西安市资源环境成本时空差异性分析

doi:10.11821/xb201204002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 结合SEEA理论与方法,核算了中国西部城市——西安市1997-2009 年的主要资源环境成本,基于市、县2 级尺度探究其时空差异性,并计算了资源环境成本占GDP比例情况.结果表明：① 按1990 年可比价,西安市资源环境成本由177197.9 万元增大到396031.8 万元,年均增长率10.29%,高于同期GDP (7.25%) 增长率.② 资源耗减成本大于环境退化成本,但前者比重有所降低,由84.84%降为69.45%.③ 各区县占总成本比例差异明显.2009 年,占西安市资源环境成本比重大于15%的是雁塔区,居于10%~15%的是未央区、莲湖区、户县;居于5%~10%的是新城区、碑林区、长安区、灞桥区、临潼区;其他区县小于5%.④ 据资环密度可将西安市分为3 个圈层：碑林区、新城区、莲湖区属于I 圈,灞桥区、未央区、雁塔区属于II 圈,其他各区属于III 圈;资环密度I 圈集聚、II 圈和III 圈渐次降低;资源环境成本总量I 圈最小,II 圈和III 圈比重相当;按组分分析,能源耗减成本总量在I 圈较低,II 圈和III 圈较高,耕地耗减成本主要产生于II 圈和III 圈,污染成本I 圈< II 圈< III 圈,生态成本集中于III 圈.⑤ 资源环境成本占GDP比例1997 年为7.58%,2005 年达到11.27%,之后降低,2009 年降为9.05%,呈现出环境库兹涅茨曲线特征,空间上I 圈< II 圈< III 圈.

关键词: 综合环境与经济核算, 资源耗减成本, 环境退化成本, 时空差异, 西安市

Abstract: This paper accounted the main components of resources depletion value & environmental costs (R-E cost) of Xi'an city in western China from 1997 to 2009 based on SEEA, analyzed temporal and spatial differences of R-E cost at city and county scales respectively, and calculated the ratio of R-E cost to GDP. The results are obtained as follows. (1) The R-E cost of Xi'an city has soared from 1.771979 billion yuan RMB to 3.960318 billion yuan RMB at comparable prices of 1990, with an annual rate of 10.29%, more than the GDP growth rate (7.25%) of the same period. (2) Resources depletion value is higher than environmental degradation cost. The proportion of resources depletion value reduced from 84.84% to 69.45%; (3) R-E cost proportion of each county was different. In 2009, Yanta District accounted for over 15%, Weiyang District, Lianhu District and Huxian County had 10%-15%, Chang'an, Baqiao and Lintong districts had 5%-10%; other counties took up less than 5%. 4) The R-E cost distribution can be divided into three circles according to cluster analysis of R-E density. Beilin, Xincheng and Lianhu districts are located in circle I, districts of Baqiao, Weiyang and Yanta are situated in circle II, and other counties are in circle III. The density of R-E cost in circle I is much higher than that in circles II and III. However, the amount of R-E cost in circle I is much lower than that in circles II and III. Energy consumption cost in circle I is lower than that in circles II and III. Land consumption cost occurred mainly in circles II and III. Pollution cost is listed in the order of circle I < circle II < circle III, and the ecological cost is mainly observed in circle III; 5) R-E cost accounted for 7.58% of GDP in 1997, this figure was up to 11.27% in 2005 and fell to 9.05% in 2009, presenting a "Kuznets curve" pattern; the ratio of R-E cost to GDP is listed in the order of circle I < circle II < circle III.

Key words: SEEA, resources depletion value, environmental degradation cost, temporal and spatial difference, Xi'an city

任志远, 马彩虹. 西安市资源环境成本时空差异性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(4): 444-454.

REN Zhiyuan, MA Caihong. Temporal and Spatial Differences of Resources Depletion Value & Environmental Cost of Xi'an City in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(4): 444-454.

参考文献

[1] Reyer Gerlagh, Rob Dellink, Marjan Hofkes et al. A measure of sustainable national income for the Netherlands.Ecological Economics, 2002, 41: 157-174.
[2] Finding a 'GREEN' GDP. Canadian Geographic, 1994, 114(5).
[3] Engelbert Stockhammer, Harald Hochreiter et al. The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) as an alternative toGDP in measuring economic welfare. The results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW calculation 1955-1992. EcologicalEconomics, 1999, (21): 19-34.
[4] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division. Integrated Environmental and EconomicAccounting: An Operational Manual. New York, 1994. [联合国经济和社会信息和政策分析部统计处. 综合环境和经济核算(临时版本) (SEEA-1993). 纽约, 1994.]
[5] The United Nations Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Agency, The United Nations Environment Program. GaoMinxue et al. trans. Comprehensive Environmental Economic Accounting Operation Manual (SEEA-2000). Beijing:National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2003. [联合国经济社会事务部统计署, 联合国环境规划署. 高敏雪等译. 综合环境经济核算操作手册(SEEA-2000). 北京: 中国国家统计局, 2003.]
[6] Chu Haiyan. Research on accounting method of green GDP accounting and evaluation of Zhejiang Province [D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2006. [褚海燕. 绿色GDP核算方法探讨及浙江省的实际估算[D]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2006.]
[7] The State Environmental Protection Administration, The National Bureau of Statistics. China Green National EconomicAccounting Report 2004. http://wirmc.sepa.gov.cn/plan/gongwen/200609/P020060908545859361774.pdf. [ 国家环保总局, 国家统计局. 中国绿色国民经济核算研究报告2004. http://wirmc.sepa.gov.cn/plan/gongwen/200609/P020060908545859361774.pdf.]
[8] Subject Group of "China Green National Economic Accounting System Framework". National economic accountingsystem framework based on the green environment. Planning Bureau of the China Environmental ProtectionAdministration Environment, http://www.caep.org.cn/. [ 《中国绿色国民经济核算体系框架研究》课题组. 基于环境的绿色国民经济核算体系框架. 国家环保总局环境规划院, http://www.caep.org.cn/.]
[9] Lei Ming. Study on issues of integrated enviromontal and economic accounting of China. China Soft Science, 1999,(11): 95-99. [雷明. 中国环境经济综合核算. 中国软科学, 1999, (11): 95-99.]
[10] Lei Ming. Design on the integrated accounting system between environment and economy of China. SystemsEngineering: Theory & Practice, 2000, (10): 18-26. [雷明. 中国环境经济综合核算体系框架设计. 系统工程理论与实践, 2000, (10): 18-26.]
[11] Wang Yongyu. Study on issues of integrated enviromontal and economic accounting [D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University,2006. [王永瑜. 环境经济综合核算问题研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2006.]
[12] Yang Youxiao, CAI Yunlong. Sustainable valuation for resources and environment and development in rural China:The SEEA and its application research. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(5): 596-606. [杨友孝, 蔡运龙. 中国农村资源、环境与发展的可持续评估: SEEA 方法及其应用. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5): 596-606.]
[13] Wang Shugong, Zhou Yongzhang. Integrated frame research for resources & environment in megalopolises andregional sustainable development: Case study on Pearl River Delta. China Population, Resources and Environment,2002, 12(3): 52-57. [王树功, 周永章. 大城市群(圈) 资源环境一体化与区域可持续发展研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2002, 12(3): 52-57.]
[14] Li Song, Zhao Yingcai. Discussing environment cost and its property. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition,2002, (5): 60-66. [李松, 赵英才. 论环境成本及其属性. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2002, (5): 60-66.]
[15] Wang Guangcheng. A study of mineral resources valuation methods based on green accounting. Journal of China CoalEconomic College, 2001, 15(1): 48-52. [王广成. 基于绿色核算的矿产资源定价方法研究. 中国煤炭经济学院学报,2001, 15(1): 48-52.]
[16] Le Groot R S. Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and DecisionMaking. Wolters-Noordhoff, 1992: 78-80.
[17] Xue Dayuan, Clem Tisdell. Economic valuation method for environmental goods: Contingent valuation method. RuralEco-Environment, 1999, 15(3): 39-43. [薛达元, Clem Tisdell. 环境物品的经济价值评估方法: 条件价值法. 农村生态环境, 1999, 15(3): 39-43.]
[18] Wang Jinnan, Gregory Chazhong, Cao Dong et al. China's environment resources accounting scheme design based onsatellite account//China's Environmental Policy Research Report. Beijing: China's Environmental Planning Institute,2000: 2. [王金南, 葛察忠, 曹东等. 基于卫星帐户的中国环境资源核算方案设计//中国环境政策专题研究报告. 北京: 中国环境规划院, 2000: 2.]
[19] Li Jinchang. On Ecological Axiology. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 1999. [李金昌. 生态价值论. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 1999.]
[20] Editorial Committee of China's Land Yearbook. China's Land Yearbook (1994-1995). Beijing: People's PublishingHouse, 1995. [ 《中国土地年鉴》编委会. 中国土地年鉴(1994-1995). 北京: 人民出版社, 1995.]
[21] Westman W. How much are nature's services worth. Science, 1977, 197: 960-964.
[22] Shi Peili, Li Wenhua, He Weiming et al. Economic estimation of ecosystem services of natural forests in westernSichuan, China. Journal of Mountain Research. 2002,20(1): 75-79. [石培礼, 李文华, 何维明等. 川西天然林生态服务功能的经济价值. 山地学报, 2002, 20(1): 75-79.]
[23] Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Jia Liangqing et al. Ecosystem services and their valuation of China grassland. ActaEcologica Sinica, 2003, 24(6): 1101-1110. [赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 贾良清等. 中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价. 生态学报, 2003, 24(6): 1101-1110.]
[24] Xie Gaodi, Zhang Yili, Lu Chunxia et al. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. Journal ofNatural Resources, 2001, 16(1): 47-53. [谢高地, 张镱锂, 鲁春霞等. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值. 自然资源学报,2001, 16(1): 47-53.]
[25] Xie Gaodi, Xiao Yu, Zhen Lin et al. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese Journalof Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 10-13. [谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖等. 我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 10-13.]
[26] Chen Zhongxin, Zhang Xinshi. The value of China's ecological system. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(1):17-22. [陈仲新, 张新时. 中国生态系统效益的价值. 科学通报, 2000, 45(1): 17-22.]
[27] Xie Gaodi, Xiao Yu, Zhen Lin et al. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese Journalof Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 10-13. [谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖等. 我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 10-13.]
[28] Xie Gaodi, Zhang Yili, Lu Chunxia et al. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. Journal ofNatural Resources. 2001, 16(1): 47-53. [谢高地, 张镱锂, 鲁春霞等. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(1): 47-53.]