1991 年以来长三角快速城市化地区生态经济系统协调度评价及其空间演化模式

doi:10.11821/xb201112007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以长江三角洲经济区1991、2001、2008 年的Landsat TM影像解译数据为基础,以长三角90 个县(市、市区) 为基本研究单元,构建空间数据转换模型、ESV模型、EEH模型,借助ArcGIS 9.3 平台对海量的栅格和矢量数据进行空间分析,依据ESV指数和EEH指数揭示长三角经济发展与生态环境系统的相关关系和演变特征,并进行功能分区和模式提炼.研究表明:① 1991 年以来长三角地区土地利用类型大幅转换,城镇面积增长最大,来源主要是水田、旱地、草地、园地和其他用地;② ESV模型研究发现,1991-2001 时段长三角生态系统呈现恶化趋势,2001-2008 时段恶化幅度有所减缓,同时证明水域、水田变为城镇和旱地的开发行为对生态系统的稳定性具有极大的伤害;③ 1991 年来GDP空间格局为中、南部高北部低,其中1991-2001 时段中部增长率明显高于北部,2001-2008 时段中部增长率明显高于南北;④依据EEH指数将长三角分为12 类区域,EEH空间特征为生态冲突区居中心区位,生态协调区居边缘区位,并且按EEH由低到高呈现出明显的核心—边缘空间结构;1991-2001 时段长三角生态—经济关系已经出现了集中型初步恶化趋势,2001-2008 时段则由集中型初步恶化趋势向分散型恶化与协调并存状态;⑤ 通过空间数据转换模型将长三角分为5 种生态经济演变类型分区:初始恶化区、初始协调区、持续恶化区、协调降低区、协调升级区;⑥ 总结出长三角EEH的空间演变模式:梯度模式与核心边缘模式共存,其中一级梯度模式为北中南三大横向梯度带,二级梯度模式为长三角南北两翼的东中西三大纵向梯度带;核心边缘模式概括为7 大组团:即苏锡常沪组团、南京组团、绍甬组团、苏北组团、泰州组团、杭州组团、南通组团.不同的模式对应着不同的生态经济系统演变方式,反映出长三角快速城市化地区内部存在着较大程度的生态经济关系空间分化趋势.

关键词: 长三角地区, LUCC, 生态系统服务价值, 生态经济系统协调度, 空间演化模式

Abstract: Based on the Landsat TM remote sensed imageries in the periods of 1991, 2001 and 2008 Yangtze Delta Economic Region, and taking 90 counties in this region as basic units, this paper builds spatial data transformation models, i.e., the ESV and the EEH models. Spatial analysis of massive vector and raster data were done within the environment of ArcGIS 9.3. The ESV index and the EEH index reveal the relationship between economic development and eco-environment system of the Yangtze River Delta and its evolution . Furthermore, the function regionalization and the model modification were developed. The results are shown as follows. (1) Since 1991, the conversion of land-use type has been significant, and the city and town land has converted mainly from the paddy field, dry land, grass land, garden plot and other lands. (2) The ESV model shows that the eco-system tends to be degraded in the 9101 period of time, while in the 0801 period, the degradation trends are less significant. At the same time, it proves that the development pattern of the conversion of water body and paddy field to the city, town and dry land deteriorated the eco-system severely. (3) Since 1991, GDP in the central and southern parts is lower than that in the northern, and GDP growth rate in the central part for the 9101 period is higher than that in the northern, while in the 0108 period, it is higher than those in the central and southern parts. (4) According to EEH index, the paper divides Yangtze Delta Economic Region into 12 zones. The spatial characteristics of the EEH are: ecological conflict zone and ecological coordination zone are located in the center and fringe areas respectively, presenting a "core-fringe" structure in the "low to high" order, and in 9101 period eco-economic relationship tends to be concentrated on initial degradation, while in 0108, it converses to dispersed degradation and coordination. (5) Using the model of spatial data transformation, five types of eco-economic evolution are identified, namely, initial degradation zone, initial coordination zone, continuous degradation zone, reduced coordination zone and increased coordination zone. (6) Finally, the paper summarizes the spatial evolution patterns of the Yangtze Delta Region: the coexistence of the gradient mode and the core-fringe mode. The former consists of three horizontal belts in the northern, central and southern parts as the first grade gradient mode and of three N-S belts along the east, middle and west for the second grade gradient mode. The latter consists of seven groups, which are Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou group, Nanjing group, Shaoxing-Ningbo group, northern Jiangsu group, Taizhou group, Hangzhou group and Nantong group. Different modes correspond to different evolution patterns of the eco-economic system, which reflects a spatial differentiation trend of eco-economic relationship at a high level.

Key words: Yangtze River Delta, LUCC, eco-service value, eco-economic harmony, special evolution pattern

王振波, 方创琳, 王婧. 1991 年以来长三角快速城市化地区生态经济系统协调度评价及其空间演化模式[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1657-1668.

WANG Zhenbo, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Jing. Evaluation on the Coordination of Ecological and Economic Systems and Associated Spatial Evolution Patterns in the Rapid Urbanized Yangtze Delta Region since 1991[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1657-1668.

参考文献

[1] Wu Dianting, Wu Hao, Jiang Ye. A research on influencing factors of carbon emission intensity. Geographical Research,2011, 30(4): 579-589. [吴殿廷, 吴昊, 姜晔. 碳排放强度及其变化: 基于截面数据定量分析的初步推断. 地理研究,2011, 30(4): 579-589.]

[2] Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997.

[3] Sutton P C, Costanza R. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery,land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41: 509-527.

[4] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R et al.. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997,387, 253-260.

[5] Costanza R, Cumberland J, Daly H et al. An Introduction to Ecological Economics. FL, USA: St Lucie Press, 1997.

[6] Lewandrowski J, Darwin R F, Tsigas M et al.. Estimating costs of protecting global ecosystem diversity. EcologicalEconomics, 1999, 29: 111-125.

[7] Bolund P, Hunhammar S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 293-301.

[8] Woodward R T, Wui Y S. The economic value of wetland services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37:257-270.

[9] Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas.Ecological Economics, 2001, 39: 333-346.

[10] Konarska K M, Sutton P C, Castellon M. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: A comparisonof NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41: 491-507.

[11] Gil Pontius Jr R, Laura C Schneider. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswichwatershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 239-248.

[12] Li T H, Li W K, Qian Z H. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen.Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1427-1435.

[13] Helming K, Perez-Soba M, Tabbush P. Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Berlin Heidelberg,Germany: Springer Press, 2008: 77-106.

[14] Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Zhang Caixia et al. Assessing the multifunctionalities of land use in China. Journal of Resourcesand Ecology, 2010, 1(4): 311-318.

[15] Li Haitao, Liao Yingchun, Yan Maochao et al. Emergy evaluation and assessment of sustainability on theeco-econommic system of Xinjiang. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5): 765-772. [李海涛, 廖迎春, 严茂超等. 新疆生态经济系统的能值分析及其可持续性评估. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 765-772.]

[16] Su Fei, Zhang Pingyu. Assessment of coordinative development between economy and environment based onecosystem service values change: A case of Daqing City. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(3): 471-477. [苏飞, 张平宇.基于生态系统服务价值变化的环境与经济协调度发展评价: 以大庆市为例. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(3): 471-477.]

[17] Peng Jian, Wang Yanglin, Chen Yanfei et al. Economic value of urban ecosystem services: A case study in Shenzhen.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2005, 41(4): 594-604. [彭建, 王仰麟, 陈燕飞等. 城市生态系统服务功能价值评估初探: 以深圳市为例. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 41(4): 594-604.]

[18] Nuñez D, Nahuelhual L, Oyarzún C. Forests and water: The value of native temperate forests in supplying water forhuman consumption. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58: 606-616.

[19] Mo Hongwei, Ren Zhiyuan, Xie Hongxia. Relation between land use/cover change and changes of ecological effect inwind drift sand region. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 33: 110-114. [莫宏伟, 任志远, 谢红霞. 榆阳区土地利用和生态效应变化分析. 陕西师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 33(1): 110-114.]

[20] Dai Quanhou, Liu Guobin, Jiang Xuewei et al. An evaluation on sustainable development of eco-econommic system insmall watershed in hilly area of Northeast China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2): 209-218. [戴全厚, 刘国彬, 刘明义等. 小流域生态经济系统可持续发展评价. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2): 209-218.]

[21] Fang Chuanglin, BAO Chao. The coupling model of water-ecology-economy coordinated development and itsapplication in Heihe River Basin. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(5): 781-790. [方创琳, 鲍超. 黑河流域水—生态—经济发展耦合模型及应用. 地理学报, 2004, 59(5): 781-790.]

[22] Liu J Y, Deng X Z. Progress of the research methodologies on the temporal and spatial process of LUCC, 2010.Chinese Science Bulletin, 55: 1354-1362.

[23] Gao Qun. Overview on ecological-economic integration model research. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(3):375-384. [高群. 国外生态—经济系统整合模型研究进展. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(3): 375-384.]

[24] Li Xiubin. A review of the international research on land use/land cover change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(6): 553-558. [李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域: 土地利用/土地覆盖变化的国际动向. 地理学报, 1996, 51(6):553-558.]

[25] Liu Jiyuan, Zhang Zengxiang, Zhuang Dafang et al. Remote Sensing Information Study of Land Use Change in Chinain 1990s. Beijing: Science Press, 2005. [刘纪远, 张增祥, 庄大方等. 20 世纪90 年代中国土地利用变化的遥感时空信息研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.]

[26] Aspinall R. Modeling land use change with generalized linear models: A multi-model analysis of change between 1860and 2000 in Gallatin Valley, Montana. J. Environ. Manage., 2004, 72: 91-103.

[27] Benson C S, Jessica M C, Darius J S. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values ofecosystem services. Applied Geography, 2010, 8: 1-13.

[28] Ning Yuemin, Shi Qing, Zha Zhiqiang. Research on the mechanism and inter-regional planning of the Yangtze Deltainterlocking metropolitan areas. City Planning Review, 1998, (1): 16-32. [宁越敏, 施倩, 查志强. 长江三角洲都市连绵区形成机制与跨区域规划研究. 城市规划, 1998, (1): 16-32.]

[29] Fang Chuanglin, Liu Haiyan. The spatial privation and the corresponding controlling paths in China's urbanizationprocess. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(8): 849-860. [方创琳, 刘海燕. 中国快速城市化进程中的区域剥夺行为及调控路径. 地理学报, 2007, 62(8): 849-860.]

[30] Tu Xiaosong, Pu Lijie. Spatio-temporal pattern of land use change and its eco-environmental response inSuzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Region. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(3): 584-594. [涂小松, 濮励杰. 苏锡常地区土地利用变化时空分异及期生态环境响应. 地理研究, 2008, 27(3): 584-594.]

[31] Xiang Wusheng, Li Xiankun, Ding Tao et al. Effects of land use changes on eco-service value in Lijiang River Basin.Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16(6): 46-50,55. [向悟生, 李先琨, 丁涛等. 土地利用变化对漓江流域生态服务价值影响. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(6): 46-50, 55.]

[32] Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and theirecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 607-613. [欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607-613.]

[33] Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China.Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. [谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.]