黄土高原作物产量及水土流失地形分异模拟
收稿日期: 2008-05-15
修回日期: 2008-10-20
网络出版日期: 2008-11-25
基金资助
中国科学院知识创新项目(KZCX2-XB2-05-01); 国家自然科学基金项目(40771086)
Topographic Differentiation Simulation of Crop Yield and Soil and Water Loss on the Loess Plateau
Received date: 2008-05-15
Revised date: 2008-10-20
Online published: 2008-11-25
Supported by
Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZCX2-XB2-05-01; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40771086
退耕坡地是近年来黄土高原整治生态环境和控制水土流失的有效措施。基于WIN_YIELD 软件， 以延安燕沟流域为例，利用2005 年延安站的逐日气象数据和燕沟流域地貌、土壤及土地利用等资料， 模拟分析了不同地形高程、坡度和坡向条件下不同作物产量及水土流失的分异特征。结果表明： 在黄土高原， 地形坡度是影响作物产量、径流和泥沙的重要因素， 地形高程和坡向的影响普遍较微弱； 地形坡度越大， 作物产量越低， 高粱和玉米在坡度为25o 时的产量模拟值分别较0o 时下降15.44%和14.32%， 大豆、绿豆和马铃薯的下降幅度依次为5.26%、4.67%和3.84%； 产生径流和泥沙随地形坡度的增大而增大， 在坡度20o左右存在一个高值区间； 不同作物的水土保持效益由高到低依次为大豆、绿豆(豆类)、马铃薯、玉米和高粱； 坡度小于5o的坡耕地可以不进行梯田改造， 坡度大于15o 的坡耕地应及早实现退耕还林还草。
徐勇,杨波,刘国彬,刘普灵 . 黄土高原作物产量及水土流失地形分异模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2008 , 63(11) : 1218 -1226 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200811011
De-farming slope farmland has been an effective measure in recent years for the improvement of the eco-environment and the mitigation of soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau. This paper, taking the Yangou Basin as a case study and using day-by-day meteorological data of Yan'an station in 2005, simulated and analyzed the quantitative relation between crop yield, soil and water loss and topographic condition with the aid of WIN-YIELD software. Results show that: 1) Topographic gradient has important influence on crop yield. The bigger the gradient is, the lower the crop yield. Yields of sorghum and corn decrease by 15.44% and 14.32% respectively at 25o in comparison to the case of 0o. In addition, yields of soya, bean and potato decrease slightly by 5.26% , 4.67% and 3.84% , respectively. The influences of topographic height and slope aspect on crop yield are slight. 2) Under the same topographic condition, different crops' runoff and soil loss show obvious disparity. The benefit of soil and water conservation from high to low ranks soya, bean, potato, corn and sorghum. Topographic gradient has important influence on soil and water loss. In general, the changing trend is that the soil and water loss aggregates with the increase of gradient, and the maximal amount occurs around 20o. The influence of topographic height is slight. Topographic aspect has a certain effect, and the fundamental characteristic is that values are higher at the aspect of south than north. 3) Topographic gradients of 5o and 15o are two important thresholds. The characteristics about soil and water loss with the variation of topographic gradients show that: the slope farmland with gradients less than 5o could remain unchanged, and the slope farmland more than 15o should be de-farmed as early as possible.
[1] Xu Jiongxin. Some problems and research requirements concerning eco-environmental construction on Loess Plateau. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 7(2): 10-13.
[许炯心. 黄土高原生态环境建设的若干问题与研究需 求. 水土保持研究, 2000, 7(2): 10-13.]
[2] Jing Ke. On the construction of ecological agriculture in the middle of the Loess Plateau. Geographical Research, 1999, 18(suppl.): 51-56.
[景可. 黄土高原中部生态农业建设探讨. 地理研究, 1999, 18(增刊): 51-56.]
[3] Zhou Deyi, Yang Haijuan. The game between central government, local governments and farmers in management of Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 22(3): 35-38.
[周德翼, 杨海娟. 黄土高原治理中中央、 地方、农民间的博弈分析. 水土保持通报, 2002, 22(3): 35-38.]
[4] Lu C H, van Ittersum M K, Rabbinge R. A scenario exploration of strategic land use options for the Loess Plateau in northern China. Agricultural Systems, 2004, 79: 145-170.
[5] Lu C H, van Ittersum M K. A trade-off analysis of policy objectives for Ansai, the Loess Plateau of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2004, 102: 235-246.
[6] Tang Keli, Zhang Keli, Lei Alin. Critical slope gradient for compulsory abandonment of farmland on the hilly Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Chinese Science, 1998, 43(2): 200-203.
[唐克丽, 张科利, 雷阿林. 黄土丘陵区退耕上限坡度的研 究论证. 科学通报, 1998, 43(2): 200-203.]
[7] Hu Shixiong, Jin Changxing. Theoretical analysis and experimental study on the critical slope of erosion. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(4): 347-356.
[胡世雄, 靳长兴. 坡面土壤侵蚀临界坡度问题的理论与实验研究. 地理学 报, 1999, 54(4): 347-356.]
[8] Cai Qiangguo, Shiuhung Luk, Wang Guiping et al. Process-based soil erosion and sediment yield model in a small basin in the hilly loess region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(2): 108-117.
[蔡强国, 陆兆熊, 王贵平等. 黄土丘陵沟壑 区典型小流域侵蚀产沙过程模型. 地理学报, 1996, 51(2): 108-117.]
[9] Chen Liding, Fu Bojie, Ingmar Messing. Sustainable land-use planning in a typical catchment in the Loess Plateau: Acase study. Geographical Research, 2001, 20(6): 713-722.
[陈利顶, 傅伯杰, Ingmar Messing. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小 流域土地持续利用案例研究. 地理研究, 2001, 20(6): 713-722.]
[10] Fu Bojie, Chen Liding, Ma Keming. The effect of land use change on the regional environment in the Yangjuangou Catahment in the Loess Plateau of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 54(3): 241-246.
[傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明. 黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响: 以延安羊圈沟为例. 地理学报, 1999, 54(3): 241-246.]
[11] Xu Jiongxin. A study on the coupling relation between the water and sediment yield sub-system and river channel deposition sub-system: An example from the Yellow River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1997, 52(5): 421-429.
[许炯心. 黄河上中游产水产沙系统与下游河道沉积的耦合关系. 地理学报, 1997, 52(5): 421-429.]
[12] Tian Junliang, Liang Yimin, Liu Puling. Research on Eco-agriculture Construction of Meso-scale Area in the Loess Hilly-gully Region. Zhengzhou: Water Conservancy Press of Yellow River, 2003.
[田均良, 梁一民, 刘普灵主编. 黄土 高原丘陵区中尺度生态农业建设探索. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2003.]
[13] Kang Xiaoguang. Dam system agriculture is the basis of harnessing the Yellow River. Science & Technology Review, 1993, 62(8): 3-6.
[康晓光. 坝系农业—— 治黄之本. 科技导报, 1993, 62(8): 3-6.]
[14] Xu Yong, Tian Junliang, Shen Hongquan. Eco-environmental rehabilitation and spatial differentiation based on enlarging terrace and defarming in the loess hilly-gully region. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(4): 430-437.
[徐 勇, 田均良, 沈洪泉. 黄土丘陵区“梯田退耕” 生态重建及地域分异特征. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(4): 430-437.]
[15] Qian Zhenghan, Ni Jinren, Xue An. Classification and identification of severity degree of the no-flow events in the Yellow River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(6): 691-699.
[钱征寒, 倪晋仁, 薛安. 黄河断流严重程度分级与判 别方法. 地理学报, 2001, 56(6): 691-699.]
[16] Liu Changming, Cheng Li. Analysis on runoff series with special reference to drying up courses of lower Huanghe River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(3): 257-264.
[刘昌明, 成立. 黄河干流下游的断流序列分析. 地理学报, 2000, 55(3): 257-264.]
[17] Tian Junliang, Liu Puling, Zhang Yi. The management of soil and water loss to rebuild a graceful Yan'an with green mountains and clean water rivers: Understanding and thinking concerning Premier Zhu's instructions on eco-environment construction. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 7(2): 4-9.
[田均良, 刘普灵, 张翼. 治理 水土流失再造山川秀美延安: 对中尺度生态环境建设中落实朱总理指示的认识和思考. 水土保持研究, 2000, 7(2): 4-9.]
[18] Peng Wenying, Zhang Keli, Li Shuangcai. Studies of the regional classification about returning farmland to forests or grassland on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(4): 438-443.
[彭文英, 张科利, 李双才. 黄土高 原退耕还林(草) 紧迫性地域分级论证. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(4): 438-443.]
[19] Xu Yong, Tian Junliang, Liu Puling. Planning method of eco-environment restoration based on enlarging terrace and de-farming in the loess hilly-gully region: A case study of Yangou catchment. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17 (4): 430-437.
[徐勇, 田均良, 刘普灵. 黄土丘陵区“梯田退耕” 生态重建规划方法: 以燕沟流域为例. 自然资源学 报, 2004, 19(5): 637-645.]
[20] Ju Tongjun, Liu Puling, Zheng Shiqing. Primary report on monitoring sediment in Yan'er gully valley. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 7(2): 176-178.
[琚彤军, 刘普灵, 郑世清. 燕儿沟流域泥沙监测初报. 水土保持研究, 2000, 7(2): 176-178.]
[21] Xu Yong, Roy C Sidle. Research on land use change and its regulation of Yangou Watershed in loess hilly-gully region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(6): 681-710.
[徐勇, Roy C Sidle. 黄土丘陵区燕沟流域土地利用变化与优 化调控. 地理学报, 2001, 56(6): 681-710.]
[22] Liu Gaohuan, Zhu Huiyi, Cai Qiangguo et al. A land-unit based integration method of geographic information system for small watershed management. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(1): 25-33.
[刘高焕, 朱会义, 蔡强国等. 小流域综 合管理信息系统集成研究. 地理研究, 2002, 21(1): 25-33.]
[23] Xie Yun, James R Kiniry. A review on the development of crop modeling and its application. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28(2): 190-195.
[谢云, James R Kiniry. 国外作物生长模型发展综述. 作物学报, 2002, 28(2): 190-195.]
[24] Xu Yong. A discussion on research progress of agricultural productivity models. Geographical Research, 1999, 18 (suppl.): 157-163.
[徐勇. 农业生产力模型研究进展述评. 地理研究, 1999, 18 (增刊): 157-163.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |