中国国有企业生产效率的区域差异
收稿日期: 2008-02-18
修回日期: 2008-07-26
网络出版日期: 2008-10-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(40701043); 地理科学与资源研究所三期创新工程项目
Research on the Regional Variation of China's State-owned Enterprises
Received date: 2008-02-18
Revised date: 2008-07-26
Online published: 2008-10-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40701043; Knowledge Innovation Project of IGSNRR]
借鉴西方经济地理学中的新区域主义和企业与区域联系的关系型理论框架， 对中国国 有企业的区域差异进行了实证分析， 发现中国的国有部门存在显著的内部差异。分省看， 存在显著的东西差异和南北差异。华北和东北的国有企业在规模上要远远大于华东和华南的国有企业， 但是前者的生产效率却要落后于后者。分地市看， 高生产效率的国有企业呈现逐渐 向沿海都市经济区集聚的空间态势。统计检验表明地方化的贸易和非贸易性联系是影响国有 企业生产效率的区域因素。具体而言： ① 与地方经济有着较多的生产和市场联系的国有企业， 受区域外部经济效应的影响， 其生产效率越高； ② 地方劳动力市场的多元化程度有利于国有企业采取灵活的薪酬制度和劳动力管理措施来提高生产效率； ③ 与外资企业的非贸易联系可以方便国有企业学习和采纳行之有效的组织行为和管治结构， 并促进其生产效率的提高。
胡智勇, 林初昇 . 中国国有企业生产效率的区域差异[J]. 地理学报, 2008 , 63(10) : 1073 -1084 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200810007
Drawing insights from theories of new regionalism and firm-region nexus in new economic geography, this paper analyzes empirically the regional variation of China's state-owned enterprises (SOEs hereafter). It reveals significant internal differentiation among China's state-owned sectors. Viewed at provincial level, SOEs in North and Northeast China were much larger and bigger than those in East and Southeast China, while their productive efficiency was greatly lagged behind by the latter. It is further found at municipal level that there emerges a trend of spatial concentration of highly productive SOEs toward coastal metropolitan areas. Statistical tests suggest that locally-specific traded and untraded interdependence is an important regional factor affecting the productive efficiency of SOEs. Specifically, SOEs with more local production and market linkages were more likely to benefit from external economies and achieve higher productive efficiency. Higher degree of diversification in local labor market allowed SOEs therein to adopt more flexible methods in labor management which was beneficial to their efficiency improvement. More untraded interdependence with foreign enterprises can facilitate SOEs to learn and adopt effective organizational structure and help them to improve productive efficiency.
[1] National Statistical Bureau of China. Chinese Industrial Economy Statistical Yearbook 2004. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2004.
[国家统计局. 中国工业经济统计年鉴2004. 北京: 中国统计出社社, 2004.]
[2] Cheng Y S, Lo D. Explaining the financial performance of China's industrial enterprises: Beyond the competitionownership controversy. The China Quarterly, 2002, 170: 413-440.
[3] McNally C A. China's state-owned enterprises: Thriving or crumbling? Asian Pacific Issues, 2002, 59: 1-8.
[4] Murphy D. Nothing more to lose. Far Eastern Economic Review, 2002, 165(44): 30-32.
[5] Wu Jinglian. Strategic Reorganization of SOEs. Beijing: China Development Press, 1998.
[吴敬链. 国有企业的战略重 组. 北京: 中国发展出版社, 1998]
[6] Lardy N. China's Unfinished Economic Revolution. Washington: Brookings, 1998.
[7] Jiang Zemin. Holding confidence, clarifying tasks and actively promote the reform of SOEs. People's Daily, 1995-07-13 (1-2).
[江泽民. 坚定信心, 明确任务, 积极推进国有企业改革, 人民日报, 1995-07-13(1-2).]
[8] Nolan P. China and the global business revolution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2002, 26: 119-137.
[9] Li X J. The changing spatial networks of large state-owned enterprises in reform-era China: A company case study, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (Journal of Social and Economic Geography), 2002, 93(4): 383-396.
[10] Li Xiaojian. The effect of SOEs reform toward regional economic development, Economic Geography, 1998, 18 (3): 1-7.
[李小建. 国有企业改革对区域经济发展的影响: 以河南为例. 经济地理, 1998, 18(3): 1-7.]
[11] Naughton B. Growing out of the plan: Chinese economic reform 1978-1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[12] McMillan J, Naughton B. How to reform a planned economy: Lessons from China. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1992, 18(1): 130-43.
[13] Perkins E C. Productivity performance and priorities for the reform of China's State-owned enterprises. The Journal of Development Studies, 1996, 32(3): 414-444.
[14] Kornai J. The soft budget constraint, Kyklos, 1986, 39(1): 3-30.
[15] Li D D, Liang M S. Causes of soft budge constraint: Evidence on three explanations. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1998, 26: 104-116.
[16] Dewatripont M, Maskin E. Credit and Efficiency in Centralized and Decentralized Economies. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1989.
[17] Lin Yifu, Liu Mingxing, Zhang Qi. Policy burden and enterprise's soft budgetary binding: A case study from China. Management World, 2004, (8): 81-89.
[林毅夫, 刘明兴, 章奇. 政策性负担与企业的预算软约束: 来自中国的实证研 究. 管理世界, 2004, (8): 81-89.]
[18] Lee K. Chinese firms and the state in transition: Property rights and agency problems in the reform era. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe Inc, 1991.
[19] Zhang Weiying. Enterprise Theory and SOEs Reform. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1999.
[张维迎. 企业理论与国 企改革. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1999.]
[20] Aoki M, Kim H. Corporate governance in transitional economies. Washington: World Bank, 1995.
[21] Qian Y Y. Enterprise reform in China: Agency problems and political control. Economics of Transition, 1996, 4(2): 427-447.
[22] MacLeod M. New regionalism reconsidered: Globalization and the remaking of political economic space, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2001, 25(4): 804-29.
[23] Yeung H W C. Does economic matter for/in economic geography? Antipode, 2001, 33(2): 168-175.
[24] Dicken P., Malmberg A. Firms in territory: A relational perspective, Economic Geography, 2001, 77(4): 345-363.
[25] Amin A., Thrift N. Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1992, 16(4): 571-87.
[26] Storper M. The Regional World: Territory Development in a Global Economy. New York: Guilford, 1997.
[27] Scott A J. Industrial organization and location: Division of labor, the firm, and spatial process. Economic Geography, 1986, 62(3):215-231.
[28] Storper M, Scott A J. Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development. London: Routledge, 1992.
[29] Amin A. An institutional perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999, 23: 365-78.
[30] Malmberg A. Industrial geography: Location and learning. Progress in Human Geography, 1997, 21: 573-582.
[31] Yeung H W C. Critical reviews of geographical perspectives on business organizations and the organization of production: Towards a network approach. Progress in Human Geography, 1994, 18(4): 460-490.
[32] Martin R. The new 'geographical turn' in economics: Some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999, 23: 65-91.
[33] Solinger D J. Clashes between reform and opening: Labor market formation in three cities. In: Chao C M, Dickson B J (eds.). Remaking the Chinese State: Strategies, Society and Security. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. 103-131.
[34] DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160.
[35] Fan C, Scott A J. Industrial agglomeration and development: A survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions. Economic Geography, 2003, 79(3): 293-329.
[36] Chandler A D. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1990.
[37] Lazonick W. Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[38] Nolan P. Large firms and industrial reform in former planned economies: The case of China. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996, 20: 1-29.
[39] Smyth R. Should China be promoting large-scale enterprises and enterprise groups? World Development, 2000, 28(4): 721-737.
[40] He C F. Entry mode and location of foreign manufacturing enterprises in China. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2003, 44(6): 443-61.
[41] Guthrie D. Dragon in a Three-piece Suit: The Emergence of Capitalism in China. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1999.
[42] Martin R. Institutional approaches in economic geography. In: Sheppard E, Barnes T (eds.). A Companion to Economic Geography. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000. 77-94.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |