岭南传统民俗节庆重构对居民地方依恋的影响——以广州珠村乞巧节为例

doi:10.11821/dlxb201404011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 民俗节庆对居民地方依恋的影响研究为认识居民和地方之间的关系，提供了一个新的视角。国内关于地方依恋的探讨尚处于萌芽阶段，应用研究主要以旅游地和旅游者为对象。乞巧节是岭南传统民俗节庆的重要组成部分，在沉寂淡化半个世纪之后又重新兴起，节日的内容形式功能已被重构。本文从新文化地理学的视角，以珠村居民为研究对象，通过问卷调查、深度访谈并结合因子分析的方法来探究民俗节庆的重构与居民地方依恋之间的关系。结果表明：① 乞巧节对珠村世居居民、新移居居民、租房于珠村的居民这三种不同身份居民心理形成过程中的情感、认知和意向都产生了重要作用，乞巧节使居民们更好地融合到了珠村社区。② 重构后的乞巧节在改善原住居民精神生活、优化珠村村落风貌、提升珠村族群的凝聚力、增强文化自豪感、保护乞巧文化及推动珠村的发展等方面产生了重要的影响和作用。③ 重构后的传统民俗节庆生产了新的文化记忆，其如何被居民内化吸收、如何被整合进原生态的乞巧文化中，都有待探索。本研究对丰富地方依恋在微观空间层面的理论和实证研究有着重要意义。

关键词: 乞巧节, 广州, 民俗节庆, 珠村, 地方依恋

Abstract: Folk festival provides residents' place attachment research with a new perspective for a better understanding of the relationship between the residents and place. Domestic research about place attachment is still at the embryonic stage, and most application research objects are tourists and tourism destinations. Qiqiao Festival is a very important part of Lingnan traditional folk custom. It has revived after a half century's decline. As a result, the function, form and content of the festival have been reconstructed. From the perspective of new cultural geography, this paper takes residents in Zhucun as the research object and adopts methods including questionnaire survey, in-depth interview and factor analysis to explore the relationship between folk festival's reconstruction and residents' place attachment. The main conclusion can be obtained as follows: (1) Qiqiao Festival is vital for emotion, cognition and intention of the psychological formation process of original inhabitants, new settlers and foreign tenants. And it makes residents integrated into Zhucun community better. (2) Reconstructed Qiqiao Festival exerts an important impact on improving original inhabitants' spiritual life, optimizing the village style, enhancing ethnic group cohesion, strengthening cultural pride, protecting the Qiqiao culture and promoting the development of Zhucun. (3) Reconstructed traditional folk festival produces new cultural memory. The way that it could be integrated into the original Qiqiao culture and absorbed by the residents has yet to be explored. This research has significance for enriching theoretical and empirical study on place attachment at the microcosmic space level.

Key words: Zhucun, place attachment, folk festival, Qiqiao Festival

陶伟, 陈慧灵, 蔡水清. 岭南传统民俗节庆重构对居民地方依恋的影响——以广州珠村乞巧节为例[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 553-565.

TAO Wei, CHEN Huiling, CAI Shuiqing. Influence of Lingnan traditional folk festival reconstruction on residents’ place attachment：A case study on Qiqiao Festival in Guangzhou Zhucun[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(4): 553-565.

参考文献

[1] Tang Xiaofeng, Zhou Shangyi, Li Leilei. The concept of super-organism in the study of cultural geography. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(2): 431-438. [唐晓峰, 周尚意, 李蕾蕾. “超级机制”与文化地理学研究. 地理研究, 2008, 27(2): 431-438.]
[2] Zhou Shangyi. Anglo-American cultural studies and the new cultural geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(7): 162-166. [周尚意. 英美文化研究与新文化地理学. 地理学报, 2004, 59(7): 162-166.]
[3] Silverman C. The politics of folklore in Bulgaria. Anthropological Quarterly, 1983, 56(2): 55-61.
[4] Liu Bo, Zhu Hong, Yuan Zhenjie. The significance of the traditional festival in the construction of place identity: A case study of the Winter Jasmine Flower Market in Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(12): 2197-2208. [刘博, 朱竑, 袁振杰. 传统节庆在地方认同建构中的意义: 以广州“迎春花市”为例. 地理研究, 2012, 31(12): 2197-2208.]
[5] Tang Xueqiong, Qian Junxi, Chen Lanxue. Cultural adaption and reconstruction of minority festival activities in tourism development: A case study of Hani Long-Street Banquet. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(5): 835-844. [唐雪琼, 钱俊图4 修正后的地方依恋模型 Fig. 4 The modified model of place attachment 希, 陈岚雪. 旅游影响下少数民族节日的文化适应与重构: 基于哈尼族长街宴演变的分析. 地理研究, 2011, 30(5): 835-844.]
[6] Tong De, Feng Changchun. Prospect and progress of the research of urban villages at home and abroad. Human Geography, 2009, 24(6): 29-35. [仝德, 冯长春. 国内外城中村研究进展与展望. 人文地理, 2009, 24(6): 29-35.]
[7] Tuan,Y. F. Space and Place. London:Edward Arnold,1977.
[8] Huang Xiang, Bao Jigang, Geoffrey Wall. Place attachment: A conceptual framework for understanding recreational behavior. Tourism Tribune, 2006, 21(9): 19-24. [黄向, 保继刚, Geoffrey Wall. 场所依赖(place attachment): 一种游憩行为现象的研究框架. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(9): 19-24.]
[9] Zhu Hong, Liu Bo. Constructs analysis and research implications: Sense of place, place attachment, and place identity. Journal of South China Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2011, (1): 1-8. [朱竑, 刘博. 地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示. 华南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, (1): 1-8.]
[10] Brook I. Making here like there: Place attachment, displacement and the urge to garden. Ethics, Place and Environment, 2003, 6(3): 227-234.
[11] Corcoran M P. Place attachment and community sentiment in marginalized neighborhoods: A European case study. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 2002, 11(1): 47-67.
[12] Smith J S. Rural place attachment in Hispanic urban centers. Geographical Review, 2002, 92(3): 432-451.
[13] Brown B, Perkins D D, Brown G. Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, (23): 259-271.
[14] Dai Guangquan, Liang Chunding. Exploring the dimensions of place attachment to event venue based on grounded theory: A case study of international horticultural exposition 2011 in Xi'an. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(7): 777-783. [戴光全, 梁春鼎. 基于扎根理论的节事场所依赖维度探索性研究: 以2011 西安世界园艺博览会为例. 地理科学, 2012, 32(7): 777-783.]
[15] Dai Guangquan, Xiao Lu. Spatial characteristics of event-goers' place identity based on regional relations & IPA model: A case study of International Horticultural Exposition 2011 in Xi'an. Human Geography, 2012, 27(4): 115-124.[戴光全, 肖璐. 基于区域联系和IPA的节事游客地方认同空间特征: 以2011 西安世界园艺博览会为例. 人文地理, 2012, 27(4): 115-124.]
[16] Li Juan. A study of place attachment to Dongda Mosque Community in Kaifeng City [D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2012. [李娟. 开封东大寺社区地方依恋研究[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2012.]
[17] Tang Wenyue. The characteristics of urban residents' place attachment to recreational block: A case study of Nanjing Confucius Temple Block. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(10): 1202-1207. [唐文跃. 城市居民游憩地方依恋特征分析: 以南京夫子庙为例. 地理科学, 2011, 31(10): 1202-1207.]
[18] Qian Shuwei, Su Qin, Zheng Huanyou. Relationship between place attachment of historic street and customer shopping satisfaction: A case study of Guanqian Street. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(3): 355-362. [钱树伟, 苏勤, 郑焕友. 历史街区顾客地方依恋与购物满意度的关系: 以苏州观前街为例. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(3): 355-362.]
[19] Xiang Wenhui, Wang Wei. A study of tourism development of the ancient village based on the place attachment theory: A case study of Fuyang Longmen. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology: Social Science, 2010, 9(3): 269-273. [项文惠, 王伟. 基于地方依恋理论的古村落旅游开发研究: 以富阳龙门为例. 浙江工业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010, 9(3): 269-273.]
[20] Bai Kai. A study on the relationship between place attachment and tourists' loyalty in rural tourism destinations. Human Geography, 2010, 25(4): 120-125. [白凯. 乡村旅游地场所依赖和游客忠诚度关联研究. 人文地理, 2010, 25 (4): 120-125.]
[21] Tang Wenyue, Zhang Jie, Luo Hao et al. Relationship between the place attachment of ancient village residents and their attitude towards resource protection. Tourism Tribune, 2008, 23(10): 87-92. [唐文跃, 张捷, 罗浩等. 古村落居民地方依恋与资源保护态度的关系. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(10): 87-92.]
[22] Li Jiuquan, Wang Li. Study on visitors attraction competitiveness based on place attachment theory. Human Geography, 2008, 23(4): 79-83. [李九全, 王立. 基于地方依附感原理的景区旅游竞争力探析. 人文地理, 2008, 23(4): 79-83.]
[23] Zeng Bingxi. The Research about sense of attachment of local residents placed on Meichuan Water Park in Taichung city [D]. Taichung: Leisure Management Research Laboratory in Chaoyang University of Technology, 2003. [曾秉希. 地方居民对台中市梅川亲水公园依附感之研究[D]. 台中: 朝阳科技大学休闲事业管理研究所, 2003.]
[24] Wei Lihua, Yan Xiaopei. The informal immigrant colony of economically developed areas in China: The formation and evolution of urban villages. Management World, 2005, (8): 48-57. [魏立华, 闫小培. 中国经济发达地区城市非正式移民聚居区: “城中村”的形成与演进. 管理世界, 2005, (8): 48-57.]
[25] Dai Tangping. Attention to the problem of urban villages. Society, 2002, (5): 44-46. [代堂平. 关注“城中村”问题. 社会, 2002, (5): 44-46.]
[26] Yan Xiaopei, Wei Lihua, Zhou Ruibo. Research on the coordination between urban and rural area in the rapid urbanization with the redevelopment of Guangzhou village-amid-the-city of Guangzhou as a case. Planning Study, 2004, 28(3): 30-38. [闫小培, 魏立华, 周锐波. 快速城市化地区城乡关系协调研究: 以广州市“城中村”改造为例. 规划研究, 2004, 28(3): 30-38.]
[27] Lan Yuyun. Causes of "Slum-like" dwelling places in China: The floating population community in the "Village in City". Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2007, 47(5): 147-153. [蓝宇蕴. 我国“类贫民窟”的形成逻辑: 关于城中村流动人口聚居区的研究. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2007, 47(5): 147-153.]
[28] Li Lixun. The economic and social characteristics of urban villages: A case study of typical villages of Guangzhou. Beijing Planning and Construction Review, 2005, (3): 34-37. [李立勋. 城中村的经济社会特征: 以广州市典型城中村为例. 北京规划建设, 2005, (3): 34-37.]
[29] Han Dang. Framework and case study on the reconstruction of city village. Planners, 2004, 20(5): 13-15. [韩荡. “城中村”改造的理论框架及案例研究. 规划师, 2004, 20(5): 13-15.]
[30] Yin Xiaoying, Yan Xiaopei, Xue Desheng. The informal sector in "Urban village" and "Urban village" transformation in rapid urbanization region: Case study of Caiwuwei and Yumincun, Shenzhen. Modern Urban Research, 2009, (3): 44-53. [尹晓颖, 闫小培, 薛德升. 快速城市化地区“城中村”非正规部门与“城中村”改造: 深圳市蔡屋围、渔民村的案例研究. 现代城市研究, 2009, (3): 44-53.]
[31] Zhou Ruibo, Yan Xiaopei. Collective economy: The reframing ligament at the end of villages. Economic Geography, 2009, 29(4): 628-634. [周锐波, 闫小培. 集体经济: 村落终结前的再组织纽带. 经济地理, 2009, 29(4): 628-634.]
[32] Liu Muping, Cheng Kegui, Lv Jun. Stay in the resettlement, effective way to solve dilemma of "village in city". China Land, 2005, (12): 32-33. [刘慕平, 程克贵, 吕军. 留地安置, 解开“城中村”难题的有效思路. 中国土地, 2005, (12): 32-33.]
[33] Wang Ruyuan, Meng Ling. Thinking on the compensation pattern of returning land usufruct to the land-lost peasants: Case of Shenzhen Special District. China Soft Science, 2005, (10): 14-20. [王如渊, 孟凌. 对我国失地农民“留地安置”模式几个问题的思考: 以深圳特区为例. 中国软科学, 2005, (10): 14-20.]
[34] Zhou Huiling, Xu Chunxiao. A logical thinking on the forming system of tourist's "place attachment". Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2009, 165(1): 22-26. [周慧玲, 许春晓. 旅游者“场所依恋”形成机制的逻辑思辩. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2009, 165(1): 22-26.]
[35] Scannell L, Gifford R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(1): 1-10.
[36] Ye Chunsheng. The function of contemporary Qiqiao Festival from the perspective of Cantonese Qiqiao folk custom. Cultural Journal, 2011, (1): 58-60. [叶春生. 从广府七夕风俗演变看当代乞巧的功能. 文化学刊, 2011, (1): 58-60.]
[37] Ye Chunsheng. Lingnan Folk Custom Notes. Guangzhou: Guangdong Tourism Press, 1988. [叶春生. 岭南风俗录. 广州: 广东旅游出版社, 1988.]
[38] Chu Dong'ai. The resurrection and the transformation of Qiqiao Festival: A case study of Qiqiao activity in Guangzhou Zhucun. Cultural Research, 2009, (3): 39-45. [储冬爱. 乞巧的复活与蜕变: 以广州珠村“七姐诞”活动为例. 文化研究, 2009, (3): 39-45.]
[39] Luo Huajuan. Qiqiao cultural resource's modern transformation research [D]. Beijing: Minzu University of China, 2009. [罗华娟. 乞巧文化资源的现代转换研究: 以广州珠村为例[D]. 北京: 中央民族大学, 2009.]
[40] Steele F. The Sense of Place. Boston: CBI Publishing Company Inc., 1981: 7.
[41] Altman I, Low S M. Place Attachment. Philadelphia: Plenum, 1992: 87.
[42] Bao Jigang, Yang Yun. On the local residents' changes of place attachment against the background of tourism commercialization: Case from Yangshuo West Street. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities, 2012, 34(4): 49-54. [保继刚, 杨昀. 旅游商业化背景下本地居民地方依恋的变迁研究: 基于阳朔西街的案例分析. 广西民族大学学报, 2012, 34(4): 49-54.]
[43] Chu Dong'ai. The transformation of the customs in "City Village" and the adaptation for the harmonious society. Guangxi National Research, 2009, 97(3): 90-95. [储冬爱. “城中村”民俗文化嬗变与和谐社会调适. 广西民族研究, 2009, 97(3): 90-95.]