认知地图的空间句法研究

doi:10.11821/dlxb201310009

地理学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (10): 1401-1410.doi: 10.11821/dlxb201310009

认知地图的空间句法研究

鲁政

湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院, 长沙 410012

收稿日期:2012-07-26 修回日期:2013-06-07 出版日期:2013-10-20 发布日期:2013-10-20
作者简介:鲁政(1975-), 男, 湖南株洲人, 博士, 主要研究领域为行为地理学。E-mail: lz2003lz@126.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学项目(10YJA760017)

Spatial syntactic analysis of cognitive maps

LU Zheng

College of Resources and Environmental Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410012, China

Received:2012-07-26 Revised:2013-06-07 Online:2013-10-20 Published:2013-10-20
Supported by:
Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Science Foundation of China, No.10YJA760017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将意识层面的空间意象外化为可被度量及分析的对象,一直是行为学、地理学、旅游学等学科关注的重要课题。本文主要从构建空间意象的结构而非意义入手,对该领域研究中的两种重要方法,即认知地图法和空间句法进行了比较,意图找到两种方法在空间结构性认知方面的相关性。基于句法空间结构的表达模型,分别就长沙太平街历史街区集成度及其认知地图的调研结果进行了比对,通过真实地图句法集成度与579 份认知地图意象要素出现频率等指标的比较,发现集成度指标与意象出现频率等指标存在较好的相关性。在对认知地图样本进行轴线化转换并比照真实地图的轴线索引后,对真实地图句法集成度与579 份认知地图平均句法集成度进行比较,发现认知地图与真实地图的句法分析在结果上仍有较好的相关性,且节点、标志物两要素的出现频次等指标也与所在街道的集成度存在较为明显的对应性。结论说明空间构形对人们结构性意象的形成有着重要的影响力,认知地图的句法分析对揭示人们空间知识的形成机制具有一定的参考价值,两种方法有相互补充的可能性。

关键词: 空间句法, 空间认知, 认知地图, 结构性意象

Abstract: The topic on the externalization of spatial images of consciousness into the measurable objects is always valued by behavioral science, geography, tourism and other related disciplines. Starting with the structure of spatial images, this paper compares two important methods of this field: the cognitive map and the space syntax. The intention of comparison is to find the relevance between these two methods in the field of structural spatial cognition. This paper firstly gives a brief introduction of spatial diagram of syntactic formula, and compares the two results that are respectively derived from syntactic integration values and imaginable indexes of cognitive sketch-maps. Through the analysis of the correlation between the integration values of real map and the elements' imaginable indexes (e.g. frequency of road occurrence, degree of road accuracy) in 579 sketch maps on the Taiping Historical Block of the Changsha City, a better correlation coefficient has been found between integration value and frequency of occurrence. Then, it redraws 579 axial-line maps based on original sketch maps, finds corresponding road index in real map, and compares the syntactic integration values with the average values of syntactic integration in 579 sketch maps. Therefore, a relatively good correlation coefficient is presented between the above two comparisons. Meanwhile, a significant correlation is also formed between integration values of real map and the imaginable indexes such as nodes or landmarks in sketch maps. The above conclusions show that the spatial configuration has a great influence on the image configuration of human mind. And the spatial syntactic analysis of cognitive maps could be valuable to reveal the mechanisms of how people can achieve the image knowledge of spatial configuration. Furthermore, the conclusions imply the possibility of the combination of the space syntax and the cognitive map.

Key words: space syntax, spatial cognition, configurational image, cognitive maps

鲁政. 认知地图的空间句法研究[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(10): 1401-1410.

LU Zheng. Spatial syntactic analysis of cognitive maps[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(10): 1401-1410.

参考文献

[1] Hart R A, Moore G T. The development of spatial cognition: A review//Downs R M, Stea D. Image and Environment. London: Amold, 1973: 246-288.
[2] Tversky B, Lee P U. How space structures language. Spatial Cognition Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1998, 1404: 157-175.
[3] Li Xueming, Li Jianhong. Analysis of urban space in Dalian. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(8): 809-817. [李雪铭, 李建宏. 大连城市意象分析. 地理学报, 2006, 61(8): 809-817.]
[4] Gu Chaolin, Song Guochen. Urban image space and main factors in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(1): 64-74. [顾朝林, 宋国臣. 北京城市意象及空间构成要素研究. 地理学报, 2001, 56(1): 64-74.]
[5] Hillier B, Between social physics and phenomenology: Exploration towards an urban synthesis?//Proceedings of the 5th International symposium on space syntax, TU Delft, Netherland, 2005.
[6] Allen C. Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology and the body-in-space encounters of visually impaired children. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2010, 22(5):719-735.
[7] Xu Leiqing. The Rethinking of themes and paradigms: A review of urban image studies in China. New Architecture, 2012, (1): 114-117. [徐磊青. 城市意象研究的主题、范式与反思: 中国城市意象研究评述. 新建筑, 2012, (1): 114-117.]
[8] Wiener J M, BÜchner S J, Hölscher C. Taxonomy of human wayfinding task: A knowledge-based approach. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2009, 9: 152-165.
[9] Wang Maojun, Zhang Huaxia, He Tingting. Spatial correlation patterns of sites cognition rate in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10): 1243-1254. [王茂军, 张学霞, 霍婷婷. 北京城市认知的空间关联模式: 城市地名认知率的空间分析. 地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1243-1254.]
[10] Kezer Z. An Imaginable Community: The material culture of nation-building in early republican Turkey. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2009, 27(3): 508-530.
[11] Kim Y O, Penn A. Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment. Environment and Behavior, 2004, 36(4): 483-504.
[12] Friedman A, Kohler B. Bidimensional regression: Assessing the configural similarity and accuracy of cognitive maps and other two-dimensional data sets. Psychology Methods, 2003, 8(4): 468-491.
[13] Blut C. Spatial analysis of sketch maps: The effect of spatial cognitive distortions on qualitative mapping of sketch maps to metric maps. Diplomarbeit, MÜnster, University of MÜnster, 2010.
[14] Xue Lulu, Shen Si, Liu Yu et al. The comparison between two cognitive map externalization methods: a case study of Beijing. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2008, 44(3): 413-420. [薛露露, 申思, 刘瑜等. 认知地图两种外部化方法的比较: 以北京市为例. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 44(3): 413-420.]
[15] Dalton R C. Space syntax and spatial cognition. World Architecture: Space Syntax Monograph, 2005, 185(11): 41-45.
[16] Steadman P, Developments in space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2004, 31(4): 483-486.
[17] Turner A. Depthmap 8: A researcher's handbook, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, London, University College of London, 2010, 6: 25.
[18] Osmann P J, Wiedenbauer G. Distance cognition in virtual environmental space: Further investigations to clarify the route-angularity effect. Psychological Research, 2006, 70(1): 43-51.
[19] Turner A. From axial to road-center lines: A new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2007, 34(3): 539-555.
[20] Baran P K, Rodriguze D A, Khattak A J. Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighborhoods. Urban Design, 2008, 13(1): 5-28.
[21] Turner A. Depthmap: A program to perform visibility graph analysis//Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2001.
[22] Dai Fei, Zhang Junhua. The survey methods in planning and design 5: Cognitive Map. Chinese Garden, 2009, (3): 98-102. [戴菲, 章俊华. 规划设计学中的调查方法5. 中国园林, 2009, (3): 98-102.]
[23] Turner A, Penn A, Hillier B. An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2005, 35(6): 425-444.
[24] Li Xun, Xu Xueqiang. A spatial analysis of the image of Guangzhou city. Human Geography, 1993, 8(3): 27-35. [李郇, 许学强. 广州市城市意象分析. 人文地理, 1993, 8(3): 27-35.]
[25] Amedeo D, Golledge R G, Stimson R J. Person Environment Behavior Research: Investigating Activities and Experiences. New York: The Guilford Press, 2009: 6-8.

认知地图的空间句法研究

Spatial syntactic analysis of cognitive maps

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	董卫华, 廖华, 詹智成, 刘兵, 王圣凯, 杨天宇. 2008年以来地图学眼动与视觉认知研究新进展[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 599-614.
[2]	周麟,田莉,张臻,李薇. 基于空间句法视角的民国以来北京老城街道网络演变[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1433-1448.
[3]	王海军, 夏畅, 张安琪, 刘耀林, 贺三维. 基于空间句法的扩张强度指数及其在城镇扩展分析中的应用[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(8): 1302-1314.
[4]	郑文升, 卓蓉蓉, 罗静, 余斌, 王晓芳. 基于空间句法的武汉城区“两抢一盗”犯罪分布环境[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(10): 1710-1720.
[5]	陶伟, 程明洋, 符文颖. 城市化进程中广州城中村传统宗族文化的重构[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12): 1987-2000.
[6]	陶伟, 陈红叶, 林杰勇. 句法视角下广州传统村落空间形态及认知研究[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(2): 209-218.
[7]	蒋志杰, 张捷, 李丽, 聂守宏. 小尺度环境地形认知与空间行为的关系分析——以南京大学浦口校区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(6): 821-830.
[8]	陈华杰, 石忆邵. 基于空间句法的商品交易市场空间结构——以义乌国际商贸城为例[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(6): 805-812.
[9]	刘承良1, 2, 余瑞林3, 熊剑平2, 曾菊新1. 武汉都市圈路网空间通达性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(12): 1488-1498.
[10]	申思, 薛露露, 刘瑜. 基于手绘草图的北京居民认知地图变形及因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(6): 625-634.
[11]	陈小钢, 王英杰, 余卓渊. 基于地理空间语义网络的多媒体电子地图系统[J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56(7s): 92-97.