吉林省松花江流域产业系统环境适应性时空分异与影响因素

doi:10.11821/dlxb201603009

地理学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (3): 458-470.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201603009

吉林省松花江流域产业系统环境适应性时空分异与影响因素

郭付友^1,²(), 佟连军²(), 魏强³, 张慧敏², 仇方道⁴, 佟伟铭^2,⁵

1. 东北师范大学地理科学学院,长春 130024
2. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,长春 130102
3. 河北大学经济学院,保定 071002
4. 江苏师范大学城市与环境学院,徐州 221116
5. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049

收稿日期:2015-05-14 修回日期:2015-08-20 出版日期:2016-03-25 发布日期:2016-03-25
作者简介:
作者简介:郭付友(1987-), 山东菏泽人, 博士, 主要从事经济地理与区域生态经济研究.E-mail: guofy945@nenu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41071086, 41471110, 41371146)

Spatio-temporal difference and influencing factors ofenvironmental adaptability assessment of industrialsystem in the Songhua River Basin of Jilin Province

Fuyou GUO^1,²(), Lianjun TONG²(), Qiang WEI³, Huimin ZHANG², Fangdao QIU⁴, Weiming TONG^2,⁵

1. College of Geographical Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
2. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS, Changchun 130012, China
3. College of Economics, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China
4. School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2015-05-14 Revised:2015-08-20 Published:2016-03-25 Online:2016-03-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41071086, No.41471110, No.41371146

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于敏感性,稳定性和响应等适应性要素构建了产业系统环境适应性评价指标体系以及评价模型,并对吉林省松花江流域产业系统环境适应性演变特征以及影响因素进行分析.结果发现:① 产业系统的发展深受内外因素双重扰动作用,重型化的产业发展现实导致了产业系统运行状况不佳,而工业化的大力发展对环境的干扰不断增强;② 不同的适应性要素以及适应性子系统均表现出迥然各异的区域性演变特征,产业系统与环境系统以及产业系统适应力与环境系统适应力均具有非线性变化关系特征.环境系统适应力的提升对于产业系统环境适应性的优化改善均具有更为重要作用;③ 产业系统环境适应性总体表现出由流域自上而下依次降低到中心--外围特征逐渐形成的过程,说明了流域产业系统环境适应性并非一定完全呈现流域的特征,流域内中心性城市功能的发挥也可以影响并且改变其演化发展趋势;④ 产业结构,科学技术,经济发展水平以及政府调控能力是流域产业系统环境适应性的影响因素.

关键词: 适应性, 产业, 环境系统, 松花江, 吉林省

Abstract:

On the basis of defining the connotation of the environmental adaptability of industrial system, this paper builds the environmental adaptability evaluation index system of industrial system and establishes an evaluation model in the perspective of the adaptive elements such as sensitivity, stability, and system response. And it analyzes the environmental adaptive evolution characteristics and the influencing factors of industrial system of the Songhua River Basin in Jilin Province. The results indicate that: (1) The development of industrial system has been under the double disturbance effect of internal and external factors. The internal impact is that the heavy industrial development leads to the poor industrial system operation condition. (2) The different adaptability elements and adaptability subsystem showed completely different regional evolution characteristics. The environmental and industrial system had the characteristics of nonlinear relationship, and so did the environmental system adaptability and the industrial system adaptability. (3) The environmental adaptability of industrial system turned from a feature of decreasing from upstream to downstream to a feature of the center-periphery with Changchun as the center. Obviously, the environmental adaptability of basin's industrial system represented a watershed characteristic to some extent. Meanwhile, the basin's central city functions could also influence and change the development trend of the adaptability. (4) The factors influencing the environmental adaptability of industrial system of the Songhua River Basin in Jilin Province include industrial structure, science and technology, economic development level and government regulation.

Key words: adaptability, industry, environmental system, Songhua River, Jilin Province

郭付友, 佟连军, 魏强, 张慧敏, 仇方道, 佟伟铭. 吉林省松花江流域产业系统环境适应性时空分异与影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 458-470.

Fuyou GUO, Lianjun TONG, Qiang WEI, Huimin ZHANG, Fangdao QIU, Weiming TONG. Spatio-temporal difference and influencing factors ofenvironmental adaptability assessment of industrialsystem in the Songhua River Basin of Jilin Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(3): 458-470.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 43

[1]	Brooks N.Vulnerability, risk, and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Working Paper 38, Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, Norwich University of East Anglia, 2003.
[2]	Scheraga J, Grambsch A E.Risks, opportunities, and adaptation to climate change. Climate Research, 1998, 11(1): 85-95. doi: 10.3354/cr011085
[3]	Schipper E L F. Conceptual history of adaptation to climate change under the UNFCCC. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 2006, 15(1): 82-92.
[4]	O'Brien M J, Holland T D. The role of adaptation in archaeological explanation. American Antiquity, 1992, 57(1): 36-69. doi: 10.2307/2694834
[5]	Brook S N, Adger W N, Kelly P M.The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15: 151-163. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006
[6]	Smit B, Wandel J.Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16: 282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
[7]	Gallopín G C.Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3):2 93-303. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
[8]	Kelly P M, Adger W N.Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation.Climate Change, 2000, 47: 325-352. doi: 10.1023/A:1005627828199
[9]	Smit B, Burton I, Klein R J T, et al. The science of adaptation: A framework for assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1999, 4(3/4): 199-213.
[10]	Nelson D R, Adger W N, Brown K.Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006, 32(1): 395-419. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
[11]	Smith J B, Ragland S E, Pitts G J.A process for evaluating anticipatory adaptation measures for climate change. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 1998, 92: 229-238. doi: 10.1007/BF00175568
[12]	Korhonen J, Seager T P.Editorial: Beyond eco-efficiency. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2008(17): 411-419.
[13]	Lioubimtseva E, Henebry G M.Climate and environmental change in arid Central Asia: Impacts, vulnerability, and adaptations. Journal of Arid Environments, 2009, 73(11): 963-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.04.022
[14]	Mark Dodgson.Asia's national innovation systems: Institutional adaptability and rigidity in the face of global innovation challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2009, 26(3): 589-609. doi: 10.1007/s10490-008-9105-4
[15]	Bormann B T, Haynes R W, Marttn J R.Adaptive management of forest ecosystems. Bioscience, 2007, 57(2): 186-171.
[16]	Fang Xiuqi, Yin Peihong.Review on the three key concepts of resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in the research of global environmental change. Progress in Geography, 2007, 26(5): 11-22. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.05.002
	[方修琦, 殷培红. 弹性,脆弱性和适应: IHDP三个核心概念综述. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5): 11-22.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.05.002
[17]	Qiu Fangdao, Tong Lianjun, Jiang Meng.Adaptability assessment of industrial ecological system of mining cities in Northeast China. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(3): 243-255. doi: 10.11821/yj2011020005
	[仇方道, 佟连军, 姜萌. 东北地区矿业城市产业生态系统适应性评价. 地理研究, 2011, 30(3): 243-255.] doi: 10.11821/yj2011020005
[18]	Lv Hongjiang, Liu Hong, Cheng Ming.The drivers of organizational adaptability and their function mechanism. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2007(12): 167-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0241.2007.12.034
	[吕鸿江, 刘洪, 程明. 组织适应性形成的驱动因素及其作用机制研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(12): 167-172.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0241.2007.12.034
[19]	Gao Yingchun, Tong Lianjun.Adaptability analysis of industrial system in Jilin province. Human Geography, 2011, 26(3): 111-115.
	[高迎春, 佟连军. 吉林省产业系统适应性分析. 人文地理, 2011, 26(3): 111-115.]
[20]	Wu Shaohong, Yin Yunhe, Zhao Huixia, et al.Recognition of ecosystem response to climate change impact. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2005, 1(3): 115-118.
	[吴绍洪, 尹云鹤, 赵慧霞, 等. 生态系统对气候变化适应的辨识. 气候变化研究进展, 2005, 1(3): 115-118.]
[21]	Lin Erda, Xu Yinlong, Jiang Jinhe, et al.National assessment report of climate change (II): Climate change impacts and adaptation. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2006, 2(2): 51-56.
	[林而达, 许吟隆, 蒋金荷, 等. 气候变化国家评估报告(II): 气候变化的影响与适应. 气候变化研究进展, 2006, 2(2): 51-56.]
[22]	Ye Yu, Fang Xiuqi, Ge Quansheng, et al.Response and adaptation to climate change indicate by the relationship between revolt and drought-flood in Shandong province during middle and late Qing Dynasty. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 680-686. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2004.06.007
	[叶瑜, 方修琦, 葛全胜, 等. 从动乱与水旱灾害的关系看清代山东气候变化的区域社会响应与适应. 地理科学, 2004, 24(6): 680-686.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2004.06.007
[23]	Fang Xiuqi, Wang Yuan, Zhu Xiaoxi.Change of cool summer hazard under an adaptation behavior to the climate warming in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(5): 664-672.
	[方修琦, 王媛, 朱晓禧. 气候变暖的适应行为与黑龙江省夏季低温冷害的变化. 地理研究, 2005, 24(5): 664-672.]
[24]	Luo Pei, Yan Xiaopei.Research on adaptive urban morphology under the rapid growth. Urban Problems, 2006(4): 27-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2006.04.006
	[罗佩, 阎小培. 高速增长下的适应性城市形态研究. 城市问题, 2006(4): 27-31.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2006.04.006
[25]	Zhang Wenhe.The development of watershed and the strategic position of China's seven river basins. Geography and Territorial Research, 1991, 7(1): 14-19.
	[张文合. 流域开发综论: 兼议我国七大江河流域的战略地位. 地理学与国土研究, 1991, 7(1): 14-19.]
[26]	Li He, Zhang Pingyu.Economic system vulnerability of mining cities in Northeast China. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(1): 116-120.
	[李鹤, 张平宇. 东北地区矿业城市经济系统脆弱性分析. 煤炭学报, 2008, 33(1): 116-120.]
[27]	Li He, Zhang Pingyu, Cheng Yeqing.Concepts and assessment methods of vulnerability. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(2): 18-25. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.02.003
	[李鹤, 张平宇, 程叶青. 脆弱性的概念及其评价方法. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(2): 18-25.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.02.003
[28]	Cui Shenghui, Li Xuanqi.Review on adaptation in the perspective of global change. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(9): 1088-1098. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.09.003
	[崔胜辉, 李旋旗. 全球变化背景下的适应性研究综述. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(9): 1088-1098.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.09.003
[29]	Yang Lihua, Tong Lianjun.Study of structural features of industrial pollutants in the Songhua River Basin in Jilin Province. Journal of Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 29(3): 346-351.
	[杨丽花, 佟连军. 吉林省松花江流域工业污染物的结构特征. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 2012,29(3): 346-351.]
[30]	Jilin Statistical Bureau. Jilin Statistical Yearbook.Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2001-2014.
	[吉林省统计局. 吉林省统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2001-2014.]
[31]	Department of Environmental Protection of Jilin Province. Jilin Environmental Quality Report. Changchun: Department of Environmental Protection of Jilin Province, 2001-2013.
	[吉林省环境保护局. 吉林环境质量报告书. 长春: 吉林省环保部, 2001-2013.]
[32]	Li He, Zhang Pingyu.Vulnerability of urban employment of mining cities in Northeast China. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(3): 751-760.
	[李鹤, 张平宇. 东北地区矿业城市社会就业脆弱性分析. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 751-760.]
[33]	Yang Lihua, Tong Lianjun.Dynamic Coupling and spatial disparity of economic development and water environmental quality in Songhua River Basin of Jilin Province, Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(2):503-510.
	[杨丽花, 佟连军. 吉林省松花江流域经济发展与水环境质量的动态耦合及空间格局. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(2): 503-510.]
[34]	Sun Pingjun, Xiu Chunliang.Study on the vulnerability of economic development in mining cities based on the PSE Model. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(2): 301-310.
	[孙平军, 修春亮. 基于PSE模型的矿业城市经济发展脆弱性研究. 地理研究, 2011, 30(2): 301-310.]
[35]	Su Fei, Zhang Pingyu.Vulnerability assessment of petroleum city's economic system based on set pair analysis: A case study of Daqing city. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(4): 454-464.
	[苏飞, 张平宇. 基于集对分析的大庆市经济系统脆弱性评价. 地理学报, 2010, 65(4): 454-464.]
[36]	Ou Xiangjun, Zhen Feng, Qin Yongdong, et al.Study on compression level and ideal impetus of regional urbanization: The case of Jiangsu Province. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(5): 993-1002. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2008.05.003
	[欧向军, 甄峰, 秦永东, 等. 区域城市化水平综合测度及其理想动力分析: 以江苏省为例. 地理研究, 2008,27(5): 993-1002.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2008.05.003
[37]	Chen Mingxing, Lu Dadao, Zhang Hua.Comprehensive evaluation and the driving factors of China's urbanization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 387-398. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.04.001
	[陈明星, 陆大道, 张华. 中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 387-398.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.04.001
[38]	Dai Quanhou, Liu Guobin, Liu Mingyi.An evaluation on sustainable development of eco-economic system in small watershed in hilly area of Northeast China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2): 209-218.
	[戴全厚, 刘国彬, 刘明义. 小流域生态经济系统可持续发展评价: 以东北低山丘陵区黑牛河小流域为例. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2): 209-218.]
[39]	Damodar N Gujarati. Basic Econometrics.4th ed. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2005: 25-41.
	[古扎拉蒂. 计量经济学. 4版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005: 25-41.]
[40]	Zhang Xiaotong.Guide to Eviews and Case Study. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2007: 118-122.
	[张晓峒. Eviews使用指南与案例. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2007: 118-122.]
[41]	Gao Tiemei.Econometrics Method and Model: Eviews Application and Case. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006: 260-278.
	[高铁梅. 计量经济分析方法与建模: Eviews应用及实例. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006: 260-278.]
[42]	Chen Zuocheng, Gong Xinshu.Evaluation of ecological efficiency of industrial system and its influencing factors analysis in China's western region. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2013(10): 49-55 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6711.2013.10.009
	. [陈作成, 龚新蜀. 西部地区产业系统生态效率测评与影响因素分析. 中国科技论坛, 2013(10): 49-55.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6711.2013.10.009
[43]	Tong Lianjun, Song Yanan, Han Ruiling, et al.Industrial environmental efficiency of costal economic belt in Liaoning province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(3): 294-300.
	[佟连军, 宋亚楠, 韩瑞玲, 等. 辽宁沿海经济带工业环境效率分析. 地理科学, 2012, 32(3): 294-300.]

系统层	准则层	指标层	权重	系统层	准则层	指标层	权重
产业系统适应性	敏感性	产业系统运行状况指数	0.0049	环境系统适应性	敏感性	人均工业废水排放量	0.0459
		二产产值比重/二产就业比重	0.0054			人均工业SO₂排放量	0.0188
		三次产业产值比重变化率绝对值之和	0.0253			人均工业废气排放量	0.0347
		体制结构状态指数	0.0124			人均水资源量变化率	0.1509
		实际利用外资额/GDP	0.0350			人均耕地面积变化率	0.0669
	稳定性	产业系统结构熵	0.0127		稳定性	人均公共绿地面积	0.0218
		产业系统结构转换率	0.0356			建成区绿化覆盖率		0.0133
		产业结构高级化系数	0.0296	人均耕地面积			0.0304
		三产产业化系数	0.0114	人均水资源量			0.0311
		市场组织结构指数	0.0297	环境质量指数			0.0234
	响应	民营经济发展指数	0.0126	响应	废气治理设施数	0.0413
		产业综合发展指数	0.1010		万元GDP能耗		0.0026
		科学技术和教育财政支出比例	0.0304		万元GDP电耗		0.0053
		每万人在校大学生数	0.0540		万元GDP水耗		0.0055
		人均固定资产投资	0.0380		三废综合利用产品产值		0.0703

吉林省松花江流域产业系统环境适应性时空分异与影响因素

Spatio-temporal difference and influencing factors ofenvironmental adaptability assessment of industrialsystem in the Songhua River Basin of Jilin Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宓泽锋, 曾刚. 本地知识基础对新兴产业知识流动的影响——以中国燃料电池产业为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 1006-1018.
[2]	张可云, 朱春筱. 中国工业结对集聚和空间关联性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 1019-1033.
[3]	吴锋, 刘桂君, 郭纳良, 李志慧, 邓祥征. COVID-19疫情对中国区域经济及产业的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 1034-1048.
[4]	关皓明, 杨青山, 浩飞龙, 冯章献. 基于“产业—企业—空间”的沈阳市经济韧性特征[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 415-427.
[5]	李文龙, 匡文慧, 吕君, 赵中华. 北方农牧交错区人地系统演化特征与影响机理——以内蒙古达茂旗为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 487-502.
[6]	王成金, 谢永顺, 陈沛然, 李绪茂. 铁路技术跨越式转移的制度—经济—文化适应性——基于亚吉铁路的实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1170-1184.
[7]	赵建吉, 王艳华, 王珏, 苗长虹. 省直管县改革背景下地级市空间溢出效应对县域产业结构的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 286-301.
[8]	贺灿飞, 朱晟君. 中国产业发展与布局的关联法则[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2684-2698.
[9]	牛方曲, 封志明, 刘慧. 资源环境承载力综合评价方法在西藏产业结构调整中的应用[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1563-1575.
[10]	王龙杰,曾国军,毕斗斗. 信息化对旅游产业发展的空间溢出效应[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 366-378.
[11]	宋爽, 王帅, 傅伯杰, 陈海滨, 刘焱序, 赵文武. 社会—生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2401-2410.
[12]	贺灿飞, 胡绪千. 1978年改革开放以来中国工业地理格局演变[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 1962-1979.
[13]	蒋晓辉,夏军,黄强,龙爱华,董国涛,宋进喜. 黑河“97”分水方案适应性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 103-116.
[14]	李博, 史钊源, 韩增林, 田闯. 环渤海地区人海经济系统环境适应性时空差异及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(6): 1121-1132.
[15]	田光辉,苗长虹,胡志强,苗健铭. 环境规制、地方保护与中国污染密集型产业布局[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1954-1969.