盐城开发空间区划及其思考
收稿日期: 2007-03-12
修回日期: 2007-06-20
网络出版日期: 2007-08-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金重点项目(40435013); 教育部博士点基金项目(20040284012)
The Development Spatial Regionalization of Yancheng City and Relevant Consider ation
Received date: 2007-03-12
Revised date: 2007-06-20
Online published: 2007-08-25
Supported by
Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40435013; Research Foundation for Doctoral Program of Ministry of Education of China, No.20040284012
在国家“十一五”规划纲要中, 将国土空间划分为优化开发、重点开发、限制开发和禁止开发四类主体功能区, 这是新时期传统区划理论和方法为国民经济和社会发展服务的一次重要创新。作者认为: 主体功能区划主要在于解决区域问题, 用科学发展观协调区域发展。 因此, 功能区区划的理论和方法也需要与时俱进的创新。文章通过盐城沿海开发空间区划实例进行功能区区划的理论和方法探索。首先, 综合经济区划。运用传统的综合经济区划理论与方法进行经济区划分, 大致确定不同经济区的经济发展布局方向; 其次, 控制开发区划。 综合考虑上述综合经济区的功能, 景观生态体系建设需要, 土地利用现状、辐射沙洲分布、近海海域污染、海港分布、水源保护地以及自然保护区和生态保护区等, 确定相关的禁止开 发区和限制开发区; 第三, 开发潜力区划。以乡镇为基本单元, 运用多因子分析方法, 按照资源环境承载力、现有开发密度强度、未来发展潜力3 个主因子进行开发潜力区划; 最后, 在上述三个区划的基础上, 进行主体功能区划。文章也认为: 主体功能区实质是一种区域发展政策区, 其区划也只是一种纯粹的区域划分, 是目前经济社会发展规划、土地利用规划和城市总体规划“三规”分立走向“三规”合一的空间平台。
顾朝林, 张晓明, 刘晋媛, 张从果 . 盐城开发空间区划及其思考[J]. 地理学报, 2007 , 62(8) : 787 -798 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200708001
In the summary of the 11th Five-Year Plan, land can be spatially divided into four kinds of main function regions, including optimal development region, important development region, restrictive development region, and prohibited development region, which is another innovation in traditional regionalization theory and will better serve national economy and social development. This paper takes the view that main function regionalization commits to solve regional problems, coordinating regional development with scientific viewpoint of development. Hence, theories and approaches of main function regionalization need to be updated from time to time. The paper explores the theories and approaches of main function regionalization through the example of the Coastal Development Spatial Regionalization of Yancheng city. First, comprehensive economic regionalization. Economic regions are divided by using traditional comprehensive economic regionalization theories and approaches to decide approximately the directions of development and distribution of different economic regions. Second, regulatory development regionalization. We consider the function, requirements of landscape and ecological system, contemporary conditions of land use, distribution of radical allusion, pollution in the nearshore area, distribution of seaports, conservative water supply resources, nature reserves and ecological reserves of the comprehensive economic regions above, and decide related prohibited development region and restrictive development region. Third, development potential regionalization. Taking administrative villages and towns as basic units, based on multi-factor analysis, we use the three main factors to make development potential divisions including carrying ability of resources and environment, existing development density and intensity, and future development potentials. Finally, the main function regions are planned on the basis of these three kinds of regionalization. The paper also proposes that a main function region is actually a kind of division of regional development policies, whose regionalization is a mere regional division and a spatial platform for the three kinds of planning —economic and social development planning, land use planning and urban comprehensive planning—to integrate together.
Key words： main function region; regionalization; Yancheng
[1] Gu Chaolin, Shen Jianfa, Wong Kwan-yin et al. Regional polarization under the socialist-market system since 1978: A case study of Guangdong Province in South China. Environment and Planning A, 2001, 33: 97-119.
[2] Yan Shengxiong, Lan Yizhi, Zhuang Hanhua. Regional comprehensive development planning system in Taiwan area. Paper for Urban Governance Conference in Nanjing University, 2002.
[严胜雄, 蓝逸之, 庄翰华. 台湾地区综合开发规 划体系及社经演变之经纬: 回顾与展望. 南京大学城市管治讨论会论文, 2002.]
[3] Fan Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.
[樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.]
[4] Lu Yuqi, Lin Kang, Zhang Li. The methods of spatial development regionalization: A case study of Yizheng City. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(4): 351-363.
[陆玉麒, 林康, 张莉. 市域空间发展类型区划分的方法探讨: 以江苏省仪 征市为例. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 351-363.]
[5] Liu Weidong, Lu Dadao. Methodological basis for making regional spatial planning in China in the new era: A preliminary study based on planning of key economic regions in developing western China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(6): 894-902.
[刘卫东, 陆大道. 新时期我国区域空间规划的方法论探讨: 以西部开发重点区域规划前期研 究为例. 地理学报, 2005, 60(6): 894-902.]
[6] Chen Wen. The methods of spatial development function regionalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59 (suppl.): 53-58.
[陈雯. 空间开发功能区划的方法. 地理学报, 2004, 59(增刊): 53-58.]
[7] Zhou Lishan. The Theory and Practice of China Agricultural Regionalization. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1993. 212-284.
[周立三. 中国农业区划的理论与实践, 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1993. 212-284.]
[8] Wu Tinghai. Regional Planning in Modern China. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006.
[武廷海. 中国近现代区域 规划. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006.]
[9] Chen Tian. A preliminary analysis on the system of influence regions of China's urban economy. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1987. 42(4): 93-104.
[陈田. 我国城市经济影响区域系统的初步分析, 地理学报, 1987, 42(4): 93-104.]
[10] Gu Chaolin. A preliminary study on the division of urban economic regions in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1991, 46(2): 129-141.
[顾朝林. 中国城市经济区划分的初步研究. 地理学报, 1991, 46(2): 129-141.]
[11] Hu Xuwei. Evolution and prospect of China's regional planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(6): 585-592.
[胡序 威. 中国区域规划的演变与展望. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 585-592.]
[12] Ma Kai. Compiling the 11th Five-Year Plan based on the new perspectives of development. Chinese Economic Tribune, 2003-10-21.
[马凯. 用新的发展观编制“十一五”规划. 中国经济导报, 2003-10-21.]
[13] Gu Chaolin, Zhen Feng, Zhang Jingxiang. Concentration and Diffusion: New Urban Spatial Strcture. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2000.
[顾朝林, 甄峰, 张京祥. 集聚与扩散: 城市空间结构新论. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2000.]
[14] European Commission. European Spatial Development Perspective. May, 2003.
[15] Greater London Authority. The London Plan, Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London, 2004.
[16] Shaw D, Sykes O. Addressing connectivity in spatial planning: The case of the English regions. Planning Theory & Practice, 2005, 6(1): 11-33.
[17] Friedman J, Alonso W (eds.). Regional Development and Planning. Cambridge: Mass MIT Press, 1964.
[18] Peter Hall. Urban and Regional Planning. Routledge, 2002.
[19] John M Levy. Contemporary Urban Planning. Prentice Hall, 2005.
[20] Stiftel B. Dialogues in Urban and Regional Planning. Routledge, 2006.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |