广州市土地覆被格局异质性的尺度与等级特征

doi:10.11821/xb200608010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于SPOT遥感数据源形成广州市土地覆被类型图,在中心城区选取互相垂直的南北和东西两条样带,用Fortran编程计算各样带在125m、250m、500m和1000m 4个幅度下的景观多样性指数,以及Moran I、Geary C系数和半变异函数。再将样带分别自北向南和自西向东等间距划分,形成一系列面积相等的区域,计算各区域以及样带整体上的多样性指数的尺度方差。结果表明,土地覆被景观多样性在不同的研究幅度下都存在正的空间自相关性,并具有方向性。尺度方差结果显示,尺度方差与尺度和幅度都有关,随着研究尺度增大,尺度方差都呈下降之势,而随幅度增大,尺度方差并非单调变化。如125m和250m两种幅度时,方差随着尺度增大而减少。尺度方差结果进一步揭示研究样带上土地覆被存在多尺度等级结构,并且具有方向性特点,同时也反映尺度方差不失为景观异质性研究的一种有效方法。

关键词: 城市土地覆被, 尺度, 等级系统, 半变异函数, 尺度方差, 广州市

Abstract:

The pattern of land cover in Guangzhou city was translated from remote sensing image of SPOT. Two transects of north-south (N/S) and west-east (W/E) were set at the cross point which was the center of Guangzhou. Landscape diversity was selected as an index to describe the abundance of landscape. Four kinds of different extents were chosen to calculate the indices, such as 125 m, 250 m, 500 m and 1000 m. All those calculations were performed with Fortran programs under moving square windows of corresponding extents. The moving windows were sampled along the transects from west to east and from north to south with the step of a moving window size. Based on the calculation of diversity index, coefficients Moran I and Geary C and function of semi-variance were counted at different extents for correlativity of landscape diversity of urban land cover. Then, the two transects were partitioned by equal distance of the small width of the transects, 8000 m. A series of sample units with equal area were formed along the two transects. Scale variances were figured out for each unit based on the indices of landscape diversity. It was carried out at four extents. The scale variance of each transect was an average of all units in the same transect. The results revealed that there was a positively spatial autocorrelation between landscape diversities under different extents and the two transects had different spatial heterogeneities of landscape. Besides internal factors, variances of spatial structure of land cover in the two transects were affected by human activities directly. Different rates of factors formed different spatial heterogeneities of landscape of urban land cover. The semi-variance curve of diversity index was not different obviously with the increasing extents at N/S transect, but it was obvious at W/E transect. The rate of Co/(Co + C) increased monotonously, indicating that the impact of stochastic factors on landscape diversity increased with the increase of research extent. The scale variance of landscape of land cover in the moving windows along the two transects under different extents decreased with the increase of scales, and all scale variances went to be almost similar at a large extent of 1000 m. The values of scale variances were obviously relative to spatially geometrical shape. The scale variance of landscape was bigger when spatial shape of sample units was a rectangle in contrast to the shape of a square. The spatial heterogeneity of landscape in the two transects was not only relative to the direction of transect, but also relative to the extent. The scale variance did not monotonously change from small extent to large extent, such as extents of 125 m and 250 m, the change of scale variance decreased with the increase of extent. Analysis of scale variance showed that there was a multi-scale hierachical structure of land cover, but it was different between the N/S and W/E transects. The heterogeneity was higher in the W/E transect than in the N/S transect. In a word, the scale variance and function of semi-variance are appropriate methods to study spatial heterogeneity and hierachical structure of landscape of urban land cover with changes in scale and extent.

Key words: urban land cover, scale, hierachical system, semi-variance, scale variance, Guangzhou

龚建周,夏北成,李楠. 广州市土地覆被格局异质性的尺度与等级特征[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(8): 873-881.

GONG Jianzhou, XIA Beicheng, LI Nan. Characteristics of Scale and Hierachical Structure of Landscape System under Different Heterogeneities of Land Cover Patterns in Guangzhou City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(8): 873-881.

参考文献

[1] Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. 10-13.
[邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. 10-13.]

[2] He Xingdong, Gao Yubao, Zhao Wenzhi. Geostatistics analyzing to cause of formation of circle distribution of plant communities in Horqin Sandy Land. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(9): 1512-1516.
[何兴东, 高玉葆, 赵文智. 科尔沁沙地植物群落圆环状分布成因地统计学分析. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(9): 1512-1516.]

[3] Qiu Yang, Zhang Jintun, Zheng Fengying. The kernel of landscape ecology: spatial and temporal heterogeneity in ecological systems. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2000, 19(20): 42-49.
[邱扬, 张金屯, 郑凤英. 景观生态学的核心: 生态系统的时空异质性. 生态学杂志, 2000, 19(2): 42-49.]

[4] Chen Yufu, Dong Ming. Spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(2): 346-352.
[陈玉福, 董鸣. 生态学系统的空间异质性. 生态学报, 2003, 23(2): 346-352.]

[5] Valerie I Cullinan, Mary Ann Simmons, John M Thomas. A Bayesian test of hierarchy theory: scaling up variability in plant cover from field to remotely sensed data. Landscape Ecology, 1997, 12: 273-285.

[6] Zev Naveh. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. Spring-Verlag New York, Inc., 1984.

[7] Yue Wenze, Xu Jianhua, Tan Wenqi et al. Spatial scale analsis of the diversities of urban landscape: a case study within the external circle highway of Shanghai City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(1): 122-128.
[岳文泽, 徐建华, 谈文琦等. 城市景观多样性的空间尺度分析: 以上海市外环线以内区域为例. 生态学报, 2005, 25(1): 122-128.]

[8] Jiang Wenwei, Liu Tong, Ding Lixia et al. Progress in spatial heterogeneity research in landscape ecology. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2003, 20(3): 311-314.
[蒋文伟, 刘彤, 丁丽霞等. 景观生态空间异质性的研究进展. 浙江林学院学报, 2003, 20(3): 311-314.]

[9] Li Habin, Wang Zhengquan, Wang Qingcheng. Theory and methodology of spatial heterogeneity quantification. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 9(6): 651-657.
[李哈滨, 王政权, 王庆成. 空间异质性定量研究理论与方法. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(6): 651-657.]

[10] Kronert R, Steinhardt U, Volk M. Landscape Balance and Landscape Assessment. Germany: Springer, 2001.

[11] Samuel A Cushman, Kevin McGarigal. Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships. Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17: 637-646.

[12] Yang Limin, Zhu Zhiliang. The status quo and expectation of global and local land cover and land use RS research. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(4): 340-344.
[杨立民, 朱智良. 全球及区域尺度土地覆盖土地利用遥感研究的现状和展望. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(4): 340-344.]

[13] Chang Xueli, Zhao Aifen, Li Shenggong. Spatial temporal scale and hierarchy of vulnerable ecotone. Journal of Desert Research, 1999, 19(2): 115-119.
[常学礼, 赵爱芬, 李胜功. 生态脆弱带的尺度与等级特征. 中国沙漠, 1999, 19(2): 115-119.]

[14] Chen Youqi, He Yingbin. Scale issues in the analysis of land use/cover change. Economic Geography, 2005, 25(2): 152-155.
[陈佑启, 何英彬. 论土地利用/覆盖变化研究中的尺度问题. 经济地理, 2005, 25(2): 152-155.]

[15] Pattee Howard H. Hierarchy theory: the challenge of complex systems. Ecology, 55(5): 1174.

[16] http://www.pc2nd.com/bbs/UploadFile/ebook/
[区域土地利用土地覆盖遥感调查]

[17] Liu Liming. The Discipline of Land Resources. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2002. 84-86.
[刘黎明. 土地资源学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2002. 84-86.]

[18] http://www.nfiieos.cn/html/criterion/land/02-1.htm
[MODIS技术标准网站2004-MODIS技术标准共享平台土地覆盖数据产品参考规范(讨论稿).]

[19] Wang Xiaochun, Han Shijie, Zou Chunjing et al. Geostatistical analysis of the pattern of Betula ermanii population in Changbai Mountain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(7): 781-784.
[王晓春, 韩士杰, 邹春静. 长白山岳桦种群格局的地统计学分析. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(7): 781-784.]

[20] Wang Jun, Fu Bojie, Qiu Yang et al. Spatiotemporal variability of soil moisture in small catchment on Loess Plateau: semivariograms. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(4): 428-439.
[王军, 傅伯杰, 邱扬等. 黄土丘陵小流域土壤水分的时空变异特征: 半变异函数. 地理学报, 2000, 55(4): 428-439.]

[21] Bai Junhong, Ouyang Hua, Deng Wei. Spatial distribution pattern of nitrogen in marsh soils in Xianghai wetlands. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(5): 614-622.
[白军红, 欧阳华, 邓伟. 向海沼泽湿地土壤氮素的空间分布格局. 地理研究, 2004, 23(5): 614-622.]

[22] Peter M Atkinso, Paul Aplin. Spatial variation in land cover and choice of spatial resolution for remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 25(18): 3687-3702.

[23] Townshend J R G, Justice C O. Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1988, 9(2): 187-236.

[24] Townshend J R G, Justice C O. The spatial variation of vegetation changes at very coarse scales. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1990, 11: 149-157.

[25] Justice C O, Townshend J R G, Kalb V L. Representation of vegetation by continental data sets derived from NOAA-AVHRR data. Intenational Remote Sensing, 1991, 12(5): 999-1021.

[26] Du Rongqian. Biology Statistics. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1985. 15-16.
[杜荣骞. 生物统计学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1985. 15-16.]