快速城市化背景下乡村绅士化的时空演变特征

doi:10.11821/xb201208004

地理学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (8): 1044-1056.doi: 10.11821/xb201208004

快速城市化背景下乡村绅士化的时空演变特征

何深静¹, 钱俊希², 徐雨璇¹, 刘斌³

1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院, 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室, 广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室, 广州 510275;
2. 英国爱丁堡大学人文地理系, 苏格兰爱丁堡EH8 9XP;
3. 国家海洋局南海海洋工程勘察与环境研究院, 广州 510300

收稿日期:2011-11-28 修回日期:2012-03-16 出版日期:2012-08-20 发布日期:2012-08-20
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大项目(11&ZD154); 国家自然科学基金项目(40801061; 41130747; 41171140); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(370003162001); 中山大学985 工程资助

Spatial-temporal Evolution of Rural Gentrification amidst Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of Xiaozhou Village, Guangzhou

HE Shenjing¹, QIAN Junxi², XU Yuxuan¹, LIU Bin³

1. School of Geography and Planning, and Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Sun Yat-Sen University; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Guangzhou China, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Human Geography Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Scotland, UK;
3. South China Sea Marine Engineering Survey and Environment Research Institute, State Ocean Administration, Guangzhou 510300, China

Received:2011-11-28 Revised:2012-03-16 Online:2012-08-20 Published:2012-08-20
Supported by:
National Social Sciences Foundation Key Project, No.11&ZD154; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40801061; No.41130747; No.41171140; The Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities, No.370003162001; Sun Yat-Sen University 985 Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 乡村绅士化是指移民从城市迁入乡村地区, 通过对一定的经济资本的利用, 来达到对乡村的自然环境与独特的生活方式及文化氛围的体验与消费的过程。乡村绅士化过程造成了乡村地区人口结构的重构以及物质景观的变迁。本文选取广州小洲村作为研究案例, 对乡村绅士化的时空特征及其演变过程进行了深入分析。研究发现, 小洲村乡村绅士化过程分为艺术先锋绅士化及学生化两个阶段。由于空间需求、付租能力、群体数量等方面的差异, 两类绅士化过程对当地的物质环境、文化、社会、经济等方面产生了不同的影响。但两者的发展紧密相连, 在时间和空间上经历了延续、重叠、更替等阶段。乡村绅士化的过程, 在一定程度上缓解了乡村社区经济发展的困境, 也没有造成对本地居民的置换。但是随着社区住房成本的上涨, 先期迁入的艺术家群体正在被付租能力更强的学生群体逐渐替换。值得注意的是, 本地村民通过积极的寻租行为成为乡村绅士化的重要推动者, 而非被置换者。研究发现, 乡村绅士化现象的中西方差异主要体现在4 个方面:经济和物质层面的影响、与城市化的关系、人口置换的后果、绅士化的推动者。这些差异主要与乡村绅士化发展的社会经济背景、机制和特殊的土地政策等密切相关。这一研究对于探讨转型期中国乡村绅士化现象的特征与机制以及乡村社区发展的模式具有重要的理论与现实意义。

关键词: 乡村绅士化, 时空演变, 先锋艺术家, 艺术学生, 后农业时代, 寻租行为

Abstract: Rural gentrification refers to a process in which urban dwellers migrate to rural areas, in a pursuit of consuming the unique cultural ambience and a proximity to nature, with a certain degree of economic capital. It can be explained as the cause of multiple processes in the restructuring of local demographic structure and landscape changing. With special reference to the process of rural gentrification in Xiaozhou Village, Guangzhou, this paper explores the temporal-spatial characteristics of this process, as well as its evolvement alongside the changes in local socio-economic conditions. This paper reveals that there are two main processes in Xiaozhou's socio-spatial transformation, namely gentrification led by avant-garde artists and studentification led by incoming students. Owing to their different spatial demands, rental affordability, and magnitude, these two gentrification processes bring about different physical, cultural, social and economic influences to the local community. Yet, these two processes are tightly connected, and their socio-spatial evolvement experiences different stages of continuation, overlay, and displacement. While the avant-garde artists highlight the aesthetic values of the old architecture in the village, partially as a way to consume the symbolic meanings of rural space and rural landscape, the process of studentification places much more emphasis upon the use of newly built residential spaces and the development of housing spaces. In general, rural gentrification mitigates the economic predicament faced by Xiaozhou Village in a post-productivist era, and does not result in the displacement of indigenous villagers. However, the avant-garde artists are now facing displacement caused by rising housing costs due to the inflow of students. It is worth noting that, indigenous villagers are not the victims of rural gentrification, but become the promoters for the gentrification process through actively engaging in rent-seeking activities. This research also shows that, the differences of rural gentrification between China and Western countries mainly lie in four aspects, namely economic and physical impacts, the relationship between gentrification and urbanization, residential displacement, and driving forces of gentrification. These incongruences result from different socioeconomic background and dynamics of rural gentrification, as well as different land ownership and policies. Overall, this research is of theoretical and realistic significance in terms of examining the characteristics and dynamics of China's rural gentrification, and the unique development trajectory of China's rural community in an era of market transition.

Key words: rural gentrification, spatial-temporal evolution, advent-guard artists, art students, post-productivist era, rent-seeking

何深静, 钱俊希, 徐雨璇, 刘斌. 快速城市化背景下乡村绅士化的时空演变特征[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(8): 1044-1056.

HE Shenjing, QIAN Junxi, XU Yuxuan, LIU Bin. Spatial-temporal Evolution of Rural Gentrification amidst Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of Xiaozhou Village, Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(8): 1044-1056.

参考文献

[1] Lees L, Slater T, Wyly E. Gentrification. New York: Routledge, 2008.
[2] Smith N. Gentrification//Johnston R J, Gregory D, Pratt G et al.//The Dictionary of Human Geography. 4th ed. Oxford:Blackwell, 2000: 294-296.
[3] Parsons D. Rural gentrification: The influence of rural settlement planning policies. Research Paper No.3, Brighton:Department of Geography, University of Sussex, 1980.
[4] Cloke P, Phillips M, Rankin D. Middle class housing choice: Channels of entry into Gower, South Wales//Champion T,Watkins D//People in the Countryside. London: Chapman, 1991: 38-52.
[5] Cloke P, Phillips M, Thrift N. The new middle classes and the social constructs of rural living//Butler T, Savage M//Social Change and the Middle Classes. London: UCL Press, 1995: 220-238.
[6] Phillips M. Other geographies of gentrification. Progress in Human Geography, 2004, 28(1): 5-30.
[7] Urry J. Consuming Places. London: Routledge, 1995.
[8] Ghose R. Big sky or big sprawl? Rural gentrification and the changing cultural landscape of Missoula, Montana. UrbanGeography, 2004, 25(6): 528-549.
[9] Nelson B P. Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family and class discourses. Journal of Rural Studies,2001, 21: 395-407.
[10] Cloke P, Thrift N. Class change and conflict in rural areas//Marsden T, Lowe P, Whatmore S. Rural Restructuring.London: David Fulton, 1990: 165-181.
[11] He Shenjing, Qian Junxi, Deng Shangkun. Various forms of gentrification in China's market transition: A case study ofsix communities in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2011, 26(1): 44-49. [何深静, 钱俊希, 邓尚昆. 转型期大城市多类绅士化现象探讨: 基于广州市六个社区的案例分析. 人文地理, 2011, 26(1): 44-49.]
[12] He Shenjing, Qian Junxi, Wu Minhua. Studentification in urban village: A case of Xiadu Village, Guangzhou.Geographical Research, 2011, 30(8): 1508-1519. [何深静, 钱俊希, 吴敏华.“学生化”的城中村社区: 基于广州下渡村的实证分析. 地理研究, 2011, 30(8): 1508-1519.]
[13] Feng Jian, Zhou Yixing. Restructuring of socio- spatial differentiation in Beijing in the transition Period. ActaGeographica Sinica, 2008, 63(8): 829-844. [冯健, 周一星. 转型期北京社会空间分异重构. 地理学报, 2008, 63(8):829-844.]
[14] Li Zhigang, Wu Fulong. Socio-spatial differentiation in transitional Shanghai. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(2):199-211. [李志刚, 吴缚龙. 转型期上海社会空间分异研究. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2): 199-211. ]
[15] Long Hualou, Liu Yansui, Zou Jian. Assessment of rural development types and their rurality in eastern coastal China.Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 426-434. [龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 426-434.]
[16] Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. ActaGeographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570. [刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报,2007, 62(6): 563-570.]
[17] Phillips M. The production, symbolization and socialization of gentrification: Impressions from two Berkshire villages.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2002, 27(3): 282-308.
[18] Phillips M. Rural gentrification and the production of nature: A case study from Middle England. The 4th InternationalConference of Critical Geographers. Mexico City, 2005.
[19] Smith D P, Holt L. Lesbian migrants in the gentrified valley' and 'other' geographies of rural gentrification. Journal ofRural Studies, 2005, 31: 313-322.
[20] Smith D P. The‘buoyancy' of other geographies of gentrification: going 'back-to-the water' and the commodificationof marginality. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2007, 98(1): 53-67.
[21] Darling E. The city in the country: Wilderness gentrification and the rent gap. Environment and Planning A, 2005, 37:1015-1032.
[22] Phillips M. Rural gentrification and the processes of class colonization. Journal of Rural Studies, 1993, 9(2): 123-140.
[23] Costello L. Going bush: The implications of urban-rural migration. Geographical Research 45(1): 85-94.
[24] Urry J. Consuming Places. London: Routledge, 1995.
[25] Friedberger M. Rural gentrification and livestock raising: Texas as a test case, 1940-1995. Rural History, 1996, 7(1):53-68.
[26] Bunce M. The Countryside Ideal. London: Routledge, 2005.
[27] Murdoch J, Pratt C. Rural studies: Modernism, postmodernism and the 'post-rural'. Journal of Rural Studies, 1993, 9(4): 411-427.
[28] Halfacree K. From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality.Progress in Human Geography, 2006, 30(3): 309-336.
[29] Phillips M. Differential productions of rural gentri fication: Illustrations from North and South Norfolk. Geoforum,2005, 36: 477-494.
[30] Hines J D. Rural gentrification as permanent tourism: the creation of the 'New' West Archipelago as postindustrialcultural space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2010, 28: 509-525.
[31] Hines J D. The post-industrial regime of production/consumption and the rural gentrification of the New WestArchipelago. Antipode, 2012, 44(1): 74-97.
[32] Smith D P, Phillips M. Socio-cultural representations of greentrified Pennine rurality. Journal of Rural Studies, 2001,17: 457-469.
[33] Hines J D. In pursuit of experience: The postindustrial gentrification of the rural American West. Ethnography, 2010,11(2): 285-308.
[34] Smith D P. Rural gatekeepers and‘greentrified’Pennine rurality: Opening and closing the access gates? Social &Cultural Geography, 2002, 3(4): 447-463.
[35] Marsden T, Murdoch J, Lowe P et al. Constructing the Countryside. London: UCL Press, 1993.
[36] Murdoch J, Marsden T. Reconstituting rurality: Class, community and power in the development process. London:UCL Press, 1994.
[37] Smith N. Gentrification and the Rent Gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1987, 77(3): 462-478.
[38] Phillips M. Making space for rural gentrification. Anglo Spanish Symposium on Rural Geography. University ofValladolid, Spain, 2000.
[39] Phillips M. Other geographies of gentrification. Progress in Human Geography, 2004, 28(1): 5-30.
[40] Bryson J, Wyckoff W. Rural gentrification and nature in the Old and New West. Journal of Cultural Geography, 2010,27(1): 53-75.
[41] Guimond L, Simard M. Gentrification and neo-rural populations in the Québec countryside: Representations of variousactors. Journal of Rural Studies, 2010, 26(4): 449-464.
[42] Cloke P, Phillips M, Thrift N. Class, colonization and lifestyle strategies in Gower//Boyle P, Halfacree K. /Migration to Rural Area. London: Wiley, 1998: 166-185.
[43] Cloke P, Little J. The Rural State? Limits to Planning in Rural Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
[44] Zhang L, Zhao S X B, Tian J P. Self-help in Housing and Chengzhongcun in China's urbanization. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research, 2003, 27(4): 912-937.

快速城市化背景下乡村绅士化的时空演变特征

Spatial-temporal Evolution of Rural Gentrification amidst Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of Xiaozhou Village, Guangzhou

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 史晨怡. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1316-1330.
[2]	余姝辰, 王伦澈, 夏卫平, 余德清, 李长安, 贺秋华. 清末以来洞庭湖区通江湖泊的时空演变[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11): 2346-2361.
[3]	刘晓琼, 吴泽洲, 刘彦随, 赵新正, 芮旸, 张健. 1960-2015年青海三江源地区降水时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1803-1820.
[4]	张行,梁小英,刘迪,史琴琴,陈海. 生态脆弱区社会—生态景观恢复力时空演变及情景模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1450-1466.
[5]	王振波, 梁龙武, 王旭静. 中国城市群地区PM_2.5时空演变格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2614-2630.
[6]	周亮, 车磊, 周成虎. 中国城市绿色发展效率时空演变特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2027-2044.
[7]	陈玮彤,张东,崔丹丹,吕林,谢伟军,施顺杰,侯泽宇. 基于遥感的江苏省大陆岸线岸滩时空演变[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1365-1380.
[8]	侯孟阳, 姚顺波. 1978-2016年中国农业生态效率时空演变及趋势预测[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(11): 2168-2183.
[9]	薛德升,万雅文,杨忍. 中国对外建设水电站时空演变过程及影响机制分析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1942-1953.
[10]	刘海猛,方创琳,黄解军,朱向东,周艺,王振波,张蔷. 京津冀城市群大气污染的时空特征与影响因素解析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(1): 177-191.
[11]	闪丽洁,张利平,张艳军,佘敦先,夏军. 长江中下游流域旱涝急转事件特征分析及其与ENSO的关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(1): 25-40.
[12]	崔林丽,史军,肖风劲. 气候要素及El Niño/La Niña事件对中国陆地NPP变化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(1): 54-66.
[13]	郭庆宾, 张中华. 长江中游城市群要素集聚能力的时空演变[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(10): 1746-1761.
[14]	丁明军, 陈倩, 辛良杰, 李兰晖, 李秀彬. 1999-2013年中国耕地复种指数的时空演变格局[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(7): 1080-1090.
[15]	陈蔚珊, 柳林, 梁育填. 广州轨道交通枢纽零售业的特征聚类及时空演变[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(6): 879-892.