陆路交通与产业集聚

产业地理集聚与外商直接投资产业分布——以北京市制造业为例

展开
  • 北京大学环境学院城市与区域规划系,北京 100871
贺灿飞 (1972-), 男, 江西永新人, 副教授, 美国亚利桑那州立大学博士, 中国地理学会和美国地理学会会员, 主要从事经济地理、产业和区域经济等研究。E-mail: hecanfei@urban.pku.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2006-06-08

  修回日期: 2006-10-30

  网络出版日期: 2006-12-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目 (40535027); 国家自然科学基金项目 (40401015)

Industrial Agglomeration and Sectoral Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment: A Case Study of Beijing

Expand
  • Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received date: 2006-06-08

  Revised date: 2006-10-30

  Online published: 2006-12-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40535027; No.40401015

摘要

外商直接投资理论强调跨国公司的垄断优势和东道国的区位优势决定外商直接投资的产业分布。本文认为外商直接投资的产业分布还可能取决于因产业地理集聚和地方化贸易所形成的竞争优势。本文采用1999~2004年北京外商直接投资的产业流资料建立面板数据回归模型,引入产业地理集聚系数、产业联系等变量来研究影响外资产业分布的因素。统计分析表明,在空间上比较集聚、产业内联系较强的产业能够吸引更多的外商直接投资;前期外商投资对于跟进投资具有显著的示范效应、信息溢出效应以及产业联系效应,从而直接导致外资的产业累积效应。外商也强烈偏好资本技术密集型产业以及在国际市场上具有显著比较优势、盈利率高的产业。外商在充分利用其垄断优势、产业比较优势和竞争优势的同时,也尽量避开实际劳动成本较高和进入壁垒较高的垄断性产业。本文的结果显示,发挥本地优势,完善产业配套,促成产业集群是提升城市吸引外商直接投资的有效途径。

本文引用格式

贺灿飞,刘洋 . 产业地理集聚与外商直接投资产业分布——以北京市制造业为例[J]. 地理学报, 2006 , 61(12) : 1259 -1270 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200612003

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the systematic forces that determine the sectoral distribution of foreign investment. Unlike the existing literature, this study highlights the importance of industrial agglomeration and industrial linkage in attracting foreign investment. Using a panel dataset of two-digit manufacturing industries in Beijing during the period 1999-2004, this study finds that geographically agglomerated industries with strong intra-industrial linkages attract much foreign investment. Previous foreign investments have demonstration effects, information spillover effects and linkage effects, leading to industrial concentration of foreign investment. Investors also highly favor capital and technology intensive industries and are drawn to the most profitable and exporting industries, but avoid industries with high effective wage rates and high entry barriers. This study provides strong evidence to support that competitive and comparative advantages of local industries are critical to allure foreign investment. The existence of industrial clusters certainly heightens a city's attractiveness to foreign investment.

参考文献


[1] Leung C K. Locational characteristics of foreign equity joint venture investment in China, 1979-1985. Professional Geographer, 1990, 42(4): 403-421.

[2] Head K, Ries J. Intercity competition for foreign investment: static and dynamic effects of China's incentive areas. Journal of Urban Economics, 1996, 40(1): 38-60.

[3] Li Xiaojian. Locational behavior of Hong Kong business investment in Mainland China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(3): 213-223.
[李小建. 香港对大陆投资的区位变化与公司空间行为. 地理学报, 1996, 51(3): 213-423.]

[4] He C. Information costs, agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment in China. Regional Studies, 2002, 36(9): 1029-1036.

[5] He C. Location of foreign manufacturers in China: agglomeration economies and country of origin effects. Papers in Regional Science, 2003, 82(3): 351-372.

[6] Qiu Y. Personal networks, institutional involvement and foreign direct investment into China's interior. Economic Geography, 2005, 81(3): 261-282.

[7] Belderbos R., Carree M. The location of Japanese investments in China: agglomeration effects, Keiretsu, and firm heterogeneity. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2002, 16(2): 194-211.

[8] Marshall A. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan, 1898.

[9] Porter M. Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 2000, 14(1): 15-34.

[10] Hymer S. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.

[11] Kojima K. Direct Foreign Investment. London: Croom Helm, 1978.

[12] Dunning J. Towards an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 1980, 11(1): 9-31.

[13] Dunning J. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 2000, 9(2): 163-190.

[14] Caves R. Causes of direct investment: foreign firms' share in Canadian and United Kingdom manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1974, 56(3): 279-293.

[15] Lall S, Mohammad S. Multinationals in Indian big business: industrial characteristics of foreign investments in a heavily regulated economy. Journal of Development Economics, 1983, 13(1): 143-157.

[16] Ratnayake R. Factors affecting inter-industry variation of foreign ownership of manufacturing industry. Applied Economics, 1993, 25(5): 653-659.

[17] Aswicahyono H, Hill H. Determinants of foreign ownership in LDC manufacturing: an Indonesian case study. Journal of International Business Studies, 1995, 26(1): 139-158.

[18] Driffield N, Munday M. Industrial performance, agglomeration, and foreign manufacturing investment in the UK. Journal of International Business Studies, 2000, 31(1): 21-37.

[19] Huang Y. The institutional foundation of foreign invested enterprises in China. Harvard Business School Working Paper No.264, 1999.

[20] Ho O. Determinants of foreign direct investment in China: a sectoral analysis. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Association for Chinese Economics Studies, 2004.

[21] Porter M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990.

[22] Dunning J. Internationalizing Porter's Diamond. Management International Review, 1993, 33(1): 7-15.

[23] Henderson J.Efficiency of resource usage and city size. Journal of Urban Economics, 1986, 19(1): 47-70.

[24] Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 1999, 99(3): 483-499.

[25] Venables A. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. International Economic Review, 1996, 37(2):341-359.

[26] Amiti M. Trade liberalization and the location of manufacturing firms. World Economy, 1998, 21(7): 953-962.

[27] Wang Jici et al. The Innovation Space: Enterprise Cluster and Regional Development. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2001.
[王缉慈 等. 创新的空间: 企业集群与区域发展. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2001.]

[28] Yeung H. Organizing "the firm" in industrial geography (Part 1): networks, institutions and regional development. Progress in Human Geography, 2000, 24(2): 301-315.

[29] Yeung H. Rethinking relational economic geography. Transaction Institute of British Geographers, 2005, 30(1): 37-51.

[30] Kinoshita Y, Mody A. Private information for foreign investment in emerging economies. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2001, 34(2): 448-464.

[31] Liu Weidong, Dicken P, Yeung H. The impact of new information and communication technologies on the spatial organization of firms: a case study of the Xingwang Industrial Park in Beijing. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(6): 833-844.
[刘卫东, Peter Dicken, 杨伟聪. 信息技术对企业空间组织的影响: 以诺基亚北京星网工业园为例. 地理研究, 2004, 23(6): 833-844.]

[32] Yeung H, Liu W, Dicken P. Transnational corporations and network effects of a local manufacturing cluster in mobile telecommunications equipment in China. World Development, 2006, 34(3): 520-540.

[33] Ellison G, Glaeser E. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, 105(5): 889-927.

[34] Maurel F, Sedillot B. A measure of the geographic concentration in French manufacturing industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1999, 29(5): 575-604.

[35] Devereux M, Griffith R, Simpson H. The geographic distribution of production activity in the UK. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2004, 34(5): 533-564.

[36] Liu S. Foreign Direct Investment and the Multinational Enterprises: A Reexamination Using Signaling Theory. Westport: Greenwood Publishing, 1998.

文章导航

/