论文

不同环境下农户自主发展能力对收入增长的影响

展开
  • 1. 河南财经学院,郑州 450002;
    2. 河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心/环境与规划学院,开封 475001
李小建 (1954-), 河南孟津人, 博士生导师。中国地理学会会员 (S110000223m)。主要研究方向为经济地理学。E-mail: xjli@henu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2008-12-01

  修回日期: 2009-04-24

  网络出版日期: 2009-06-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目 (40535025); 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目 (2007JJD790124)

Self-developing Ability of Rural Households and Its Impact on Growth of the Household Income: A Geographical Study

Expand
  • 1. Henan University of Finance and Economics, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
    2. Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China

Received date: 2008-12-01

  Revised date: 2009-04-24

  Online published: 2009-06-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40535025; Key Project of the Ministry of Education of China, No.2007JJD790124

摘要

采用改进的信息熵值法和多元线性回归法对河南11个村1251农户调研数据进行处理,基于时空耦合的概念,定量分析了不同地理环境条件下农户自主发展能力与农户持续增收的内在关系。得出如下结论:① 农户自主发展能力影响农户农业收入,但耕地和地形等地理因素的影响更为突出,且耕地增长的贡献度在山区最大,丘陵次之,平原最小,能力增长的贡献度恰好相反。② 农户自主发展能力和家庭劳动投入显著影响农户非农收入,地理因素对家庭非农收入没有直接影响,地域通达性通过影响家庭自主发展能力间接影响家庭非农收入。③ 不同阶段农户自主发展能力对农户非农发展的贡献度不同。初级阶段,农户非农发展几乎完全依赖劳动投入的增长,能力增长几乎没有起作用;中级阶段,能力增长和劳动增长的贡献各半;高级阶段,能力的贡献度又跌至15%。④ 农民非农收入报酬率的增长依赖农户能力增长和地域通达性提高。在低报酬阶段,能力的贡献度约占2/3,但进入中下报酬阶段后,报酬的增长完全依赖地域通达性的增强,进入中上报酬阶段后,地域通达性的作用开始下降,到达高报酬阶段后下降到零,这时报酬的增长完全依赖能力的增长。

本文引用格式

李小建1, 2, 周雄飞1, 乔家君2, 王丽2, 王玉婵1 . 不同环境下农户自主发展能力对收入增长的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2009 , 64(6) : 643 -653 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200906001

Abstract

Using the improved method of entropy value of information and the multi-linear regression, we analyze the data for 1251 households of the 11 villages in Henan province. Based on conception of copulas of time and space, we quantitatively analyze the essential relation between farmers  self-developing ability and sustainable income-increasing for various geographical environments. We conclude: (1) Farmers  self-developing ability influences farmers  agricultural income, but the effects of geographical factors, such as the farmland, types of geographic conditions, etc. are more significant. The effect of farmland size is the largest for the mountainous areas, the less for the hilly areas, the smallest for the plain areas. The effect of farmers' self-developing ability is opposite to the effects of farmland size. (2) The farmers  self-developing ability and farmers  inputs of labor have a great influence the non-agricultural income of farmers, while the geographical factors do not have direct effect on farmers  non-agricultural income. The transportation conditions of the location of farms have indirect influence on agricultural income of farming households through influencing farmers  self-developing ability. (3) In different periods of farmers  developing process, the contribution of farmers  self-developing ability's to farmers  non-agricultural income is different. In the beginning stage of non-agricultural development of farmers, non-agricultural development of farmers relys almost completely on the inputs of labor, and the self-developing ability has almost no effect on the non-agricultural development of farmers. In the intermediate stage of non-agricultural development of farmers, the developing ability and input of labor contribute 50% to the non-agricultural development respectively. In the late stage of development, the ability s contribution falls to 15%. (4) The increment of return of non-agricultural income relies on the improvement of the ability of farmers and transportation conditions. In the period of lower return, the contribution of ability is about 2/3, but in the period of lower-middle return, the increment of return relies on the improvement of transportation conditions. In the upper-middle period, the effect of transportation conditions begin to decrees, and in the period of high return, the effect of transportation conditions comes to zero while the increment of return relies on the increment of ability.

参考文献

[1] Liu Zuoxiang. The study of new rural construction and rural economic organizations viability. Rural Economy, 2006, (11): 6-10. [刘祚祥. 新农村建设与农村经济组织自生能力研究. 农村经济, 2006, (11): 6-10.]
[2] Niu Ruofeng. Industry integration: The model of market agriculture development. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 1995, (6): 7-11. [牛若峰. 产业一体化: 市场农业发展的基本模式. 农业经济问题, 1995, (6): 7-11.]
[3] Li Dingyi. The system reasons of peasants' poverty in China. The Journal of Beijing Institute of Economic Management, 2006, 21(1): 28-32. [李定轶. 论导致我国农民贫困问题的制度性原因. 北京市经济管理干部学院学报, 2006, 21(1): 28-32.]
[4] Rozelle S. Stagnation without equity: Patterns of growth and inequality in China's rural economy. The China Journal, 1996, 35: 63-96.
[5] Brauw A et al. The evolution of China's rural labor markets during the reforms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2002, 30(2): 329-353.
[6] Knight J, Song L. The spatial contribution to income inequality in rural China. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1993, 17(2): 195-213.
[7] Wan G, Zhou Z. Income inequality in rural China: Regression-based decomposition using household data. Review of Development Economics, 2005, 9(1): 107-120.
[8] Meng X, Wu H. Household income determination and regional income differential in rural China. Asian Economic Journal, 1998, 12(1): 65-88.
[9] Huang Zuhui, Wang Min, Song Yu. The study of the incomes difference among rural residents. Management World, 2005, (3): 75-84. [黄祖辉, 王敏, 宋瑜. 农村居民收入差距问题研究: 基于村庄微观角度的一个分析框架. 管理世界, 2005, (3): 75-84.]
[10] Rozelle S. Rural industrialization and increasing inequality: Emerging patterns in China's reforming economy. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1994, 19: 362-391.
[11] Zhu Ling. The impact of non-agricultural activities on the pattern of farmers income distribution. Economy Research Journal, 1992, (3): 23-30. [朱玲. 非农产业活动对农户收入分配格局的影响. 经济研究, 1992, (3): 23-30.]
[12] Xu Yong. "The farmers know" and the social construction of small farmers. The Journal of Central China Normal University, 2006, 45(3): 2-8. [徐勇. “再识农户”与社会化小农的建构. 华中师范大学学报, 2006, 45(3): 2-8.]
[13] Zeng Yanhua. The problems and countermeasures of the farmer's development capacity. Economy Research Journal, 2006, (6): 29-33. [曾艳华. 农民发展能力的问题与对策. 经济研究, 2006, (6): 29-33.]
[14] Li Jie. The study of the endogenous growth of human capital investment in China. World Economy, 2004, (4): 20-24. [李杰. 中国人力资本投资的内生增长研究. 世界经济, 2004, (4): 20-24.]
[15] Schultz T W (1964). Liang Xiaomin Trans. Transforming Traditional Agriculture. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2003. 122-153. [舒尔茨 著. 梁小民 译. 改造传统农业. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003. 122-153.]
[16] Yu Changlin. Investment structure in human capital and economic growth: Endogenous economic growth analysis on education capital and health capital. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2006, 32(10): 102-112. [余长林. 人力资本投资结构与经济增长: 基于包含教育资本、健康资本的内生增长模型理论研究. 财经研究, 2006, 32(10): 102-112.]
[17] Qiao Jiajun. The Theory of Regional Economics in Chinese Countryside. Beijing: Science Press, 2008. 263-298. [乔家君. 中国乡村地域经济论. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008. 263-298.]
[18] Li Xiaojian, Shi Huina. Rural development in the less developed region of China: A household perspective. Human Geography, 2008, 23(1): 1-6. [李小建, 时慧娜. 基于农户视角的农区发展研究. 人文地理, 2008, 23(1): 1-6.]
[19] Li Xiaojian, Gao Genghe, Qiao Jiajun. Rural household's income and its determinant factors: Evidence from 1251 rural households in Henan Province, China. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(5): 1037-1047. [李小建, 高更和, 乔家君. 农户收入的农区发展环境影响: 基于河南省1251家农户的分析. 地理研究, 2008, 27(5): 1037-1047.]
[20] Li Xiaojian, Zhou Xiongfei, Zheng Chunhui. Geography and economic development in rural China: A township level study in Henan Province, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 147-155. [李小建, 周雄飞, 郑纯辉. 河南农区经济发展差异地理影响的小尺度分析. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 147-155.]

文章导航

/