土地利用可持续性的度量—一种显示过程的综合方法
收稿日期: 2002-07-08
修回日期: 2002-12-04
网络出版日期: 2003-03-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目 (40171004)
Measurement of Land Use Sustainability:A Comprehensive Method Representing Processes
Received date: 2002-07-08
Revised date: 2002-12-04
Online published: 2003-03-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40171004
土地利用可持续性的度量指标应该具有时间序列性、空间敏感性、客观性和综合性，能显示趋势性和可预测性，有参照值或阈值，能表达逆转性和可控性，能正确地进行数据转化，能方便地采集和使用数据。迄今所见的指标体系，在方法上皆可归纳为枚举法和综合法。枚举法的困难是：指标体系很难穷尽所有的影响因素，又不能准确判断每一因素的影响程度，也难以有完备的数据序列。综合法避免了枚举法的困难，但目前还没有完整的时间序列，因而只能评价现状而不是过程。本文提出一种针对变化过程进行评价的指标体系，采用系统综合指标，即生产力、稳定性、恢复力、公平性、自立性、协调性，来定量地评价土地利用的可持续性，并应用于山东省莱西市案例研究。
蔡运龙,李军 . 土地利用可持续性的度量—一种显示过程的综合方法[J]. 地理学报, 2003 , 58(2) : 305 -313 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200302018
This article brings forward a set of comprehensive indicators aiming at the temporal process of land use change. Productivity, stability, restorability, equity, self-supporting ability and harmonizing capacity in a rather long period are used to measure the sustainability of land use, and applied in the case study of Laixi City, Shandong Province. Productivity is the growth process of yield per unit of land area. Stability is the coherence and consistency of the productivity and may be presented by variation coefficient V= σ/ā. Restorability is the ability of land use system withstanding outside impacts, such as natural hazard and policy or market changes, and resuming productivity. It can be shown by annual variation. Equity is the degree of justice of land use benefit allocation, and can be measured by the proportion of population at various levels of income. Self-supporting ability presents the extent of supply, improvement, organization and control of land use system itself and may be shown by the proportion of capital assert investment in the total financial income. Harmonizing capacity is the extent of balance between demand for land products and supply of land productivity. The result of the case study shows that land use in Laixi City is sustainable in general. It is evident in the case study that these comprehensive measurements representing processes are concise, effective, reasonable and operationable.
[1] Liu Yansui. The Optimizational Allocation of Regional Land Use. Beijing: Academic Garden Press, 1999. 46.
[刘彦随. 区域土地利用优化配置. 北京: 学苑出版社, 1999. 46. ]
[2] Tang Huajun et al. Sustainable Use of Land Resource in China. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. 13.
[唐华俊 等. 中国土地资源可持续利用的理论与实践. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. 13.]
[3] World Bank. Land Quality Indicators, World Bank Discussion Papers 315. The World Bank, Washington D.C., 1995.
[4] FAO. FESLM: An International Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Land Management, World Soil Resources Report 73. FAO, Rome, Italy, 1993.
[5] Chen Baiming et al. Theory and method for Indicting sustainable land use in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2001, 16(3): 197-202.
[陈百明 等. 中国土地持续利用评价指标体系的理论与方法. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(3): 197-203.]
[6] Fu Bojie et al. Indicators and method of sustainable land use. Journal of Natural Resources, 1997, 12(2): 112-118.
[傅伯杰 等. 土地持续利用评价的指标体系和方法. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2): 112-118.]
[7] UNDP. Human Development Report 1995, UNDP, New York, 1995.
[8] Yang Youxiao, Cai Yunlong. Sustainable valuation for resources and environment and development in rural China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(5): 596-606.
[杨友孝, 蔡运龙. 中国农村资源、环境与发展的可持续性评估: SEEA方法及其应用. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5): 596-606.]
[9] Conway G R. Agro-ecosystems analysis. Agricultural Administration, 1985, 20: 31-55.
[10] Cai Yunlong. Sustainable development: the new approach to optimization of man-earth system. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1995, 6(3): 329-333.
[蔡运龙. 持续发展: 人地系统优化的新思路. 应用生态学报, 1995, 6(3): 329-333.]
[11] Marten G G. Productivity, stability, sustainability, equitability and autonomy as properties for agro-ecosystem assessment. Agricultural Systems, 1988, 26: 291-316.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |