论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展

doi:10.11821/dlxb202006013

地理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (6): 1272-1286.doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013

论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展

戈大专¹, 龙花楼²()

1.南京师范大学地理科学学院江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023;
2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101

收稿日期:2019-12-09 修回日期:2020-04-25 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-08-25
作者简介:戈大专(1987-), 男, 江苏新沂人, 博士后, 硕士生导师, 中国地理学会会员(S110011568M), 主要从事乡村空间治理与土地利用转型研究。E-mail: gedz@njnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41901204);国家自然科学基金项目(41971216);国家自然科学基金项目(41731286);中国博士后科学基金(2019M660109);中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室开放基金(KF2018-02);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20190717);江苏省社会科学基金项目(19GLC002)

Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development

GE Dazhuan¹, LONG Hualou²()

1. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2019-12-09 Revised:2020-04-25 Published:2020-06-25 Online:2020-08-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901204);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971216);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41731286);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2019M660109);Funds from Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling(KF2018-02);Jiangsu Provincial Science Foundation(BK20190717);Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Foundation(19GLC002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

构建现代乡村治理体系成为推动城乡融合发展和乡村振兴的重要内容。破解乡村空间利用过程中出现的发展空间受限、权属关系不明和组织体系不畅等系统性问题,成为乡村空间治理的首要任务。本文从乡村空间“物质—权属—组织”综合治理的视角出发,尝试解析乡村空间治理在推动乡村空间重构、权属关系重塑和组织体系重建中的作用机制,并进一步探讨乡村空间治理优化城乡格局、改善城乡互动关系、推动城乡融合发展的可行路径。结论如下:物质空间治理可作为乡村空间结构和功能优化的重要手段,空间权属治理有助于保障乡村空间不同参与主体的发展权利,空间组织治理可提升乡村空间的组织效率;乡村空间治理导向的“人口—土地—产业”转型过程为“深化空间治理—活化乡村空间—优化人地关系—改善城乡格局”的分析思路创造条件;乡村空间治理推动城乡发展格局不断演化,城乡互动关系改善成为推动城乡融合发展和破解乡村发展困境的重要依据。最后,本文构建了乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展互动分析框架,并探讨了乡村空间治理与国土空间规划的内在关系及研究趋势。

关键词: 乡村治理, 城乡融合, 空间治理, 乡村空间重构, 乡村振兴, 城乡关系, 空间规划

Abstract:

The construction of the modern rural governance system becomes an important part in promoting the urban-rural integration development and rural vitalization. Solving systemic problems such as limited development space, unclear ownership relationship and inefficient organization in the process of using rural space has become the primary task of rural spatial governance. Based on the breakthrough of the comprehensive governance of "matter-ownership-organization" in rural space, this paper attempts to analyze the mechanism of rural space governance in promoting rural space restructuring, ownership reshaping and organizational system reconstruction, and further explores the feasible path of rural space governance to optimize the urban-rural pattern, improve the urban-rural interaction, and promote the urban-rural integration development. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Physical space governance facilitates the optimization of rural spatial structure, the space ownership governance safeguards the development rights of different stakeholders, and the space organization governance enhances rural organizational capabilities. The comprehensive governance of "matter-ownership-organization" in rural space helps to impel the restructuring of rural space, the reshaping of ownership relations and the reconstructing of organizational system, to achieve the goals of the modern rural space governance system with clear rural space ownership. (2) The "population-land-industry" transformation path guided by rural space governance creates conditions for the analysis of "deepening space governance-activating rural space-optimizing human-land relationship-improving the urban-rural pattern". (3) Rural space governance promotes the continuous evolution of urban-rural development, and the improvement of urban-rural interaction becomes an important basis for upgrading urban-rural integration development and solving the dilemma of rural development. Finally, this paper constructs an analytical framework and feasible path for the interaction between rural space governance and the urban-rural integration development, and explores the internal relationship and research trends of rural space governance and territory spatial planning.

Key words: rural governance, urban-rural integration, spatial governance, rural spatial restructuring, rural vitalization, urban-rural relationship, spatial planning

戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.

GE Dazhuan, LONG Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.

图/表 4

参考文献 47

[1]	Fan Jie. Perspective of China's spatial governance system after 19th CPC National Congress. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017,32(4):396-404.
	[ 樊杰. 我国空间治理体系现代化在“十九大”后的新态势. 中国科学院院刊, 2017,32(4):396-404.]
[2]	Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao. Spatial governance: Political economy of China's urban and rural planning transformation. City Planning Review, 2014,38(11):9-15.
	[ 张京祥, 陈浩. 空间治理: 中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学. 城市规划, 2014,38(11):9-15.]
[3]	Liu Weidong. Economic geography for spatial governance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(8):1109-1116. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408007
	[ 刘卫东. 经济地理学与空间治理. 地理学报, 2014,69(8):1109-1116.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408007
[4]	Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Zhai Rongxin. Geographical research and optimizing practice of rural hollowing in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009,64(10):1193-1202. doi: 10.11821/xb200910005
	[ 刘彦随, 刘玉, 翟荣新. 中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践. 地理学报, 2009,64(10):1193-1202.] doi: 10.11821/xb200910005
[5]	Long Hualou. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(8):1019-1028.
	[ 龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构. 地理学报, 2013,68(8):1019-1028.]
[6]	Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, Tu Shuangshuang. Land consolidation and rural vitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(10):1837-1849. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
	[ 龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018,73(10):1837-1849.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
[7]	Dong Zuoji. Promoting rural development through space governance transformation: The practice and implication of the urban-rural integrated land management innovation in Jiangsu Sucheng. China Land, 2019(1):16-20.
	[ 董祚继. 以空间治理转型提质促农村社会转型发展: 江苏宿城创新城乡统筹土地管理的做法与启示. 中国土地, 2019(1):16-20.]
[8]	Zhang Fugang, Liu Yansui. Dynamic mechanism and models of regional rural development in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008,63(2):115-122. doi: 10.11821/xb200802001
	[ 张富刚, 刘彦随. 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式. 地理学报, 2008,63(2):115-122.] doi: 10.11821/xb200802001
[9]	Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang. Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(4):563-576. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704001
	[ 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构. 地理学报, 2017,72(4):563-576.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704001
[10]	Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007,62(6):563-570. doi: 10.11821/xb200706001
	[ 刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007,62(6):563-570.] doi: 10.11821/xb200706001
[11]	Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[ 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):637-650.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[12]	Long H L, Tu S S, Ge D Z, et al. The allocation and management of critical resources in rural China under restructuring: Problems and prospects. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016,47:392-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.011
[13]	He Xuefeng. Governing via top-down regulations and grassroots governance internalization: Dialectics of grassroots governance. Journal of Social Sciences, 2019(4):64-70.
	[ 贺雪峰. 规则下乡与治理内卷化: 农村基层治理的辩证法. 社会科学, 2019(4):64-70.]
[14]	Wen Tiejun, Yang Shuai. Rural governance and rural development in the background of rural social structure change in China. Theoretical Investigation, 2012(6):76-80.
	[ 温铁军, 杨帅. 中国农村社会结构变化背景下的乡村治理与农村发展. 理论探讨, 2012(6):76-80.]
[15]	Wu Chuanjun. The core of study of geography: Man-land relationship areal system. Economic Geography, 1991,11(3):1-6. doi: 10.2307/140646
	[ 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991,11(3):1-6.] doi: 10.2307/140646
[16]	Cheng Pengfei, Liu Yungang. The territory and territoriality in the spatial governance of Chinese rural society in Ming and Qing dynasties. Human Geography, 2017,32(1):29-36.
	[ 程朋飞, 刘云刚. 明清时期乡村社会治理的空间机制: 基于领域性视角. 人文地理, 2017,32(1):29-36.]
[17]	Sun Jiuxia. Cultural inheritance and spatial governance based on cultural confidence in the new era: An introduction to the issue of "Cultural Inheritance and Spatial Governance". Geographical Research, 2019,38(6):1283-1289.
	[ 孙九霞. 新时代背景下基于文化自信的文化传承与空间治理: “文化传承与空间治理”专栏解读. 地理研究, 2019,38(6):1283-1289.]
[18]	Xu Lu, Luo Xiaolong, Wang Shaobo, et al. Research on the production of rural consumption space and the reconstruction of rural space in "Yangjiale": A case of Deqing County of Zhejiang Province. Modern Urban Research, 2018(9):35-40.
	[ 许璐, 罗小龙, 王绍博, 等. “洋家乐”乡村消费空间的生产与乡土空间重构研究: 以浙江省德清县为例. 现代城市研究, 2018(9):35-40.]
[19]	He Renwei. Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018,37(11):2127-2140.
	[ 何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径. 地理研究, 2018,37(11):2127-2140.]
[20]	Ye Xingqing. The general principles of the China's rural revitalization strategy in the new era. Reform, 2018(1):65-73.
	[ 叶兴庆. 新时代中国乡村振兴战略论纲. 改革, 2018(1):65-73.]
[21]	Zhang Yingnan, Long Hualou, Ma Li, et al. Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):578-594.
	[ 张英男, 龙花楼, 马历, 等. 城乡关系研究进展及其对乡村振兴的启示. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):578-594.]
[22]	Chen K Q, Long H L, Liao L W, et al. Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China's evidence. Land Use Policy, 2020,92, 104465. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104465
[23]	Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(12):2511-2528.
	[ 刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2019,74(12):2511-2528.]
[24]	Yang Ren. Spatial differentiation and mechanisms of typical rural areas in the suburbs of a metropolis: A case study of Beicun Village, Baiyun District, Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(8):1622-1636. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908010
	[ 杨忍. 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制. 地理学报, 2019,74(8):1622-1636.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908010
[25]	Liu Chunfang, Zhang Zhiying. From town-country integration to urban-rural integration: New thinking on the relationship between urban and rural areas. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(10):1624-1633. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.10.006
	[ 刘春芳, 张志英. 从城乡一体化到城乡融合: 新型城乡关系的思考. 地理科学, 2018,38(10):1624-1633.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.10.006
[26]	Yang Kui, Zhang Yu, Zhao Xiaofeng, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics and influencing factors of structural efficiency of rural land use. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(9):1393-1402. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.012
	[ 杨奎, 张宇, 赵小风, 等. 乡村土地利用结构效率时空特征及影响因素. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(9):1393-1402.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.012
[27]	Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, et al. Pattern and coupling relationship between grain yield and agricultural labor changes at county level in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(6):1063-1077. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201706009
	[ 戈大专, 龙花楼, 张英男, 等. 中国县域粮食产量与农业劳动力变化的格局及其耦合关系. 地理学报, 2017,72(6):1063-1077.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201706009
[28]	Chen Yangfen, Liu Yu, Li Yurui. Agricultural development status and industrial prosperity path under the relationship between urban and rural. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):632-642.
	[ 陈秧分, 刘玉, 李裕瑞. 中国乡村振兴背景下的农业发展状态与产业兴旺途径. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):632-642.]
[29]	Wang Yongsheng, Liu Yansui. Pollution and restructuring strategies of rural ecological environment in China. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):710-717. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.014
	[ 王永生, 刘彦随. 中国乡村生态环境污染现状及重构策略. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):710-717.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.014
[30]	Yan Jinming, Xia Fangzhou, Ma Mei. Strategy orientations of transformation development: Land consolidation in the new period of China. China Land Science, 2016,30(2):3-10.
	[ 严金明, 夏方舟, 马梅. 中国土地整治转型发展战略导向研究. 中国土地科学, 2016,30(2):3-10.]
[31]	Qiao Luyin, Liu Yansui. China's rural revitalization strategy and rural homestead system reform in the new period. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):655-666.
	[ 乔陆印, 刘彦随. 新时期乡村振兴战略与农村宅基地制度改革. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):655-666.]
[32]	Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou, Qiao Weifeng. The transformation of China's grain production since reform and opening-up and its prospects. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(3):658-670.
	[ 戈大专, 龙花楼, 乔伟峰. 改革开放以来我国粮食生产转型分析及展望. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(3):658-670.]
[33]	Yang Ren, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou, et al. Research progress and prospect of rural transformation and reconstruction in China: Paradigms and main content. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(8):1019-1030. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.08.009
	[ 杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼, 等. 中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望: 逻辑主线与内容框架. 地理科学进展, 2015,34(8):1019-1030.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.08.009
[34]	Tu Shuangshuang, Long Hualou, Zheng Yuhan, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern of rural development and restructuring and regional path of rural vitalization in Guangxi, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(2):365-381.
	[ 屠爽爽, 郑瑜晗, 龙花楼, 等. 乡村发展与重构格局特征及振兴路径: 以广西为例. 地理学报, 2020,75(2):365-381.]
[35]	Ge D Z, Wang Z H, Tu S S, et al. Coupling analysis of greenhouse-led farmland transition and rural transformation development in China's traditional farming area: A case of Qingzhou City. Land Use Policy, 2019,86:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.002
[36]	Woods M. Rural. London and New York: Routledge, 2011.
[37]	Wu Cifang, Fei Luocheng, Ye Yanmei. The theoretical perspective, rational, paradigm and strategic solution of land consolidation. Economic Geography. 2011,31(10):1718-1722.
	[ 吴次芳, 费罗成, 叶艳妹. 土地整治发展的理论视野、理性范式和战略路径. 经济地理, 2011,31(10):1718-1722.]
[38]	Li Yuheng, Yan Jiayu, Liu Yansui. The cognition and path analysis of rural revitalization theory based on rural resilience. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(10):2001-2010. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004
	[ 李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 刘彦随. 基于乡村弹性的乡村振兴理论认知与路径研究. 地理学报, 2019,74(10):2001-2010.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004
[39]	Feng Yingbin, Yang Qingyuan. Key research fields and basic directions of Chinese rural land comprehensive consolidation in transitional period. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014,30(1):175-182.
	[ 冯应斌, 杨庆媛. 转型期中国农村土地综合整治重点领域与基本方向. 农业工程学报, 2014,30(1):175-182.]
[40]	Tang Chengli, He Yanhua, Zhou Guohua, et al. The research on optimization mode of spatial organization of rural settlements oriented by life quality. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(10):1459-1472. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
	[ 唐承丽, 贺艳华, 周国华, 等. 基于生活质量导向的乡村聚落空间优化研究. 地理学报, 2014,69(10):1459-1472.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410006
[41]	Zhou Guohua, Liu Chang, Tang Chengli, et al. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of quality of life in rural areas of Hunan province. Geographical Research, 2018,37(12):2475-2489.
	[ 周国华, 刘畅, 唐承丽, 等. 湖南乡村生活质量的空间格局及其影响因素. 地理研究, 2018,37(12):2475-2489.]
[42]	Huang Xianjin. A review of effects of urban and rural land market integration on land use and land cover change. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(2):200-208. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.02.005
	[ 黄贤金. 城乡土地市场一体化对土地利用/覆被变化的影响研究综述. 地理科学, 2017,37(2):200-208.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.02.005
[43]	Yang Ren, Liu Yansiu, Long Hualou. The study on non-agricultural transformation co-evolution characteristics of "population-land-industry": Case study of the Bohai Rim in China. Geographical Research, 2015,34(3):475-486.
	[ 杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼. 中国环渤海地区人口—土地—产业非农化转型协同演化特征. 地理研究, 2015,34(3):475-486.]
[44]	Tu Shuangshuang, Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, et al. Process and driving factors of rural restructuring at typical village. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(2):323-339. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201902009
	[ 屠爽爽, 龙花楼, 张英男, 等. 典型村域乡村重构的过程及其驱动因素. 地理学报, 2019,74(2):323-339.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201902009
[45]	Long Hualou, Ge Dazhuan, Wang Jieyong. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(12):2547-2559.
	[ 龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展与展望. 地理学报, 2019,74(12):2547-2559.]
[46]	Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(2):257-270. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
	[ 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015,70(2):257-270.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
[47]	Lu Qian. Improve the efficiency of rural public space governance. Xinhua Daily, 2019-05-28.
	[ 卢倩. 提升乡村公共空间治理效率. 新华日报, 2019-05-28. ]

论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展

Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	戈大专, 陆玉麒. 面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.
[2]	杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
[3]	郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421.
[4]	周扬, 李寻欢, 童春阳, 黄晗. 中国村域贫困地理格局及其分异机理[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 903-920.
[5]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.
[6]	曹智, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞, 王永生. 中国专业村镇空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1647-1666.
[7]	刘彦随. 中国乡村振兴规划的基础理论与方法论[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1120-1133.
[8]	杨庆媛, 罗奎, 劳昕. 基于地理学视角的国际空间规划嬗变与启示[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1223-1236.
[9]	屠爽爽, 郑瑜晗, 龙花楼, 万诗梦, 梁小丽, 王炜. 乡村发展与重构格局特征及振兴路径——以广西为例[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 365-381.
[10]	李睿倩, 李永富, 胡恒. 生态系统服务对国土空间规划体系的理论与实践支撑[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2417-2430.
[11]	周扬, 黄晗, 刘彦随. 中国村庄空间分布规律及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2206-2223.
[12]	胡西武, 刘小鹏, 黄越, 黄立军, 东梅. 宁夏生态移民村空间剥夺测度及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2224-2240.
[13]	程明洋, 刘彦随, 蒋宁. 黄淮海地区乡村人—地—业协调发展格局与机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589.
[14]	杨忍. 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1622-1636.
[15]	李裕瑞,曹智,龙花楼. 发展乡村科学,助力乡村振兴——第二届乡村振兴与乡村科学论坛综述[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1482-1486.