地理学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (2): 159-174.doi: 10.11821/xb201302002
吴康1,2, 方创琳1, 赵渺希3, 陈晨4
收稿日期:
2012-07-26
修回日期:
2012-11-12
出版日期:
2013-02-20
发布日期:
2013-02-20
通讯作者:
方创琳(1966-), 男, 研究员, 博士生导师, 近年来主要从事城市发展与城市规划等研究.E-mail: fangcl@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:
吴康(1985-), 男, 博士生, 江苏淮安人, 中国地理学会会员(S110008920M), 主要从事城市地理研究.E-mail: ruoyunyi@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40971101; 51108184)
WU Kang1,2, FANG Chuanglin1, ZHAO Miaoxi3, CHEN Chen4
Received:
2012-07-26
Revised:
2012-11-12
Online:
2013-02-20
Published:
2013-02-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.40971101; No.51108184
摘要: 在流动空间的视角下,高速铁路交通客流成为城市区域功能联系的重要表征,本研究选取京津城际高速铁路出行作为研究对象,通过对乘客群体问卷访谈式的实证调查,从微观个体的角度研究城际高铁所表征下的跨城流动空间.研究发现:① 北京与天津城区同属城际流动密集区,郊区县市为流动稀疏区,城际高铁流具有显著的空间极化性;京—津中心城区是最主要的空间联系带,京滨、京(津) 武走廊流则构成次级联系带,京津跨城流动呈现出轴辐式空间格局.② 旅游、购物等休闲活动对跨城流动具有较明显的增强作用,而从跨城活动的时空迁移来看,城际高铁某种程度上缩短了时空距离,但对居住地点和工作空间的迁移改变有限.③ 京津跨城流动的频次并不很高,通勤者跨城周期为1 周左右,现阶段城铁交通主要为商务出行流和休闲旅游流,这反映了高铁作为流动空间物质基础的构成特征;出行人群以男性、高学历、较高职业地位和商务出行为主,且商务出行的跨城流动频次更高,对出行时间更敏感,这反映了高铁跨城流动空间具备一定的精英空间特征.④ 以城际高铁交通出行表征的区域一体化进程中,北京和天津的跨城流动空间暗含一定的不对称性,这体现在京津两地的到发客流分布不均、商务出差客流的比重差异以及不同站点在居住、工作、休闲等跨城功能联系方向上的不均衡等.
吴康, 方创琳, 赵渺希, 陈晨. 京津城际高速铁路影响下的跨城流动空间特征[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(2): 159-174.
WU Kang, FANG Chuanglin, ZHAO Miaoxi, CHEN Chen. The intercity space of flow influenced by high-speed rail: A case study for the rail transit passenger behavior between Beijing and Tianjin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(2): 159-174.
[1] Black W R. Transportation: A Geographical Analysis. New York: Guilford Press, 2003.[2] Zook M A. Old hierarchies or new networks of centrality? The global geography of the Internet content market.American Behavioral Scientist, 2001, 44(10): 1679-1696.[3] Liu Weidong, Zhen Feng. Spatial implications of new information and communication technologies. Acta GeographicaSinca, 2004, 59(Suppl.): 67-76. [刘卫东, 甄峰. 信息化对社会经济空间组织的影响研究. 地理学报, 2004, 59(增刊):67-76.][4] Castells M. The Information City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Progress.Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell, 1989.[5] Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996.[6] Couclelis H. The death of distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1996, 23(4): 387-389.[7] Bates Stephen. The death of geography, the rise of anonymity, and the Internet. American Enterprise, 1996, 7(2): 50-52.[8] Graham S. The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology.Progress in Human Geography, 1998, 22(2): 159-163.[9] Rietveld P, Vickerman R. Transport in regional science: The 'death of distance' is premature. Papers in RegionalScience, 2004, 83(1): 229-248.[10] Shen Lizhen. The Space of Flows. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2010. [沈丽珍. 流动空间. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2010.][11] Zhen Feng, Zhai Qing, Chen Gang et al. Mobile social theory construction and urban geography research in theinformation era. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(2): 197-206. [甄峰, 翟青, 陈刚等. 信息时代移动社会理论构建与城市地理研究. 地理研究, 2012, 31(2): 197-206.][12] Bridge G. Mapping the terrain of time-space compression: Power networks in everyday life. Environment andPlanning D: Society and Space, 1997, 15(5): 611-626.[13] Kivisto P. Time-space compression. Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, 2012.[14] Van Oort F, Burger M, Raspe O. On the economic foundation of the urban network paradigm: Spatial integration,functional integration and economic complementarities within the Dutch Randstad. Urban Studies, 2010, 47(4):725-748.[15] Scott A J. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.[16] Lang R E, Dhavale D. Beyond megalopolis: Exploring America's new 'megapolitan' geography. Metropolitan InstituteCensus Report, 2005, 46(3): 5-6.[17] Hall P G, Pain K. The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe. London: Earthscan, 2006.[18] Wang De, Song Yu, Shen Chi et al. A review on the implementation of city integration strategy. Urban PlanningForum, 2009, (4): 74-78. [王德, 宋煜, 沈迟等. 同城化发展战略的实施进展回顾. 城市规划学刊, 2009, (4):74-78.][19] Li Jun, Zhu Shunying, Li Anxun et al. Trip characteristics of intercity and incity of Changzhutan UrbanAgglomeration. Transportation Science & Technology, 2006, (6): 69-72. [李军, 朱顺应, 李安勋等. 长株潭城市群城际与城内客运出行特征. 交通科技, 2006, (6): 69-72.][20] Li Guoping, Yang Jun et al. Network Metropolis: The New Strategy of Hangzhou Spatial Development. Beijing: ChinaArchitecture & Building Press, 2009. [李国平, 杨军等. 网络化大都市: 杭州市域空间发展新战略. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.][21] UIC. General definitions of high speed. http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article971, 2012-05-10.[22] Wang Jixian. Urban and regional impacts of high-speed railways: A preamble. Urban Planning International, 2011, 26(6): 1-5. [王缉宪. 高速铁路影响城市与区域发展的机理. 国际城市规划, 2011, 26(6): 1-5.][23] Ureña J M, Menerault P, Garmendia M. The high-speed rail challenge for big intermediate cities: A national, regionaland local perspective. Cities, 2009, 26(5): 266-279.[24] Wang Jixian, Lin Chenhui. High-speed rail and its impacts on the urban spatial dynamics in China: the backgroundand analytical framework. Urban Planning International, 2011, 26(1): 16-23. [王缉宪, 林辰辉. 高速铁路对城市空间演变的影响: 基于中国特征的分析思路. 国际城市规划, 2011, 26(1): 16-23.][25] Kim K S. High-speed rail developments and spatial restructuring: A case study of the capital region in South Korea.Cities, 2000, 17(4): 251-262.[26] Wang Jiao'e, Ding Jinxue. High-speed rail and its impacts on the urban spatial structure of China. Urban PlanningInternational, 2011, 26(6): 49-54. [王姣娥, 丁金学. 高速铁路对中国城市空间结构的影响研究. 国际城市规划, 2011,26(6): 49-54.][27] Wang Hao, Long Hui. Effect of high speed railway network on spatial structure of urban agglomeration. City PlanningReview, 2009, 33(4): 41-44. [王昊, 龙慧. 试论高速铁路网建设对城镇群空间结构的影响. 城市规划, 2009, 33(4):41-44.][28] Wang Lan. Research framework of high-speed railway impact on urban space. Planners, 2011, 27(7): 13-19. [王兰. 高速铁路对城市空间影响的研究框架及实证. 规划师, 2011, 27(7): 13-19.][29] Gutiérrez Javier. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of thehigh-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 2001(9): 229-242.[30] Coto-Millán Pablo, Vicente Inglada, Belén Rey. Effects of network economies in high-speed rail: The Spanish case.Annals of Regional Science, 2007, 41: 911-925.[31] Jiang Haibin, Xu Jiangang, Qi Yi. The influence of Beijing-Shanghai High-speed Railways on land accessibility ofregional center cities. Acta Geographica Sinca, 2010, 65(10): 1287-1298. [蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅. 京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响. 地理学报, 2010, 65(10): 1287-1298.][32] Su Wenjun, Shi Haitao, Wang Xinjun. Effect research of Jing-Hu high-speed railway on the main cities along therailway in southwest of Shandong. Journal of Fudan University: Natural Science, 2009, 48(1): 111-116. [苏文俊, 施海涛, 王新军. 京沪高铁对鲁西南沿线主要城市的影响. 复旦学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 48(1): 111-116.][33] He Jianfeng. A study on the accessibility of high-speed rail in China: A case study of Yangtze River Delta. UrbanPlanning International, 2011, 26(6): 55-62. [贺剑锋. 关于中国高速铁路可达性研究: 以长三角为例. 国际城市规划,2011, 26(6): 55-62.][34] Gutiérrez Javier, Rafael González, Gabriel Gómez. The European high-speed train network. Journal of TransportGeography, 1996, 4(4): 227-238.[35] Sasaki K, Ohashi T, Ando A. High-speed rail transit impact on regional system: Does the shinkansen contribute todispersion? The Annals of Regional Science, 1997, 31(1): 77-98.[36] Pol P M J. The economic impact of the high-speed train on urban regions. ERSA Conference Paper from EuropeanRegional Science Association, 2003.[37] Vickerman R. High-speed rail in Europe: Experience and issue for future development. The Annals of RegionalScience, 1997, 31(1): 21-38[38] Preston J, Wall G. The impact of high speed trains on socio-economic activity. 11th World Conference on TransportResearch, 2007.[39] Bonnafous A. The regional impact of TVG. Transportation, 1987, 14(2): 127-137.[40] Masson S, Petiot R. Can the high speed rail reinforce tourism attractiveness? The case of the high speed rail betweenPerpignan (France) and Barcelona (Spain). Technovation, 2009, 29: 611-617.[41] Haynes K E. Labor markets and regional transportation improvements: The case of high-speed trains. The Annals ofRegional Science, 1997, 31(1): 57-76.[42] Feliu J. High-speed rail in European medium-sized cities: Stakeholders and urban development. Journal of UrbanPlanning and Development, 2012, 138(4): 293-302.[43] Hou Xue, Liu Su, Zhang Wenxin et al. Characteristics of commuting behaviors between Beijing and Tianjin influencedby high speed train. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(9): 1573-1579. [侯雪, 刘苏, 张文新等. 高铁影响下的京津城际出行行为研究. 经济地理, 2011, 31(9): 1573-1579.][44] Zhao Miaoxi, Wang Shifu, Zhang Xiaoxing. The functional linkage represented by the subway passengers betweenGuangzhou and Foshan. Journal of South China University of Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2012, 40(6):134-142. [赵渺希, 王世福, 张小星. 基于地铁出行的广佛城市功能联系研究. 华南理工大学学报: 自然科学版,2012, 40(6): 134-142.] |
[1] | 张学波, 宋金平, 于伟, 王振波. 基于感知的北京居民职住空间关系生成机理[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 383-397. |
[2] | 高晓路, 吴丹贤, 颜秉秋. 北京城市老年贫困人口识别与空间分布[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1557-1571. |
[3] | 马海涛. 知识流动空间的城市关系建构与创新网络模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 708-721. |
[4] | 李涛, 王姣娥, 高兴川. 中国居民工作日与节假日的城际出行网络异同性研究[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 833-848. |
[5] | 张杰, 史培军, 杨静, 龚道溢. 北京地区景观城市化进程对暴雨过程的影响——以“7·21”暴雨为例[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1): 113-125. |
[6] | 乔治, 黄宁钰, 徐新良, 孙宗耀, 吴晨, 杨俊. 2003-2017年北京市地表热力景观时空分异特征及演变规律[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 475-489. |
[7] | 张延吉,秦波,朱春武. 北京城市建成环境对犯罪行为和居住安全感的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 238-252. |
[8] | 王亮,刘慧. 基于PS-DR-DP理论模型的区域资源环境承载力综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 340-352. |
[9] | 周麟,田莉,张臻,李薇. 基于空间句法视角的民国以来北京老城街道网络演变[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1433-1448. |
[10] | 赵美风,戚伟,刘盛和. 北京市流动人口聚居区空间分异及形成机理[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1494-1512. |
[11] | 秦静,李郎平,唐鸣镝,孙岩,宋昕芮. 基于地理标记照片的北京市入境旅游流空间特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1556-1570. |
[12] | 冯健,钟奕纯. 北京社会空间重构(2000-2010)[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 711-737. |
[13] | 杨斯棋,邢潇月,董卫华,李帅朋,詹智成,王全意,杨鹏,张奕. 北京市甲型H1N1流感对气象因子的时空响应[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 460-473. |
[14] | 韩会然,杨成凤,宋金平. 北京批发企业空间格局演化与区位选择因素[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(2): 219-231. |
[15] | 申犁帆,王烨,张纯,姜冬睿,李赫. 轨道站点合理步行可达范围建成环境与轨道通勤的关系研究——以北京市44个轨道站点为例[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12): 2423-2439. |