地理学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (12): 2378-2391.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812008

• 城市与区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CiteSpace方法的京津冀协同发展研究演化

孙威1,2(),毛凌潇1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
    2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-07 出版日期:2018-12-14 发布日期:2018-12-14
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类) (XDA19040401);国家自然科学基金项目(41871117)

Evolution of research on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cooperative development based on CiteSpace method

SUN Wei1,2(),MAO Lingxiao1,2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2018-03-07 Online:2018-12-14 Published:2018-12-14
  • Supported by:
    Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA19040401;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41871117

摘要:

京津冀地区是中国人口和经济最密集的城市化地区,在中国区域发展战略中具有重要地位,一直受到学者的广泛关注。但受国家宏观政策等因素的影响,研究热点处于持续演化之中。为梳理京津冀研究的脉络,利用知识图谱可视化技术,对京津冀研究的文献数量特征、期刊和学科分布特征、研究机构的网络特征进行了分析,总结了不同时段的研究热点和演化过程。研究表明:① 1982年以来京津冀研究的刊文量越来越多,主要集中在经济学、地理学、社会学、环境学四大学科,其中地理学在刊文量和期刊影响因子方面排在前列;② 位于京津冀区域内的高校和科研院所是京津冀研究的主要力量,研究机构间的共现网络密度为0.0063,表明已经初步形成合作网络,但联系与合作程度依然较低,各领域研究较为独立;③ 京津冀研究经历了3个阶段,不同阶段的研究热点具有鲜明的时代特征,说明京津冀研究与国家宏观政策的联系十分紧密。2006年以来形成了京津冀一体化与产业结构调整、区域空间结构与协调发展对策、PM2.5与大气环境3个主要的研究方向。雄安新区、城市群、新型城镇化、碳排放等成为新的研究热点。

关键词: 京津冀地区, 文献计量, CiteSpace方法, 研究热点

Abstract:

Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, which is the most densely populated area and plays an important role in China's regional development strategy, has aroused great concern from scholars. Influenced by the national macro policies, the research hotspots are in continuous evolution. In order to sort out the research hotspots in different periods and the network links between research hotspots, and have a deeper understanding of the research fields, research directions, and research status of scholars in various disciplines, bibliometrics and knowledge map visualized technology are used to examine the quantitative characteristics of literatures, the characteristics of journal and discipline distribution, the co-occurrence network structure map of research institutes, and the research hotspots in different periods and their evolution are summarized as well. In addition, we take the research papers of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei in the collection of core journals, CSSCI, EI source journals and SCI source journals in CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) as the object of study. The research suggests that: (1) The number of publications of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei study is increasing, mainly in the four majors of economics, geography, sociology, and environmental studies, with geography ranking in the forefront of the volume of papers and journal impact factors; (2) Universities and research institutes located in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are the main forces of the research, and the co-occurrence network density is 0.0063, indicating that a cooperative network has initially been formed among universities and research institutes, but the degree of contact and cooperation is relatively low, and the research in various fields is relatively independent; (3) The study of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei has gone through three stages, and the research hotspots at different stages have distinctive characteristics of the times, explaining that the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei study is closely linked to the national macro policies. Since 2006, three major research directions have been formed: Beijing- Tianjin-Hebei integration and industrial restructuring, regional spatial structure and coordinated development strategies, as well as PM2.5 and atmospheric environment. Xiong'an new district, urban agglomeration, new urbanization, and carbon emissions have become new research hotspots.

Key words: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, bibliometrics, CiteSpace method, research hotspot