长江河口悬浮泥沙的混合过程

doi:10.11821/xb201209011

地理学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (9): 1269-1281.doi: 10.11821/xb201209011

长江河口悬浮泥沙的混合过程

刘红^1,2, 何青¹, 王亚¹, 陈吉余¹

1. 华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室, 上海200062;
2. 中交上海航道勘察设计研究院有限公司, 上海200120

收稿日期:2012-03-31 修回日期:2012-05-23 出版日期:2012-09-20 发布日期:2012-09-20
通讯作者: 何青,教授,博导。E-mail:qinghe@sklec.ecnu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘红(1978-),男,湖北宜昌人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事河口海岸水动力和工程泥沙研究。E-mail:liuhg007@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41076051); 创新研究群体项目(41021064); 上海市科委重点项目(11dz1204900);河口海岸学国家重点实验室开放基金项目(SKLEC-KF201201)

Processes of Suspended Sediment Mixture in the Yangtze River Estuary

LIU Hong^1,2, HE Qing¹, WANG Ya¹, CHEN Jiyu¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
2. Shanghai Waterway Engineering Design and Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China

Received:2012-03-31 Revised:2012-05-23 Online:2012-09-20 Published:2012-09-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41076051; Creative Research Groups of China, No. 41021064; Key Project of the Shanghai Science & Technology Committee, No. 11dz1204900; Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, No. SKLEC-KF201201

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据准同步观测的悬浮泥沙及表层沉积物粒度、流速、含沙量资料, 分析了长江口及临近海域悬浮泥沙在河口的混合过程。长江河口—陆架系统悬浮泥沙中值粒径呈现“细—粗—细”的变化规律, 河口上段悬浮泥沙中值粒径为8.9 μm, 拦门沙海域为10.5 μm, 陆架区为4.5 μm, 北支为9.9 μm, 杭州湾口为5.6 μm, 泥沙类型为粘土质粉砂。河口上段和陆架区悬浮泥沙与表层沉积物的垂向混合作用较弱, 拦门沙区域二者发生强烈的混合和交换, 悬浮泥沙在由长江河口向陆架系统输移过程中仅有表层泥沙保留了流域输入的泥沙粒度特征。长江口悬浮泥沙中值粒径与含沙量呈良好的正相关关系, 水流的剪切作用是引起拦门沙海域泥沙再悬浮、近底高含沙量和悬浮泥沙粒径增加的主要原因, 悬浮泥沙粒径和含沙量的增加主要由粉砂组分的增加引起。2007 年长江河口区范围内悬浮泥沙中值粒径比2003 年普遍减小11％, 含沙量比2003 年减小22%, 河口上段含沙量对流域来沙减少的响应最为敏感, 而拦门沙区的泥沙粒径对流域来沙减少的响应最敏感。在长江流域来沙量减少的背景下, 河口拦门沙区域仍能维持较高的含沙量, 主要缘于河口系统内部的供沙

关键词: 长江口, 悬浮泥沙, 含沙量, 泥沙混合, 流速梯度

Abstract: Based on the sub-simultaneous data of grain size distributions (GSDs) of suspended and surface sediment, current velocity, suspended sediment concentration (SSC), the mixing processes between suspended and surface sediment were conducted in the Yangtze River Estuary and adjacent area. The characteristics of suspended sediment D50 (SSD) were showed a fine-coarse-fine pattern from the Yangtze River Estuary to continental shelf. The SSD were 8.9 μm, 10.5 μm and 4.5 μm in the upper Yangtze River Estuary, mouth bar area and continental shelf respectively, and were 9.9 μm and 5.6 μm in the North Branch and Hangzhou Bay respectively. Clayey silt was the dominant sediment type in the study area. The vertical mixing processes between suspended and surface sediments were weak in the upper estuary and the continental shelf, while it was strong in the mouth bar area. Only surface layer of suspended sediment retained the characteristics of GSDs from the Yangtze River basin. Good positive correlations were observed between the SSD and SSC, and the sediment resuspension by the shear flow was the main causes of SSC and SSD increase near the bottom. The SSD of the Yangtze Estuary in the year 2007 decreased by 11% compared with 2003, while the SSC decreased by 22% in the same period.

Key words: Yangtze River Estuary, suspended sediment, suspended sediment concentration, sediment mixing, velocity gradient

刘红, 何青, 王亚, 陈吉余. 长江河口悬浮泥沙的混合过程[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9): 1269-1281.

LIU Hong, HE Qing, WANG Ya, CHEN Jiyu. Processes of Suspended Sediment Mixture in the Yangtze River Estuary[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(9): 1269-1281.

参考文献

[1] Chen J Y, Zhu H F, Dong Y F et al. Development of the Changjiang Estuary and its submerged delta. Continental ShelfResearch, 1985, 4(1/2): 47-56.

[2] Zhang J. Heavy metal compositions of suspended sediments in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) Estuary: Significance ofriverine transport to the ocean. Continental Shelf Research, 1999, 19: 1521-1543.

[3] Yan Suzhuang, Cao Peikui. The grain size characteristics of the suspended matters in the offshore region of theChangjiang Estuary and the relation with the front information. Journal of East China Normal University: NaturalScience, 1995, (1): 81-89. [严肃庄, 曹沛奎. 长江口外海滨悬浮体的粒度特征及其与锋面的关系. 华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 1995, (1): 81-89.]

[4] Cao Peikui, Yan Suzhuang. Suspended sediments front and its impacts on the materials transport of the ChangjiangEstuary. Journal of East China Normal University: Natural Science, 1996, (1): 85-94. [曹沛奎, 严肃庄. 长江口悬浮泥沙锋及其对物质输移的影响. 华东师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 1996, (1): 85-94.]

[5] Shao Mihua, Li Yan, Wang Zhengfang et al. The spatial and temporal variation of suspended substance in theChangjiang Estuary area. Marine Environmental Science, 1996, 15(3): 36-40. [邵秘华, 李炎, 王正方等. 长江口海域悬浮物的分布时空变化特征. 海洋环境科学, 1996, 15(3): 36-40.]

[6] Li Daoji, Li Jun, Chen Jiyu. A study on suspended matter in the Changjiang River Estuary. Oceanologia et LimnologiaSinica, 2000, 31(3): 295-301. [李道季, 李军, 陈吉余. 长江口悬浮颗粒物研究. 海洋与湖沼, 2000, 31(3): 295-301.]

[7] Li Jun, Gao Shu, Zeng Zhigang et al. Particle-size characteristics and seasonal variability of suspended particulatematters in the Changjiang River Estuary. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2003, 34(5): 499-510. [李军, 高抒, 曾志刚等. 长江口悬浮体粒度特征及其季节性差异. 海洋与湖沼, 2003, 34(5): 499-510.]

[8] Zhang Huaijing, Zhai Shikui, Fan Dejiang et al. Form characteristics and substance constituents of suspended matters inthe Yangtze River Estuary area after the first-stage storage of the Three Gorges Project. Marine Geology & QuaternaryGeology, 2007, 27(2): 1-10. [张怀静, 翟世奎, 范德江等. 三峡工程一期蓄水后长江口悬浮体形态及物质组成. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2007, 27(2): 1-10.]

[9] Wang Aijun, Wang Yaping, Gao Shu et al. Relationship between suspended sediment grain size and concentration in theChangjiang Estuary area during dry season. Advances in Marine Science, 2005, 23(2): 159-167. [王爱军, 汪亚平, 高抒等. 长江口枯季悬浮泥沙粒度与浓度之间的关系. 海洋科学进展, 2005, 23(2): 159-167.]

[10] Li Jiufa, He Qing, Zhang Chen. The mouth bar area of the Changjiang River Estuary. Oceanologia et LimnologiaSinica, 2000, 31(1): 101-109. [李九发, 何青, 张琛. 长江河口拦门沙河床淤积和泥沙再悬浮过程. 海洋与湖沼, 2000,31(1): 101-109.]

[11] Li Zhanhai, Chen Shenliang, Zhang Guo'an. The study on grain-size distribution of suspended sediment andresuspension process on the Chongming east intertidal and subtidal zones in the Changjiang Estuary in China. ActaOceanologica Sinica, 2008, 30(6): 154-163. [李占海, 陈沈良, 张国安. 长江口崇明东滩水域悬浮泥沙粒径组成和再悬浮作用特征. 海洋学报, 2008, 30(6): 154-163.]

[12] Zhang Zhizhong. Studies on basic characteristics of fine sediment in Changjiang Estuary. Journal of SedimentResearch, 1996, (1): 67-73. [张志忠. 长江口细颗粒泥沙基本特性研究. 泥沙研究, 1996, (1): 67-73.]

[13] Cheng Jiang, He Qing, Wang Yuanye. Using LISST-100 for in-situ estimates of floc size, density and settling velocity,Changjiang Estuary, China. Journal of Sediment Research, 2005, (1): 33-39. [程江, 何青, 王元叶. 利用LISST 观测絮凝体粒径、有效密度和沉速的垂线分布. 泥沙研究, 2005, (1): 33-39.]

[14] Tang Jianhua, He Qing, Wang Yuanye et al. Study on in-situ flocs size in turbidity maximum of the ChangjiangEstuary. Journal of Sediment Research, 2008, (2): 27-33. [唐建华, 何青, 王元叶等. 长江口浑浊带絮凝体特性. 泥沙研究, 2008, (2): 27-33.]

[15] Shen Huanting, Zhu Huifang, Mao Zhichang. Circulation of the Changjiang River Estuary and its effect on thetransport of suspended sediment. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 1986, 17(1): 26-35. [沈焕庭, 朱慧芳, 茅志昌. 长江河口环流及其对悬浮泥沙输移的影响. 海洋与湖沼, 1986, 17(1): 26-35.]

[16] Uncles R J. Estuarine physical processes research: some recent studies and progress. Estuarine, Coastal and ShelfScience, 2002, 55: 829-856.

[17] Chant R J, Stoner A W. Particle trapping in a stratified flood-dominated estuary. Journal of Marine Research, 2001,59: 29-51.

[18] Geyer W R, Woodruff J D, Traykovski P. Sediment transport and trapping in the Hudson River Estuary. Estuaries,2001, 24: 670-679.

[19] Le Hir P, Fight A, Jacinto R S et al. Fine sediment transport and accumulations at the mouth of the Seine Estuary,France. Estuaries, 2001, 24: 950-963.

[20] Chen Jiyu, Shen Huanting, Yun Caixing. Introduction//Chen Jiyu, Shen Huanting, Yun Caixing. Processes of Dynamicsand Geomorphology of the Changjiang Estuary. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1988: 1-4. [陈吉余, 沈焕庭, 恽才兴. 绪论. 长江河口动力过程和地貌演变. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1988: 1-4.]

[21] Liu Hong, He Qing, Yu Zhiying et al. Comparative study of current instruments for estuary and coast. The OceanEngineering, 2007, 25(4): 60-65. [刘红, 何青, 虞志英等. 河口海岸测流仪器的比测研究. 海洋工程, 2007, 25(4):60-65.]

[22] Liu Hong, He Qing, Ji Xiaoqiang et al. Sediment and geomorphology differentiation of tidal flat profiles combinedwave and current actions. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2008, 26(5): 833-843. [刘红, 何青, 吉晓强等. 波流共同作用下潮滩剖面沉积物和地貌分异规律. 沉积学报, 2008, 26(5): 833-843.]

[23] Chen Shenliang, Gu Guochuan, Liu Yongsheng. Formation conditions and initial site of tidal bore in the north branchof Yangtze River Estuary. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, (11): 30-36. [陈沈良, 谷国传, 刘勇胜. 长江口北支涌潮的形成条件及其初生地探讨. 水利学报, 2003, (11): 30-36.]

[24] The Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. Chinese River Sediment Bulletin. Beijing: ChinaWaterPower Press, 2003: 2-18. [中华人民共和国水利部. 中国河流泥沙公报. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2003:2-18.]

[25] The Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. Chinese River Sediment Bulletin. Beijing: ChinaWaterPower Press, 2007: 2-13. [中华人民共和国水利部. 中国河流泥沙公报. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2007:2-13.]

[26] Liu Hong, He Qing, Xu Junjie et al. The effect of the exceptionally low water discharge on sediment characteristics ofthe middle and lower Yangtze River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(1): 50-64. [刘红, 何青, 徐俊杰等. 特枯水情对长江中下游悬浮泥沙的影响. 地理学报, 2008, 63(1): 50-64.]

[27] Zhai Xiaoming, He Qing, Liu Hong et al. Characteristics of current and sediment in the Changjiang Estuary during thedry seasons. Marine Science Bulletin, 2007, 26(4): 23-33. [翟晓鸣, 何青, 刘红等. 长江口枯季水沙特性分析. 海洋通报, 2007, 26(4): 23-33.]

[28] Li Bogen, Xie Qinchun, Xia Xiaoming et al. Size distribution of suspended sediment in maximum turbidity zone andits response to tidal dynamics in Jiaojiang River Estuary. Journal of Sediment Research, 1999, (1): 18-26. [李伯根, 谢钦春, 夏小明等. 椒江河口最大浑浊带悬浮泥沙粒径分布及其对潮动力的响应. 泥沙研究, 1999, (1): 18-26.]

[29] Cao Zude, Yang Hua, Hou Zhiqiang. Sand movement of silt-sandy beach and the outer navigation siltation. Journal ofWaterway and Harbor, 2008, 29(4): 247-252. [曹祖德, 杨华, 侯志强. 粉沙质海岸的泥沙运动和外航道淤积. 水道港口, 2008, 29(4): 247-252.]

[30] Zhang Ruijin. River Sediment Dynamics. 2nd ed. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 1998: 149-169. [张瑞瑾. 河流泥沙动力学. 2 版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1998. 149-169.]

长江河口悬浮泥沙的混合过程

Processes of Suspended Sediment Mixture in the Yangtze River Estuary

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘晓燕, 刘昌明, 党素珍. 黄土丘陵区雨强对水流含沙量的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1723-1732.
[2]	华凯,程和琴,郑树伟. 长江口横沙通道近岸冲刷地貌形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1363-1373.
[3]	严鑫,孙昭华,谢翠松,夏军强. 基于经验模型的长江口南支上段压咸临界流量[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 935-947.
[4]	李一鸣,张国安,游博文,李占海. 长江河口河槽近期沉积特征及影响因子分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 178-190.
[5]	张云峰, 张振克, 任航, 高磊, 丁海燕. 近百年来长江口启东嘴潮滩沉积物质来源及定量估算[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2105-2116.
[6]	宋城城, 王军. 近30年来长江口水下三角洲地形演变与受控因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1683-1696.
[7]	章伟艳, 张霄宇, 金海燕, 冯旭文, 姚旭莹, 高为利, 张富元, 高爱根. 长江口—杭州湾及其邻近海域沉积动力环境及物源分析[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(5): 640-650.
[8]	刘红, 何青, Gert Jan Weltje, 陈吉余. 长江入海泥沙的交换和输移过程——兼论泥质区的“泥库”效应[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(3): 291-304.
[9]	欧冬妮, 刘敏, 许世远, 程书波, 侯立军, 王丽丽. 基于多参数指标的长江口滨岸多环芳烃来源辨析[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(5): 535-543.
[10]	刘红,何青,徐俊杰,戴志军,陈吉余. 特枯水情对长江中下游悬浮泥沙的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(1): 50-64.
[11]	高建华, 汪亚平, 潘少明, 张瑞, 李军, 白风龙. 长江口外海域沉积物中有机物的来源及分布[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(9): 981-991.
[12]	陈庆强, 周菊珍, 孟翊, 顾靖华, 胡克林. 长江口盐沼土壤有机质更新特征的滩面趋势[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(1): 72-80.
[13]	刘红, 何青, 孟翊, 王元叶, 唐建华. 长江口表层沉积物分布特征及动力响应[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(1): 81-92.
[14]	王军,陈振楼,王东启,许世远,毕春娟,刘杰. 长江口滨岸湿地无机氮界面交换通量量算[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(7): 729-740.
[15]	汪亚平, 潘少明, H.V.Wang, 高建华, 杨旸, 王爱军, 李占海, 吴中. 长江口水沙入海通量的观测与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(1): 35-46.