电站建设对澜沧江—湄公河 泥沙年内分配的影响
收稿日期: 2006-06-03
修回日期: 2006-11-10
网络出版日期: 2007-01-25
基金资助
国家重点基础研究发展计划(2003CB415105); 云南大学理( 工) 科校级科研重点项目(2005Z003B)
Impacts of Dam Constructions on the Annual Distribution of Sediment in Lancang- Mekong River Basin
Received date: 2006-06-03
Revised date: 2006-11-10
Online published: 2007-01-25
Supported by
National Key Project for Basic Research of China, No.2003CB415105; Key Project for Science and Technology of Yunnan University, No.2005Z003B
采用澜沧江漫湾电站上游旧州站和下游允景洪、清盛站1987~2003 年逐月悬移质泥沙含量实测资料, 分析对比了三站年内泥沙分配不均匀系数、集中度和集中期、变化幅度等特性。将上述参数与澜沧江上游干流漫湾与大朝山电站建设的响应进行关联研究, 分析电站建设进程对河道输沙变化的驱动作用。结果表明: (1) 旧州水文站泥沙年内分配与区域气候变化 (降水) 趋势一致, 研究时段内不均匀性系数呈上升趋势, 维持天然河道输沙特性; 允景洪和 清盛水文站的泥沙年内分配不均匀性系数对电站建设等人类活动的响应程度不一致, 允景洪站泥沙含量不均匀系数先减小后急剧增加, 而清盛站呈微弱减小态势。(2) 旧州水文站泥沙年 内分配集中度及集中期基本无变化; 允景洪与清盛水文站的泥沙年内分配集中度变化较大, 泥沙集中期在在电站施工的高峰期(1987~1992 年、1997~2003 年) 后延, 且不同步, 允景洪在漫湾施工期后延5~6 天, 而清盛则后延将近半个月,而在大朝山施工期, 允景洪的后延响应 却明显于清盛。(3) 旧州站相对、绝对泥沙变幅逐时段递增, 允景洪站年内最大与最小月泥沙含量的相对、绝对变化幅度均减小, 清盛站泥沙含量的相对变化幅度却先增后减, 绝对变化 幅度则一直减小。三站泥沙年内极值变幅以及电站建设前后的响应差异, 说明三站泥沙变化的驱动因子有明显不同。这些关于泥沙含量年内分配特征规律的发现, 为研究澜沧江干流电站建设对上下游泥沙变化以及跨境影响的科学评价提供了新的佐证。
傅开道, 何大明, 陈武, 叶长青, 李运刚 . 电站建设对澜沧江—湄公河 泥沙年内分配的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2007 , 62(1) : 14 -21 . DOI: 10.11821/xb200701002
Annual distribution characteristic of river sediment concentration is closely related to climate change and anthropogenic activities and directly affected by the process of hydraulic resource development in the Lancang-Mekong River basin. Using monthly suspended sediment concentrations in 1987-2003 at the three hydrological stations, Jiuzhou, Yunjinghong and Chiang Saen stations, on the mainstream of Lancang-Mekong River, the uneven distributions coefficient, the concentrated rate and period, and the range of variation of annual distribution characteristics of sediment concentrations at the three stations were studied and then the responses of these characteristics to the progress of upstream dam constructions were analyzed. The research results show that: (1) Annual distribution of sediment concentration at Jiuzhou hydrological station agrees with the variation trend of local climate changes, its uneven distribution coefficients (AUDC) increased at the studied period and maintained the characteristics of natural river; AUDCs at Yunjinghong and Chiang Saen stations seemed to be affected by anthropological activities such as dam constructions rather than climate changes, however, sediments of two downstream stations responded differently to the dam constructions. AUDC at Yunjinghong station decreased from the periods of 1987-1992 to 1993-1996, then abruptly increased during 1997-2003; while AUDC at Chiang Saen took on a trend of moderate decreasing in the whole period. (2) Rates and distribution periods of sediment concentrations at Jiuzhou station almost kept stable during the studied period; but those at Yunjinghong and Chiang Saen changed evidently, their distribution periods delayed asynchronously during the dam construction processes (1987-1992, 1997-2003), in the period of Manwan dam construction, distribution periods at Yunjinghong station delayed 5-6 days, while Chiang Saen delayed almost half a month, and in the Dachaoshan dam construction, delayed period at Yunjinghong station was longer than that at Chiang Saen. (3) Relative and absolute ranges of sediment variations at Jiuzhou station both increased against the time phases; those at Yunjinghong decreased, while relative ranges of sediment variation at Chiang Saen decreased in the earlier years then increased later, but absolute range was decreasing all the time. Different responses of annual distributions of sediment concentration at three hydrological stations to dam constructions indicate that their driving factors of sediment variation are absolutely different. These discoveries of annual distribution characteristics of sediment concentrations present new scientific evidences for assessing the impacts of dam constructions on upstream and downstream sediment change as well as its transboundary effects.
[1] Qian Ning, Zhang Ren, Zhou Zhide. Fluvial Process. Beijing: Science Press, 1987. 453-496.
[钱宁, 张仁, 周志德. 河床 演变学. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987. 453-496.]
[2] Lu X X, Higgitt D L. Sediment delivery to the Three Gorges (2): local response. Geomorphology, 2001, 41: 157-169.
[3] Li Yitian, Sun Zhaohua, Deng Jinyun et al. Variation of sediment transport and flood disaster in the middle reach of Yangtze River. Journal of Sediment Research, 2004, (2): 33-39.
[李义天, 孙昭华, 邓金运等. 泥沙输移变化与长江中 游水患. 泥沙研究, 2004, (2): 33-39.]
[4] Liu Shaoquan, Chen Zhijian, Chen Guojie et al. Surface erosion and fluvial silt in the Jinsha River watershed. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 1999, 8(4): 423-428.
[刘邵权, 陈治谏, 陈国阶等. 金沙江流域水土流失现状 与河道泥沙分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 1999, 8(4): 423-428.]
[5] Chen Zhongyuan, Li Jiufa, Shen Huanting et al. Yangtze River of China: historical analysis of discharge variability and sediment flux. Geomorphology, 2001, 41: 77-91.
[6] Xu Jiongxin. Watershed factors and anthropological activities affect sediment transporting function in lower reaches of Yellow River. Science in China (Series D), 2004, 34(8): 775-781.
[许炯心. 流域因素与人类活动对黄河下游河道输沙 功能的影响. 中国科学(D 辑), 2004, 34(8): 775-781.]
[7] Higgitt D L, Lu X X. Challenges in relating land use to sediment yield in the Upper Yangtze. Hydrobiologia, 1999, 410: 269-277.
[8] Guo Qingchao, Hu Chunhong, Lu Qin et al. Effect of different operation of Sanmenxia Reservoir on water level at Tongguan. Journal of Sediment Research, 2003, (1): 1-9.
[郭庆超, 胡春宏, 陆琴等. 三门峡水库不同运行方式对降低 潼关高程作用的研究. 泥沙研究, 2003, (1): 1-9.]
[9] Li Congxian, Yang Shouye, Fan Daidu et al. The change in Changjiang suspended load and its impact on the delta after completion of Three-Gorge Dam. Quaternary Sciences, 2004, 24(5): 495-500.
[李从先, 杨守业, 范代读等. 三峡大坝建 成后长江输沙量的减少及其对长江三角洲的影响. 第四纪研究, 2004, 24(5): 495-500.]
[10] Anders Brandt S. Classification of geomorphological effects downstream of dams. Catena, 2000, 40: 375-401.
[11] Jim Bogen, Truls E BΦnsnes. The impact of hydroelectric power plant on the sediment load in downstream water bodies, Svartisen northern Norway. The Science of the Total Environment, 2001, 266: 273-280.
[12] Gupta A, Hock L, He X J et al. Evaluation of part of the Mekong River using satellite imagery. Geomorphology, 2002, 44(3-4): 221-239.
[13] Kummu M, Koponen J, Sarkkula J. Upstream effects on lower Mekong floodplains: Tonle Sap case study. In: Proceedings international conference on "Advances in Integrated Mekong Rvier Management". Vientiane, the Lao PDR, 2004, 347-352.
[14] He Daming, Wu Shaohong, Peng Hua et al. A study of ecosystem changes in longitudinal range-gorge and transboundary eco-security in Southwest China. Advances in Earth Science, 2005, 20(3): 338-344.
[ 何大明, 吴绍洪, 彭华等. 纵向岭谷区生态系统变化及西南跨境生态安全研究. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(3): 338-344.]
[15] Liu Heng, Liu Jiufu, Tang Haixing. Present and future of water resources development in Lancang River Basin in Yunnan Province. Advances in Water Science, 1998, 9(1): 70-76.
[刘恒, 刘九夫, 唐海行. 澜沧江流域(云南段)水资 源开发利用现状及趋势分析. 水科学进展, 1998, 9(1): 70-76.]
[16] Zou Gaolu, Luo Huailiang. Analysis of the Granger causality between the scouring and silting and the coefficient of incoming sediments of the Lancang River. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 698-703.
[邹高禄, 罗怀良. 澜沧 江河道冲淤变化与来沙系数的格兰吉尔因果分析. 地理科学, 2004, 24(6): 698-703.]
[17] Huang Ying. Study on sediment concentration and its variation of Lancang River in Yunnan Province. Yangtze River, 1996, 27(1): 33-35.
[黄英. 澜沧江云南段河流输沙量及其变化规律探讨. 人民长江, 1996, 27(1): 33-35.]
[18] You Lianyuan. Scouring and silting changes of Lancang River (Mekong River) and its development tendency. Geographical Research, 20(2): 178-183.
[ 尤联元. 澜沧江河道冲淤变化特征及发展趋势. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2): 178-183.]
[19] You Lianyuan. A study on temporal changes of river sedimentation in Lancang River Basin. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(suppl.): 93-100.
[ 尤联元. 澜沧江流域河流泥沙发展趋势初步研究. 地理学报, 1999, 54( 增刊): 93-100.]
[20] Tang Qicheng, Cheng Tianxiu, Li Xiuyun. Primary study on concentrated rates and periods of river monthly runoff in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1982, 37(4): 383-393.
[汤奇成, 程天文, 李秀云. 中国河川月径流的集中度和集 中期的初步研究. 地理学报, 1982, 37(4): 383-393.]
[21] Yang Yuandong. Computing methods for annual distribution of river runoff. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1984, 39(2): 218-227.
[杨远东. 河川径流年内分配的计算方法. 地理学报, 1984, 39(2): 218-227.]
[22] Zheng Hongxing, Liu Changming. Changes of annual runoff distribution in the headwater of the Yellow River Basin. Progress in Geography, 2003, 22(6): 585-590.
[郑红星, 刘昌明. 黄河源区径流年内分配变化规律分析. 地理科学进 展, 2003, 22(6): 585-590.]
[23] Zhang Xinbao, Wen Anbang. Variation of sediment in upper stream of Yangtze River and its tributary. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, (4): 56-59.
[张信宝, 文安邦. 长江上游干流和支流河流泥沙近期变化及其原因. 水利 学报, 2002, (4): 56-59.]
[24] Han Qiwei (ed.). Reservior Deposit. Beijing: Science Press, 2003. 533-606.
[韩其为编. 水库淤积. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003. 533-606.]
[25] Cao Tingjian, Qin Dahe, Kang Ersi et al. Runoff variation of main rivers in outflowing zone on Tibetan Plateau. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2005, 50(21): 2403-2408.
[曹廷建, 秦大河, 康尔泗等. 青藏高原外流区主要河流地表径 流变化, 科学通报, 2005, 50(21): 2403-2408.]
[26] Fu Kaidao, He Daming, Li Shaojuan. Response of downstream sediment to water resource development in mainstream of the Lancang River. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(suppl.): 100-105.
[傅开道, 何大明, 李少娟. 澜沧江干流水 电开发的下游泥沙响应. 科学通报, 2006, 51(suppl.): 100-105.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |