喜马拉雅地区传统贸易通道演变过程及动力机制

doi:10.11821/dlxb202109009

地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (9): 2157-2173.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202109009

• 青藏高原二次科考与绿色研究 • 上一篇下一篇

喜马拉雅地区传统贸易通道演变过程及动力机制

吴仕海¹(), 阎建忠¹(), 张镱锂²^,³, 彭婷¹, 苏康传⁴

1.西南大学资源环境学院,重庆 400716
2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所中国科学院陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
3.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049
4.西南大学地理科学学院,重庆 400716

收稿日期:2020-07-17 修回日期:2020-12-16 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-11-25
通讯作者: 阎建忠(1972-), 男, 重庆忠县人, 研究员, 博士生导师, 研究方向为土地利用/覆被变化以及全球变化与区域响应。E-mail: yanjzswu@126.com
作者简介:吴仕海(1987-), 男, 云南曲靖人, 博士生, 研究方向为土地利用与生态过程以及全球变化与区域响应。E-mail: wshai2010@126.com
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合考察研究(2019QZKK0603);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA20040201);国家自然科学基金项目(41761144081)

Exploring the evolution process and driving mechanism of traditional trade routes in Himalayan region

WU Shihai¹(), YAN Jianzhong¹(), ZHANG Yili²^,³, PENG Ting¹, SU Kangchuan⁴

1. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
2. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4. College of Geographical Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China

Received:2020-07-17 Revised:2020-12-16 Published:2021-09-25 Online:2021-11-25
Supported by:
The Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program(2019QZKK0603);Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA20040201);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41761144081)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

喜马拉雅地区传统贸易通道是突破喜马拉雅山脉天然屏障、连接中国与南亚腹地两大市场的关键,对于南亚大通道建设和跨喜马拉雅互联互通建设具有重要的战略意义。本文以喜马拉雅山脉断裂河谷为出发点,综合历史文献、实地调查及GIS技术手段,分析通道的空间分布特征、演变过程及动力机制。研究表明：① 喜马拉雅地区的传统贸易通道主要有21条,其中中尼通道6条,中不通道4条,中印通道11条,在空间上形成了“一横多纵”的空间格局。② 传统贸易通道的发展经历了萌芽期（7世纪以前）、形成期（7世纪—842年）、发展期（842—1959年）、衰落期（1959—1962年）和恢复期（1962年至今）的演变过程。③ 货物交换和佛教传播促进了通道的萌芽和形成,西藏及中原地方政权稳定和边贸政策、英国的殖民扩张和商业利益推动了通道的发展,印度的战略误判和前进政策导致了通道的衰落,中国的战略需求将推动通道的恢复和建设。④ 战略互信和边界问题是通道恢复和建设面临的主要障碍,未来需要加强对通道的多视角调查和研究,制定通道的建设和管控策略,充分发挥通道的商贸、旅游和文化交流功能,积极服务于南亚大通道建设,促进西藏边疆地区的稳定与发展。

关键词: 传统贸易通道, 演变过程, 动力机制, 喜马拉雅地区

Abstract:

Traditional trade routes that penetrate the natural barrier of the Himalayas are critical for connecting major Chinese and South Asian markets. Research on these trade routes can contribute significantly to facilitating the construction of the South Asia Channel and enhancing trans-Himalayan connectivity. Combining historical literature, field surveys, and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques, this study examined the spatial distribution characteristics and dynamic mechanisms driving the formation, development, decline, and restoration of the routes, focusing on transverse valleys of the Himalayan arc. The key findings were as follows. First, there are 21 traditional trade routes traversing the Himalayan region: 6 Sino-Nepalese routes, 4 Sino-Bhutanese routes, and 11 Sino-Indian routes. The routes are arranged in a "one horizontal and multiple vertical" spatial pattern. Second, the evolution of the traditional trade routes has entailed five distinct phases: an incipient period (pre-7th century), formation (7th century-842 AD), development (842-1959), decline (1959-1962) and recovery (1962-present). Third, the incipient and formative developmental phases were prompted by the spread of Buddhism and the exchange of goods. The stability of local governments in Tibet and in the Central China Plains and favorable border trade policies along with Britain's colonial expansion and commercial interests stimulated further development of traditional trade routes. However, India's strategic miscalculation and "Forward Policy" instigated the decline phase, while China's strategic needs are currently the key driver of the restoration and construction phase. Finally, a lack of strategic mutual trust and existing border issues are the main obstacles impeding the restorative and construction phases. Future efforts to support the construction of the South Asia Channel and the stability and development of border regions should focus on strengthening multi-perspectival investigations and research on traditional trade routes, formulating strategies for corridor construction and control, and emphasizing the corridor's commerce, tourism, and cultural exchange functions.

Key words: traditional trade route, evolution process, driving mechanism, Himalayan region

吴仕海, 阎建忠, 张镱锂, 彭婷, 苏康传. 喜马拉雅地区传统贸易通道演变过程及动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(9): 2157-2173.

WU Shihai, YAN Jianzhong, ZHANG Yili, PENG Ting, SU Kangchuan. Exploring the evolution process and driving mechanism of traditional trade routes in Himalayan region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(9): 2157-2173.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 71

[1]	Sun Honglie, Zheng Du, Yao Tandong, et al. Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(1): 3-12. doi: 10.11821/xb201201001
	[孙鸿烈, 郑度, 姚檀栋, 等. 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设. 地理学报, 2012, 67(1): 3-12.]
[2]	Jeong C, Ozga A T, Witonsky D B, et al. Long-term genetic stability and a high-altitude East Asian origin for the peoples of the high valleys of the Himalayan arc. PNAS, 2016, 113(27): 7485-7490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520844113
[3]	Murton G. Trans-Himalayan transformations: Building roads, making markets, and cultivating consumption between Nepal and China's Tibet//Zhou Yongming. Roadology: Roads, Space, and Culture. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2016: 328-340.
[4]	Tong Tao. Silks and the Silk Road in western Tibet. Journal of National Museum of China, 2017(2): 6-16.
	[仝涛. 西藏西部的丝绸与丝绸之路. 中国国家博物馆馆刊, 2017(2): 6-16.]
[5]	Wu Kunming. A History of the Actives of Early Missionaries in Tibet. Beijing: China Tibetology Press, 1992.
	[伍昆明. 早期传教士进藏活动史. 北京: 中国藏学出版社, 1992.]
[6]	Bergmann C. Trans-Himalayan trade in an imperial environment//Bergmann C. The Himalayan Border Region: Trade, Identity and Mobility in Kumaon, India. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 23-73.
[7]	Lamb A. Britain and Chinese Central Asia: The Road to Lhasa, 1767 to 1905. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960: 245.
[8]	Liang Junyan. British landway strategy toward China from late 18th century to early 20th century. World History, 2008(5): 47-55, 160.
	[梁俊艳. 论18世纪末至20世纪初英国对华陆路战略: 以西藏为中心. 世界历史, 2008(5): 47-55, 160.]
[9]	Pande V. Borderlands, empires and nations: Himalayan and trans-Himalayan borderlands (c 1815-1930). Economic and Political Weekly, 2017, 52(15): 68-78.
[10]	Dai Chaowu. India's trade controls and embargoes on Tibet and China's reactions and policies (1950-1962) (I). CPC History Studies, 2013(6): 24-37.
	[戴超武. 印度对西藏地方的贸易管制和禁运与中国的反应和政策(1950—1962) (上). 中共党史研究, 2013(6): 24-37.]
[11]	Dai Chaowu. India's trade controls and embargoes on Tibet and China's reactions and policies (1950-1962) (Ⅱ). CPC History Studies, 2013(7): 57-70.
	[戴超武. 印度对西藏地方的贸易管制和禁运与中国的反应和政策(1950—1962)(下). 中共党史研究, 2013(7): 57-70.]
[12]	Kreutzmann H. Boundaries and trade-geopolitical implications in the Indo-Chinese mountain barrier of eastern High Asia. Geograpahische Rdsch, 2007, 59(11): 4-11.
[13]	Wallrapp C, Faust H, Keck M. Production networks and borderlands: Cross-border yarsagumba trade in the Kailash landscape. Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 66: 67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.016
[14]	Zhang Weimin. Development of border trade in Tibet and customs supervision. Tibetan Studies, 1993(1): 12-20.
	[张卫民. 西藏地区边境贸易的发展与海关监管. 西藏研究, 1993(1): 12-20.]
[15]	Xie Yanjie, Luosang Qunjue. A historical review of the trade situation on the border of Tibet. Journal of Tibet University, 1994(3): 48-51.
	[谢延杰, 洛桑群觉. 关于西藏边境贸易情况的历史追朔. 西藏大学学报(汉文版), 1994(3): 48-51.]
[16]	Tashi, Pubu Tsering. An analysis of the history and current state of Tibet's border trade. Journal of Tibet University, 2014, 29(3): 1-7.
	[扎西, 普布次仁. 西藏边境贸易的历史演进与现实情况分析. 西藏大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 29(3): 1-7.]
[17]	Zha Luo. Small-scale trade on the border of Tibet and increase in income among the frontiers: A fieldwork in Luozha county. China Tibetology, 2015(3): 128-137.
	[扎洛. 西藏的边境小额贸易与边民增收: 基于洛扎县的田野调查. 中国藏学, 2015(3): 128-137.]
[18]	Zha Luo, Ao Jian. Three models of traditional trade between Bhutan and Tibet in China. China's Borderland History and Geography Studies, 2017, 27(4): 126-135, 182.
	[扎洛, 敖见. 中国西藏与不丹之间传统贸易的三种模式. 中国边疆史地研究, 2017, 27(4): 126-135, 182.]
[19]	Dong Liying. Trade between Tibet and Nepal. China Tibetology, 2008(1): 218-222.
	[董莉英. 西藏地方与尼泊尔贸易试述. 中国藏学, 2008(1): 218-222.]
[20]	Liang Junyan. On the development of contemporary Sino-Nepal trade. China Tibetology, 2017(3): 52-58.
	[梁俊艳. 当代中尼贸易发展述论. 中国藏学, 2017(3): 52-58.]
[21]	Chen Jidong. The trade relation between Yadong of Tibet and India in modern history. South Asian Studies Quarterly, 2003(4): 61-64, 80.
	[陈继东. 近代西藏亚东与印度的贸易往来. 南亚研究季刊, 2003(4): 61-64, 80.]
[22]	Fang Jianchang. Brief notes on modern Tibetan musk routes and its changes. Tibetan Studies, 2015(4): 17-37.
	[房建昌. 近代西藏麝香之路考: 兼论印度大三角测量局班智达、日本僧人河口慧海和侵藏英军噶大克考察团在沿路的活动等. 西藏研究, 2015(4): 17-37.]
[23]	Zhang Yongpan. China (Rima)-India (Asam) road, Indo-Tibet piggy road and British intervention. Journal of Xizang Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 23(1): 15-20.
	[张永攀. 中印日玛线、印藏驮运线与英国的干涉活动. 西藏民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2002, 23(1): 15-20.]
[24]	Liu Yu. On the spatial layout, development and countermeasures of the land border crossings in Tibet from the geo-economic perspective. Journal of Tibet University, 2018, 33(2): 195-204.
	[刘妤. 地缘经济视角下西藏边境陆路口岸空间布局、发展效力及对策研究. 西藏大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 33(2): 195-204.]
[25]	Bergmann C, Gerwin M, Nüsser M, et al. Living in a high mountain border region: The case of the 'Bhotiyas' of the Indo-Chinese border region. Journal of Mountain Science, 2008, 5(3): 209-217. doi: 10.1007/s11629-008-0178-9
[26]	Aiyadurai A, Lee C S. Living on the Sino-Indian border the story of the Mishmis in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. Asian Ethnology, 2017, 76(2): 367-395.
[27]	Karackattu J T. India-China trade at the borders: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Contemporary China, 2013, 22(82): 691-711. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2013.766387
[28]	Chettri P. India-China border trade through Nathu La Pass: Prospects and impediments. Himalaya, 2018, 38: 11-22.
[29]	Datta S. India: The Bridge Linking South and Southeast Asia. London: Global Policy and Observer Research Foundation, 2017: 16-23.
[30]	Zhang Yili, Li Bingyuan, Zheng Du. A discussion on the boundary and area of the Tibetan Plateau in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(1): 1-8.
	[张镱锂, 李炳元, 郑度. 论青藏高原范围与面积. 地理研究, 2002, 21(1): 1-8.]
[31]	Tong Liqiang, Nie Hongfeng, Li Jiancun, et al. Survey of large-scale debris flow and study of its development characteristics using remote sensing technology in the Himalayas. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2013, 25(4): 104-112.
	[童立强, 聂洪峰, 李建存, 等. 喜马拉雅山地区大型泥石流遥感调查与发育特征研究. 国土资源遥感, 2013, 25(4): 104-112.]
[32]	Yin An. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation. Earth Science Frontiers, 2006, 13(5): 416-515.
	[尹安. 喜马拉雅造山带新生代构造演化: 沿走向变化的构造几何形态、剥露历史和前陆沉积的约束. 地学前缘, 2006, 13(5): 416-515.]
[33]	Zheng Du. A comparative study on physico-geographic conditions between the Himalayas and Hengduan mountainous regions. Journal of Mountain Research, 1988, 6(3): 137-146.
	[郑度. 喜马拉雅山区与横断山区自然条件对比. 山地研究, 1988, 6(3): 137-146.]
[34]	Qin Dahe. Map of Glacier Resources in the Himalayas. Beijing: Science Press, 1999: 7.
	[秦大河. 喜马拉雅山冰川资源图. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 7.]
[35]	Lutz A F, Immerzeel W W, Shrestha A B, et al. Consistent increase in High Asia's runoff due to increasing glacier melt and precipitation. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(7): 587-592. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2237
[36]	Liu Zhiyang. Ethnic composition and cultural interaction on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its neighboring regions. Ethno-National Studies, 2017(2): 55-67, 124.
	[刘志扬. 青藏高原及其周边地区的民族构成与文化互动. 民族研究, 2017(2): 55-67, 124.]
[37]	Xia Min. Ecological distribution of religions in the Himalayas. Journal of Tibet Nationalities Institute (Philosophy and social Sciences Edition), 2004(6): 1-4, 9.
	[夏敏. 喜马拉雅山区宗教的生态分布. 西藏民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004(6): 1-4, 9.]
[38]	Lv Hongliang. West of Tibet: The earliest mountain people in the Himalayas. Tibet Geographic, 2017(3): 56-69.
	[吕红亮. 西藏之西: 喜马拉雅最早的山民. 西藏人文地理, 2017(3): 56-69.]
[39]	Duojie Caidan. On the ancient Tibet traffic route of the Silk Road. Chinese Culture Tradition and Modernization, 1995(4): 45-54.
	[多杰才旦. 关于丝路吐蕃道的交通路线问题. 传统文化与现代化, 1995(4): 45-54.]
[40]	Feng Kunyuan. Analysis of the border trade between Nepal and Tibet in modern China. China International Business, 2018(2): 1-2.
	[丰坤元. 浅析近现代中国西藏与尼泊尔边境贸易. 中国国际财经(中英文), 2018(2): 1-2.]
[41]	Sciences Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Comprehensive Investigation. Tibetan Landscape. Beijing: Science Press, 1983: 7-10.
	[中国科学院青藏高原综合考察队. 西藏地貌. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983: 7-10.]
[42]	Transportation Department of Tibet Autonomous Region. Tibet's Ancient and Modern Transportation History. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2001: 7-19.
	[西藏自治区交通厅. 西藏古近代交通史. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2001: 7-19.]
[43]	Zhang Li. Indo-Tibetan communication through the Himalayas: A historical review. South Asian Studies Quarterly, 1991(1): 41-48.
	[张力. 历史上的印藏交通. 南亚研究季刊, 1991(1): 41-48.]
[44]	Sarkar R, Ray I. Two nineteenth century trade routes in the Eastern Himalayas: The Bhutanese trade with Tibet and Bengal. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 2006, 15: 56-83.
[45]	Williams T. Silk roads in the Kingdom of Bhutan and the development of a national heritage inventory. Archaeology International, 2017, 19: 122-133.
[46]	Xu Jinzhi. Trails on the frontier of Tibet and Sikang, their importance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1936, 3(4): 713-726.
	[徐近之. 西藏西康国防线上之通路及其重要. 地理学报, 1936, 3(4): 713-726.]
[47]	Zha Xi, Liu Yu. Analysis of traditional trade and its characteristics in ethnic distribution areas with small population at the border of Tibet. Research on the Development in Western China, 2014(1): 15-22.
	[扎西, 刘玉. 西藏边境人口较少民族分布区传统贸易及其特点分析. 西部发展研究, 2014(1): 15-22.]
[48]	Huo Wei. Rediscovering the prehistoric transportation and trade in Tibet from archaeological discoveries. China Tibetology, 2013(2): 5-24.
	[霍巍. 从考古发现看西藏史前的交通与贸易. 中国藏学, 2013(2): 5-24.]
[49]	Xu Xiaoyang. The history and reality of economic exchange between Tibet and south Asia. South Asian and Southeast Asian Studies, 2018(4): 63-72, 119.
	[许肖阳. 西藏与南亚经济交流的历史与现实. 南亚东南亚研究, 2018(4): 63-72, 119.]
[50]	Zhang Yun. A textual research on the Qionglong silver castle of Xiangxiong kingdom: Also on the root cause of the rise and fall of Xiangxiong's civilization. China Tibetology, 2016(2): 5-11, 47.
	[张云. 象雄王国都城琼隆银城今地考: 兼论象雄文明兴衰的根本原因. 中国藏学, 2016(2): 5-11, 47.]
[51]	Huo Chuan, Huo Wei. The open of "Plateau Silk Road" in west Tibet during the Han and Jin dynasties and its historic significance. Journal of Tibet University, 2017, 32(1): 52-57.
	[霍川, 霍巍. 汉晋时期藏西“高原丝绸之路”的开通及其历史意义. 西藏大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 32(1): 52-57.]
[52]	Duojie Caidan. Tubo study two or three questions. China Tibetology, 2016(Suppl.1): 122-132.
	[多杰才旦. 吐蕃研究二三题. 中国藏学, 2016(Suppl.1): 122-132.]
[53]	Li Tao. The salt road that was once as famous as the "Silk Road". China Salt Industry, 2017(18): 64-67.
	[李涛. 曾与“丝绸之路”齐名的食盐之路. 中国盐业, 2017(18): 64-67.]
[54]	Huang Bo. Separation of the three dimensions: The political pattern and political differentiation of the Ali dynasty in the 11th century. China Tibetology, 2012(3): 35-42.
	[黄博. 三围分立:11世纪前后阿里王朝的政治格局与政权分化. 中国藏学, 2012(3): 35-42.]
[55]	Petech L, Zhang Changhong. Translation of Western Tibet: Historical introduction. Journal of Tibetology, 2012(1): 135-176.
	[伯戴克, 张长虹. 西部西藏的历史. 藏学学刊, 2012(1): 135-176.]
[56]	Bergmann C. Confluent territories and overlapping sovereignties: Britain's nineteenth-century Indian empire in the Kumaon Himalaya. Journal of Historical Geography, 2016, 51: 88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2015.06.015
[57]	Lamb A, Deng Ruiling. Selected translation of Tibet and the British Raj. Journal of Xizang Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 37(2): 39-54, 154.
	阿拉斯泰尔·兰姆, 邓锐龄. 《英属印度与西藏》摘译(二). 西藏民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 37(2): 39-54, 154.]
[58]	Lamb A, Deng Ruiling. Selected translation of British India and Tibet 1766-1910. Journal of Xizang Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 37(3): 47-57.
	阿拉斯泰尔·兰姆, 邓锐龄. 《英属印度与西藏》摘译(三). 西藏民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 37(3): 47-57.]
[59]	Wu Congzhong. A brief history of the British invasion of southeastern Tibet. Tibetan Studies, 1988(3): 35-42, 92.
	[吴从众. 英国入侵西藏东南地方史略. 西藏研究, 1988(3): 35-42, 92.]
[60]	Goldstein M. A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. Du Yongbin, trans. Beijing: China Tibetology Press, 2005.
	[梅·戈尔斯坦. 喇嘛王国的覆灭. 杜永彬译. 北京: 中国藏学出版社, 2005.]
[61]	Liang Junyan. Translation of selected from the Mc Mahon Line (V). Journal of Xizang Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 36(6): 37-48.
	[梁俊艳. 《麦克马洪线》摘译(五). 西藏民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 36(6): 37-48.]
[62]	Vasan S. Indo-Tibetan border trade in Himachal pradesh. China Report, 2006, 42(1): 41-55. doi: 10.1177/000944550504200103
[63]	Li Yumin. The main difference between late Qing Sino-foreign treaty relationships and tributary telationships. Historical Research, 2018(5): 53-70, 190.
	[李育民. 晚清中外条约关系与朝贡关系的主要区别. 历史研究, 2018(5): 53-70, 190.]
[64]	Maxwell N. India's China War. Lu Ren, trans. Beijing: World Affairs Press, 1981.
	[内维尔·马克斯韦尔. 印度对华战争. 陆仁, 译. 北京: 世界知识出版社, 1981.]
[65]	Beszterda R. The Shipki la and its place in cross-border trade between India and Tibet. The Tibet Journal, 2015, 40(2): 239-259.
[66]	Du Debin, Ma Yahua. One Belt and One Road: The grand geo-strategy of China's rise. Georaphical Research, 2015, 34(6): 1005-1014.
	[杜德斌, 马亚华. “一带一路”: 中华民族复兴的地缘大战略. 地理研究, 2015, 34(6): 1005-1014.]
[67]	Lin Minwang. China-Nepal-India economic corridor: Its strategic significance and developing model. Contemporary International Relations, 2017(2): 31-39, 67.
	[林民旺. 中尼印经济走廊建设: 战略价值及建设思路. 现代国际关系, 2017(2): 31-39, 67.]
[68]	Harris T. Trading places: New economic geographies across Himalayan borderlands. Political Geography, 2013, 35: 60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.002
[69]	Chand B. Dynamics of rivalry between geographically contiguous regional powers: The case of Sino-Indian competition. Asian Politics & Policy, 2019, 11(1): 122-143.
[70]	Sati V P. Pilgrimage tourism in mountain regions: Socio-economic and environmental implications in the Garhwal Himalaya. South Asian Journal of Tourism and Heritage, 2015, 8(2): 164-182.
[71]	Lu Dadao, Du Debin. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geo-economic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.
	[陆大道, 杜德斌. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考. 地理学报, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.]

喜马拉雅地区传统贸易通道演变过程及动力机制

Exploring the evolution process and driving mechanism of traditional trade routes in Himalayan region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 71

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	袁丹, 朱传耿, 陈寒昱. 中国按比例安排残疾人就业的动力机制与空间分布[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 341-351.
[2]	邓辉, 卜凡. 历史上冀中平原“塘泺”湖泊群的分布与水系结构[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2332-2345.
[3]	刘永强, 龙花楼. 黄淮海平原农区土地利用转型及其动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(4): 666-679.
[4]	王利伟, 冯长春. 转型期京津冀城市群空间扩展格局及其动力机制研究——基于夜间灯光数据方法[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(12): 2155-2169.
[5]	程佳佳, 王成金. 珠江三角洲集装箱港口体系演化及动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(8): 1256-1270.
[6]	孟广文, 王洪玲, 杨爽. 天津自由贸易试验区发展演化动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(10): 1552-1565.
[7]	朱会义. 土地利用变化的内在动力——新疆地区农业生产要素产出效率的变动趋势分析[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1029-1037.
[8]	龙花楼. 中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1203-1213.
[9]	张富刚,刘彦随. 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 115-122.
[10]	宋乃平, 张凤荣. 鄂尔多斯农牧交错土地利用格局的演变与机理[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(12): 1299-1308.
[11]	周国华,贺艳华. 长沙城市土地扩张特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(11): 1171-1180.
[12]	吴宏安, 蒋建军, 周杰, 张海龙, 张丽, 艾莉. 西安城市扩张及其驱动力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 143-150.
[13]	欧向军,顾朝林. 江苏省区域经济极化及其动力机制定量分析[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(5): 791-799.
[14]	许学强,王欣,阎小培. 技术流的动力机制、渠道与模式——以珠江三角洲为例[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(4): 489-496.
[15]	石忆邵. 中国市场群落发展机制[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(3): 356-364.