城乡发展与旅游地理

基于DEA 的中国特大城市资源效率及其变化

展开
  • 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101
郭腾云, 男, 副研究员, 博士, 主要从事产业、区域与城市发展和GIS 应用研究。E-mail: guoty@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2008-10-22

  修回日期: 2009-02-20

  网络出版日期: 2009-04-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635026); 国家自然科学基金项目(40671054)

The Analyses of Metropolitan Efficiencies and Their Changes in China Based on DEA and Malmquist Index Models

Expand
  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2008-10-22

  Revised date: 2009-02-20

  Online published: 2009-04-25

Supported by

Key Project of National Natural Sciences of China, No.40635026, National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40671054

摘要

利用DEA、Malmquist 指数模型方法, 对1990-2006 年中国特大城市要素资源效率及其 变化进行了深入的研究。城市效率研究显示, 特大城市平均效率一般, 只有少数城市达到了 效率最优。进一步的分类研究发现: ① 东、中部地区特大城市综合效率一般要高于西部地 区, 呈现出与我国区域经济格局相似的特征;② 纯技术效率与城市规模成弱负相关关系, 即 城市规模越大, 城市纯技术效率越低;③ 城市规模与规模效率成一定的正相关关系, 即城市 规模越大, 规模效率越高。城市效率变化研究显示, 1990-2006 年特大城市效率呈现弱改善趋 势, 但技术退步和生产率下降明显。其中1990-2000 年全都呈上升趋势, 而2000-2006 年全都 呈下降趋势。进一步的分类研究显示: ① 城市综合效率和生产率变化趋势是, 东部沿海地区 有一定提高, 中西部地区下降, 其中, 西部地区下降最明显。② 不同规模城市的综合效率变 化表现为, 特大城市提高, 超大城市和巨型城市下降;③ 不同规模城市的生产率都呈现下降 趋势;④ 不同规模城市的规模效率都呈上升趋势, 存在随特大城市规模的增大, 城市规模效 率提高的趋势呈现递减的现象。

本文引用格式

郭腾云, 徐勇, 王志强 . 基于DEA 的中国特大城市资源效率及其变化[J]. 地理学报, 2009 , 64(4) : 408 -416 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200904003

Abstract

The factors resources efficiencies (including Technological Efficiency, TE; Pure Technological Efficiency, PTE; and Scale Efficiency, SE) of metropolises in China in 1990, 2000 and 2006, and their changing trends in China during the period 1990-2006 are investigated using DEA model and Malmquist index model, respectively. Firstly, the DEA model results show the efficiencies were not too high, with the characteristics of almost decreasing from Eastern Coastal China to Western China, and only few metropolises were in DEA efficiencies. Secondly, the results also show the PTEs were correlated with the urban population sizes of metropolises negatively, and the SEs correlated with the urban population sizes of metropolises positively in 1990, 2000, 2006, that is, with urban population sizes getting larger the corresponding PTEs were decreasing accordingly, and the SEs were increasing consequently. Thirdly, the Malmquist index results display the TE changing trends were increasing weakly, the technological changing trends were decreasing, and the total factor productivity changing trends are decreasing more apparently during 1990-2006, in which they were all increasing during the sub-period 1990-2000, and all decreasing during the sub-period 2000-2006. Fourthly, the Malmquist index results also demonstrate the TE changing trend was slightly increasing in Eastern Coastal China, while it was decreasing in Central China, and decreasing evidently in Western China. And with the increase of urban population size, the increasing trends of SEs became weaker and weaker. And the main reasons for the relatively low urban efficiencies and their changing trends, as well as a slight increase of total factor productivity changing trends mainly lie in the technological degeneracy and a significant decreasing trend in PTE during 2000-2006. Finally, the analyses also shed some highlights on the importance and significances to develop some metropolises with a proper size of population in China through implementing intensive factor resources utilization mode based on sustainable development concept.

参考文献


[1] Chen Gangqiang, Li Xun, Xu Xueqiang. Spatial agglomeration and evolution of urban population in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(10): 1045-1054.
[陈刚强, 李郇, 许学强. 中国城市人口的空间集聚特征与规律分析. 地 理学报, 2008, 63(10): 1045-1054.]

[2] Li Xun, Xu Xianxiang, Chen Haohui. Temporal and spatial changes of urban efficiency in the 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(4): 615-625.
[李郇, 徐现祥, 陈浩辉. 20 世纪90 年代中国城市效率的时空变化. 地理学报, 2005, 60 (4): 615-625.]

[3] Yuan Xiaoling, Zhang Baoshan, Zhang Xiaoni. Evolution characters of China's cities based on the super-efficient DEA. Urban Economics, 2008, (6): 102-107.
[袁晓玲, 张宝山, 张小妮. 基于超效率DEA 的城市效率演变特征. 城市经济, 2008, (6): 102-107.]

[4] Daniel J G. Productivity and efficiency in urban railways: Parametric and non-parametric estimates. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2008, 44(1): 84-99.

[5] Attah K B. The technical efficiency of Canadian urban transit systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2004, 40(5): 401-416.

[6] Kerstens K. Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1996, 30(6): 431-452.

[7] Toshiyuki S. Measuring the industrial performance of Chinese cities by data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1992, 26(2): 75-88.

[8] Matthew G K. A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 152(2): 354-364.

[9] Charnes A, William W Cooper, Shanling Li. Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1989, 23(6): 325-344

[10] G觟ran Bergendahl, Ted Lindblom. Evaluating the performance of Swedish savings banks according to service efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185(3): 1663-1673.

[11] Barros C P. Measuring efficiency in the hotel sector. Annals of Tourism Research, 2005, 32(2): 456-477.

[12] Ban Maosheng, Fang Chuanglin, Liu Xiaoli et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land use performance of Beijing high-tech industrial zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.
[班茂盛, 方创琳, 刘晓丽等. 北京高新技 术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.]

[13] Xu Chensheng. Assessment on efficiencies of hi-tech parks in China based on DEA. Scientific Progress and Countermeasure, 2007, 24(8): 117-119.
[许陈生. 基于DEA 的我国高新区相对效率评价, 科技进步与对策, 2007, 24 (8): 117-119.]

[14] Ye Shiqi, Mo Jianfang. Efficiency analysis on macroeconomics invest-production of four special economic zones. Journal of Jinan University, 2002, 23(3): 15-19.
[叶世绮, 莫剑芳. 四个经济特区宏观经济投入产出有效性分析. 暨 南大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 23(3): 15-19.]

[15] Zha Weixiong, Xiong Guilin, Liu Huilin et al. An efficiency evaluation of the transportation territorial economics compound system. System Engineering, 2007, 25(5): 60-65.
[查伟雄, 熊桂林, 刘会林等. 交通运输—区域经济复合 系统的效率评价. 系统工程, 2007, 25(5): 60-65.]

[16] Pang Ruizhi. Dynamic evaluation of main sea ports in Mainland China based on DEA model. Economic Research Journal, 2006, (6): 92-100.
[庞瑞芝. 我国主要沿海港口的动态效率评价. 经济研究, 2006, (6): 92-100.]

[17] Yang Kaizhong, Xie Xie. The analysis about DEA-efficiency of China cities' input-output. Geography and Territorial Research, 2002, 18(3): 45-47.
[杨开忠, 谢燮. 中国城市投入产出有效性的数据包络分析. 地理学与国土研究, 2002, 18(3): 45-47.]

[18] Guo Haitao, Yu Linlin, Li Jingtao. Assessment on efficiency of resources cities with data envelopment analysis. China Mining Magazine, 2007, 16(6): 5-9.
[郭海涛, 于琳琳, 李经涛. 我国资源型城市效率的DEA 方法评价, 中国矿业, 2007, 16(6): 5-9.]

[19] Wei Quanling. Effective Methods on Evaluating Relative Efficiency. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
[魏权龄. 数据包络 分析. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.]

[20] F覿re R, Grosskopf S, Linderdgren B et al. Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989: A nonparametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992, 3: 85-101.

[21] F覿re R, Grosskopf S, Norris M et al. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(1): 66-83.

[22] The World Bank. Monitoring Environmental Progress: A Report on Work in Progress. Washington DC, The World Bank, 1995.

[23] Sun Linlin, Ren Ruo'en. Capital input measurement: A survey. Economics, 2005, 4(4): 823-842.
[孙琳琳, 任若恩. 资 本投入测量综述. 经济学, 2005, 4(4): 823-842.]

文章导航

/