Changes of ports' connection across the Taiwan Straits in the global maritime network (1895-2016)
WANG Liehui1,2,3(),LIN Yushan1,2,Cesar DUCRUET4
1. The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China 2. School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China 3. Future City Lab, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China 4. French National Center for Scientific Research, UMR 8504 Géographie-cités, Paris F-75006, France;
Taiwan and the Chinese mainland face each other across the sea, and maritime transport is the most important means for the exchange of goods between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits. Affected by international politics and trade patterns, since the middle and late 19th century, the transportation links between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits have changed dramatically. Using the O-D data of vessels transiting between ports from the Lloyd's database between 1895 and 2008, we studied the changes in the transport links between ports on both sides of the Taiwan Straits at the national and global scales. The analysis concludes as follows: (1) Since before the beginning of modern times until Taiwan was ceded to Japan, Taiwan and the Chinese mainland had island-land relations, and Xiamen Port was the most important transit port to Taiwan. After the Japanese occupation, Taiwan became Japan's source of raw materials and a location in which to sell Japan's goods, and Taiwan, Japan, and the Chinese mainland were forming triangular transportation links. After the confrontation between the two sides of the strait, the United States intervened in the Taiwan Straits, and the transportation links between the ports on both sides of the Taiwan Straits were cut off. Taiwan, the United States, and Japan formed a triangular trade network. After 1979, Hong Kong Port became the most important transit port for cross-strait transport links. After direct flights across the Taiwan Straits were instituted, the port transportation links between Taiwan and the Chinese mainland continued to expand in breadth and depth. (2) Taiwan has obvious advantages in location, but because it is an island, the hinterland is narrow. Therefore, making full use of regional and geopolitical advantages, using the regional economic growth centre as its own foreland and forming a close sea transportation link is key to Taiwan's sustained economic development. Improving relations with the mainland, sharing in opportunities for the development of the mainland, and promoting the transport links between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits are opportunities for Taiwan.
. 1895-2016年全球海运网络中的海峡两岸港口运输联系变化[J]. 地理学报,
2018, 73(12): 2282-2296.
. Changes of ports' connection across the Taiwan Straits in the global maritime network (1895-2016)[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,
2018, 73(12): 2282-2296.
Zhang KH.Why does so much FDI from Hong Kong and Taiwan go to Mainland China? , 2005, 16(3): 293-307.http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1043951X05000271
While the European Union, the US, and Japan (the Triad) supply 90% of global foreign direct investment (FDI) and China is the second largest FDI recipient in the world, most FDI into China did not come from the Triad but from Hong Kong and Taiwan (HKT). Evidence presented in the paper reveals that the unusually large amount of Hong Kong aiwan direct investment (HKTDI) cannot be fully appreciated without understanding China's location characteristics and differences between HKTDI and the Triad FDI. Four determinants of the dominant HKTDI in China are identified: China's export-promotion FDI strategy, its large pool of cheap labor, HKT's specific advantages in export-oriented FDI, and their unique links with China (the Chinese connections). Empirical results suggest that HKTDI was primarily motivated by low labor costs while FDI from the Triad was market-oriented. As China's domestic markets become more open to foreign investors, the share of HKTDI may shrink and the importance of FDI from the Triad may rise.
Hu WX.Explaining change and stability in cross-strait relations: A punctuated equilibrium model. , 2012, 21(78): 933-953.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10670564.2012.701033
Relations across the Taiwan Strait have experienced several cycles over the last 60 years. Tension and crisis seem to come and go, followed by periods of peace and stability. What explains the cyclical pattern of change and stability? How can we explain the sources of change and stability in the relationship? This article examines the last 60 years of cross-Strait relations in light of an interpretative framework of ‘punctuated equilibrium’. Cross-Strait relations are complex, consisting of actors at the domestic, cross-Strait, and international levels. With a high degree of economic interaction, the cross-Strait relationship can be characterized as economic integration cum political impasse. This article analyzes the cyclical changes through three causal factors: (a) the role of issue cycles in cross-Strait relations; (b) the impulsive drivers for change; and (c) the structural constraints dampening change.
XiwenBai, Jasmine Siu Lee Lam. Dynamic regional port cluster development: Case of the ports across Taiwan Strait. , 2015, 80: 619-636http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10708-014-9567-5
The term luster is defined as a regional concentration of related economic activities and the concept has been embraced by many scientists and regional policy makers. However, little research has been done for fast-growing port clusters in Asia. The geographical focus of this study is the ports across the Taiwan Strait which is a seldom investigated area in cluster research. This study aims to develop an institutional framework to analyse the interactions and coordination among key port cluster actors with respect to the internal and external environment, and further identify the role policy plays in being a main driver for cluster evolution. We employ a case study approach in the research. Ports along the Taiwan Strait have access to abundant resources and possess strategic locations, as well as broad market bases including Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. Taiwan ports have advanced infrastructure and information technology management systems, while Fujian ports are rich in resources and have access to the vast mainland hinterland. They have complementary advantages and the formation of a port cluster across Taiwan Strait could improve the market competitiveness of both. Thus, the efficient governance and integration of such a port cluster has practical significance. This paper provides specific suggestions to the policy makers across the Taiwan Strait with regards to a unified path of development for the port and logistics industry for Fujian Province of China.
Lam J SL, Wei YY. Dynamics of liner shipping network and port connectivity in supply chain systems: Analysis on East Asia. , 2011, 19(6): 1272-1281.https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0966692311001013
The study of ports in supply chain systems is an emerging area of importance which has drawn more attention from researchers in recent years. This paper presents a new perspective in this research area by examining the calling patterns of container shipping services in order to understand the dynamics of port connectivity and inter-port relationships in the supply chains. Empirical evidence is drawn from four major ports in East Asia, namely Shanghai, Busan, Kaohsiung and Ningbo. The study identifies the shipping capacity, trade routes and geographical regions connected to the ports, shipping lines involved, and the extensity and intensity of inter-port relationships among the four container ports from liner shipping network perspective. The findings show that most of the shipping capacity employed on the major east est trade routes became non-exclusive and involved calls at two or more of the four ports. Port planners, terminal operators and carriers could capitalise on opportunities through exploitation of complementary relationships that exist among the selected ports, such as offering a package for shipping lines to call at a portfolio of terminals owned by the same terminal operator. Policy and research implications as well as recommendations are discussed for various stakeholders concerned with port planning and regional development.Highlights? We examine the calling patterns of container shipping services connected to East Asia. ? Inter-port relationships include both port competition and complementarity in supply chain systems. ? Complementarity in port calls existed in Shanghai, Busan, Kaohsiung and Ningbo.
TongJ, WatanabeY.China-Japan port networks suitable for short sea shipping. , 2016, 4(4): 205-220.
Wei YimYap, JasmineS.L. LAM, Theo Notteboom. Developments in container port competition in East Asia. , 2006, 26(2): 167-188.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01441640500271117
The ports of Hong Kong, Busan and Kaohsiung have long dominated container handling in East Asia. However, the emergence of new transhipment and gateway hub candidates, which include Shanghai, Shenzhen, Kwangyang and Qingdao, among others, will vie with these incumbents for a greater share of container traffic. Some might even unseat the incumbents. This study finds, through evidences from container shipping services connecting the region to major markets and trade routes between 1995 and 2001, that Mainland Chinese ports are increasingly attractive as direct ports of call for mainline services. The evidence also suggests that new services started by mainline operators calling at Mainland China are bypassing Japanese and Taiwanese ports. Nonetheless, these services continue to call at Hong Kong. Although the composition of containers handled at Mainland Chinese ports consists largely of gateway cargo, these ports are expected to handle a rising share of transhipment traffic.
JiangJ, Lee LH, Chew EP, et al.Port connectivity study: An analysis framework from a global container liner shipping network perspective. , 2015, 73: 47-64.https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1366554514001859
This paper introduces an analysis framework for port connectivity from a global container liner shipping network perspective: it is defined in terms of the impact on the transportation network when the transshipment service is not available at the evaluated port. Under this framework, two models for port connectivity are introduced from transportation time and capacity. Compared with existing measures, the strength of our framework and models is not only that it provides scientific methods to compute port connectivity, but it is able to capture a global effect on how port connectivity contributes to the overall network for given shipping services.
XuM, LiZ, ShiY, et al.Evolution of regional inequality in the global shipping network. , 2015, 44: 1-12.https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0966692315000289
Global shipping is a backbone of the global economy, and as such, it evolves alongside the development of trade and the elaboration of commodity chains. This paper investigates the evolution of regional inequality in the global shipping network by analyzing the changing positions of world regions during the period from 2001 to 2012. This was a period of both prosperity and recession in maritime shipping. Using data on inter-regional flow connections, the positions of seventeen regions in the global shipping network are analyzed in terms of their traffic development, centrality, dominance and vulnerability. The East Asian, Northwest European and Europe Mediterranean regions have consistently held the highest positions, while East African and North African regions have held the lowest positions. By commanding the largest flows in the network, East Asia assumes a dominant position. The Australasian, North American West Coast, Northwest European and Southern African regions show an increasing dependency on East Asia. The analysis also identifies a few emerging regions that have had the highest growth rates in total traffic volume and connectivity for the studied period, namely South American North Coast, South American East Coast, West Africa, Southern Africa and West Asia. The empirical results of this paper supplement existing research on global shipping network evolution. One implication of the analysis is that the traffic growth of East Asia does not imply that, there is an equivalent improvement in its position in the global shipping network. The paper also shows that indicators from network analysis may be used to provide a more nuanced understanding of port-regional development than existing measures based solely on total traffic volume.
ChoH, ParkH.Constructing resilience model of port infrastructure based on system dynamics. . 2017, 7(3): 245-254.
DucruetC, WangL.China's global shipping connectivity: Internal and external dynamics in the Contemporary Era (1890-2016). , 2018, 28(2): 202-216.http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11769-018-0942-x
China’s global shipping connectivity had been somewhat overlooked as the bulk of related studies predominantly focused on the throughput volume of its own port cities. This article tackles such lacunae by providing a relational perspective based on the extraction of vessel movement archives from the Lloyd’s List corpus. Two complementary analyses are proposed: long-term dynamics with all ships included (1890–2008) and medium-term dynamics focusing on container flows (1978–2016). Each analysis examines China’s maritime connectivity in various ways and on different spatial scales, from the global to the local, in terms of concentration, vulnerability, and expansion. The main results underline the influence of technological, economic, and political factors on the changing distribution of connectivity internally and externally. In particular, China has managed to reduce its dependence upon external transit hubs, to increase the internal connectivity of its own port system, and to strengthen its dominance towards an increasing number of foreign nodes and trade partners through the maritime network.
LauY, DucruetC, NgA K Y, et al. Across the waves: A bibliometric analysis of container shipping research since the 1960s. , 2017, 44(4): 1-18.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03088839.2017.1311425
The paper investigates collaborative and semantic patterns that emerged between 1967 and 2013 about the theme of container shipping based on a corpus of 294 articles published in scholarly journals within the fields of transportation, supply chain, economics, geography, regional planning and development, and operations research. An analysis based on the co-occurrence of title words allows identifying dominant sub-themes and their evolution. Main results point to the gradual diversification of container shipping research, from the dominance of economics towards a more trans-disciplinary set of approaches which integrate port-related activities and multimodal networks. Yet, disciplinary specialization remains strong up to nowadays so that container shipping research remains rather fragmented. While co-authorships have increased over time, they remain polarized by few, weakly connected research battalions. Our study suggests that research on container shipping would benefit from more frequent contacts between such communities to foster in-depth cross-disciplinary studies and fundamental cooperation.
HayuthY.Containerization and the load center concept. , 1981, 57(2): 160-176.https://www.jstor.org/stable/144140?origin=crossref
Containerization and intermodal transportation systems have a profound effect on port structure and port operation, have modified some of the traditional port functions, and have introduced new dimensions to port competition, port hierarchy, and hinterland delineations. In this paper a five-phase model illustrates the dynamic development process of a container port system and the rationale behind such development. A particular emphasis is being given to the phenomenon of concentration of container traffic in few, large ports-load centers. The North American container ports serve as a case study. It is difficult to weigh the importance of each factor in the development of a load center port, but a large-scale local market, high accessibility to inland markets, advantageous site and location, early adoption of the new system, and aggressiveness of port management are major factors to consider.
ChenKongli. Taiwan History Compendium.Beijing: Jiuzhou Press, 2008: 156.
[陈孔立. 台湾地区历史纲要.北京: 九州出版社, 2008: 156.]
Sargent AJ.Seaports and Hinterlands. , 1938.
HoyleB.Port concentration, inter-port competition and revitalization: The case of Mombasa, Kenya. , 1999, 26(2): 161-174.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/030888399286989
Mombasa is overwhelmingly the dominant port, urban and industrial complex on the Kenya coast. Improvements in operational efficiency, management restructuring and the revitalization of the port in the competitive context of the East A frican port system as a whole are critically important current policy objectives. These issues are discussed in the context of the character and development of the port. Two further issues are outlined: the proposal to establish a free port at Mombasa, and the idea of developing a second deepwater port elsewhere on the Kenya coast. Both are considered interesting but premature.