生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响——渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析

doi:10.11821/xb201204007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 耕地比较效益低下引致耕地保护经济补偿成为破解耕地保护问题的客观选择,而影响经济补偿成败的关键因素之一在于补偿模式设计是否符合农户诉求,因此定量刻画农户生计资产差异对其补偿模式选择的影响便是补偿模式设计的核心.运用参与式农村评价法(PRA)对渝西方山丘陵3 个样点村392 户农户进行了实地调查,构建了农户生计资产六边形计量分析框架,运用灰色关联分析模型和Probit 回归分析法对农户生计资产差异与补偿模式选择意愿间耦合关系的存在性和影响度进行了分析,并设计了差别化耕地保护经济补偿模式.研究结果表明：① 农户生计资产存在属性差异和空间分异.农户生计总资产呈现由自给型纯农户到非农户递增的总体趋势,空间上存在海拔越高生计资产越低的趋势.② 农户对耕地保护经济补偿模式的选择意愿存在随农户生计资产差异由“成都模式”向“佛山模式”过渡的趋势,不同地带农户模式选择意愿存在空间分异.③ 农户生计资产差异与耕地保护补偿模式选择间存在耦合关系,自然资产与农户模式选择意愿呈负相关,社会资产对农户的模式选择影响最小,金融资产对农户模式选择的影响较弱,人力资产和物质资产对农户决策均产生较显著影响,心理资产对农户的决策影响最为显著.④ 根据农户生计资产缺乏情况为7 种类型农户设计了概念性的补偿模式体系,并就补偿方法、补偿依据、补偿标准和补偿资金来源问题进行了探讨.

关键词: 生计资产, 耕地保护, 经济补偿模式, 农户, 渝西地区

Abstract: Economic compensation plays a crucial role in promoting farmland protection and raising farmland utilization ratio. Farmer households' willingness is one of the most important factors that determines the economic compensation pattern for farmland protection, and their difference in livelihood assets has influence on pattern choice of economic compensation for farmland protection significantly. Through participatory rural appraisal method, three villages and 392 households were investigated and sampled in Tabular mountainous and hilly areas of western Chongqing City. A quantitative analysis framework of household livelihood assets of hexagon is constructed; through Gray relation analysis model and Probit regression analysis, the existence and influencing degree of coupling relationship between the divergence of farmer household livelihood assets and compensation pattern choice were analyzed. Furthermore, differential patterns of economic compensation for farmland protection were designed. The results are shown as follows. (1) There exist different qualities and spatial heterogeneity in household livelihood assets. We can find a general trend that the total assets transfer from pure self-sufficiency households to off-farm households, and a spatial trend that the higher the altitude, the less household livelihood assets. (2) There is a trend that household choice willingness about compensation pattern varies from Chengdu Pattern to Foshan Pattern, and there exists spatial heterogeneity in their choice willingness in different areas. (3) The coupling relationship exists between household livelihood assets and compensation pattern. Negative correlation is observed between natural assets value and household pattern choice and the other livelihood assets have different positive impacts on compensation pattern, which from the top are psychological assets, human assets and physical assets, financial assets, and social assets. (4) Based on seven types of the lack of household livelihood assets, the paper designs a conceptual compensation pattern system. Moreover, compensation method, compensation basis, compensation standard and the source of compensation funds are discussed.

Key words: livelihood assets, farmland protection, economic compensation pattern, household, western Chongqing City

李广东, 邱道持, 王利平, 王平, 骆东奇. 生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响——渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(4): 504-515.

LI Guangdong, QIU Daochi, WANG Liping, WANG Ping, LUO Dongqi. Impacts of Difference among Livelihood Assets on the Choice of Economic Compensation Pattern for Farmer Households Farmland Protection in Chongqing City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(4): 504-515.

参考文献

[1] Cinner J E, Bodin ?. Livelihood diversification in tropical coastal communities: A network-based approach to analyzing'Livelihood Landscapes'. PLoS ONE, 2010, 5(8): e11999, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011999.
[2] Block S, Webb P. The dynamics of livelihood diversification in post-famine Ethiopia. Food Policy, 2001, 26(4): 333-350.
[3] Sharp K. Measuring destitution: Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in the analysis of survey data. IDSWorking Paper, 2003: 217.
[4] Li Xiaoyun, Dong Qiang, Rao Xiaolong et al. Methods of assessing vulnerability of farmers and local use. ChineseRural Economy, 2007,(4): 32-39. [李小云, 董强, 饶小龙等. 农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用. 中国农村经济,2007,(4): 32-39.]
[5] World Bank. Tanzania: A poverty profile. Report No.12298-TA. Washington DC, 1985.
[6] Soini E. Land use change patterns and livelihood dynamics on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. AgriculturalSystems, 2005, 85(3): 306-323.
[7] Lasse K. The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction. Swedish International Development CooperationAgency, 2001: 42-98.
[8] Frankenberger T D, Maxwell M. Operationalising household livelihood security: A holistic approach for addressingpoverty and vulnerability. CARE, 2000.
[9] DFID. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London: Department for International Development, 2000: 68-125.
[10] Carney D. Implementing the sustainable livelihoods approach in sustainable rural livelihoods: What contribution canwe make? London, Department for International Development (DFID), 1998: 3-26.
[11] Ellis F. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[12] Chambers R. Vulnerability, coping and policy (editorial introduction). IDS Bulletin, 2006, 37(4): 33-40.
[13] Habermas J. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.
[14] Giddens A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, LosAngeles, California: University of California Press, 1979.
[15] Bebbington A J. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty.World Development, 1999, 27(12): 2021-2044.
[16] Zhang Liping, Zhang Yili, Yan Jianzhong et al. Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoralmountainous region of the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(4): 377-385. [张丽萍, 张镱锂,阎建忠等. 青藏高原东部山地农牧区生计与耕地利用模式. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 377-385.]
[17] McCuskera B, Carr E R. The co-production of livelihoods and land use change: Case studies from South Africa andGhana. Geoforum, 2006, 37(5): 790-804.
[18] Chen Yangfen, Liu Yansui, Li Yurui. Calculation on economic compensation standard for farmland protection from theperspective of peasant households' production decision. China Land Science, 2010, 24(4): 4-8, 31. [陈秧分, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞. 基于农户生产决策视角的耕地保护经济补偿标准测算. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(4): 4-8, 31.]
[19] Qu Futian, Zhu Xinhua. A study of the conversion of cultivated land in various grain areas and regional difference.China Land Science, 2008, 22(3): 34-40. [曲福田, 朱新华. 不同粮食分区耕地占用动态与区域差异分析. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(3): 34-40.]
[20] Sun Haibing, Zhang Anlu. Rural land external benefit internalization and rural-urban land conversion control. ChinaPopulation, Resources and Environment, 2006, 16(1): 83-87. [孙海兵, 张安录. 农地外部效益内在化与农地城市流转控制. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2006, 16(1): 83-87.]
[21] Zhang Xiaojun, Ou Minghao, Gao Yanmei. Study on the regional compensation mechanism for cultivated landpreservation. China Soft Science Magazine, 2007, (12): 47-55. [张效军, 欧名豪, 高艳梅. 耕地保护区域补偿机制研究. 中国软科学, 2007, (12): 47-55.]
[22] Zhu Xinhua, Qu Futian. Mechanism research on cultivated land preservation exterior between different sub-grainareas. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(5): 148-153. [朱新华, 曲福田. 不同粮食分区间的耕地保护外部性补偿机制研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(5): 148-153.]
[23] Wang Yumeng. Externality analysis on arable land utilization and benefit compensation. Issues in AgriculturalEconomy, 2007, (3): 52-57. [王雨濛. 耕地利用的外部性分析与效益补偿. 农业经济问题, 2007, (3): 52-57.]
[24] Wang Yumeng, Zhang Anlu, Huang Zonghuang. Analysis on the multi-objective policy structure of agricultural landcompensation in the context of land use control. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2009, (4): 62-69. [王雨濛, 张安录, 黄宗煌. 土地用途管制背景下的农地补偿多目标政策结构分析. 农业技术经济, 2009, (4): 62-69.]
[25] Zhang Xiaojun, Ou Minghao, Gao Yanmei. Value standard of regional compensation mechanism of cultivated landpreservation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(5): 154-160. [张效军, 欧名豪, 高艳梅. 耕地保护区域补偿机制之价值标准探讨. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(5): 154-160.]
[26] Wu Zebin, Liu Weidong. Assessment on compensation for external benefit in cultivated land protection from theconsideration of regional grain security. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(12): 2076-2086. [吴泽斌, 刘卫东. 基于粮食安全的耕地保护区域经济补偿标准测算. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(12): 2076-2086.]
[27] Niu Haipeng, Zhang Anlu. Externality and its calculation of cultivated land protection: A case study of Jiaozuo City.Resources Science, 2009, 31(8): 1400-1408. [牛海鹏, 张安录. 耕地保护的外部性及其测算: 以河南省焦作市为例. 资源科学,2009, 31(8): 1400-1408.]
[28] Chen Changhua, Fang Xiaojun. An analysis of households' operation behavior differentiation in Jiangsu Province.Chinese Rural Economy, 1999, (4): 46-50. [陈长华, 方晓军. 江苏农户经营行为分化实证分析. 中国农村经济, 1999,(4): 46-50.]
[29] Ouyang Jinliang, Song Chunmei, Yu Zhenrong et al. The farm household's choice of land use type and itseffectiveness on land quality and environment in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(1):1-11. [欧阳进良, 宋春梅, 宇振荣等. 黄淮海平原农区不同类型农户的土地利用方式选择及其环境影响: 以河北省曲周县为例. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(1): 1-11.]
[30] Chen Xiaohong, Wang Zhaoxia. An analysis of the causal factors to farmers' households' behaviors of part-timefarming in Suzhou Prefecture of Jiangsu Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2007, (4): 25-31. [陈晓红, 汪朝霞. 苏州农户兼业行为的因素分析. 中国农村经济, 2007, (4): 25-31.]
[31] Cramb R A, Purcell T, Ho T C S. Participatory assessment of rural livelihoods in the Central Highlands of Vietnam.Agricultural Systems, 2004, 81(3): 255-272.
[32] Kangalawe R Y, Liwenga E T. Livelihoods in the wetlands of Kilombero Valley in Tanzania: Opportunities andchallenges to integrated water resource management. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2005, 30(11-16): 968-975.
[33] Yan Jianzhong, Wu Yingying, Zhang Yili et al. Livelihood diversification of peasants and nomads of eastern transectin Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(2): 221-233. [阎建忠, 吴莹莹, 张镱锂等. 青藏高原东部样带农牧民生计的多样化. 地理学报, 2009, 64(2): 221-233.]