土地利用与人居环境

土地利用/土地覆被变化(LUCC) 模型研究进展

展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京100081;
    2. 农业部资源遥感与数字农业重点开放实验室, 北京100081;
    3. 荷兰瓦赫宁根大学环境系, 瓦赫宁根47-6700
唐华俊(1960-), 男, 研究员, 博士生导师, 主要从事土地利用变化、遥感和GIS 应用方面研究。 E-mail: hjtang@mail.caas.net.cn

收稿日期: 2008-08-27

  修回日期: 2009-02-14

  网络出版日期: 2009-04-25

基金资助

国家科技支撑计划(2007BAC03A10); 中央级公益性科研院所专项资金项目(2008IARRP01)

Recent Progresses of Land Use and Land Cover Change (LUCC) Models

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Resources Remote Sensing and Digital Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;
    3. Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen 47-6700, the Netherlands

Received date: 2008-08-27

  Revised date: 2009-02-14

  Online published: 2009-04-25

Supported by

National Key Technology R&D Program, No.2007BAC03A10; National Non-Profit Scientific Institution, Ministry of Finance of China, No.2008IARRP01]

摘要

土地利用/ 土地覆被变化(LUCC) 是全球环境变化的重要原因, LUCC 模型研究始终是 土地变化科学研究的重点。论文系统总结了近10 年来国内外LUCC 模型在理论、方法、实 践应用等方面取得的新进展, 指出了亟待解决的问题, 并对今后的发展方向进行了展望。研 究发现, ①LUCC 模型的功能和作用呈现多样化趋势, 是了解、认识和解释土地利用系统的 动态变化特征、过程和效应的有效工具, 可以服务于土地利用管理和政策的制订。②模型的 核心内容是研究LUCC 时空变化格局, 模型发展正经历从单一的非空间模型向非空间模型和 空间模型融合的演进过程, 但多数模型只重视空间变化机制研究, 而对时间机制考虑不足。 ③反馈机制是LUCC 系统的一个重要特征, 现有模型在反馈机制方面的研究尚十分薄弱, 研 究不同时空尺度的反馈机制必将是未来LUCC 模型的新焦点。④LUCC 研究本质上是“人 类—环境” 关系研究, 以往模型多为局部均衡分析模型, 未来LUCC 模型发展趋向应从系统 观和整体观角度来综合考虑“人类—环境” 相互作用机制, 这也是LUCC 模型的最高更次的 科学难点问题。⑤多尺度、多层次的综合研究是LUCC 模型的必然要求, 模型空间尺度已经 从早期的单一空间尺度转变到现今的多空间尺度, 但尺度推移仍是模型研究中值得深入探讨 的问题。⑥尽管LUCC 模型验证方法趋于多元化, 但目前还没有一个模型验证的统一标准和 规范, 参考数据的不足也大大限制了模型验证效果, 如何对LUCC 模型的可靠性和科学性进 行合理验证始终是LUCC 模型所面临的关键挑战之一。

本文引用格式

唐华俊, 吴文斌, 杨鹏, 陈佑启, Peter H. Verburg . 土地利用/土地覆被变化(LUCC) 模型研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2009 , 64(4) : 456 -468 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200904008

Abstract

Land use and land cover change (LUCC) is a major part and also a main cause of global environmental changes, and it has emerged recently as an important focus for land change studies. Based on the systematic summary of the progress of studies in LUCC in the latest decade, including its theories, methods and applications, a series of problems that should be urgently resolved in the study are put forward, and some important study directions and priorities for future are reviewed. Results show that LUCC model plays an important role and is an efficient tool to support the analysis of the causes, processes and consequences of land use systems and to support land use planning and policy. Second, spatio-temporal patterns of LUCC are the research core of LUCC models. The development of models has experienced an evolvement from single non-spatial to the combination of non-spatial and spatial models, however, at present most models are static models and ignore the temporal dimension of land-use change. Third, feedback is one of the important characteristics of LUCC; however, the majority of the existing LUCC models are very weak in analyzing and presenting the feedbacks of LUCC. In this regard, how to get a better understanding of the feedbacks at different time and space scales will be one of new tasks in LUCC models. Fourth, the objective of LUCC models is to study the dynamic relations of a coupled human-environment. Currently, most LUCC models are partial-equilibrium ones. Future LUCC models will focus on studies on the human-environment system from a systematic and holistic point of view. Fifth, multi-scale analysis in LUCC models is needed for a better understanding of land use change. Early LUCC models used to take a single scale or level of analysis into account. Recently, a number of LUCC models which implement multiple scales can be distinguished. The scaling will be a key issue in future LUCC models. Finally, although many methods of model validation are available, there is not a uniform standard and criterion of model validation. The weakness in reference data also limits the performance of model validation. All these will challenge the development of future LUCC models.

参考文献


[1] GLP Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No. 53/IHDP Report No. 19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm, 2005.

[2] Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309: 570-574.

[3] Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Tang Huajun et al. Regional variability of effects of land use system on soil properties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(8): 1697-1702.
[吴文斌, 杨鹏, 唐华俊等. 土地利用对土壤性质影响的区域差异 研究. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(8): 1697-1702.]

[4] Liu J, Diamond J. China's environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 2005, 435: 1179-1186.

[5] Yu Xingxiu, Yang Guishan, Wang Yao. Advances in researchers on environmental effects of land use/cover change. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(5): 627-633.
[于兴修, 杨桂山, 王瑶. 土地利用覆被变化的环境效应研究进展与 动向. 地理科学, 2004, 24(5): 627-633.]

[6] Qin Lijie, Zhang Yu, Xu Hongmei et al. Study on the effect of land use change on the eco-environment. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002, 22(4): 508-512.
[秦丽杰, 张郁, 许红梅等. 土地利用变化的生态环境效应研究: 以前郭县 为例. 地理科学, 2002, 22(4): 508-512.]

[7] Pielke Sr R A. Land use and climate change. Science, 2005, 310: 1625-1626.

[8] Kalnay E, Cai M. Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature, 2003, 423: 528-531.

[9] Pimm S L, Raven P. Biodiversity: Extinction by numbers. Nature, 2000, 403: 843-845.

[10] Tang Huajun, Chen Youqi, Qiu Jianjun et al. China Land-use and Land-cover Change. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2004.
[唐华俊, 陈佑启, 邱建军等. 中国土地利用/ 土地覆盖变化研究. 北京: 中国 农业科学科技出版社, 2004.]

[11] Chen Youqi, Yang Peng. Recent progresses of international study on land use and land cover change (LUCC). Economic Geography, 2001, 21(1): 95-100.
[陈佑启, 杨鹏. 国际上土地利用/ 土地覆盖变化研究的新进展. 经济地 理, 2001, 21(1): 95-100.]

[12] Lambin E F, Baulies X, Bockstael N et al. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC): Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No.48 and IHDP Report No.10, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, International Human Dimension on Global Environment Change Programme, Stockholm Bonn, 1999.

[13] Rindfuss R R, Walsh S J, Turner B L II et al. Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2004, 101: 13976-13981.

[14] Turner B L II, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2007, 104: 20666-20671.

[15] Lambin E F, Geist H J (eds). Land use and land cover change: Local processes and global impacts. Global Change-IGDP series, Springer Dordrecht, 2006.

[16] Fang Chuanglin. Recent progress of studies on man-land relationship and its prospects in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(suppl.): 21-32.
[方创琳. 中国人地关系研究的新进展与展望. 地理学报, 2004, 59(增刊): 21-32.]

[17] Li Xiubin. A review of the international researches on land use/land cover change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51 (6): 553-558.
[李秀彬. 全球环境变化研究的核心领域: 土地利用/ 土地覆被变化的国际研究动向. 地理学报, 1996, 51(6): 553-558.]

[18] Huang Qiuhao, Cai Yunlong. Review on several domestic land use change models. China Land Science, 2005, 19(5): 25-30.
[黄秋昊, 蔡运龙. 国内几种土地利用变化模型述评. 中国土地科学, 2005, 19(5): 25-30.]

[19] Zhang Hua, Zhang Bo. Review on land use and land cover change models. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005, 20(3):422-431.
[张华, 张勃. 国际土地利用/ 覆盖变化模型研究综述. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(3): 422-431.]

[20] Heistermann M, Muller C, Ronneberge K. Land in sight? Achievements, deficits and potentials of continental to global scale land-use modeling. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 141-158.

[21] Pontius J R G, Schneider L C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 239-248.

[22] St伢phenne N, Lambin E F. A dynamic simulation model of land-use changes in Sudano-Sahelian countries of Africa (SALU). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 145-161.

[23] He Chunyang, Shi Peijun, Li Jinggang et al. Scenarios simulation land use change in the northern China by system dynamic model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(4): 599-608.
[何春阳, 史培军, 李景刚等. 中国北方未来土地利 用变化情景模拟. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 599-608.]

[24] Verburg P H, Soepboer W, Limpiada R et al. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management, 2002, 30: 391-405.

[25] Wu W, Yang P, Meng C et al. An integrated model to simulating sown area changes for major crops at a global scale. Science in China (Series D), 2008, 51: 370-379.

[26] Verburg P H, Overmars K P, Huigen M G A et al. Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in Phillippines. Applied Geography, 2006, 26: 153-173.

[27] Verburg P H, De Nijs T C M, Van Eck J R et al. A method to analyze neighborhood characteristics of land use patterns. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28: 667-690.

[28] Verburg P H, Rounsevell M D A, Veldkamp A. Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 1-6.

[29] Kok K, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A. Integrated assessment of the land system: The future of land use. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24: 517-520.

[30] Ewert F, Rounsevell M D A, Reginster I et al. Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: I. Estimating changes in crop productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 107: 101-116.

[31] Rounsevell M D A, Ewert F, Reginster I et al. Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: II. Projecting changes in cropland and grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 107: 117-135.

[32] Rounsevell M D A, Reginster I, Araujo M B et al. A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 57-68.

[33] Westhoek H J, van den Berg M, Bakkes J A. Scenario development to explore the future of Europe's rural areas. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 7-20.

[34] Audsley E, Pearn K R, Simota C et al. What can scenario modelling tell us about future European scale agricultural land use, and what not? Environmental Science & Policy, 2006, 9: 148-162.

[35] Rounsevell M D A, Berry P M, Harrison P A. Future environmental change impacts on rural land use and biodiversity: a synthesis of the ACCELERATES project. Environmental Science & Policy, 2006, 9: 93-100.

[36] Dockerty T, Lovett A, Appleton K et al. Developing scenarios and visualizations to illustrate potential policy and climatic influences on future agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 103-120.

[37] Verburg P H, Schulp C J E, Veldkamp A. Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 39-56.

[38] Van Meijl H, van Rheenen T, Tabeau A et al. The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 21-38.

[39] Fan Zemeng, Yue Tianxiang, Liu Jiyuan et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of land cover scenarios in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(6): 941-952.
[范泽孟, 岳天祥, 刘纪远等. 中国土地覆盖时空变化未来情景分析. 地理 学报, 2005, 60(6): 941-952.]

[40] Wang Shuang, He Chunyang, Pan Yaozhong et al. Research for scenarios simulation of urban land use change in Beijing by system dynamic model under water restriction from 2004 to 2020. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21 (4): 535-544.
[王双, 何春阳, 潘耀忠等. 水资源约束下北京地区2004-2020 年土地利用变化情景模拟研究. 自然资 源学报, 2006, 21(4): 535-544.]

[41] Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Tan Guoxin et al. Global-scale modeling of future changes in sown areas for major crops based on a Logit model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 589-598.
[吴文斌, 杨鹏, 谈国新等. 基于LOGIT 模 型的世界主要作物播种面积变化模拟研究. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 589-598.]

[42] Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Zhou Qingbo et al. Modeling sown area changes for major crops during 2005-2035 at global-scale. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(10): 93-97.
[吴文斌, 杨鹏, 周 清波等. 2005~2035 年全球农作物播种面积变化情景模拟研究. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(10): 93-97.]

[43] Evans T P, Manire A, de Castro F et al. A dynamic model of household decision-making and parcel level land cover change in the eastern Amazon. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 143: 95-113.

[44] Pontius J R G, Cornell J D, Hall C A S. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: Application and validation for Costa Rica. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 191-203.

[45] Goldstein N C, Candau J T, Clarker K C. Approaches to simulating the "March of bricks and mortar". Computers,Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28: 125-147.

[46] Bürgi M, Hersperger A M, Schneeberger N. Driving forces of landscape change-current and new directions. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19: 857-868.

[47] Verburg P H, Schot P P, Dijst M J et al. Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal, 2004, 61: 309-324.

[48] Li Xiubin. Explanation of land use change. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(3): 195-203.
[李秀彬. 土地利用变化的解 释. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(3): 195-203.]

[49] Verburg P H. Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models. Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21: 1171-1183.

[50] Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 2007, 317: 1513-1516.

[51] Brown D G, Page S, Riolo R et al. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2005, 19: 153-174.

[52] Shi Peijun, Wang Jing'ai, Chen Jing et al. The future of human-environmental interaction research in geography: Lessons from the 6th open meeting of IHDP. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(2): 115-126.
[史培军, 王静爱, 陈婧 等. 当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向: 全球变化人类行为计划(IHDP) 第六届开放会议透视. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2): 115-126.]

[53] Fischer G, Sun L. Model based analysis of future land-use development in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 163-176.

[54] Nute D, Potter W D, Maier F et al. NED-2: An agent-based decision support system for forest ecosystem management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2004, 19: 831-843.

[55] Matthews R. The People and Landscape Model (PALM): Towards full integration of human decision-making and biophysical simulation models. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 194: 329-343.

[56] Manson S M. Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the southern Yucatan Peninsular Region of Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 111: 47-62.

[57] Barnaud C, Bousquet F, Trebuil G. Multi-agent simulations to explore rules for rural credit in a highland farming community of Northern Thailand. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66: 615-627.

[58] Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Shibasaki R et al. Agent-based model for land use/cover change: A review. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(4): 573-578.
[吴文斌, 杨鹏, 柴崎亮介等. 基于Agent 的土地利用/ 土地覆盖变化模型 的研究进展. 地理科学, 2007, 27(4): 573-578.]

[59] Bousquet F, C Le Page. Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: A review. Ecological Modeling, 2004, 176: 313-332.

[60] Xue Ling, Yang Kaizhong, Shen Tiyan. Agent-based modeling: the new advance in geocomputation. Advances in Earth Sciences, 2004, 19(2): 305-311.
[薛领, 杨开忠, 沈体雁. 基于Agent 的建模: 地理计算的新发展.地球科学进展, 2004, 19(2): 305-311.]

[61] Zhang Honghui, Zeng Yongnian, Jin Xiaobin et al. Urban land expansion model based on multi-agent system and application. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(8): 869-881.
[张鸿辉, 曾永年, 金晓斌等. 多智能体城市土地扩张模 型及其应用. 地理学报, 2008, 63(8): 869-881.]

[62] Parker D C, Manson S M, Janssen M A et al. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003, 93: 314-337.

[63] Grimm Vloker, Revilla Eloy, Berger Uta et al. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 2005, 310: 987-991.

[64] Müller B, Birr-Pedersen K, Schou J S. Combined ecological and economic modelling in agricultural land use scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 174: 5-18.

[65] Kotchen M J, Young O R. Meeting the challenges of the anthropocene: Towards a science of coupled human-biophysical systems. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17: 149-151.

[66] Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H G. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 2001, 11: 261-269.

[67] Verburg P H, Chen Y, Veldkamp A. Spatial explorations of land use change and grain production in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 82: 333-354.

[68] Wassenaar T, Gerber P, Verburg P H. Projecting land use changes in the Neotropics: The geography of pasture expansion into forest. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17: 86-104.

[69] Lambin E F, Geist H J, Lepers E. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2003, 28: 205-241.

[70] Rounsevell M D A, Annetts J E, Audsley E et al. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2003, 95: 465-479.

[71] Wu W, Shibasaki R, Yang P et al. Global-scale modelling of future changes in sown areas of major crops. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 208: 378-390.

[72] Van Tongeren F, Van Meijl H, Surry Y. Global models applied to agricultural and trade policies: A review and assessment. Agricultural Economics, 2001, 26: 149-172.

[73] Overmars K P, Verburg P H. Multilevel modelling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines. Agricultural Systems, 2006, 89: 435-456.

[74] De Koning G H J, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A et al. Multi-scale modelling of land use change dynamics in Ecuador. Agricultural Systems, 1999, 61: 77-93.

[75] Verburg P H, Eickhout G, Van Meijl H. A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. The Annals of Regional Science, 2006. DOI 10.1007/s00168-007-0136-4.

[76] Verburg P H, Vledkamp A. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19: 77-98.

[77] Roetter R P, Hoanh C T, Laborte A G et al. Integration of systems network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2005, 20(3): 291-307.

[78] Castella J C, Boissau S, Trung T N et al. Agrarian transition and lowland-upland interactions in mountain areas in northern Vietnam: Application of a multi-agent simulation model. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 86(3): 312-332.

[79] Castella J C, Kam S P, Quang D D. Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: Application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24: 531-545.

[80] Castella J C, Verburg P H. Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 202: 410-420.

[81] Overmars K P, de Groot W T, Huigen M G A. Comparing inductive and deductive modeling of land use decisions: Principles, a model and an illustration from the Philippines. Human Ecology, 2007, 35: 439-452.

[82] Overmars K P, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A. Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24: 584-599.

[83] Zhang Qiuju, Fu Bojie. Several problems of landscape patterns dynamics. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2003, 23 (3): 264-270.
[张秋菊, 傅伯杰. 关于景观格局演变研究的几个问题. 地理科学, 2003, 23(3): 264-270.]

[84] Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[ 邬建 国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.]

[85] Rykiel Jr E J. Testing ecological models: The meaning of validation. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 90: 229-244.

[86] Loehle C. A hypothesis testing framework for evaluating ecosystem model performance. Ecological Modelling, 1997, 97: 153-165.

[87] Wada Y, Rajan K S, Shibaski R. Modelling the spatial distribution of shifting cultivation in Luangprabang, Lao PDR. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2007, 34: 261-278.

[88] Li A, Linderman M, Qi J et al. Exploring complexity in a human-environment system: An agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2005, 95 (1): 54-79.

[89] Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Liska R et al. The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 203: 167-182.

[90] Snowling S D, Kramer J R. Evaluating modeling uncertainty for model selection. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 138: 17-30.

[91] He C, Okada N, Zhang Q et al. Modelling dynamic urban expansion processes incorporating a potential model with cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 86: 79-91.

[92] Lesschen J P, Verburg P H, Staal S J. Statistical methods for analyzing the spatial dimension of changes in land use and farming system. LUCC Report Series No.7, 2005.

[93] Hagen A E. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 2003, 173: 235-249.

[94] Pontius J R G, Huffaker D, Denman K. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 179: 445-461.

[95] Veldkamp A, Verburg P H, Kok K et al. The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modeling. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2001, 6: 111-121.

[96] Kok K, Farrow A, Veldkamp A et al. A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 223-238.

文章导航

/