北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价
收稿日期: 2007-04-25
修回日期: 2007-09-04
网络出版日期: 2008-02-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金重点项目(40335049); 国家自然科学基金项目(40471059)
Comprehensive Evaluation of Land Use Performance of Beijing High- tech Industrial Zone
Received date: 2007-04-25
Revised date: 2007-09-04
Online published: 2008-02-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40335049; No.40471059
高新技术产业区是建设创新型城市的重要载体, 在实施国家自主创新战略中具有重要 作用。针对高新技术产业区土地利用评价中存在的问题, 引入了土地利用绩效的概念, 构建 了包括土地效益、土地利用效率和创新功能三个维度的高新技术产业区土地利用绩效理论模 型, 以这一模型为理论基础建立了由3 个二级指标, 8 个三级指标, 37 个四级指标组成的高 新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价指标体系, 同时以土地利用绩效概念模型为理论基础, 构造了与土地利用绩效指标体系相匹配的矢量评价模型。在此基础上, 以北京市高新技术产 业区中5 个不同类型的园区为例做了综合评价, 评价结果显示, 清华科技园、上地信息产业 基地以及中关村西区的土地利用绩效指数较高, 中关村软件园和永丰基地的土地利用绩效指 数较低。通过与其他评价模型的对比验证, 本文构造的评价模型对高新技术产业区创新能力 指数的变化更为敏感。
班茂盛,, 方创琳, 刘晓丽, 刘海燕 . 北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2008 , 63(2) : 175 -184 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200802007
High-tech industrial district is an important carrier for constructing innovative cities. It also plays an important role in implementing national independent innovative strategy. However, most of the high-tech industrial districts face many problems in their developing process, such as low efficiency of land use, weakness in innovative ability, lack of intensive land utilization. To solve these problems, this paper introduces the concept of land use performance and establishes a theoretical model to assess the land use performance of high-tech industrial districts. The model consists of the following three-dimensional parts: land use benefit, land use efficiency, and innovative function. Based on this theoretical model, an index system composing of the three secondary indictors, eight tertiary indictors and 37 fourth grade indictors was set up to evaluate the land use performance of high-tech zone. In order to avoid the defects of plus model and function model, a three-dimensional evaluation model is developed to examine the index of the land use performance of the high-tech industrial parks, which equals the evaluation indicator system of land use performance of high-tech zone based on the above research. The land use performance of five different high-tech industrial parks in Beijing high-tech industrial zone is examined. The results indicated that the indicator system performs better in the aspect of evaluating land use benefit, land use efficiency, and function of the high-tech industrial district compared to other models.
Key words： high-tech industrial zone; land use; performance; Beijing city
[1] Gu Chaolin, Zhao Lingxun. Hi-tech Industry and Parks in China. Beijing: Citic Publishing House, 1998. 34-38.
[顾朝林, 赵令勋. 中国高技术产业与园区. 北京: 中信出版社, 1998.]
[2] Liu Weidong. The constructive and developmental tendencies of high technology and science parks in the world. World Regional Studies, 2001, 10(1): 36-40.
[ 刘卫东. 世界高科技园区建设和发展的趋势. 世界地理研究, 2001, 10(1): 36-40.]
[3] Zhang Xiaoqiang. Almanac of Hi-Tech Industry in China (2006). Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2007.
[张晓强. 中国高技术产业发展年鉴(2006). 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2007.]
[4] Hsien-Che Lai, Joseph Z Shyu. A comparison of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan Strait: The case of Zhangjiang High-Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park. Technovation, 2005, 25: 805-813.
[5] Zhang Xiaoping. The characteristics and drive mechanism of the economic and technological area in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(5): 657-666.
[ 张晓平. 我国经济技术开发区的发展特征及动力机制. 地理研究, 2002, 21(5): 657-666.]
[6] Wang Xin. Status, problems and countermeasures of the development of hi-tech district in China. China Science and Technology Information, 2005, (15).
[王新. 我国高新区发展的现状、问题及对策. 中国科技信息, 2005, (15).]
[7] Yan Xiujie. The developmental problems of high-tech district in China. Modern Enterprises, 2003, (9).
[闫秀杰. 我国高 新区发展中存在的问题. 现代企业, 2003, (9).]
[8] Dong Qiulin. The summary of technological innovative capacity evaluation of science park. Scientific Management Research, 2005, 23(6): 20-28.
[董秋玲. 科技园区区域技术创新能力评价综述. 科研管理, 2005, 23(6): 20-28.]
[9] Wu Dan. Evaluating method of science & technology input benefit in national high-tech districts. Statistics and Decision, 2006, (3): 58-60.
[吴丹. 国家高新区科技投入效益的评价方法. 统计与决策, 2006, (3): 58-60.]
[10] Fan Bonai. The theoretic and empirical filter selection of evaluating indicators of investment soft-environment in national high-tech district. Journal of Natural Dialectic Communication, 2004, 153(5): 57-63.
[范柏乃. 国家高新区投 资软环境评价指标的理论遴选与实证筛选. 自然辩证法通讯, 2004, 153(5): 57-63.]
[11] Zhuang Yu. The index system of hi-tech parks' innovative ability in West China. Science and Technology Management Research, 2006, (2): 67-70.
[庄宇. 西部科技园区技术创新能力评价的指标体系. 科技管理研究, 2006, (2): 67-70.]
[12] Tian Xinbao. Research on the evaluation of the centralized function of high-tech districts in China. Journal of Capital Economic & Trade University, 2006, (1): 81-84.
[田新豹. 我国高新区集聚功能评价研究. 首都经贸大学学报, 2006, (1): 81-84.]
[13] Wang Qiwen. The index system of national high-tech districts with independent innovation ability. Chinese High-tech Parks, 2006, (10): 71-75.
[王其文. 建立以自主创新为核心的国家高新区评价指标体系. 中国高新区, 2006, (10): 71-75.]
[14] Zhou Lisan. Lastest research on Chinese agricultural geography and land use. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1990, 45(2): 146-153.
[周立三. 中国农业地理和土地利用的近期研究. 地理学报, 1990, 45(2): 146-153.]
[15] Li Xiaowen. Land use changes and its eco-environment effect in lower Yangtze drainage area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5): 659-667.
[ 李晓文. 近10 年来长江下游土地利用变化及其生态环境效应. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 659-667.]
[16] Zhai Wenxia. Intensive land use potential in urban development zones: A case study in typical urban development zones in Jiangsu Province. Resources Science, 2006, 28(2): 54-60.
[翟文侠. 城市开发区土地集约利用潜力研究. 资 源科学, 2006, 28(2):54-60.]
[17] Wu Yuling. Intensity assessment of land use in development zones in Jiangsu Province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2006, 15(6): 703-707.
[吴郁玲. 江苏省开发区土地利用集约度的评价研究. 长江流域资源与环 境, 2006, 15(6): 703-707.]
[18] Long Hualou. Sustainability evaluation of land use in development zone: The case of Kunshan. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(6): 719-728.
[龙花楼. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价: 以江苏昆山经济技术开发区为例. 地理学 报, 2000, 55(6): 719-728.]
[19] Landy F J, Farr J. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, (87): 72- 107.
[20] Chen Jie. New study evolvement of performance evaluating. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science), 1997, (3): 81-85.
[陈捷. 绩效评估研究的新进展. 南京师范大学学报(社科版), 1997, (3): 81-85.]
[21] Noah Douglass C. Institutions Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[22] Qu Zhongqiong. Study on evaluating indicator system of urban land supply system performance. China Land Science, 2006, 20(2): 45-49.
[瞿忠琼. 城市土地供给制度绩效评价指标体系研究. 中国土地科学, 2006, 20(2): 45-49.]
[23] Hao Jiayou. The selection of indices for quantitative evaluation of performance. Human Work Efficiency, 1999, 5(2): 36-38.
[郝家友. 绩效定量考核指标的选择方法. 人类工效学, 1999, 5(2): 36-38.]
[24] Zhu Qinghua. Statistics analysis on types of Chinese manufacturers based on practice of green supply chain management and their performance. Application of Statistics and Management, 2006, 25(4): 392-399.
[朱庆华. 中国制 造企业绿色供应链管理实践类型及绩效实证研究. 数理统计与管理, 2006, 25(4): 392-399.]
[25] Mei Guoping. Empirical study on corporation performance evaluating based on multiple correlation method. Administration World, 2004, (1): 145-148.
[梅国平. 基于复相关系数法的公司绩效评价实证研究. 管理世界, 2004, (1): 145-148.]
[26] Mao Ying'e. Analysis on evaluating indicator system of disbursal performance in local financial application items of science and technology. Study of Finance, 2006, (7): 66-70.
[茆英娥. 地方财政应用科技项目专项支出绩效评价指标 体系探析. 财政研究, 2006, (7): 67-70.]
[27] Zhou Feng. Analysis on land use change and its effectiveness in Su-Xi-Chang area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.
[周峰. 苏锡常地区土地利用变化及其绩效分析. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.]
[28] Zheng Huadong. Comparative study on the scale, structure and performance of urban land expansion in Beijing and Shanghai. Economic Theoretical Research, 2006, (4): 22-25.
[郑华东. 京沪城市用地扩张的比较研究: 规模、结构与 绩效. 经济理论研究, 2006, (4): 22-25.]
[29] Zheng Meiqun. Study on the indicator system construction for the high-tech corporation performance evaluating. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2004, (7): 68-72.
[郑美群. 高技术企业绩效评价指标体系的构建研 究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2004, (7): 68-72.]
[30] Xu Xueqiang, Zhang Junjun. Comprehensive evaluation of Guangzhou urban sustainable development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(1): 54-63.
[许学强, 张俊军. 广州城市可持续发展的综合评价. 地理学报, 2001, 56(1): 54-63.]
[31] Yu Feng, Li Xiaobing, Wang Hong. Land use change and eco-security assessment of Huangfuchuan watershed. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(1): 645-653.
[喻锋, 李晓兵, 王宏. 皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价. 地理学 报, 2006, 61(1): 645-653.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |