Please wait a minute...
 
引用检索 快速检索 DOI 高级检索
地理学报    2017, Vol. 72 Issue (8): 1331-1346     DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201708001
  产业发展 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
参与全球生产网络与中国出口产品升级
贺灿飞1(),陈航航2
1. 北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871
2. 北京大学城市规划与设计学院,深圳 518055
Participation in global production networks and export product upgrading
HE Canfei1(),CHEN Hanghang2
1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2. College of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
全文: PDF (1141 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)     
摘要 

随着技术进步和贸易自由化发展,在全球范围内组织生产的跨国公司所主导的全球生产网络迅速发展并不断深化。全球生产网络为发展中国家融入全球经济体系、实现技术进步和产业升级提供了契机。同时,中国经济发展进入“新常态”,出口贸易的发展方式亟待转变,对出口产品升级的研究显得尤为重要,而参与全球生产网络可能是中国出口产品升级的重要途径。本文利用2000-2011年中国海关贸易数据库对中国出口产品质量进行了测算,并以此为基础衡量出口产品升级。研究发现,中国出口产品质量有波动上升迹象,东中西区域产品质量基本呈现递减趋势。统计分析结果表明,参与全球生产网络直接促进了中国出口产品的升级,尤其是深入融合到价值链中对出口产品质量有明显的正向促进作用。东部地区的研发投入能够促进出口质量升级,但研发投入不能通过提高垂直专业化的程度来提升质量,印证了出口企业提升价值链地位能力的不足。地区财政自主权在中部地区和东北地区起到了至关重要的作用,并且地方政府倾向于支持技术密集型产品的升级。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
贺灿飞
陈航航
关键词 全球生产网络出口产品升级出口产品质量垂直专业化中国 
Abstract

Organized globally and led by trans-national enterprises, global production networks (GPNs) develop rapidly along with the advancement of technology and deepening of trade liberalization. GPN provides great opportunities for developing countries to blend in global economy and realize their technological advance, as well as value chain upgrading. Facing the pressure of shifting model of economic development, China has urgent need of optimizing export trade though she has experienced marvelous success especially on export trade during the past few decades, so that the study on export product upgrading can be particularly important. Based on such consideration, this article focuses on how participating GPN influences China's export product upgrade. This article uses the conception of quality to quantitively describe product upgrade, and we calculate the product quality based on data of customs trade database from 2000 to 2011. The result shows that export product quality presents a declining trend from east to west of China, and the average quality of the whole country fluctuates a lot during 2000-2011 with a slight rising trend showing up recently. We then build several econometric models to examine whether participating in GPN matters, and how exactly this influence works. The results show that participating in GPN has remarkable influence on export product upgrading especially in eastern China, but market dispersion does not help in product upgrading. We also find that R&D investment cannot promote regional position in global value chain in eastern China, forming a typical "Low-end lock-in". Capital- and technology-intensive products benefit a lot from participating in GPN while labour-intensive exports may open markets with low-quality products. Fiscal decentralization is a key determinant in eastern and central provinces, and local governments tend to give more support to technology-intensive product upgrading.

Key wordsglobal production network    export product upgrading    export product quality    vertical specification    China
收稿日期: 2016-08-12      出版日期: 2017-08-23
基金资助:国家杰出青年科学基金项目(41425001)
引用本文:   
贺灿飞, 陈航航 . 参与全球生产网络与中国出口产品升级[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1331-1346.
HE Canfei, CHEN Hanghang . Participation in global production networks and export product upgrading[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1331-1346.
链接本文:  
http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/10.11821/dlxb201708001      或      http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V72/I8/1331
Fig. 1  研究框架
Fig. 2  2000-2011年中国出口产品质量变化
Fig. 3  2000-2011年中国出口产品质量变化
Fig. 4  2000-2011年中国各省出口额和出口产品质量平均值
Fig. 5  2000-2011年中国出口产品质量省际变化
Fig. 6  依2位HS产品分类的中国出口产品质量
资源密集型产品 劳动密集型产品 资本密集型产品 技术密集型产品
HS编码 01~27,71 41~70,94~96 28,29,31~40,72~84,86,87,89 30,85,88,90~93
Tab. 1  HS产品分类
Fig. 7  2000-2011年中国四类出口产品质量均值随时间变化
Fig. 8  中国四类出口产品质量均值省际分布
变量名称 计算方法 预期系数
出口规模 export 地区出口总额÷地区名义GDP 待检验
进口规模 import 地区进口总额÷地区名义GDP +
财政分权 fd 本级人均地方财政收入÷(本级人均地方财政收入+本级人均中央财政收入) 待检验
研发投入 RD R&D经费÷地区名义GDP +
人力资本 humcap 地区规模以上企业研发技术人员数÷规模以上企业从业人员总数 +
Tab. 2  控制变量
Fig. 9  主要解释变量—质量散点图
全国 全国 东部 中部 西部
VARIABLES quality quality quality quality quality
VS 0.04079*** 0.0571*** 0.144*** 0.109*** 0.0484***
VA 0.00163 0.00156 0.0184*** 0.00105 -3.96e-05
Disp -0.0007923*** -0.000287 0.00298*** -0.00165** -0.000172
export -0.1000*** -0.0581* -0.379** -0.0384**
import 0.0747*** 0.0113 0.745*** 0.304***
fd 0.131*** 0.0582 0.392*** 0.00262
RD -2.63e-05* -2.62e-05* 3.45e-05 -2.06e-05
humcap 0.278** 0.216 0.151 0.373
DistrictFE - Yes Yes Yes -
YearFE - Yes Yes Yes -
Constant 0.499*** 0.470*** 0.417*** 0.585*** 0.535***
Observations 360 360 132 108 120
R2 0.146 0.264 0.495 0.521 0.443
观测省份 30 30 11 9 10
Hausman P-value 0.5574(RE) 0.0000(FE) 0.0000(FE) 0.0000(FE) 0.5960(RE)
Tab. 3  面板模型回归结果
全国 全国 东部 中部 西部
VARIABLES quality quality quality quality quality
VS 0.0454*** 0.0418*** 0.0644*** 0.0957*** 0.0675***
VA 0.00190* 0.00190* 0.00807** 0.000309 0.000727
Disp -0.00059** -0.000460* 0.000738 -0.00176*** 1.13e-05
export -0.0657*** -0.0443* -0.229 -0.0482*
import 0.0554*** 0.0274 0.469*** 0.306***
fd 0.110*** 0.0475 0.278*** -0.0509
RD -1.69e-05** -8.86e-06 5.88e-05 -3.72e-05
humcap 0.0989* 0.0768 -0.0577 0.456**
DistrictFE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
YearFE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Constant 0.588*** 0.459*** 0.500*** 0.409*** 0.551***
Observations 360 360 132 108 120
观测省份 30 30 11 9 10
Tab. 4  FGLS模型回归结果
全国 东部 中部 西部 东北
VARIABLES quality quality quality quality quality
VS 0.0399*** 0.0988*** 0.0918*** 0.0504* -0.122*
VA 0.00197* 0.0128*** 0.0103*** -4.79e-05 -0.00129
Disp -0.000413* 0.00104*** -0.00162** -0.000106 -0.00156
export -0.0605*** -0.0282 -0.642*** -0.0426 -0.101
import 0.0505*** -0.00541 0.680** 0.321*** -0.122
fd 0.100*** 0.00625 0.358*** 0.00376 0.307**
RD 9.27e-06 4.18e-05*** 0.000112 -6.90e-05 -6.85e-05
humcap 0.0868 0.0578 -0.0427 0.515*** -0.668***
VS×RD -0.00434** -0.00753*** -0.00627 -0.00219 -0.00523
DistrictFE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
YearFE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Constant 0.464*** 0.535*** 0.375*** 0.535*** 0.504***
Observations 360 120 72 132 36
观测省份 30 10 6 11 3
Tab. 5  加入交叉项、分四大经济板块回归结果
资源密集型 劳动密集型 资本密集型 技术密集型
VARIABLES quality_res quality_lab quality_cap quality_tec
VS 0.0785 0.151*** 0.284*** 0.279***
VA -0.0213*** 0.00223 -0.00426 -0.00229
Disp 0.00187 -0.00461*** -0.00133 0.00165
export -0.0519 -0.0343 -0.0520 -0.146*
import -0.000962 0.0365 0.139** 0.130*
fd -0.281* -0.0460 -0.179** 0.442***
RD -8.99e-05** 2.75e-05 8.64e-05*** -5.38e-05
humcap 0.324 0.0537 -0.000896 0.160
DistrictFE Yes Yes Yes Yes
YearFE Yes Yes Yes Yes
Constant 0.859*** 0.728*** 0.552*** 0.106
Observations 360 360 360 360
Number of prov_id 30 30 30 30
Tab. 6  分产品回归结果
[1] Lin Yifu, Cai Fang, Li Zhou.China Miracle: Development Strategy and Economic Reform. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 1994.
[林毅夫, 蔡昉, 李周. 中国的奇迹: 发展战略与经济改革. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1994.]
[2] Humphrey J, Schmitz H.How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 2002, 36(9): 1017-1027.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0034340022000022198
[3] Porter M E.The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc., 1985: 166-169.
[4] Gereffi G.International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 1999, 48(1): 37-70.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199698000750
[5] Dicken P, Kelly P F, Olds K, et al.Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 2001, 1(2): 89-112.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0374.00007/citedby
[6] Hidalgo C A, Klinger B, Barabási A L, et al.The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 2007, 317(5837): 482.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/reference/PMED?id=17656717
DOI: 10.1126/science.1144581      PMID: 17656717     
[7] Boschma R, Frenken K.The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2011, 11(2): 295-307.
DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbq053     
[8] He Canfei, Dong Yao, Zhou Yi.Evolution of export product space in China: Path-dependent or path-breaking? Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(6): 970-983.
[贺灿飞, 董瑶, 周沂. 中国对外贸易产品空间路径演化. 地理学报, 2016, 71(6): 970-983.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlxb201606006
[9] Zhang Yu, Dai Xiang.Can export upgrading and market diversifying release China's trade friction? World Economy Study, 2013(6): 73-78.
[张雨, 戴翔. 出口产品升级和市场多元化能够缓解我国贸易摩擦吗? 世界经济研究, 2013(6): 73-78.]
[10] Rodrik D.What's so special about China's exports? China & World Economy, 2006, 14(5): 1-19.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2006.00038.x/full
[11] Schott, Peter K.The relative sophistication of Chinese export. Economic Policy, 2006, 23(1): 5-49.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444306699.ch1/pdf
[12] Vitola K, Davidsons G.Structural transformation of exports in a product space model. Working Papers, 2008.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/23984631_Structural_Transformation_of_Exports_in_a_Product_Space_Model
[13] Shi Bingzhan, Wang Youxin, Li Kunwang.The product quality measurement and determinants of China export. World Economy, 2013(9): 69-93.
[施炳展, 王有鑫, 李坤望. 中国出口产品品质测度及其决定因素. 世界经济, 2013(9): 69-93.]年度引用
[14] Li Kunwang, Jiang Wei, Song Ligang.The mystery of changes in the quality of China's exports: A micro-level explanation based on market entry. Social Sciences in China, 2014(3): 80-103.
[李坤望, 蒋为, 宋立刚. 中国出口产品品质变动之谜:基于市场进入的微观解释. 中国社会科学, 2014(3): 80-103.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZSHK201403007.htm
[15] Shi Bingzhan.The product quality heterogeneity of China firms export: Measurement and facts. China Economic Quarterly, 2013, 13(1): 263-284.
[施炳展. 中国企业出口产品质量异质性:测度与事实. 经济学(季刊), 2013, 13(1): 263-284.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_jjx201304011.aspx
[16] Schott P K.Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004, 119(2): 646-677.http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/119/2/647.short
[17] Hummels D, Klenow P J.The variety and quality of a nation's exports. American Economic Review, 2005, 95(3): 704-723.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132736
[18] Hallak J.C. Product quality and the direction of trade. Journal of International Economics, 2006, 68(1): 238-265.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199605000516
[19] Bastos P, Silva J.Identifying vertically differentiated products. Economics Letters, 2010, 106(1): 32-34.
[20] Yang Rudai, Zhu Shi'e. Firm, geography and product price: What is so special of Chinese exports? China Economic Quarterly, 2013, 12(4): 1347-1368.
[杨汝岱, 朱诗娥. 企业、地理与出口产品价格: 中国的典型事实. 经济学(季刊), 2013, 12(4): 1347-1368.]http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_jjx201303011.aspx
[21] Hallak J C, Schott P K.Estimating cross-country differences in product quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2011, 126(1): 417-474.http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/126/1/417.full
DOI: 10.2307/23015671     
[22] Henn C, Papageorgiou C, Spatafora N.Export quality in developing countries. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2013, 13(108).http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2276343
[23] Feenstra R C, Romalis J.International prices and endogenous quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013, 129(2): 477-527.
[24] Khandelwal A K, Schott P K, Wei S J.Trade liberalization and embedded institutional reform: Evidence from Chinese exporters. Cepr Discussion Papers, 2013, 103(6): 2169-2195.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42920647
[25] Stokey N L.Human capital, product quality, and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, 106(2): 587-616http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937948
DOI: 10.2307/2937948     
[26] Coe D T, Helpman E.International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 1995, 39(5): 859-887.
[27] Lugovskyy, Volodymyr, Skiba, et al. Transport cost and endogenous quality choice. Cage Online Working Paper, 2010.
[28] Flach L.Quality Upgrading and Price Heterogeneity: Evidence from Brazilian Exporters. Arbeitspapier, 2011.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199616300836
[29] Fan H, Li Y A, Yeaple S.Imported intermediate inputs, export prices, and trade liberalization. Cancer Genetics & Cytogenetics, 2012, 127(1): 34-37.http://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/58369
[30] Verhoogen E A.Trade, quality upgrading and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2008, 123(2): 489-530.http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/123/2/489.short
[31] Hallak J C, Sivadasan J.Productivity, quality and exporting behavior under minimum quality constraints. Mpra Paper, 2008.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/46446807_Productivity_quality_and_exporting_behavior_under_minimum_quality_constraints
[32] Kugler M, Verhoogen E A.The Quality-Complementarity Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence from Colombia. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2008.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1345645
[33] Murdoch J, Marsden T, Banks J, et al.Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography, 2000, 76(2): 107-125.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2000.tb00136.x/full
DOI: 10.2307/144549     
[34] Mansfield B.Spatializing globalization: A 'Geography of Quality' in the seafood industry. Economic Geography, 2003, 79.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00199.x/full
[35] Wu Qiang, Cui Xinxin, Ma Yeqing.Institutional explanation of China's export growth in perspective of fiscal decentralization and local government competition: A theoretical and empirical research. Journal of International Trade, 2015(10): 142-151.
[巫强, 崔欣欣, 马野青. 财政分权和地方政府竞争视角下我国出口增长的制度解释:理论与实证研究. 国际贸易问题, 2015(10): 142-151.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GJMW201510014.htm
[36] Zhang Jie, Zhai Fuxin, Zhou Xiaoyan.Government grands, market competition and the quality of export products. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2015(4): 71-87.
[张杰, 翟福昕, 周晓艳. 政府补贴、市场竞争与出口产品质量. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015(4): 71-87.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SLJY201504005.htm
[37] Coe N M, Dicken P, Hess M.Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 2008, 8(3): 271-295.http://joeg.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/3/271.short
DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbn002     
[38] Henderson J, Dicken P, Hess M, et al.Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 2002, 9(3): 436-464.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09692290210150842
[39] Yeung W C.The firm as social networks: An organisational perspective. Growth & Change, 2005, 36(3): 307-328.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2005.00279.x/full
[40] Dicken P, Thrift N.The organization of production and the production of organization: Why business enterprises matter in the study of geographical industrialization. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1992, 17(3): 95-98.http://www.jstor.org/stable/622880
DOI: 10.2307/622880     
[41] Yeung W C, Coe N M.Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 2015, 91(1): 29-58.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecge.12063/full
DOI: 10.1111/ecge.12063     
[42] Scott A J.Regional push: Towards a geography of development and growth in low- and middle-income countries. Third World Quarterly, 2002, 23(1): 137-161.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1295926X03000066
[43] Peter D, Anders M.Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography, 2001, 77(4): 345-363.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2001.tb00169.x/full
[44] Gereffi G, Kaplinsky R.Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development. IDS Bulletin, 2001, 32(3): 1-8.
[45] Qiu Bin, Ye Longfeng, Sun Shaoqin.An empirical study on the impact of GPNs on China's manufacturing industries' upgrading in global value chains: An analysis from the perspective of ESI. China Industrial Economics, 2012(1): 57-67.
[邱斌, 叶龙凤, 孙少勤. 参与全球生产网络对我国制造业价值链提升影响的实证研究: 基于出口复杂度的分析. 中国工业经济, 2012(1): 57-67.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GGYY201201008.htm
[46] Gereffi G.International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 1999, 48(1): 37-70.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199698000750
[47] Grossman G M, Helpman E.Integration versus outsourcing in industry equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117(1): 85-120.http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/117/1/85.short
[48] Jabbour L.Determinants of international vertical specialization and implications on technology spillovers. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015, 54(2): 188-196.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440802_Determinants_of_International_Vertical_Specialization_and_Implications_on_Technology_Spillovers
[49] Pack H, Saggi K.Vertical technology transfer via international outsourcing. Journal of Development Economics, 2001, 65(2): 389-415.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387801001420
[50] Coe D T, Helpman E, Hoffmaister A W.North-south R&D spillovers. Cepr Discussion Papers, 1997, 107(107): 134-149.
[51] Yang C.Strategic coupling of regional development in global production networks: Redistribution of Taiwanese personal computer investment from the Pearl River Delta to the Yangtze River Delta, China. Regional Studies, 2009, 43(3): 385-407.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00343400802508836
[52] Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K M.The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 2001, 54(1): 75-96.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.163193     
[53] Wu Chenxiang.Calculation of international intra-product specialization share of China's industry and cause strategies [D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2011.
[吴陈香. 中国工业参与国际产品内分工程度的测算与动因分析[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2011.]
[54] Cheng Dazhong.China's integration into the global value chains: A transnational input-output analysis. Economic Research Journal, 2015(9): 4-16.
[程大中. 中国参与全球价值链分工的程度及演变趋势: 基于跨国投入—产出分析. 经济研究, 2015(9): 4-16.]年度引用
[55] Yao Zhiyi.Global production networks and industrial structure upgrading: An empirical analysis from China [D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2011.
[姚志毅. 全球生产网络与产业结构升级: 中国的检验[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2011.]
[56] Gervais A.Product quality and firm heterogeneity in international trade. Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2015, 48(3): 1152-1174.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caje.12171/full
DOI: 10.1111/caje.12171     
[57] David J M. Competition, Innovation,the Sources of Product Quality and Productivity Growth, 2011. V Intertic Conference. 2011. .http://www.intertic.org/Conference/David.pdf
[58] Khandelwal A K, Schott P K, Wei S J.Trade liberalization and embedded institutional reform: Evidence from Chinese exporters. Cepr Discussion Papers, 2012, 103(6): 2169-2195.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42920647
[59] Abulaiti Yiming.Measurement of the bilateral trade cost. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2013(4): 160-166.
[阿布来提·依明. 中国出口贸易成本测度方法研究. 经济问题探索, 2013(4): 160-166.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jjwtts201304028
[60] Novy D.Is the iceberg melting less quickly? International trade costs after World War II. Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2006.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=944421
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.944421     
[61] Qian Xuefeng, Liang Qi.Measuring the bilateral trade costs between China and G-7: A revised gravity model. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2008, 26(2): 53-62.
[钱学锋, 梁琦. 测度中国与G-7的双边贸易成本: 一个改进引力模型方法的应用. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008, 26(2): 53-62.]年度引用
[62] Xu Tongsheng, Chen Jin, Xue Zhiyun.Measuring the trade cost of Chinese manufacturing industries. China Industrial Economics, 2011(7): 15-25.
[许统生, 陈瑾, 薛智韵. 中国制造业贸易成本的测度. 中国工业经济, 2011(7): 15-25.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GGYY201107003.htm
[63] Chen Xiaohua, Huang Xianhai, Liu Hui.Mechanism and empirical study on the evolution of China's export technology structure. Management World, 2011(3): 44-57.
[陈晓华, 黄先海, 刘慧. 中国出口技术结构演进的机理与实证研究. 管理世界, 2011(3): 44-57.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_glsj201103005.aspx
[64] Chen Wanling, Yang Yongcong.Global changes of import demand structure and the industrial restructuring of China.International Economics and Trade Research, 2014(9): 13-23.
[陈万灵, 杨永聪. 全球进口需求结构变化与中国产业结构的调整. 国际经贸探索, 2014(9): 13-23.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GJTS201409002.htm
[65] Guo Bingnan.The research on the economic effects of China's participation in international vertical specialization [D]. East China Normal University, 2011.
[郭炳南. 中国参与国际垂直专业化分工的经济效应研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2011.]
[66] Wang Shuning.The measurement and determination of China's manufacturing exports quality ladder [D]. Changsha: Hunan Universty, 2014.
[王抒宁. 中国制造业出口产品质量阶梯及决定因素分析[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2014.]
[67] Zhu Shujin, Zhang Penghui.The domestic technical content of China's manufacturing exports and its determinants. Statistical Research, 2013(6): 58-66.
[祝树金, 张鹏辉. 中国制造业出口国内技术含量及其影响因素. 统计研究, 2013(6): 58-66.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tongjyj201306008
[68] Liu Weilin, Li Lanbing, Liu Yuhai.The impact of global value chain embeddness on technological sophistication of China's export. China Industrial Economics, 2014(6): 83-95.
[刘维林, 李兰冰, 刘玉海. 全球价值链嵌入对中国出口技术复杂度的影响. 中国工业经济, 2014(6): 83-95.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GGYY201406008.htm
[1] 叶士琳,曹有挥,王佳韡,吴威. 基于企业视角的中国集装箱运输组织网络[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1520-1530.
[2] 王姣娥,景悦. 中国城市网络等级结构特征及组织模式——基于铁路和航空流的比较[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1508-1519.
[3] 王茂军,徐永平. 中国在美洲OFDI的基本特征与决定因素[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1373-1391.
[4] 王向楠. 财产保险公司的地理扩张与利润[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1347-1360.
[5] 黄麟,郑瑜晗,肖桐. 中国县域尺度生态保护的地域分异及其适宜性[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1305-1315.
[6] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞. 中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1290-1304.
[7] 赵映慧,郭晶鹏,毛克彪,项亚楠,李怡函,韩家琪,吴馁. 1949-2015年中国典型自然灾害及粮食灾损特征[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1261-1276.
[8] 张文霞,刘普幸,冯青荣,汪天广,王天强. 1960-2015年中国绿洲胡杨生长季对全球变暖的时空响应及原因[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1151-1162.
[9] 赵梓渝,魏冶,庞瑞秋,王士君,冯章献. 基于人口省际流动的中国城市网络转变中心性与控制力研究——兼论递归理论用于城市网络研究的条件性[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 1032-1048.
[10] 王录仓,武荣伟,李巍. 中国城市群人口老龄化时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 1001-1016.
[11] 李佳洺,杨宇,樊杰,金凤君,张文忠,刘盛和,傅伯杰. 中印城镇化区域差异及城镇体系空间演化比较[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 986-1000.
[12] 朱晓华,何书金,袁丽华. 中国地理与资源期刊集群化服务平台的发展与实践[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(5): 918-941.
[13] 王瑛,林齐根,史培军. 中国地质灾害伤亡事件的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(5): 906-917.
[14] 程维明,周成虎,申元村,刘樯漪. 中国近40年来地貌学研究的回顾与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(5): 755-775.
[15] 赵雪雁,王伟军,万文玉. 中国居民健康水平的区域差异:2003-2013[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 685-698.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2013 《地理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发