中国省区经济增长空间分布动态
收稿日期: 2007-02-13
修回日期: 2007-07-25
网络出版日期: 2007-10-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(40471054)
Spatial Distr ibution Dynamics of Provincial Economic Growth in China
Received date: 2007-02-13
Revised date: 2007-07-25
Online published: 2007-10-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40471054
采用分布动态方法(MEDD), 从省区经济增长空间分布的形状和流动性两方面考察1978-2004 年中国省区经济增长空间分布的动态演进, 结果表明, 中国省区经济增长的空间分布形态经历多极化—收敛—双峰状的变化过程, 其中, 俱乐部收敛省区内部的经济发展差距由扩大到再次缩小, 俱乐部间的发展差距由缩小到再次扩大, 说明收敛俱乐部间的经济差距在扩大。1990 年后, 地区经济增长的活跃性提高; 转移概率矩阵、无条件和空间条件动态随机核估计及密度等高线图显示空间相互作用影响着省区经济增长未来的空间分布, 空间因素是影响地区经济增长分布的重要因素, 相邻地区经济增长互相依赖, 因地理位置临近所产生的空间溢出效应促使了相似经济水平地区的空间聚集。
李国平, 陈晓玲 . 中国省区经济增长空间分布动态[J]. 地理学报, 2007 , 62(10) : 1051 -1062 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200710005
By using the method of MEDD, from two aspects of shape and mobility, this paper explores the evolution of spatial distribution dynamics of provincial economic growth in China from 1978 to 2004. The research results indicate that the shape of provincial economic spatial distribution has changed from stratification to convergence and then to two peaks state in China. Besides the gap among the economic growth levels of provinces within a convergence club has varied from widening to narrowing again, whereas the gap among the economic level of different convergence clubs has varied from narrowing to widening again, indicating that the economic inequities between the two convergence clubs have continue to expand. After the 1990s the regional economic growth became more energetic. Transition matrices, unconditional and space-conditioned dynamic stochastic kernel and contour plots reveal that spatial interactions influence the spatial distribution of provincial economic growth in the future. The spatial context is a very important factor in affecting the distribution of economic growth. It is very likely that spatial proximity stimulates spatial interaction. The economic growth of a region depends on the performance of its neighboring provinces. Provinces with wealthier neighbors have a greater chance to become prosperous. The spatial spillovers from the economic development of provinces having close geographical positions promote provinces with similar economic level to cluster spatially.
[1] Barro R J, Sala-i-Martin X. Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economics Activity, 1991, 1: 107-182.
[2] Barro R J, Sala-i-Martin X. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100: 223-251.
[3] Mankiw, Romer, Weil. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107: 407-437.
[4] Wei Houkai. Regional economic growth and convergence in China. China Industrial Economy, 1997, (3): 31-37.
[ 魏后 凯. 中国地区经济增长及其收敛. 中国工业经济, 1997, (3): 31-37.]
[5] Cai Fang, Wang Dewen, Du Yang. The impact of a distorted labor market on regional disparities. Social Sciences in China, 2001(2): 4-14.
[蔡昉, 王德文, 都阳. 劳动力市场扭曲对区域差距的影响. 中国社会科学, 2001, (2): 4-14.]
[6] Bernard A B, Durlauf S N. Convergence in international output. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1995, 10: 97-108.
[7] Quah D T. Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 1993, 37: 427-443.
[8] Rey S, Montouri B. US regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 1999, 33: 146-156.
[9] Quah D T. Galton's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1993, 95: 427-443.
[10] Quah D T. Regional convergence clusters across Europe. European Economic Review, 1996, 40: 1951-1958.
[11] Quah D T. Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth, 1997, (2): 27-59.
[12] Rey S J. Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis, 2001, 33: 195-214.
[13] Le Gallo J. Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov chains approach. International Regional Science Review, 2004, 27(2): 138-163.
[14] Aroca, Bosch, Maloney. Spatial dimensions of trade liberalization and economic convergence: Mexico 1985-2002. The World Bank Economic Review, 2005, 19: 345-378.
[15] Aziz Jahangir, Christoph Duenwald. China's Provincial Dynamics. IMF working paper WP/01/3. 2001.
[16] Xu Xianxiang, Shu Yuan. Physical capital, human capital and twin peak convergence in China. The Journal of World Economy, 2005, (1): 47-57.
[徐现祥, 舒元. 物质资本、人力资本与中国地区双峰趋同. 世界经济, 2005, (1): 47-57.]
[17] Pu Yingxia1, Ma Ronghua, Ge Ying et al. Spatial-temporal dynamics of Jiangsu regional convergence with spatial Markov Chains approach. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(9): 817-826.
[蒲英霞, 马荣华, 葛莹等. 基于空间马尔 可夫链的江苏区域趋同时空演变. 地理学报, 2005, 60(9): 817-826.]
[18] Pittau Zelli. Income dynamics across EU regions: Empirical evidence from Kernel Estimation. www.h.scb. se/scb/Projekt/iariw/program/8Amgrz.pdf , 2002. 1-28.
[19] Bickenbach, F.,and E. Bode. Markov or not Markov: This should be a question. Working Paper Series No.1086, Kiel Institute of World Economics, Kiel, Germany, 2001.
[20] Silverman B. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall, 1986.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |