecological responsibility, ecological influence and ecological stress among regions in the world, and tourism development may have profound impacts on global environments.
[1] Ree W E. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2).
[2] Wackernagel M, Ree W. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1996.
[3] Wang Shuhua. Progress in research of ecological footprint all over the world. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(6): 776-782.
[王书华. 生态足迹研究的国内外近期进展. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(6): 776-782.]
[4] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong. The calculation and analysis of ecological footprint of Gansu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(5): 607-616.
[徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋. 甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5): 607-616.]
[5] Xu Zhongmin. Calculation and analysis of ecological footprint of China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(3): 441-445.
[徐中民.中国1999年的生态足迹分析. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(3): 441-445.]
[6] Zhang Zhiqiang, Xu Zhongmin. The ecological footprints of the 12 provinces of West China in 1999. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(5): 599-610.
[张志强, 徐中民. 中国西部12省(市区)的生态足迹.地理学报, 2001, 56(5): 599-610.]
[7] Xu Zhongmin. Measuring sustainable development with the ecological footprint method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(9): 1484-1493.
[徐中民. 生态足迹方法：可持续性定量研究的新方法. 生态学报, 2001, 21(9): 1484-1493.]
[8] Yang Kaizhong. Ecological footprint analysis: concept, method and case. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2000, 15(6): 630-636.
[杨开忠. 生态足迹分析理论与方法. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(6): 630-636.]
[9] Wang Shuhua, Wang Zhongjing. Value of the coordination to eco-economy of mountain district based on ecological footprint model. Journal of Mountain Science, 2003, 21(3): 324-330.
[王书华, 王忠静. 基于生态足迹模型的山区生态经济协调发展定量评估——以贵州镇远县为例. 山地学报, 2003, 21(3): 324-330.]
[10] Colin Hunter. Sustainable tourism and the ecological footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2002, 4: 7-20.
[11] Stefan. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43: 199-211.
[12] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P et al. National nature capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 375-390.
[13] Gossling S. Tourism, environmental degradation and economic transition: interacting processes in a Tanzanian coastal community. Tourism Geographies, 2001, 3(4): 230-254.
[14] UK CEED (UK Centre for Economic and Environmental Development). A life-cycle analysis of a holiday destination: Seychelles. British Airways Environment Report, Cambridge, UK, CEED. 1994, No. 41-94.
[15] WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature), United Nations Environment Programmer (UNEP), World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC), 2000. Redefining Progress (RP), The Centre for Sustainability Studies, 2000. Living Planet Report. Jonathan L (ed.), World Wide Fund for Nature. Gland, Switzerland.
[16] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong et al. Calculation & analysis of ecological footprint, diversity and development capacity of China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2003, 13(1): 19-26.
[17] Li Jinping, Wang Zhishi. The analysis of ecological footprint of Macao in 2001. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2): 197-203.
[李金平, 王志石. 澳门2001年生态足迹分析. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 197-203.]
[18] Green H, Hunter C. The environmental impact assessment of tourism development. In: Johnson P, Thomas B (eds.), Perspectives on Tourism Policy. Mansell, 1992.
[19] O'Reilly A M. Tourism carrying capacity-concept and issues. Tourism Management, 1986, 7: 254-258.
[20] McCool S. Planning for Sustainable nature dependent tourism development: the limits of acceptable change system. Tourism Recreation Research, 1994, 19(2): 51-55.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |