生态与旅游地理

理想类型叙事视角下的乡村景观变迁与优化策略

展开
  • 东北师范大学城市与环境科学学院, 长春130024
房艳刚(1979-),男,山东曲阜人,副教授,中国地理学会会员(S110008452M),主要从事乡村文化景观演变、区域农业与农村可持续发展研究。E-mail:fangyg578@nenu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2012-05-03

  修回日期: 2012-07-24

  网络出版日期: 2012-10-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41001107); 教育部博士点基金项目(20090043120003)

Rural Landscape Changes and Its Optimization Strategies: From the Perspective of Ideal Type Narratives

Expand
  • College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

Received date: 2012-05-03

  Revised date: 2012-07-24

  Online published: 2012-10-20

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41001007; Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China, No.20090043120003

摘要

乡村景观是陆地生态系统的主体, 在整个人地关系中扮演着重要角色。20 世纪下半叶以来, 城市化、交通网络和全球化的迅速发展深刻地改变了乡村景观。不同学科、不同研究者对此有不同甚至相互矛盾的认识、解释和评价, 这影响了对乡村景观变迁的理性认识, 以及对乡村景观的高效利用和保护。本文采用理想类型叙事法, 利用国内外研究成果, 对乡村景观的变迁进行叙事分析, 提出更具包容性和解释力的4 种乡村景观变迁理想类型叙事:保护叙事、现代化叙事、公平生存叙事和内生发展叙事, 更客观全面地凝练乡村景观变迁的多元价值观、理论基础、核心假设和基本观点与建议。最后本文提出了乡村景观分异的7 种情景类型, 每种情景类型具有不同的判征指标、空间区位指向、主体景观和主要功能, 并结合理想类型叙事提出相应的优化策略, 以期为未来建设健康、富有生产力和吸引力、和谐的乡村景观提供科学参考。

本文引用格式

房艳刚, 刘继生 . 理想类型叙事视角下的乡村景观变迁与优化策略[J]. 地理学报, 2012 , 67(10) : 1399 -1410 . DOI: 10.11821/xb201210010

Abstract

Rural landscape is the main part of a terrestrial ecosystem, and plays a vital role in the human-environmental interactions. It mainly consists of rural building, settlement, agricultural land, and natural space, and has both commercial functions such as production functions and consumption functions, and noncommercial functions such as ecosystem service functions and defending functions of private rights. It is a cross field of geography, ecology, and social science. The development of urbanization, transportation network and globalization since the second half of the 20th century has profoundly changed rural space and rural landscapes. Different disciplines and researchers have different descriptions, interpretations and assessments in terms of these changes. Consequently, the rational understanding of rural landscape changes is impeded, as well as the optimized utilization and efficient protection of rural landscape. Using the research results published at home and abroad, this article put forward four more inclusive and explanatory ideal type narratives of rural landscape changes: protection narrative, modernization narrative, fair subsistence narrative, and endogenous development narrative. In this way, this paper refined the diversified values, assumptions, theories, viewpoints and strategies of rural landscape changes more objectively and comprehensively. The shift of rural areas from an economy centered on agriculture to a more service-centered economy is inevitably an increasingly global process. Meanwhile the rural landscapes and their functions have a significant spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability. In the end, this paper uses the natural, landscape, social-economic and spatial indicators to identify seven future scenario types of rural landscape evolution in China: arable production landscape, tourism landscape, natural landscape, agriculture-nature balanced landscape, nature-tourism balanced landscape, agriculture-residence balanced landscape, and rights competed landscape. Each type of rural landscapes has different locations, compositions and functions. Their optimizing strategies are discussed respectively so as to provide a scientific reference for the construction of healthy, productive, attractive and harmonious rural landscape in the future.

参考文献

[1] Domon G. Landscape as resource: Consequences, challenges and opportunities for rural development. Landscape andUrban Planning, 2011, 100(4): 338-340.

[2] Willemen L, Hein L, Martinus E F. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiplelandscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10(1): 62-73.

[3] Campos M, Velázquez A, Verdinelli G B. An interdisciplinary approach to depict landscape change drivers: A casestudy of the Ticuiz agrarian community in Michoacan, Mexico. Applied Geography, 2012, 32(2): 409-419.

[4] Wang Pengfei, Shen Yuming. Changes in agricultural regions of southern Ontario in Canada. Acta Geographica Sinica,2011, 66(8): 1122-1130. [王鹏飞, 申玉铭. 加拿大南安大略农业地域的变迁. 地理学报, 2011, 66(8): 1122-1130.]

[5] Meng Guangwen, Hans Gebhardt. Rural development and transformation in the Federal Republic of Germany since the1950s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1644-1656. [孟广文, Hans Gebhardt. 二战以来联邦德国乡村地区的发展与演变. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1644-1656.]

[6] Solana M S. Rural gentrification in Catalonia, Spain: A case study of migration, social change and conflicts in theEmpordanet area. Geoforum, 2010, 41(3): 508-517.

[7] Yokohari M, Morimoto Y, Nakagoshi N. Ecological dynamics of urban and rural landscapes in East Asia. Landscapeand Urban Planning, 2005, 70(3): 193-194.

[8] Valdivia C, Seth A, Gilles J L et al. Adapting to climate change in Andean ecosystems: Landscapes, capitals, andperceptions shaping rural livelihood strategies and linking knowledge systems. Annals of the Association of AmericanGeographers, 2010, 100(4): 818-834.

[9] Jackson L, Wheeler S, Hollander A. Case study on potential agricultural responses to climate change in a Californialandscape. Climatic Change, 2011, 109(1): 407-427.

[10] Beetz S, Huning S, Plininger T. Landscapes of peripherization in north-eastern Germany's countryside: New challengesfor planning theory and practice. International Planning Studies, 2008, 13(4): 295-310.

[11] Vanwambeke S O, Meyfroidt P, Nikodemus O. From USSR to EU: 20 years of rural landscape changes in Vidzeme,Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 105(3): 241-249.

[12] Neumann R P. Political ecology III: Theorizing landscape. Progress in Human Geography, 2011, 35(6): 843-850.

[13] Bański J, Wesolowska M. Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland's Lublin region: Influenceon the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 94(2): 116-126.

[14] Benjamin K, Bouchard A, Domon G. Abandoned farmlands as components of rural landscapes: An analysis ofperceptions and representations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 83(4): 228-244.

[15] Petit S. The dimensions of land use change in rural landscapes: Lessons learnt from the GB countryside surveys.Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(9): 2851-2856.

[16] Woods M. Rural geography III: Rural futures and the future of rural geography. Progress in Human Geography, 2012,36(1): 125-134.

[17] Vik M L, Benjaminsen T A, Daugstad K. Synergy or marginalisation? Narratives of farming and tourism in Geiranger, western Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 2010, 64(1): 36-47.

[18] Farbotko C, Lazrus H. The first climate refugees? Contesting global narratives of climate change in Tuvalu. GlobalEnvironmental Change, 2012, 22(2): 382-390.

[19] Liverman D M. Conventions of climate change: Constructions of danger and the dispossession of the atmosphere.Journal of Historical Geography, 2009, 35(2): 279-296.

[20] Fløysand A, Jakobsen S E. Commodification of rural places: A narrative of social fields, rural development, andfootball. Journal of Rural Studies, 2007, 23(2): 206-221.

[21] Panelli R. Narratives of community and change in a contemporary rural setting: The case of Duaringa, Queensland.Australian Geographical Studies, 2001, 39(2):156-166.

[22] Soliva R. Landscape stories: Using ideal type narratives as a heuristic device in rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies,2007, 23(1): 62-74.

[23] Soliva R, Hunziker M. Beyond the visual dimension: Using ideal type narratives to analyze people's assessments oflandscape scenarios. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(2): 284-294.

[24] Lentin R. At the heart of the Hibernian post-metropolis: Spatial narratives of ethnic minorities and diasporiccommunities in a changing city. City, 2002, 6(2): 229-249.

[25] Elwood S. Beyond cooptation or resistance: urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatialnarratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2006, 96(2): 323-341.

[26] Mccarthy J F, Cramb R A. Policy narratives, landholder engagement, and oil palm expansion on the Malaysian andIndonesian frontiers. The Geographical Journal, 2009, 175(2): 112-123.

[27] Zhang Fugang, Liu Yansui. Dynamic mechanism and models of regional rural development in China. ActaGeographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 115-122. [张富刚, 刘彦随. 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式. 地理学报,2008, 63(2): 115-122.]

[28] Zhou Guohua, He Yanhua, Tang Chengli et al. Dynamic mechanism and present situation of rural settlementsevolution in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(4): 515-524. [周国华, 贺艳华, 唐承丽等. 中国农村聚居演变的驱动机制及态势分析. 地理学报, 2011, 66(4): 515-524.]

[29] Fu Bojie, Chen Liding. Landscape diversity types and their ecological significance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(5): 454-462. [傅伯杰, 陈利顶. 景观多样性类型及其生态意义. 地理学报, 1996, 51(5): 454-462.]

[30] Green R E, Cornell S J, Scharlemann J P W et al. Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science, 2005, 307(5709):550-555.

[31] Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng. Cultural landscape evolution of cluster agricultural village: The case of Yukou village inShandong Province. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(4): 968-978. [房艳刚, 刘继生. 集聚型农业村落文化景观的演化过程与机理: 以山东曲阜峪口村为例. 地理研究, 2009, 28(4): 968-978.]

[32] Fang Yangang, Mei Lin, Liu Jisheng et al. Vernacular dwellings evolution in agricultural villages ofHebei-Shandong-Henan Province in the past 30 years. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(2): 220-233. [房艳刚, 梅林, 刘继生等. 近30 年冀鲁豫农业村落民宅景观演化过程与机理. 地理研究, 2012, 31(2): 220-233.]

[33] Wang Yuncai, Shi Xin. The spatial characteristics and dynamic mechanism of traditional territory cultural landscape.Tongji University Journal Social Science Section, 2010, 21(1): 31-38. [王云才, 史欣. 传统地域文化景观空间特征及形成机理. 同济大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010, 21(1): 31-38.]

[34] Wen Jiabao. China's agriculture and rural development road. Qiushi, 2012, 55(2): 3-10. [温家宝. 中国农业和农村的发展道路. 求是, 2012, 55(2): 3-10.]

[35] Mitchell D. Work, struggle, death, and geographies of justice: The transformation of landscape in and beyondCalifornia's Imperial Valley. Landscape Research, 2007, 32(5): 559-577.

[36] Claval P. Reading the rural landscape. Landscape and Rural Planning, 2005, 70(1/2): 9-19.

[37] Benjamin K, Bouchard A, Domon G. Abandoned farmlands as components of rural landscapes: An analysis ofperceptions and representations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 83(4): 228-244.

[38] Seoanea S S, Osborne P E, Baudry J. Responses of birds of different biogeographic origins and habitat requirementsto agricultural land abandonment in northern Spain. Biological Conservation, 2002, 105(3): 333-344.

[39] Mitchell D. Cultural landscapes: Just landscapes or landscape of justice? Progress in Human Geography, 2003, 27(6):787-796.

[40] Marsden T, Sonnino R. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK.Journal of Rural Studies, 2008, 24(4): 422-431.

[41] Norton W. Human Geography. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 196-197.

[42] McManus P, Walmsley J, Argent N et al. Rural community and rural resilience: What is important to farmers inkeeping their country towns alive? Journal of Rural Studies, 2012, 28(1): 20-29.

[43] Hall C, McVittie A, Moran D. What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidenceand methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 2004, 20(2): 211-225.

[44] Dissart J C, Vollet D. Landscape and territory-specific economic base. Land Use Policy, 2011, 28(3): 563-573.

[45] Long H L, Woods M. Rural restructuring under globalization in Eastern Coastal China: What can be learned fromWales? Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2011, 6(1): 70-94.

[46] Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Chen Yufu. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at countyscale in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389. [刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.]
文章导航

/